Tuesday, September 30, 2025

AROUND 400 FLAG OFFICERS FROM MILITARY BASES AROUND THE WORLD ARE FORCED TO ATTEND MAGA LECTURES IN QUANTICO ... WHAT AN AWFUL WASTE OF TIME AND MONEY WHEN TRUMP AND HEGSETH COULD HAVE SENT THEIR MESSAGES TO THEM BY VIDEO

Trump and Hegseth ripped by ex-Pentagon staff for 'condescending and insulting' America's top generals

 

By Elina Shiraz

 

Daily Mail

Sep 30, 2025

 

Hegseth today fired a direct message to America's top generals: 'No more DEI, dudes in dresses, or gender delusion .... prepare for war'

Hegseth today fired a direct message to America's top generals: 'No more DEI, dudes in dresses, or gender delusion .... prepare for war'

 

Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth were accused of 'condescending and insulting' America's top generals and admirals at a highly anticipated summit on Tuesday.

The president and Secretary of War hosted hundreds of military chiefs at Marine Corps Base Quantico on Tuesday, for a meeting they hoped would inspire the nation and revolutionize America's fighting force.

But ex-Pentagon chiefs warned that the political speeches, which meandered through various topics from fat soldiers to Joe Biden's autopen, risked alienating the top brass.

A former national security official told the Daily Mail that he found it 'incredibly condescending ... and a highly inappropriate politicization of the US military.'

'A charade,' was how another ex-Pentagon official characterized the televised meeting. 'To add insult to injury, [Trump] told four-star generals they could quit if they didn't like what he was saying.'

Hegseth set out a vision for troops and their commanding officers unencumbered by woke politics, DEI and 'dudes in dresses,' dropping four-letter expletives throughout his opening gambit.

Trump then followed, attempting to soften the stone-faced generals with anecdotes and quips — including joking about needing to avoid saying the N-word, referring to nuclear weapons.

The summit at Quantico, which was to the Press last week, involved hundreds of generals and admirals being summoned from around the world, including those from war zones. 

The purpose of the meeting had remained shrouded in mystery — but speculation of any ominous portending was put to rest this morning, as Hegseth began his speech by lecturing about the need for a 'male standard' fitness test. 

 

U.S. President Donald Trump gestures after speaking during a meeting of senior military leaders convened by U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, at Marine Corps Base Quantico in Quantico, Virginia, U.S., September 30, 2025. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque / Kevin Lamarque / REUTERS

U.S. President Donald Trump gestures while speaking during a meeting of senior military leaders convened by U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, at Marine Corps Base Quantico in Quantico, Virginia, U.S., September 30, 2025

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine listen to Donald Trump's speech in Quantico, Virginia, today

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine listen to Donald Trump's speech in Quantico, Virginia, today

America's highest-ranking military leaders looked on from their seats, sitting stone-faced
America's highest-ranking military leaders looked on from their seats, sitting stone-faced

 

A former Biden defense official said: 'They spent tons of money to come here and talk about the direction of the department and 'culture'. 

'We were already aware that they didn't want women in the military. So, how is that new? Then, to add insult to injury, he told four-star generals they could quit if they didn't like what he was saying. I am not sure how this is going to land moving forward.' 

Len Khodorkovsky, former deputy assistant secretary of state, said that Hegseth clearly wants to stay in line with the president's MAGA lane, while cementing his own role, saying 'everything is being recalibrated towards winning.'

'I think what you are seeing with Hegseth and his Pentagon is connected to that idea. Let's focus on the fundamentals, let's focus on what our military is supposed to be doing and our warfighting capacity and name changes,' Khodorkovsky said.

A former national security official told the Daily Mail he found it absurd to see the military's highest ranking service men and women being forced to listen to Hegseth, who was only ever a junior ranking soldier before becoming a Fox TV host.

The ex-defense staffer said: 'I thought it was a highly inappropriate politicization of the US military is something which both Trump and Hegseth love to do.'

'I am impressed by the self-control that so many members of the audience, our senior officers, our generals and admirals, had to sit there and listen with a straight face to a man who couldn't get promoted above major, trying to lecture these people about military standards.

'It was unhinged. I cannot even imagine the thoughts of hundreds of military officers in the audience.' 

The former official went even further, saying it was not only the 'wrong message' but the 'wrong messenger.' 

 

'From this moment forward the only mission of the newly restored Department of War is this: war fighting, preparing for war and preparing to win,' Hegseth continued, saying, however, that they do not wish for war, touting their 'strength through peace' motto

'From this moment forward the only mission of the newly restored Department of War is this: war fighting, preparing for war and preparing to win,' Hegseth continued, saying, however, that they do not wish for war, touting their 'strength through peace' motto

Hegseth slammed the political softening of the armed forces, including concerns over bullying and hazing, and wokeness
Hegseth slammed the political softening of the armed forces, including concerns over bullying and hazing, and wokeness
 

'An unqualified alcoholic who has been accused of domestic violence intended to lecture our military leadership about military standards that he himself is unable to uphold. It was utterly ridiculous,' the source added.

Hegseth has previously strongly denied allegations of domestic violence. 

Not everyone took such a dim view of the speeches by the Commander-in-Chief and Secretary of War. 

Dakota Meyer, a US Marine Corps veteran and Medal of Honor recipient, said that the military needed to be revamped, and that lower standards had crept in under previous administrations.

In 2025, Meyer reenlisted into the US Marine Corps, making him the only living Medal of Honor recipient currently on active duty. He says the negative reaction to the secretary of war's speech is flat out wrong, calling out ex-defense officials.

'Dying because of a lack of preparation is unbecoming. The key takeaway from someone who has watched the cost and brutality of war… is if our leaders amongst our ranks, if their biggest fears are that their people are not prepared, then they should not be in a position to ask these men and women to give their lives for them,' Meyer said. 

He added, 'People criticizing this, I just don't know what person wouldn't want their person in uniform carrying out the highest standards to protect them.'

Victoria Coates, former deputy national security advisor to President Trump, agrees.

‘I think both Secretary Hegseth and President Trump put the United States military on notice today that the soft phase of the past with DEI, officers, and climate initiatives and drag queen story hour is a thing of the past… it is no longer a social experiment for liberal progressives,’ said Coates.

Coates responds to criticisms that the event could have been done virtually instead of flying out hundreds of military leaders for a short event.

‘COVID is over. It did strike me, everybody in the same room, bring them together, emphasize that this is an important cultural shift, it is going to lead to the American people being safer. And I think they also wanted to deliver some messages. I think when the secretary said if this announcement is making your heart sink, you should think about retiring, I thought that was a very pertinent message that needed to be delivered in person.’

Hegseth had focused his speech on woke politics which he believes have undermined America's fighting force, telling the generals and admirals: 'No more DEI, dudes in dresses, or gender delusion .... prepare for war.' 

The Secretary of War said that America's enemies would 'FAFO', which stands for 'f*** around and find out,' if they chose to challenge its military might.

 

Hegseth said standard training guidelines will be restored 'to what it should be ¿ scary, tough disciplined,' and one where drill sergeants 'can put their hands on recruits'
Hegseth said standard training guidelines will be restored 'to what it should be — scary, tough disciplined,' and one where drill sergeants 'can put their hands on recruits'
 

'From this moment forward the only mission of the newly restored Department of War is this: war fighting, preparing for war and preparing to win,' Hegseth continued, saying, however, that they do not wish for war, touting their 'strength through peace' motto.

What started as a pep talk turned into a list of new directives.

The Secretary of War said that there would be a male standard of fitness for all troops, stating that he was 'tired of seeing fat troops.' Hegseth also said these new rules are 'not about preventing women from serving.'

But he added that the physical standards needed to be gender neutral.

'If women can make it, excellent, if they cannot — then so be it ... it will also mean that weak men won't qualify. This is combat.' 

Hegseth said standard training guidelines will be restored 'to what it should be — scary, tough disciplined,' and one where drill sergeants 'can put their hands on recruits.' 

Trump meanwhile attempted to soften his military leaders with a series of jokes that didn't quite hit with the serious crowd of top brass.

The president slipped into his MAGA-rally style, but found himself addressing a largely silent crowd of military generals rather than the raucous, overtly supportive audiences he typically commands.

The president bragged that liberals didn't even put up a fight when he wanted to rename the Department of Defense to the Department of War, claiming: 'There's been no fight... They're sort of giving up. They've had it with Trump.'

He claimed the 'first sign of wokeness' in the military was in the mid 1900s when the War Department, which existed for 158 years, was renamed to the Department of Defense. 

But those usual attack lines didn't hit, Trump attempted to soften the stone-faced generals with a series of quips at the top of his remarks – including making a joke about the 'N' word.

'There are two 'n' words and you can't use either of them,' Trump said, telling the room of uniformed leaders that the second 'N' word is 'nuclear.'

'We can't let people throw around that word. I call it the 'N' word,' Trump insisted, explaining how he moved one or two submarines to the coast of Russia after the Kremlin spoke about nuclear-armed adversaries.

IT'S RUSSIA, NOT CHINA,THAT WE NEED TO FEAR IN A NUCLEAR WAR

Word War III fears loom as Trump ramps up production of devastating missiles

By Chris Melore 

 

Daily Mail

Sep 30, 2025

 

The Pentagon has reportedly asked its weapons makers to dramatically ramp up production of several devastating missiles as the fear of a war with China looms.

Military leaders are believed to have already requested that defense contractors double and possibly quadruple their inventory of roughly a dozen key weapons, including Patriot missile interceptors, anti-ship missiles, and precision bombs.

The Trump Administration has repeatedly warned that the US could soon need to respond to China, amid growing economic tensions and the threat of the superpower invading Taiwan.

However, Department of War officials have been sounding the alarm of dwindling missile supplies for years, due to America's support of the ongoing war in Ukraine.

According to the Wall Street Journal, this has led Deputy Defense Secretary Steve Feinberg to start calling on major defense companies to invest heavily in missile production, despite not having a new contract for this still-hypothetical war.

The massive order includes new supplies of THAAD interceptors used by the US Army to destroy ballistic missiles, SM-6 missiles used by the Navy to knock out ships, drones, and enemy missiles, and the Precision Strike Missiles used against high-value targets.

The Trump Administration's 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' signed into law in July, set aside approximately $25 billion over five years for new spending on munitions.

However, the initial estimates of this new weapons order would cost much more over the next two years.

 

The Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Interceptor is used to shoot down missiles that may be targeting US cities

The Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Interceptor is used to shoot down missiles that may be targeting US cities

The Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM) is carried by the US Navy and Air Force to target and sink enemy fleets at sea

The Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM) is carried by the US Navy and Air Force to target and sink enemy fleets at sea

 

THEY'RE NOT GOING TO STOP BECAUSE THEY WANT A CONFRONTATION FOR ITS ANTI-ISRAEL PROPAGANDA PURPOSE

Italian Prime Minister urges Greta Thunberg's flotilla to 'stop now' as it makes final approach to Gaza - as Israeli naval troops prepare to board

 

By Sabrina Penty 

 

Daily Mail

Sep 30, 2025

 

Giorgia Meloni has urged Greta Thunberg's 'Freedom Flotilla' trying to deliver aid to Gaza to immediately stop their mission. Pictured: Meloni walking during a bilateral meeting with South Korean President Lee Jae Myung (not pictured) on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in New York, New York, USA, 24 September

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni (pictured) has urged Greta Thunberg's 'Freedom Flotilla' trying to deliver aid to Gaza to immediately stop their mission

 

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni on Tuesday called on Greta Thunberg's 'Freedom Flotilla' to immediately stop their mission as it nears the shores of Gaza.

Posting a statement to X on Tuesday, Meloni said that insisting on a confrontation with Israel would upset the current 'fragile balance' that could lead to peace based on a plan proposed by US President Donald Trump aimed at ending the war in Gaza. 

'A hope of agreement has finally opened up to end the war and the suffering of the Palestinian civilian population and to stabilize the region. A fragile balance, which many would be happy to disrupt', the Italian PM said. 

'I fear that the flotilla's attempt to breach the Israeli naval blockade could provide a pretext for this. 

'Also for this reason, I believe the Flotilla should stop now and accept one of the various proposals put forward for the delivery of the aid,' she added.

Meloni also said that any other choice could fuel the conflict in Gaza further.

Her remarks come after the Global Sumud Flotilla said Italy had informed it on Tuesday that the naval frigate shadowing it would soon issue a radio call, offering participants the opportunity to abandon ship and return to shore before reaching a 'critical zone'.

The  international flotilla said it would continue to sail onwards with over 40 civilian boats carrying parliamentarians, lawyers and activists including Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg, aiming to break Israel's blockade of the Palestinian enclave.

 

Greta Thunberg and a crew member flash victory signs from their ship, part of the Global Sumud Flotilla aiming to reach Gaza and break Israel's naval blockade, as they sail off Crete island, Greece, September 25, 2025

Greta Thunberg (right) flashes victory signs from her ship, part of the Global Sumud Flotilla aiming to reach Gaza and break Israel's naval blockade, as they sail off Crete island, Greece, September 25, 2025

The Global Sumud Flotilla, launched with the aim of opening a humanitarian aid corridor to Gaza and breaking Israel's blockade, continues its voyage in the Mediterranean
The Global Sumud Flotilla, launched with the aim of opening a humanitarian aid corridor to Gaza and breaking Israel's blockade, continues its voyage in the Mediterranean
 

Earlier on Tuesday, the Italian defence ministry said its navy would stop following the international flotilla once it reached within 278km of the shore of Gaza. 

The flotilla's advance has raised international tensions, especially after a drone attack last week damaged some boats. 

No one was injured, but the flotilla had to pause for several days in Greek waters for repairs before setting sail again for Gaza over the weekend. 

Organisers said on Monday that the mission was now expected to reach Gaza this week.

Italy warned on Sunday that the flotilla was nearing a high-risk zone and repeated a proposal made last week for the flotilla to take the aid to Cyprus for eventual distribution in Gaza by the Roman Catholic Church. 

The flotilla rejected the idea.

The flotilla's advance comes as Israeli forces killed at least 31 Palestinians in the Gaza on Tuesday, local hospitals said, as questions churned about Trump’s peace plan aimed at ending the nearly two-year war in Gaza.

Hamas announced it would review the proposal with group members and other Palestinian factions before reaching a decision. 

While the proposal offers an end to the fighting, guarantees the flow of humanitarian aid and promises reconstruction, the Palestinian militant group will have to disarm, something it has rejected in the past. 

Also, Gaza and its more than 2 million Palestinians would be put under international governance for the foreseeable future.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu backs the plan, and several leaders of Arab countries have applauded it.

Israel’s campaign in Gaza has killed more than 66,000 Palestinians and wounded nearly 170,000 others, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry. 

The ministry does not differentiate between civilians and militants in its toll, but has said women and children make up around half the dead.

Its campaign was triggered by Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023 attack on southern Israel, in which militants killed some 1,200 people and abducted 250 others. 

Most of the hostages have been freed under previous ceasefire deals.

BEN GVIR IS SPOT ON

Ben Gvir, in cabinet meeting, said to call Gaza plan dangerous, ‘full of holes’

 

The Times of Israel

Sep 30, 2025

 

National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir and Otzma Yehudit MK Limor Son Har-Melech attend a meeting of the Knesset National Security Committee, September 28, 2025. (Noam Moskowitz, Office of the Knesset Spokesperson)
National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir and Otzma Yehudit MK Limor Son Har-Melech attend a meeting of the Knesset National Security Committee, September 28, 2025. 
 

Itamar Ben Gvir, speaking at a full government cabinet meeting, says US President Donald Trump’s peace plan harms Israel’s security, in comments reported by Hebrew media.

The far-right national security minister, who has opposed previous hostage-ceasefire deals, reportedly calls the deal “dangerous to Israel’s security.”

Turning to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Ben Gvir reportedly says: “I understand there was pressure on you, but you should never have gone along with an agreement that’s full of holes like this.”

ISLAMIC IDEOLOGY: DEATH TO ISRAEL AND DEATH TO THOSE JEWS WHO WON'T CONVERT TO ISLAM

Trump’s Gaza deal: A masterful stroke that sidesteps inconvenient truths

Israel’s foes, and even those currently backing the plan, remain ultimately bound to Islamic ideology, just as the West does to an entrenched antisemitism.

 

By Ryan Jones

 

Israel Today

Sep 30, 2025

 

How Hamas aims to maximize gains in ceasefire talks 

Palestinians driven by a violent religious ideology aren't going to change their ways because Trump offers them money. 

 

President Donald Trump’s Gaza plan and the way he garnered support for and presented it looks on the surface like a masterful stroke. Countries that until now tacitly backed Hamas in its war against Israel are now lined up insisting that the terror group accept the terms of a proposal that effectively means its defeat.

It would seem that Trump has Hamas in checkmate. It either accepts the deal and loses the war, or it dithers, if not outright rejects the proposal, and is labeled the unequivocal obstacle to ending the conflict. 

 

 

Hamas terrorists accompanied by children celebrate in the streets of Gaza. 

 

But we’ve seen this movie before. Or something like it.

Previous agreements that were supposed to be win-win for Israel somehow always turned out to be catastrophic mistakes.

Two glaring examples are the signing of the “Oslo Accords”–when Israel agreed to recognize and treat with the world’s premier terrorist organization, the PLO–and the 2005 Gaza Disengagement–when Israel unilaterally gave the Palestinians everything they demanded in Gaza.

I 'M AFRAID THAT TRUMP'S PLAN IMPERILS ISRAEL ..... THE PALESTINIANS WILL NEVER GIVE UP THEIR YEARNING TO RID THE WORLD OF ISRAEL AND JEWS

Trump gives the Palestinians another opportunity to choose peace

The president’s plan could end the fighting in Gaza and free the remaining hostages. But it depends on a belief that Israel’s foes are willing to give up their genocidal fantasies.

 

By Jonathan S. Tobin
 
JNS
Sep 30, 2025 
 
 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his delegation meet with US President Donald Trump and his team at the White House, Sept. 29, 2025. Photo by Avi Ohayon/GPO.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his delegation meet with US President Donald Trump and his team at the White House, Sept. 29, 2025.
 

If it works, President Donald Trump would deserve the Nobel Peace Prize he covets but almost certainly will never receive. His 20-point plan to end the war in Gaza, which was publicly accepted by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at a White House meeting on Sept. 29, is based on some breathtaking assumptions about the future.

But if it did work, then it would not only mean that Israel would have achieved its two main war goals: the release of all of the remaining hostages held by Palestinian terrorists and the elimination of the Hamas terrorist organization in the Gaza Strip. It would also provide yet another opportunity for the Palestinian Arabs to choose peace and to end their century-old war on Zionism that has brought them nothing but death and destruction.

Do they want peace?

Like the other peace initiatives the Palestinians have been offered over the past decades, the problem is that it’s by no means clear that they regard a chance to end their long war against the Jewish presence in the land of Israel or even the latest chapter of it that began two years ago as a desirable outcome. As long as their national identity is inextricably tied to the conflict against the Jews, then no plan—no matter how fair or potentially beneficial to their future—will wind up working. In the absence of an acceptance that their struggle to erase Israel is finished, nothing is going to change.

In addition to that, Trump’s scheme can only succeed if there really is a body of nonpolitical Palestinian technocrats available to run Gaza who are not tainted by a belief in Israel’s destruction. If that happens, it also means that we are about to witness a sea change in the political culture of the Palestinian Arabs that is hard to imagine, coupled with an equally unlikely reform of the corrupt Palestinian Authority that hopes eventually to take over control of the Strip.

It will also require the global community and the United Nations to adopt policies to advance the cause of peace, rather than enabling the perpetuation of the century-old Muslim and Arab war on Zionism.

On top of that, it is based on the idea that a “Board of Peace” chaired by Trump and composed of world leaders like Tony Blair, the former British prime minister, will have the will and ability to fairly supervise the creation of a “new Gaza” dedicated to co-existence rather than continuing to construct a terrorist fortress.

And, of course, it’s also dependent on the good behavior of Hamas terrorists—the combatants who were not present in Washington.

Its leaders will have to surrender not just their arms and the control of the coastal enclave that they’ve had since 2007. It will also compel the Islamist group and the vast number of Palestinians who agree with their genocidal goals to give up their faith-based ideology that compels them to keep fighting for the elimination of Israel, regardless of what happens to them or how many of their own people are killed as a direct result of their strategies and tactics.

If all that happens, then the 20-point plan provides a path for Israel to achieve its main goals in the war started by the Hamas-led invasion and attacks in southern Israeli communities on Oct. 7, 2023. That is why Netanyahu had no choice but to go along with Trump.

Bitter pills for Israel

Nevertheless, certain elements of the plan are bitter pills for Israel’s government to swallow.

The release of 250 terrorists currently serving life sentences in Israeli prisons in exchange for the immediate release of the remaining 48 Israeli hostages—both those alive and those whose bodies are still being held by the Palestinians—is yet another outrageous example of the way peace processors accept a false moral equivalency between murderers and the innocent people they target.

Then there is the way that the plan trusts in the desire of these mythical apolitical Palestinian technocrats to build a Gaza dedicated to providing its residents with decent lives, as opposed to serving as a launching pad for the next edition of the jihad against the Jews.

The notion that the International Stabilization Force envisioned by the plan can police Gaza or ensure that it won’t be a threat to its neighbors, including Egypt, requires another enormous leap of faith. After all, it could also be used as an opportunity for those who hate the Jewish state to set in motion a train of events that might lead to the outbreak of the next violent Palestinian attempt to destroy Israel.

That Netanyahu was forced by Trump to apologize to Qatari Prime Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani for Israel’s airstrike on Hamas leaders residing in security and luxury in the Gulf state, expressing “deep regret” and pledging never to violate its sovereignty again, was both humiliating and deeply wrong. Trump’s willingness to believe in the fairy tale that the Qataris are a force for peace, rather than the primary funders of Islamist hate around the world, is an astonishing blunder by the president. It calls into question his judgment and the motives of some of his advisers, like Mideast envoy Steve Witkoff, who are compromised by their financial ties to Doha.

Despite all of that, the plan’s demand for the immediate release of all of the hostages and the prospect, even if it is entirely theoretical, of a Hamas-free Gaza was more than enough reason for Netanyahu to suspend disbelief and do as the president bade him.

Trump’s judgment is far from perfect, as his stand on Qatar makes obvious. That nation’s involvement in this scheme is a red flag in and of itself. This is, after all, the government that owns and runs Al Jazeera—the most influential news outlet in the Arab and Muslim world, as well as a primary source of Hamas propaganda—and is the primary funder and host of the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas.

Still, Trump has also made clear that if Hamas doesn’t agree to and abide by all 20 points in the new plan, Israel will be free to “finish the job” of destroying the terrorists in Gaza City where they still hold sway. What’s more, the plan for creating a “new Gaza” will be implemented in the parts of the Strip currently occupied by Israel even if Hamas won’t go along with it.

There would be no reason to trust virtually any other player on the international stage to ensure that an agreement with terrorists isn’t flouted by them. The United Nations and its agencies are fatally compromised by their ties to Hamas and sympathy for the cause of Israel’s elimination. European nations—the supposed friends and allies of Israel—now unilaterally recognizing Palestinian statehood in order to reward Hamas and undermine Israel also remain untrustworthy.

The peacemakers test

As the world learned in the years that followed the signing of the Oslo Accords in September 1993, President Bill Clinton and his foreign-policy team were prepared to turn a blind eye to Palestinian violations of its terms, as well as to the obvious indications that they viewed Israel’s concessions of territory as merely a gift that allowed them to prepare to continue their quest for its destruction on more advantageous terms. The same was largely true of the George W. Bush, Barack Obama and Joe Biden administrations.

But as the most pro-Israel president in the history of the modern Jewish state, Trump has earned the trust of those who care about it. And so, there is good reason to believe that, his mistaken ideas about Qatar notwithstanding, he will keep his word to hold the Palestinians and Hamas accountable.

At this moment, it is once again possible—as it was at every other point in the history of the last century when the Palestinians could have chosen peace—to imagine success.

To do so, however, means forgetting everything we know about the Palestinians and a society informed by Islamic ideas about the impossibility of accepting the idea that non-Muslims can be allowed to rule lands once possessed by Muslims. The continuation of the conflict is not a failure on the part of the Israelis to compromise or to take “risks for peace.” Rather, it is a function of the Palestinian understanding that they are perennial victims and the necessity to go on sacrificing generations of their children on the altar of an eternal quest to rid the Middle East of a state whose existence contradicts jihadist principles.

That is why all previous efforts to build peace have failed. All the billions in investment and foreign aid that have poured into Gaza, as well as Judea and Samaria, have not created a constituency for peace. The pragmatic assumptions of the diplomats that created the Oslo process, and those of more transactional figures like Trump, have always foundered on the fact that this conflict is about Islamist faith and not a dispute over real estate.

But no matter how foolish those assumptions may be, Trump has given the Palestinians one more exit ramp from a war that continues to devastate them. To think that they will embrace that opportunity is unmoored from a realistic assessment of their political culture and recent history. And if they fail to do so, we know that most of the world will blame Israel and not the Palestinians, as has happened every previous time they have rejected peace.

Decent people should pray that the Palestinians will finally wake up from the nightmare ideology that has led them down the path of bloodshed for a century. That would mean an end to their suffering, as well as freedom for the hostages and a respite for Israel. Yet no one should be surprised if that doesn’t happen. If, or rather when, the Palestinians return to terrorism, then Trump must keep his word and back Israeli efforts to destroy Hamas and also double down on his campaign to rid American education of the woke antisemitism that has surged since Oct. 7.

As the world should have learned long ago, the real path to peacemaking is about more than crafting theoretical plans to end conflicts. The will to enforce such schemes, instead of winking at more Palestinian violations and promises to continue the war, serves as the true test of statesmanship. 

I BELIEVE THAT NETANYAHU WILL LIVE TO REGRET THE COMPROMISES HE'S MAKING

Israel’s most difficult gamble: Hope amid terror

In his meeting with Trump, Netanyahu embraced compromise not as weakness but as the virtue of the strong. 

 

By Fiamma Nirenstein 

 

JNS

Sep 29, 2025

 

 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his delegation meet with US President Donald Trump and his team at the White House, Sept. 29, 2025. Photo by Avi Ohayon/GPO.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his delegation meet with US President Donald Trump and his team at the White House, Sept. 29, 2025.
 

Now is the time of hope. With American support, Israel has accepted the most difficult gamble: to risk its security, its current government and even its very identity as the unbeatable Jewish state, to test the possibility of an end to the Gaza war after almost two years.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, with extraordinary courage, has staked his place in history. Like his soldiers, whom he praised for their heroism, he now fights on another battlefield—one of diplomacy, compromise and unrelenting danger.

The test is immediate and severe. Within 72 hours, Hamas must return all hostages, alive and dead. Only then will it become clear whether the terrorist group truly accepts U.S. President Donald Trump’s 20-point plan. If Hamas betrays it, Netanyahu has promised to finish the job and destroy its power once and for all.

The plan is as ambitious as it is perilous: Israel has agreed to a three-phase withdrawal, to hand Gaza over to a mixed international authority led by the United States but with Arab nations at the center—once Hamas is dismantled.

It requires Hamas to surrender its strategic weapons, the missiles and explosives with which it has tormented Israel for years. And it forces painful concessions, including the release of prisoners who have committed horrific crimes.

Notably, the word “annexation” has disappeared from the table. Israel has set it aside, at least for now. The focus is elsewhere: on saving lives, on securing its southern communities, on ensuring that never again will Hamas terrorize Israeli families living near the Gaza border.

Trump, meanwhile, has pushed hard on both Hamas and the Arab world, offering to expand the Abraham Accords and again raising the prospect of a Palestinian state. On that point, Netanyahu is firm: only after a long, serious process of de-radicalization can such an idea even be considered.

For Israel, this is a leap into the unknown. The challenge is immense: to reach an accord with those who still preach jihadist ideology, without surrendering or backtracking, but while keeping open a path toward peace.

Words have filled the air for years. Now, what matters are deeds: the release of the hostages, a verifiable withdrawal that leaves strong security zones, Hamas handing over its weapons and the stance of the Arab states.

Netanyahu has embraced compromise not as weakness but as the virtue of the strong. If the hostages come home, they will open the road to history. If Hamas truly yields, it will mark an unprecedented victory not only for Israel but for the free world.

The joint strength of Israel and the United States may—just may—make the impossible possible.

THE GENOCIDE BLOOD LIBEL

Fabricating genocide?

As Netanyahu told the UN General Assembly, Hamas, a genocidal terrorist organization, is given a pass, while Israel is accused of committing “genocide.” 

 

By Martin Sherman 

 

JNS

Sep 30, 2025

 

 

72-3239 (untitled)
A group of  mostly Jewish bodies piled in a shed at a concentration camp near Ohrdruf, Germany. The Nazis slaughtered Jews solely for their existence. 
 

It is as if we are caught in a surreal time warp back to the 1930s, when the Jew was the ubiquitous villain, blamed for capitalism and communism alike, the perpetual culprit of humankind’s ills.

Now, the global call to antisemitism manifests itself in the latest blood libel—that Israel, in its war against Hamas, is engaged in genocide. The lie has spread across universities, news outlets, and international forums, fueling harassment of Jewish students and faculty on elite American campuses from Harvard to UCLA.

But this accusation is not merely false. It is a total inversion of reality.

Far from being genocidal, Israel has been at the forefront of saving lives—dispatching humanitarian aid across the world to victims of natural disasters, pioneering medical breakthroughs, and sustaining global agriculture and water technology.

Even in war, Israel exercises more care than any military in history to minimize civilian harm. As John Spencer, a leading U.S. expert on urban warfare at West Point, concluded: “Israel has taken more measures to avoid needless civilian harm than virtually any other nation that’s fought an urban war.”

And yet, none of this prevents Israel’s enemies from fabricating the charge of genocide.

International law is clear: to prove genocide, there must be genocidal intent—the deliberate aim to eliminate an ethnic or religious group. That intent is utterly absent in Israel’s conduct.

The International Court of Justice itself has recognized genocide in only one case in its history: the 1995 Srebrenica massacre. Even in Darfur, Biafra, and the Yazidi slaughter, the ICJ refrained from using the term. Yet, somehow, Israel is branded with this gravest of crimes—precisely while it pleads with civilians to flee fighting zones, pauses operations for humanitarian corridors, and allows in millions of tons of food and aid.

As Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu asked at the U.N. General Assembly: “Would a country committing genocide plead with the civilian population it is supposedly targeting to get out of harm’s way?”

Perhaps the most grotesque abuse of the term comes from the so-called Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention, which repeatedly accuses Israel of genocide—while using the name of Raphael Lemkin, the Jewish jurist who coined the term itself.

 

Raphael Lemkin, who coined the term “genocide” during the Holocaust. Credit: Holocaust Center of Florida.

Raphael Lemkin, who coined the term “genocide” during the Holocaust.
 

But Lemkin, a staunch Zionist and multiple Nobel Peace Prize nominee, would have recoiled at such slander. His relatives and the European Jewish Association are now pursuing legal action to stop the hijacking of his legacy.

The contrast could not be starker. The Nazis slaughtered unarmed Jews solely for their existence. By contrast, Israel faces an enemy—Hamas—that openly seeks its annihilation and launched the Oct. 7 pogrom with widespread Palestinian support.

Netanyahu nicely summed up the obscenity: “Hamas, a genocidal terrorist organization whose charter calls for the murder of all Jews on the planet, this genocidal organization is given a pass … while Israel, which does everything it can to get civilians out of harm’s way—Israel is put in the dock.”

So true. So sad.

TRUMP'S POLLING NUMBERS ARE DOWN, BUT THE DEMOCRATS STILL CAN'T SCORE

Maher: Dems Don’t Stand for Anything Other than Opposing Trump

 

By Ian Hanchett 

 

Breitbart

Sep 27, 2025 

 

 

 

During the online “Overtime” segment of Friday’s broadcast of HBO’s “Real Time,” host Bill Maher discussed polling numbers about who voters prefer on different issues and stated that while some of the issues Democrats have are due to people being misinformed, Democrats also don’t have anything they stand for other than opposing President Donald Trump.

Maher said, “Trump’s numbers are down. They’re down with Latinos. They’re down with blacks. They’re down 15 points with whites. … And yet, in the other poll, on issues, Trump’s still winning. So, this is your big opportunity, Democrats. He’s down in the numbers, and you still can’t score.”

He added, “Now, some of this is just because people are f*cking stupid.” And cited Democrats only having a 2-point polling edge on respect for democracy as an example of this.

After Maher read more from the polling data, CNN host Michael Smerconish said, “The only thing the Democratic Party stands for today is opposition to Donald Trump.” And Maher responded, “Yeah.”

Smerconish added that former Vice President Kamala Harris’ recent book has no plan for Democrats in the future, which is “indicative of the party at large.” Which Maher also agreed with.

FRANKLY SCARLET...

By Bob Walsh

 

Illustration of the Capitol Dome with a sign that reads "sorry, we're closed"


Looks like the government is going to shut down this evening at 2400 east coast time.  I don't give a shit. I am, I must admit, bothered by the fact that congress can't seem to do it's job, but I am confident that the world will keep spinning until the chest thumpers and finger pointers get their shit together and do their job more-or-less correctly.

ANOTHER DEMOCRAT GOES AWAY

By Bob Walsh

 

Monday, September 29, 2025

IT'S A DOWNRIGHT DIRTY SHAME THAT THEY TOOK THE TWO PIECES OF SHIT ALIVE

Adorable little girl gunned down in horror daylight shooting as cops finally make arrests

 

By Melissa Koenig

 

Daily Mail

Sep 29, 2025

 

Maryann Marble, four, was shot in the head inside her San Antonio-area home on May 8, 2024  

Maryann Marble, four, was shot in the head inside her San Antonio-area home on May 8, 2024

 

A second suspect has been arrested over the gruesome killing of a young girl who was fatally shot inside her Texas home when masked gunmen fired a hail of bullets at her family in a broad-daylight shooting. 

Maryann Marble, four, was inside her San Antonio-area home with her parents and her older siblings on May 8, 2024 at around 7.30pm when two gunman pulled up to the house in a stolen gray Infiniti Q50 and opened fire with high-powered rifles.

Shocking surveillance footage captured the moment two men ran down a residential street with their rifles drawn in the moments before police say they fired 20 to 25 shots into the home.

'The front door had so many bullet holes that it looked like Swiss cheese,' Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar told Fox San Antonio at the time. 

Maryann was struck in the head and was pronounced dead at the scene, while her parents, ages 25 and 27, and her two siblings, ages seven and eight, were critically injured.

'This is a case we'll never forget,' the sheriff said Friday, as he announced the charges against 20-year-old Bryan Salazar. 

'Five members of a family were all shot and Maryann unfortunately lost her life almost instantly after being shot in the head.'

Deputies have been working diligently ever since to find the perpetrators, the sheriff said, and the first arrest came in October 2024, when investigators charged 19-year-old Isaiah Perales in connection with the shooting.

 

Bryan SalazarIsaiah Perales
The Bexar County Sheriff's Office has since arrested Bryan Salazar, 20, and Isaiah Perales, 19, in connection with the shooting
  
The moment Salazar and Perales opened fire and shot 20 to 25 rounds on a townhome in northeast Bexar County on May 8, 2024.


Perales had been booked in jail on separate auto crimes, but arrest records obtained by KENS 5 show investigators reviewed phone calls involving inmates who referred to Perales and Salazar by their nicknames ('Zay' and 'Trapz,' respectively).

In these calls, the inmates allegedly discussed who the intended target was in the shooting that led to Maryann's death.

One person allegedly said at the time it was 'whoever killed Trapz's older brother,' according to the arrest records.

Police now believe Perales and Salazar were seeking retaliation for the shooting death of 20-year-old Xavier Perez - a relative of Salazar's - two weeks prior.

Investigators say the pair stole the Infiniti Q50 used in the drive by within days of Perez's murder and began planning out their attack, though it remains unclear what role Marble's family may have had in Perez's murder.

'This was a calculated act,' Sheriff Salazar said. 'They stole the car, they conducted surveillance and then carried out the shooting.'

Digital evidence ultimately gave police reason to believe that in the hours after the shooting, the suspects may have discarded evidence at Calaveras Lake, where dive teams recovered a Draco-style AK-47 days after Perales' arrest.

Ballistics testing later confirmed the rifle was the same one used in the attack. 

 

Salazar denied any involvement in the crime as he was perp walked on Friday

Salazar denied any involvement in the crime as he was perp walked on Friday

Shortly after Perales was arrested, dive teams recovered a Draco-style AK-57 rifle from the bottom of Calaveras Lake

Shortly after Perales was arrested, dive teams recovered a Draco-style AK-57 rifle from the bottom of Calaveras Lake

Maryann's loved ones celebrated the arrest of a second suspect this week

Maryann's loved ones celebrated the arrest of a second suspect this week 

 

In the months since, the sheriff's office said it received a number of tips and reviewed cell phone data that eventually led deputies to Salazar.

According to the sheriff, surveillance footage showed both Salazar and Perales scoping out the family home in the days before the shooting.

Cell tower records also showed that both suspect's phones were near the scene of the shooting that night, turned off briefly during the barrage of gunfire and later pinged again near Calaveras Lake - where the rifle was found.

Salazar is now facing eight counts of aggravated assault-mass shooting, two counts of injury to a child in relation to Maryann's siblings injuries and one capital murder charge.

The Bexar County Sheriff's Office also noted that the suspect was previously arrested and charged with tampering with evidence back when Perales was first taken into custody.

He is also facing drug and firearms offenses.

Following the arrest on Friday, Maryann's mother took to Facebook to celebrate.

'They got him baby girl!!!!!! They got him!!!!!!!' she wrote, sharing a photo of her young daughter. 'I knew this day would come I just didn't know when but it's here!!!!!!'

'Today's an amazing day!!!! My angel is going to get her justice soon!!!!' 

 

Following Salazar's arrest on Friday, Maryann's mother took to Facebook to celebrate that her daughter would finally get justice

Following Salazar's arrest on Friday, Maryann's mother took to Facebook to celebrate that her daughter would finally get justice

 

The grieving mother then went on to call Salazar a 'pos' and said she hopes he and Perales 'rot a slow death in hell.' 

But as Salazar was perp walked on Friday, the suspect maintained his innocence.

'Bro, I'm as innocent as can be, bruh,' he told reporters, according to KSAT. 'Hopefully they catch the right people 'cause it ain't me.'

Sheriff Salazar, though, denied that his team took the wrong guy into custody. 

'This case is almost 400 pages of just evidence after evidence,' the sheriff said of the case against Salazar. 'My investigators did an awesome job of piecing it all together.'

He noted that Salazar was 'not a very cooperative young man' in the investigation.

'If we have things our way, he's going to spend the rest of his life behind bars, at the very least,' the sheriff said. 

Yet the investigation into the shooting is still ongoing, as a third man, Ashton Garcia, remains a person of interest in the case and the sheriff's office continues to seek tips from the public.

'This is a big case,' Sheriff Salazar explained. 'My investigators have done an outstanding job following leads, but there's always more information out there.

'If anybody knows something, we're asking them to come forward.' 

ISRAEL-HATER TUCKER CARLSON TIOLD HIS VIEWERS 'BIBI IS REUNNING AROUND THE MIDDLE EAST AND TELLING PEOPLE, I CONTROL THE UNITED STATES, I CONTROL DONALD TRUMP' ... YAIR NETANYAHU RESPONDED BY CALLING CARLSON 'QATAR'S BITCH'

Netanyahu's son drops damaging claim about Tucker Carlson's secret ties to Qatar

 

By Victoria Churchill 

 

Daily Mail

Sep 29, 2025

 

 יאיר נתניהו

 Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's oldest son Yair

 

Benjamin Netanyahu's son has furiously hit back at Tucker Carlson, suggesting that he is being secretly funded by the Qatari government.

Yair Netanyahu was responding to a recent Carlson video titled 'It's time for Bibi to go' in which the conservative commentator claimed that Israel's Prime Minister was telling Arab leaders in the Middle East that he had control over Trump.

'Bibi [Benjamin Netanyahu] is running around the Middle East and telling people, I control the United States, I control Donald Trump,' Carlson told viewers. 

Yair Netanyahu hit back hard, writing on X that Carlson was 'Qatar's b****'.

'Tucker just say (sic) any bs propaganda lie, without any source or proof, and expect everyone to believe him, despite him being obsessed about Israel, Jews and Netanyahu for two years and being super bias,' Yair said.

'My dad isn’t “running around the Middle East” saying that s***. He can’t go anywhere in the Middle East these days, and the Middle East Muslim Arab leaders are his biggest enemies!'

Yair then posted a series of images showing Carlson meeting with Arab leaders and re-posted other tweets which accused the ex-Fox host of taking money from Middle Eastern countries.

The furious clash between the Netanyahu heir and one of America's leading conservative voices came as Donald Trump and Netanyahu announced a peace agreement for Gaza at the White House on Monday.

 

US political commentator Tucker Carlson speaks during the public memorial service for right-wing activist Charlie Kirk at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona, on September 21, 2025

US political commentator Tucker Carlson speaks during the public memorial service for right-wing activist Charlie Kirk at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona, on September 21, 2025

US President Donald Trump (R) and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (L) participate in a joint press conference in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, DC, USA, 29 September 2025

US President Donald Trump (R) and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (L) participate in a joint press conference in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, DC, USA, 29 September 2025

Yair Netanyahu (L) and Sara Netanyahu listen to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speech at The 80th session of The United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) on September 26, 2025 in New York City

Yair Netanyahu (L) and Sara Netanyahu listen to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speech at The 80th session of The United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) on September 26, 2025 in New York City

 

Carlson has been accused of taking money from Middle Eastern nations such as Qatar and Iran, especially as he has elevated his criticism of Israel in recent months.

The former Fox News star also raised eyebrows after conducting a friendly interview with Qatari leader Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani in March of 2025.

Yair Netayahu also noted that there is no way that his father has been 'running around' the Middle East, as Prime Minister Netanyahu does not have the best relationships with many other nations in the region.

Benjamin Netanyahu was also designated as a war criminal by the International Criminal Court ahead of his visit to the United Nations last week, which led to thousands of protestors calling for his arrest in New York last week.

Netanyahu also took an unusual route to fly to New York, one mapped to avoid crossing into the airspace of adversarial nations that would seek to arrest him for his alleged war crimes. 

The Prime Minister's route avoided crossing over France and Spain, and took him over Italy and Greece.

The detour added an additional 372 miles to the trip.