Monday, June 08, 2020

THE CIVIL WAR DID NOT END AT APPOMATTOX ... IT WILL CONTINUE UNTIL THE LAST CONFEDERATE MONUMENT HAS BEEN TOPPLED

‘A long time coming’: Iconic Robert E. Lee statue in Virginia to be removed after 130 years

 

By Sarah Rankin and Denise Lavoie

 

Associated Press

June 7, 2020

 

RICHMOND, Va. – David Harris Jr., a nephew of humanitarian and tennis legend Arthur Ashe, tried for decades to get a street named after his uncle in Richmond, the hometown that once denied Ashe access to segregated public tennis courts.

Finally, in 2019, the City Council approved the renaming over the objections of some city residents. So it was gratifying, Harris said, to see Virginia’s governor announce plans to remove an iconic statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee after days of protests over the death of George Floyd.

“My hat is off to them for getting this done,” Harris said Friday. “It took me 25 years to get the street name changed. I commend these young folks for getting these guys to see it within a week and a half.”

In recent days, amid an extraordinary outpouring of grief over Floyd’s death, Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam has pledged to remove the Lee statue, while city leaders have also committed to taking down the other four Confederate memorials along Richmond’s prestigious Monument Avenue.

The changes amount to a reshaping of how one of America’s most historic cities tells its story in its public spaces – and a rethinking of whom it glorifies.

“It’s been a long time coming. … We’ve tried marches, petitions, protests, going to city council” to get the Confederate monuments removed, said Phil Wilayto, a longtime community organizer and activist with the Virginia Defenders for Freedom, Justice & Equality. “And it took what is in effect a mass uprising of the community to say these things are not acceptable.”

Republican lawmakers, Confederate heritage groups and a Monument Avenue preservation group have criticized the decisions. Many have equated the monuments’ removal to erasing history.

“Attempts to eradicate instead of contextualizing history invariably fail,” Senate GOP leaders said in a statement.

 

Floyd, a black man in Minneapolis, died after a white officer jammed his knee into his neck for nearly nine minutes as other officers watched. Video captured Floyd’s arrest and final moments, and his death has sparked protests around the world that demonstrators have vowed to turn into a sustained movement focused on addressing racial injustice.

The Richmond monument decisions, part of a wave of Confederate monument removals around the country, has stunned some observers in this former capital of the Confederacy, a place where even three years ago many residents said they considered removing the statues impractical, or nearly impossible due to a state law that protected war memorials.

Late Saturday, a small group of demonstrators toppled a statue o f Confederate Gen. Williams Carter Wickham in Monroe Park, a Richmond police spokeswoman said. She said she did not know if there were any arrests or damage done to the statue.

The new Democratic majority at the General Assembly rewrote that law earlier this year, an effort led by black women lawmakers. It will take effect July 1, giving Richmond and other localities around the state permission to do as they please. The Lee statue, meanwhile, was on state property.

“Yes, that statue has been there for a long time,” Northam said Thursday. “But it was wrong then, and it is wrong now. So we’re taking it down.”

The idea to erect a monument to Lee originated “within hours” of his death, according to a National Register of Historic Places nomination form. Two rival campaigns to raise money for the memorial dragged on for more than 15 years, and the selected site was a gift of a prominent Richmond businessman, the documents show.

The statue was the first of five Confederate monuments to be erected on Richmond’s Monument Avenue. It was unveiled in May 1890, at a time when the Civil War and Reconstruction were long over, and Jim Crow racial segregation laws were on the rise.

The statue arrived in Richmond in pieces from France, where it was created. Thousands of Virginians used wagons to help pull the pieces for more than a mile to what was then an empty field. That field is now part of Monument Avenue, the city’s grandest boulevard and one that’s been visited over the years by dignitaries including then-British Prime Minister Winston Churchill and Britain’s Queen Elizabeth.

To white citizens in the late 19th century, the statue of Lee, a Civil War hero and native Virginian, was a cause for celebration. Some even saved pieces of the rope used to haul the statue as souvenirs.

But black citizens felt a deep-seated animosity toward the statue, seeing it as a glorification of slavery, the Civil War and their treatment as second-class citizens, said Julian Hayter, a historian and professor of leadership studies at the University of Richmond.

Today, the 21-foot (6-meter) bronze equestrian sculpture that shows the general in military attire sits atop a 40-foot (12-meter) pedestal on whose side is featured a single word: “Lee.”

Northam emphasized the monument’s enormous size in his remarks Thursday, saying that at six stories tall, it towers over homes, businesses and “everyone who lives in Virginia.”

“And when it’s the biggest thing around, it sends a clear message: ‘This is what we value the most.’ But that’s just not true anymore,” he said.

Joseph Rogers, a descendant of enslaved people and an organizer with the Defenders who spoke with AP this week from a rally at the Lee monument, said he felt he was witnessing history when he learned the statue would be removed.

He also said the moment felt like “a fulfillment of prophecy,” a reference to words written by the black editor of the Richmond Planet newspaper who covered the unveiling of the Lee memorial.

“(The black man) put up the Lee Monument, and should the time come, will be there to take it down,” John Mitchell Jr. wrote.

Elsewhere on the broad avenue are statues to Confederate President Jefferson Davis, generals J.E.B. Stuart and Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson, and Confederate naval officer Matthew Maury.

Richmond Mayor Levar Stoney announced this week that he and a city councilman would introduce an ordinance removing the statues, and the Richmond Times-Dispatch has reported the city council has unanimously affirmed support for such a move.

Dr. Fergie Reid, who grew up in segregated Richmond and in 1967 became the first African American elected to the Virginia General Assembly since Reconstruction, called the monuments’ removal “long overdue.” But Reid, 95, said he thinks they still have historical value.

“I think they should go to a museum – just like the dinosaurs,” he said.

WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE, WHERE ARE THE PROTESTS?

'We lost a hero': 38-year-old deputy killed, 2 officers injured after ambush in Santa Cruz County, sheriff says

 

By and Lauren Martinez

 

KGO-TV

June 7, 2020

 

BEN LOMOND, Calif. -- A Santa Cruz County deputy was killed and other officers were injured after an ambush on Saturday, Sheriff Jim Hart said.

Around 1:30 p.m., the sheriff's office received a report of a suspicious van on a turnout at Jamison Creek Road near Ben Lomond. The caller said they saw guns and bomb-making devices inside the vehicle.


When deputies arrived at the scene they saw the van leave and followed the vehicle. As the van pulled into a driveway on Waldeberg Drive, the officers were ambushed with gunfire and many improvised explosives, Hart said.

Sergeant Damon Gutzwiller, 38, was shot and taken to the hospital where he was pronounced dead.

"In my 32-year career, this is the worst day I've ever experienced," Sheriff Jim Hart said as he began the news conference.

Gutzwiller worked for the sheriff's office since 2006 and is survived by his wife, young child and another on the way. Hart described him as a courageous, intelligent, sensitive and caring man.

"Words cannot express the pain we feel for Damon and his family," Sheriff Jim Hart said, "He was the kind of person we all hope to be. Today, we lost a hero. We are grateful to have known him and we mourn with his family."

During the ambush, another officer was struck by either gunshot or shrapnel from the explosives, then struck by a getaway vehicle, Hart said.

Calls of carjacking soon followed as officers from other departments arrived to the scene.

Hart said another officer was shot in the hand and taken to the hospital. The two officers have not been identified and officials say they are hopeful they will recover.

The suspect, Steven Carrillo of Ben Lomond, was shot during his arrest and transported to the hospital. Hart said Carillo is expected to survive and will be arrested for the murder of Sergeant Gutzwiller and other felonies.

The ABC7 I-Team has new information on Carillo since officials identified him. The I-Team has learned he is 32 years-old and an active duty US Air Force sergeant based out of Travis Air Force Base in Fairfield.

Sources tell ABC7 News' Dan Noyes that investigators found many improvised explosive devices inside Carillo's home Saturday and that the FBI has taken over the case. The working theory is the sheriff's deputies "interrupted something big that was about to happen."

On his Facebook page on May 31, Carillo reposted a meme that said, "I'll never let racist white people make me forget about the dope white people I know exist. I love y'all." The post includes fist emojis of different skin tones, and both of the "whites" in the meme were crossed out. Carillo wrote, "The only race that matters, the human race."

Carillo has two children. His wife, Monika Carrillo, was a First Class Airmen in the Air Force, but she died in an off-base hotel in South Carolina in 2018. Authorities said at the time her death was not suspicious.

The District Attorney's Office is investigating the case and the Santa Cruz Co. will release more information about the incident early next week.

Governor Gavin Newsom issued the following statement regarding the death of Santa Cruz County Sheriff's Office Sergeant Damon Gutzwiller:

"Jennifer and I extend our heartfelt condolences to the family, friends and coworkers of Santa Cruz County Sheriff's Sergeant Damon Gutzwiller, who was tragically killed while on duty today. He will be remembered as a hero who devoted his life to protecting the community and as a loving husband and father."

In honor of Sergeant Gutzwiller, Capitol flags will be flown at half-staff and a vigil will be held on Sunday. 

POLITICIANS INSIST IT'S TIME TO DISBAND THE POLICE

Ilhan Omar says it's time to disband Minneapolis Police Department

 

JUDGE: "THE THREAT TO PHYSICAL SAFETY AND FREE SPEECH OUTWEIGHS THE THREAT TO PROPERTY"

A federal judge says smashing windows and spraying graffiti is a 'fair trade' if it means protesters' bones aren't broken by the police

 

By

 

Insider

June 6, 2020 

 


A federal judge has limited the force police in Denver, Colorado, can use against protesters, saying that breaking windows and spraying graffiti is a "fair trade" if it means protesters are not injured.

U.S. District Court Judge R. Brooke Jackson ruled on Friday night to block the use of chemicals like tear gas and non-lethal weapons like plastic bullets on protesters, saying that their right to free speech was more important than protecting buildings.

"If a store's windows must be broken to prevent a protester's facial bones from being broken or eye being permanently damaged, that is more than a fair trade," Jackson wrote in his page ruling," Reuters reported.

"If a building must be graffiti-ed to prevent the suppression of free speech, that is a fair trade. The threat to physical safety and free speech outweighs the threat to property."

Protests have spread across the country following the death of George Floyd, an unarmed black man who died after a police officer in Minneapolis kneeled on his neck for almost nine minutes on May 25.

Jackson temporarily limited the circumstances in which police can use force on protesters, and ordered a clear chain of command regarding its use.

Jackson said that police officers have a "very difficult and often thankless job," but that protesters "have an absolute right to demonstrate and protest the actions of government officials, including police officers."

"It is one of the many freedoms on which this country is built," he wrote.
He said he believed that the mistreatment of protesters and people of color has been committed by a "minority" of police officers in Denver and across the country, but said that some police action has been "disgusting."

He said that Denver police "failed in its duty to police its own."

Reports and video footage from across the country have shown police appearing to use excess force on seemingly peaceful protesters, including shooting at and arresting journalists, shoving a 75-year-old man to the ground so that he then bled from his ears, and punching, kicking, teargassing and firing at protesters.

Videos of such incidents were shown at the court.

Jackson's ruling came after four protesters filed a lawsuit, The Denver Post reported. The lawsuit claimed that Denver police "have engaged in injurious riot control tactics without issuing clear warnings and orders to disperse."

Jackson's ruling is temporary and will last for 14 days, The Denver Channel reported.

The measures the judge imposed, included:

__An officer ranked captain or higher has to give permission for projectiles or chemical agents to be used. They can only do so if they have witnessed acts of violence or destruction that justify that level of force.

__Chemical agents like pepper spray tear gas can only be used after officers order protests to disperse.

__If it seems like protesters cannot hear the order, officers must repeat it before using the chemicals.

__Projectiles cannot be shot at peoples' the head, pelvis or back.

__Projectiles cannot be fired indiscriminately into a crowd.

__No officers from outside Denver can use force in the city where Denver's officers are allowed to use.

__Officers have to keep their body cameras running at all times and are not allowed to block them.

Tyrone Campbell, a Denver Police spokesman, said the police would comply with the judge's order, Reuters reported.

Denver police said on Twitter that it would "comply with the judge's directions, many of which are already in line with our community-consulted Use of Force Policy."

But The Denver Post reported that police said it would seek modifications "that would account for limitations on staffing and body-worn cameras so the directions can be operationalized."

Jackson wrote in his ruling: "Although I do not agree with those who have committed property damage during the protests, property damage is a small price to pay for constitutional rights — especially the constitutional right of the public to speak against widespread injustice."

VIOLENT PROTEST AND THE INTELLIGENTSIA

Scholar Gary Saul Morson sees disturbing parallels between Russia before the Revolution and contemporary America

 

By Barton Swaim 

 

The Wall Street Journal

June 5, 2020

 

The similarities between this week’s riots and the Los Angeles riots of 1992 are obvious. Both were occasioned by appalling video images, and both divided the nation along partisan and ideological lines. The differences between the two events, however, are more revealing. The violence in 1992 came after a court verdict; the beating and arrest of Rodney King had happened more than a year before. This year’s riots came within days of George Floyd’s killing by Minneapolis officers. The riots of 1992 were mostly confined to poor and working-class areas of Los Angeles. This week saw mayhem all over America, and in Los Angeles, New York and elsewhere the rioters targeted wealthy streets and neighborhoods.
But perhaps the most striking difference is the rationalization, and sometimes full-throated defense, of violence from left-wing elites: the glorification of havoc, the vilification of cops and their middle-class admirers, highfalutin defenses of vandalism. The sense of revolution and class warfare was everywhere this week: the cognoscenti and underclass arrayed against the petty bourgeois shop owners; the elite and those they claim to represent against everybody else.
Gary Saul Morson says he has no special insight regarding police actions and the death of George Floyd. But he does have a provocative thesis about America’s current political moment: “To me it’s astonishingly like late 19th-, early 20th-century Russia, when basically the entire educated class felt you simply had to be against the regime or some sort of revolutionary.”
Mr. Morson, 72, is a professor of Russian literature at Northwestern University and an accomplished interpreter of Fyodor Dostoevsky, Anton Chekhov and Leo Tolstoy. Obviously we haven’t arrived at anything like what Lenin called a “revolutionary situation,” Mr. Morson says, but we have arrived at a situation in which well-intentioned liberal people often can’t bring themselves to say that lawless violence is wrong.
In late czarist Russia, some political parties and other groups—the Social Democrats, the anarchists, the Marxists—explicitly endorsed terrorism. “The liberal party—the Constitutional Democrats, they called themselves—did not condone terrorism,” Mr. Morson says. “But they refused to condemn it. And indeed they called for the release from prison of all terrorists, who were pledged to continue terrorism right away. . . . A famous line from one of the liberal leaders put it this way: ‘Condemn terrorism? That would be the moral death of the party.’ ”
The lesson seems highly relevant today. “When you’re dragged along into something you don’t really believe yourself—because otherwise you are identified with those evil people, and your primary identity is being a ‘good guy,’ not like those people—you will wind up supporting things you know to be wrong. And unless there is some moral force that will stop it, the slide will accelerate.”
Mr. Morson, ensconced in his delightfully untidy and book-laden office in Chicago as we chat on Zoom, concedes that a scholar who spends much of his time thinking and writing about Russia’s revolutionary period will tend to look for parallels between that time and our own. The parallels don’t obtain in every way.
But some of them make the analogy worth considering. One is that many of today’s revolutionaries are wildly successful and privileged. Take Colinford Mattis and Urooj Rahman, both New York lawyers in their 30s, who have been criminally charged for attempting to firebomb a police vehicle with a Molotov cocktail. Mr. Mattis was educated at Princeton and New York University, Ms. Rahman at Fordham.
Why do people at the top want to destroy the system that enabled them to get there? “No,” Mr. Morson says, “you have it wrong. When you’re such a person, you don’t feel you’re at the top. The people at the top are wealthy businesspeople, and you’re an intellectual. You think that people of ideas should be at the top.”
The word “intelligentsia,” he notes, comes from Russian. In the classic period, from about 1860 to the First Russian Revolution in 1905, “the word did not mean everybody who was educated. It meant educated people who identified with one or another of the radical movements. ‘Intelligents’ believed in atheism, revolution and either socialism or anarchism.
“The idea was that since they knew the theory, they were morally superior and they should be in charge, and that there was something fundamentally wrong with the world when ‘practical’ people were. So what you take from your education would be the ideology that would justify this kind of activity—justify it because the wrong people have the power, and you should have it. You don’t feel like you’re the establishment.”
Is American society, shaped by Protestant Christianity and dominated by a kind of dovish, humanitarian left-liberalism, ever likely to fall into the barbarity of the Russian Revolution? Aren’t we too—I fumble for a word as I formulate the question—soft for that sort of totalizing violence?
“I don’t know,” Mr. Morson answers after a long pause. “I don’t know if that means people won’t go as far as they did in Russia, or if it just means there will be less resistance to it.”
The danger begins, he thinks, when complex social and political problems can’t be debated any longer. “You get into a revolutionary situation because people can’t hear,” he says. “Can there be a dialogue on important questions, or is there only one thing to say about every question? Are people afraid to say, ‘Well, yes, but it’s not quite as simple as that’? . . . When you can’t do that, you’re heading to a one-party state or a dictatorship of some sort. If one party is always wrong and another always right, why not just have the right one?”
Mr. Morson speaks with conviction about the peril of “ideological segregation”: “It was very easy for white people to believe evil things of black people when they never met any. But when you live with somebody, you realize that they’re no worse than you are. . . . We’ve increasingly had ideological segregation on both sides. Each side has caricature views of the other.”
The assumption of historical inevitability may play a part here. You hear it in our political language: A favored policy is “an idea whose time has come,” a disfavored one is “on the wrong side of history.” This sort of teleological thinking—history has a direction, and that direction is identical with our political views—is fervently, if unconsciously, embraced by highly educated people today. It was also “one of the central arguments of late-19th-century Russian thought,” Mr. Morson says.
“Does history have a direction? And is later necessarily better? The greatest thinkers—Tolstoy, Alexander Herzen—answered no, later is not always better. They believed that sort of thinking was an importation of religious providentialism into history—the determinism of Hegel and Marx. The difficulty of this form of thinking is that it paralyzes you from acting. Between the wars, it was common for people to say: ‘Yes, you may like liberal democracy, but that’s of the past. We fascists are of the future.’ Or ‘We communists are of the future.’ People would resign themselves to the inevitable and conclude, ‘Well I can’t fight the future, I can’t resist the fascists or the communists.’ ”
I suggest that the American left is very fond of this teleological language—Barack Obama spoke in his first inaugural address of the “worn-out dogmas that for far too long have strangled our politics.” But Mr. Morson reminds me that Ronald Reagan used similar rhetoric. “Part of being a revolutionary is knowing that you don’t have to acquiesce to the tired, old ideas of the past,” he said in a 1985 speech.
Another marker of the Russian intelligentsia was the sheer contempt its members had for the peasants and workers they claimed to represent. “How many workers, how many peasants, were even in the Bolshevik Party? Very few. . . . Lenin’s whole idea was that ‘the working class, left to itself, will never develop more than a trade-union consciousness.’ That’s his famous phrase. They had to be led by the intelligentsia and completely disciplined. No matter what you say, they will do it, no matter how violent. They don’t have to understand the reasons, they’ll just do it. Because they’re the agents of history, as Marx described them. . . . That implies a contempt for the working class and a greater contempt for the peasantry.”
The supposition that America is moving toward anarchy or revolution because we’ve had a week of riots—or three years of bad faith and acrimony, or three decades of polarization—still seems hard to accept. Mr. Morson is careful not to predict the course of events. He uses the phrase “insofar as the Russian example applies” more than once.
But, he says, “we have a major depression, we have terrible fear from the illness, and now we have mass riots in the street, which our leaders do not seem to know how to handle. That’s a very rapid slide from only a year ago. And there’s no reason to think it will slow down. The slide could well continue.”
And history can unfold in unpredictable ways. Who would have guessed 20 years ago, he asks, that the First Amendment’s free-speech guarantee would become passé on the liberal left? “I used to get a laugh from students by quoting a Soviet citizen I talked to once. He said to me, ‘Of course we have freedom of speech. We just don’t allow people to lie.’ That used to get a laugh! They don’t laugh anymore.”

THE OLD LIBERAL ORDER IS UNDER SIEGE

In the past two weeks, Black Lives Matter has essentially converged with the entire modern U.S. establishment, from academia to the media to corporate leaderships

 

By Gerard Baker

 

The Wall Street Journal

June 5, 2020

 

History mocks us all eventually. It’s the rare pundit or politician who doesn’t find that once passionately held verities are eventually undone by the steady march of inconvenient events.
This week I listened to prominent Republican Never Trumpers—who took the U.S. into perhaps the worst foreign policy adventure in its history, promising to impose democracy in Iraq through the deployment of the U.S. military—as they denounced a president for destroying democracy by threatening to deploy the U.S. military. It brought a bitter smile to my lips.
The main lesson—one that those of us who supported the Iraq war have learned with humility and regret—is that the U.S. military isn’t perhaps the best tool for imposing democracy, in Firdos Square or Lafayette Square.
But an even larger historical lesson is being taught now in the tumult of current events. It resonates across the years to those innocent days when Americans believed in a world that could be united under the banner of a patented liberal democracy that seemed to have triumphed over all other systems and ideologies.
The battle being waged in the country is about many things—race, justice, inequality—but it is at root about the rapidly accelerating unraveling of the liberal consensus. This isn’t a partisan phenomenon, as some people would have us believe; it’s not all the fault of a would-be dictator issuing threats of violent domestic repression from the White House. It’s a broad-based collapse of confidence in the system that America has pioneered, propagated and led for the last half-century.
It’s only by recognizing this deeper crisis that we can understand a particular curiosity in the fight being waged in the wake of the killing of George Floyd last month. On what appears to be the principal point of contention, the nation isn’t really that divided at all.
The vast majority of people in the U.S. seem to agree not only that there was a specific injustice done to Mr. Floyd, captured in the video of that depraved act by a police officer in Minneapolis, but that there is a larger injustice that African-Americans face. A Pew Research poll conducted in late May found that almost two thirds of white Americans thought black Americans were not treated fairly by the criminal justice system.

But the struggle clearly concerns a much more radical disagreement over what this country is and what it ought to be. The protesters proclaim that the injustices are a reflection of “systemic racism,” derived from the original sin of America, and the remedies they propose are revolutionary. The Black Lives Matter movement wants to “defund the police,” redistributing those funds to programs for social injustice.


These arguments have been raging for years, but what’s different about the current climate is the much wider acceptance of the critique and the remedy. In the past two weeks, Black Lives Matter has essentially converged with the entire modern establishment, from academia, to the media, to corporate leaderships. More Democrats for the first time openly expressed support for the movement’s key policy objective. In New York and Los Angeles, controlled by Democrats, city councils are considering measures for steep cuts in police budgets.

This radicalism is a threat to the fading liberal order. One of the new things this week was the sight of major companies across America rallying to the cause of Black Lives Matter, while others found themselves challenged by activist employees. At the New York Times, a revolt by reporters forced the company into an abject renunciation of an op-ed by a leading Republican senator. At Facebook, employees are trying to force their CEO to censor presidential pronouncements they find objectionable.

 

A basic tenet of the old liberal order is the toleration of views we find detestable, not least because airing them enables them to be examined and rebutted. The larger illiberalism on today’s left involves the deplatforming and denunciation of those who won’t sign up for the prevailing orthodoxy.


America now finds itself facing authoritarian nationalism on the one side, led by a Trumpian Republican Party that angrily rejects plurality and deviation, and on the other side, an increasingly illiberal liberalism that compels submission to identity politics.

There was once a comforting hope among some Americans in the political middle ground that the Trump years would mark some sort of aberration, that after four years of a bracing, terrifying experiment, the old order would assert itself. Not anymore. Fasten your seat belts. The order itself is under siege.

Sunday, June 07, 2020

ROGER GOODELLSUPPORTS DISRESPECT FOR FLAG AND COUNTRY ..... BOYCUT THE UNPATRIOTIC NFL!

By Howie Katz

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell now support's Colin Kaepernick and encourages NFL players to take a knee during the playing of the National Anthem.  What a worthless piece of shit!

Here is what Goodell said on Friday:
 
“We, the National Football League, condemn racism and the systematic oppression of black people,” Goodell said. "We, the National Football League, admit we were wrong for not listening to NFL players earlier and encourage all to speak out and peacefully protest. We, the National Football League, believe black lives matter. I personally protest with you and want to be part of the much needed change in this country. Without black players, there would be no National Football League. And the protests around the country are emblematic of the centuries of silence, inequality and oppression of black players, coaches, fans and staff. We are listening. I am listening, and I will be reaching out to players who have raised their voices and others on how we can improve and go forward for a better and more united NFL family.”

It looks like everyone of note is getitng on the BLM bandwagon.  With Goodell joining in, look for Kaepernick now to land a job with one of the NFL teams.

Kaepernick inciting the 'freedom fighters' to riot, burn and loot has been completely disregarded.

We should boycut the NFL, but that will never happen with our sports-hungey fans.

AUTOPSY SHOWED THE SAINTLY FLOYD WAS USING FENTANYL AND METH

Trump retweets video of black conservative Candace Owens attacking George Floyd

By Jon Levine

New York Post
June 6, 2020

President Trump retweeted a video Friday of right-wing commentators Glenn Beck and Candace Owens attacking the reputation of George Floyd.

“The fact that he has been held up as a martyr sickens me,” Owens told Beck in the footage. “George Floyd was not a good person.”

As mass protests rocked the nation for yet another day, the Trump retweet amplified the message to a worldwide audience and his 81.8 million Twitter followers.

Beck and Owens then delved into Floyd’s lengthy criminal record, which included time behind bars. Floyd’s autopsy report revealed he had both fentanyl and methamphetamine in his system at the time of his death.

“Is this really the guy that Black America … is this the symbol of Black America today?” Beck wondered, though adding that Floyd’s treatment by Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin had been wrong.

“I don’t care WHAT George Floyd did. The officer should have never treated him like that and killed him!” Beck wrote in a tweet sharing the video.

MAYBE I AM A BAD PERSON, OR PERHAPS I AM JUST SHALLOW

But I Am Getting Really Tired Of Hearing About George Floyd

by Bob Walsh

George Floyd wasn't Mother Theresa.  He wasn't really a good person.  He was a thief and a doper and a robber who was almost certainly killed by a Minneapolis cop without any sort of reasonable justification.  It looks like there is at least a fair chance that "the system" is going to deal appropriately with those involved.   Maybe we should let it.

I am tired of two weeks of "demonstrations."  I am tired of two weeks of fucking riots and thievery.  I am tied of listening to self-serving whores (aka politicians) talk about how we need to defund the police or end systematic racism or White privilege or sleeping in church or farting in the subway or whatever the hell is putting a bee under someone's bonnet.  If you have any actual fucking ideas I wouldn't mind listening to those.

Is America perfect?  No.  But we try to get better all the time.  Mostly we succeed.  People still risk their lives to come here, many of them in violation of our laws, so somebody must like it here.  

How does breaking into somebody's store and burning it down or stealing a car or shooting some poor bastard down in the street make it better for people like George Floyd?  Maybe one of these "protesters" can answer that for me.  

PLAGUE / RIOT REPORT UPDATE FROM STOCKTON

by Bob Walsh

Went by a gun store / range I do some business with but haven't been to since the plague hit.  Got there about 15 minutes after opening time and couldn't even get into the parking lot.  I THINK they were maybe doing a CCW class as well as normal business but I am not sure.  

Went by another gun store / range I do a lot of business with.  Range has been closed for weeks but the store has been open on a minimal customer load basis.  All the windows were boarded up and the security door was down and padlocked.  I suspect it was in reaction to a crash and grab burglary at a Hayward gun store last weekend but I don't know that for a fact.  Could have been something closer to home. 

By the time you read this I will be out with my IDPA group for the first time in months blasting away at things and getting in some quality trigger time.  I am too old and slow so I am no longer competitive, but I have fun and keep my skill level up so that is good.  They are limiting each squad to ten so I will have to get my ass up and do more taping and brass than I usually do.  If there are 15+ nobody bothers me about it because I am so slow I am almost in the way.  When there only 10 I feel bad if I can't do my bit, which is definitely not going to do my knee any good.  As long as I get a lot of good hits, very few poor hits and misses and don't shoot any good guys I am reasonably happy.  

They had some major interruptions and demonstrations in Sacramento two days ago and a little bit in downtown Stockton.  They seemed to be semi-legit protests, no violence, though the deliberate interference with traffic is IMHO unfair to people who just want to get on with their lives.  

I did note the Walgreen's stores in my area are now closing up well before dark.  I wouldn't be surprised if other similar retailers are doing the same thing.  Just in case.

With luck these "protesters" will now go away and wait for the trials to produce some results.  I am, however, not betting on it. 

HUGE FAKE NEWS STORY

by Bob Walsh

There is a huge fake news story out of Valhermoso Springs, Alabama.  Allegedly the cops responded to a house on fire early Friday and found seven people and one dog shot to death in the burning building.  

The cops had responded to the house on numerous occasions, mostly for drug related issues as well as robbery, trespassing and disturbing the peace beefs.

Since we all know that drugs crimes are victimless and druggies just want to use drugs and be mellow obviously this story is false.  I think the dog shot the seven people in the house and then committed suicide.  Case closed.  Nothing to see here. Move along.   

VAMPIRES ARE DANGEROUS

by Bob Walsh

Joshua Rudiger, 42, is a guest of the people of the formerly great state of California.  He lives at the California Health Care Facility (state prison hospital) outside of Stockton.  He believes he is an ancient vampire and has the bad habit of slashing people's throats and drinking their blood.  Even in California that is sort-of illegal.  

He is believed to have murdered Aaron Coderre, 40, in a shower room at the facility on Sunday afternoon a week ago.  Corderre was doing life for an attempted murder out of Butte County.   Rudiger is doing life for killing one homeless woman and attempting to kill three other homeless people in the People's Republic of San Francisco in 1998 so he could drink their blood.  When questioned about it, he responded, "Prey is prey."  

TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE PREVENTED?

McAllen police: Man wielding chainsaw at protestors in custody; charges pending

 

By Matthew Wilson

The Brownsville Herald
June 5, 2020

McALLEN, Texas — McAllen Police Chief Victor Rodriguez confirmed Friday afternoon that an individual seen shouting and brandishing a chainsaw at protestors downtown had been detained.

“Thus far it’s been the only incident we’ve had at today’s event,” he said. “We’ve identified that person, we’ve detained that person and are continuing our investigation into the particular incident.”

Rodriguez later added that the man is in custody and the department is assessing what charges will be filed.

Lt. Joel Morales of the McAllen Police Department previously confirmed that an assault investigation is underway related to the man, who was seen in a video brandishing and revving a chainsaw at Black Lives Matter protestors marching downtown Friday.

“Go home,” the man shouted repeatedly in the video, dispersing a group of protestors while pointing animatedly.

He at one point used a racial slur.

“Don’t let those fucking niggers out there control you. Don’t let those fucking trash antifa bullshit people,” the man continued to shout.

Lorena Houghton of McAllen was one of the women in the group the man accosted.

“We were just walking, because we were walking over here by ourselves, it was a group of like six or seven, and we were just trying to cross the street and someone stopped in the middle of the crosswalk and started yelling at the girl in front,” she said.

According to Houghton, the man ripped a poster out of that woman’s hands before grabbing a chainsaw.

“It’s very scary,” she said. “I think that the exact point they were trying to make is that they didn’t think that Black Lives Matter was necessary here, but I think he disproved his own point by violently attacking people that were walking on the street.”

NY COPS IN PERI IF THEY CONTROL PROTESTERS

NYPD suspends two cops over misconduct caught on camera during protests

 
By Vincent Barone

New York Post
June 5, 2020

The NYPD has suspended two officers who were caught on bystander video shoving and pepper-spraying protesters at separate George Floyd demonstrations over the past week.

Both videos had gone viral as examples of apparently unprovoked violence against peaceful protesters; the two officers, who were not identified by NYPD officials, have been suspended without pay.

In the first incident, from Friday, May 29, the offending officer was caught on camera shoving Dounya Zayer to the ground as she peacefully protested in Brooklyn.

The officer can be heard calling Zayer a “stupid bitch” before pushing her to the pavement. She suffered a seizure and concussion, she has said.

The second cop was filmed the next day pulling down a protester’s mask and pepper-spraying him in the face.

The NYPD’s investigation into the two incidents is ongoing, Commissioner Dermot Shea announced Friday.

“These incidents mentioned below are disturbing and run counter to the principles of NYPD training, as well as our mission of public safety,” Shea said. “The actions by these officers stand apart from the restrained work of the thousands of other officers who have worked tirelessly to protect those who are peacefully protesting and keep all New Yorkers safe.”

Shea added that “there are other matters that we are actively investigating and we will be transparent as the process continues.”

Zayer chided the officer who shoved her from her hospital bed after the incident.

“Them acting the way they acted isn’t helping the cause,” she tweeted shortly after the attack. “It isn’t proving to us that they care about us.”

KAEPERNICK'S FREEDOM FIGHTERS USE ROLLS-ROYCE TO LOOT

Looters flee in luxury SUVs, including a $300k Rolls-Royce, after ransacking NYC stores

 

By Natalie O'Neill

 

New York Post

June 3, 2020

 

New York City looters were caught on camera pulling up in luxury SUVs — including what was claimed to be a pricey Rolls-Royce — before apparently looting an upscale retail store in Manhattan, according to footage shared on social media.

The video, filmed by Justine Miller and Keith Feldman, shows a group of men in masks hopping out of two cars and charging through a smashed door in Soho before running back outside carrying boxes of goods on Monday night.

“Looters are literally pulling up in nice cars and cleaning out stores in #Soho. What #Curfew?” Feldman wrote on Twitter.

One of the men can be heard shouting, “Come on, come on!” before the apparent thieves jump back in their luxury rides and drive away.

“That’s a $500,000 Rolls Royce on the right, incredible,” one observer wrote on Twitter.

Another identified the car as a Rolls-Royce Cullinan, which they claim “starts north of $300k.”

The retail raid came amid an 11 p.m. citywide curfew enacted Monday night, implemented after protesters furious over the death of George Floyd turned violent in Manhattan. The curfew start time was then moved to 8 p.m. by Mayor Bill de Blasio on Tuesday and extended through Sunday night.

The name and location of the shop in the footage were not immediately clear — nor was it clear if police were called. 

NYC'S BLACK PUBLIC ADVOCATE RIPS INTO DE BLASIO

Jumaane Williams to de Blasio: ‘You can no longer hide behind your black wife and children’

 

By Julia Marsh 

 

New York Post
June 5, 2020

Public Advocate Jumaane Williams just made his criticism of Bill de Blasio’s handling of Big Apple protests personal — accusing the mayor of using his biracial family as a political shield.

“This is me talking, like, you can no longer hide behind your black wife and children, not anymore,” Williams said during a press conference live-streamed on Facebook Friday.

“You’re exposed now. We are at a time when we need your leadership. It is not there,” Williams said.

A spokeswoman for the mayor did not immediately return a request for comment.

De Blasio’s wife, first lady Chirlane McCray, is black, and they share two biracial children, Dante, 23 and Chiara, 25.

In 2013, then 15-year-old Dante, sporting a puffed-out afro, starred in a campaign ad for his father’s mayoral race that some pundits say helped de Blasio clinch the primary race.

A year later, thousands of cops turned their backs on the mayor at the funerals for a pair of officers who were shot just weeks after an interview in which de Blasio said he and McCray had taught Dante about the “dangers” posed by the police to young black men.

Williams’ rebuke comes a day after de Blasio was booed off the stage at a George Floyd memorial in Brooklyn.

When the mayor attempted to tell the crowd, “Black lives matter in New York,” one heckler shouted, “Not to you!” even as McCray stood by de Blasio’s side.
And in an echo of the 2014 police funeral, much of the crowd turned their backs on the mayor before he finished speaking.

On Friday, Williams said the NYPD should take a hands-off approach to protestors who are demonstrating past the city’s 8 p.m. curfew, instead of aggressively shutting them down.

“Don’t put additional tension spots and say you got to be home by this time,” he said, before faulting the mayor for failing to assure protests remain peaceful.

“It’s like you’re not even trying. I don’t know how much you care at his point to put forth a plan. I guess it’s good to show up at a George Floyd memorial, but where’s your plan?” Williams asked. 

Pressed on his Facebook comment, Williams later said, “This time we’re in is not about the mayor’s family or any one family, but the thousands of families and people across the city who are looking for leadership and action but aren’t receiving it.”

PUSH COPS CHARGED

Two Buffalo cops are charged with assault for shoving peace activist, 75, during protests and hide from cameras in court - while hundreds of colleagues gather outside in solidarity over their 'disgusting' treatment 

 

Daily Mail 

June 6, 2020

 

Aaron Torgalski and Robert McCabe were each charged with one count of assault in the second degree over the shocking incident that left peaceful protester Martin Gugino in a 'serious condition' in hospital. 

 

The cops were arraigned Saturday morning in a virtual court hearing where they both pleaded not guilty to the charges. They each face up to seven years in prison if convicted of the class D felony. They will appear in court on July 20. 

 

The announcement came as hundreds of non-uniformed cops gathered outside the city court in the latest show of support of their colleagues, one day after the entire 57-strong Buffalo Police Department's Emergency Response Team resigned in outrage at their suspension without pay. 

 

Shocking footage showed the two cops pushing 75-year-old Gugino to the ground, causing him to crack his head on the ground. The two cops were suspended without pay immediately and calls mounted for them to be fired. 

__________

 

Buffalo mayor says 75-year-old man who was shoved to the ground by police was an 'agitator trying to spark up crowd of protesters' and won't fire two cops amid the ongoing investigation because it's 'very important they get due process'

 

Daily Mail 

June 5, 2020

 

Buffalo Mayor Byron Brown has said the 75-year-old man who was shoved to the ground by two cops on Thursday was an 'agitator' who tried to work up the crowd and had been asked to leave the area 'numerous' times.

Brown addressed the incident in a press conference on Friday after 57 officers on the Emergency Response Team resigned from their positions in support of their two colleagues who were suspended without pay after video showed them pushing protester Martin Gugino and causing him to fall and hit his head. 

Gugino, a longtime peace activist from Amherst, had been at a protest at Niagara Square near Buffalo City Hall when he approached a line of officers in riot gear after the city's 8pm curfew went into effect. 

'What we were informed of is that that individual was an agitator. He was trying to spark up the crowd of people. Those people were there into the darkness. Our concern is when it gets dark, there is a potential for violence,' Brown said.

 

 'There has been vandalism, there have been fires set, there have been stores broken into and looted. According to what was reported to me, that individual was a key major instigator of people engaging in those activities.'  

 

 The mayor said he will not call for the two officers to be fired amid the ongoing investigation, adding it was 'very important they get due process.' 

MAYOR WOODARDS, SHUT THE FUCK UP

Police unions criticize ‘theatrics’ in Tacoma mayor’s order to fire officers in Ellis case 

 

By Stacia Glenn

 

The News Tribune

June 5, 2020

 

Two Tacoma police unions are pushing back against Mayor Victoria Woodards’ demand that four officers involved in the death of Manuel Ellis be fired.

Tensions have risen this week around the case of Ellis, a black man who died March 3 while being restrained by police in South Tacoma.

The Pierce County Medical Examiner’s Office ruled the 33-year-old’s death a homicide, which legally means he was killed by another person. Fatal police shootings, for instance, are generally determined to be homicides. It is up to prosecutors to decide if police acted lawfully and if the homicide was justifiable or a criminal act was committed.

Ellis died from oxygen deprivation due to physical restraint, with methamphetamine intoxication and heart disease as contributing factors, according to the Medical Examiner.

Those findings prompted his family to call for an independent investigation, separate from the one being conducted by the Pierce County Sheriff’s Department.

On Thursday, a video surfaced showing a portion of Ellis’ encounter with police.

Woodards then addressed the public in a press conference aired live on Tacoma TV and Facebook.

“The officers who committed this crime should be fired and prosecuted to the full extent of the law,” she said. “I am demanding tonight that the Pierce County Sheriff review and confirm every action taken by each officer.”

The four officers involved in restraining Ellis have been identified as Christopher Burbank, 34; Matthew Collins, 37; Masyih Ford, 28; and Timothy Rankine, 31.
They were placed on administrative leave after the autopsy findings became public Wednesday.

Within hours of Woodards’ statement, Tacoma police union representatives released a statement accusing the mayor of “theatrics” and claiming the investigation will show the officers “did no wrong.”

“This is not a time to sacrifice dedicated public servants at the altar of public sentiment, especially when that sentiment is almost wholly fueled by the uninformed anger of a theatrical politician,” they wrote.

On Friday, the Tacoma Police Management Association, which represents lieutenants and captains, voiced their concerns.

“Mayor Woodards’ inflammatory language calling the Officers criminals and calling for their prosecution before the incident is reviewed by the Prosecutor’s Office does not suit the office of the Mayor,” representatives said in the statement. “We expect more from our Mayor than an angry theatrical reaction to a short partial video of our Officers attempting to take Mr. Ellis into custody.”

Representatives of both unions said they were appalled by the killing of George Floyd, a black man who died May 25 in Minneapolis after a white police officer pressed a knee into his neck for nearly nine minutes, but said the Ellis and Floyd cases are not the same.

Both unions said they’re eager to see the completed investigation, which is expected to be forwarded to the Prosecutor’s Office by next week.
Prosecutors then will determine whether the officers’ actions warrant criminal charges or if Ellis’ death was a justifiable homicide.

The Management Association asked Woodards to retract her statement until the investigation is over. Efforts by The News Tribune to reach Woodards on Friday morning were unsuccessful.

“Mayor Woodards’ reckless, inflammatory language only escalates anger instead of unifying our city and awaiting a full report of facts. Mayor Woodards’ blatant and concerted disregard for the rule of law serves only one purpose, which is to undermine the constitutional rights of all citizens,” union representatives said in their statement. “The officers involved in this tragedy must be afforded the same rights as all citizens.”

Police Chief Don Ramsdell has not yet commented on the mayor’s demands.

Investigators have said Ellis was trying to open doors of occupied vehicles and attacked two officers who encountered him at the intersection of South 96th Street and Ainsworth Avenue.

His family said they do not believe Ellis would have behaved that way and believe the officers killed Ellis without cause.

In the video, Ellis can be seen on the ground struggling with two officers while a passerby screams for police to stop hitting him.

It is unclear where the other two officers were at the time or what role they played in Ellis’ death.

The Police Department identified the four officers as all having been a part of restraining Ellis at one point during the encounter.

Ellis said, “Can’t breathe,” during the encounter, at which time sheriff’s detectives say the Tacoma officers rolled him on his side.

Police called for medical aid at 11:26 p.m., four minutes after the encounter began.

Within a minute of firefighters arriving on scene, Ellis stopped breathing and lost consciousness.

Paramedics performed CPR for nearly 90 minutes, but he was pronounced dead at the scene.

Read more here: https://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/article243309141.html#storylink=

Read more here: https://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/article243309141.html#storylink=c

Read more here: https://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/article243309141.html#storylink=

Read more here: https://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/article243309141.html#storylink=cpy

RALPH IS IN THE IC UNIT AT THE HOSPITAL

Ralph gets home late one night and Linda, his wife says, 'Where in the hell have you been?'

Ralph replies, 'I was out getting a tattoo.' 

'A tattoo?' she frowned. 'What kind of tattoo did you get?' 


'I got a hundred dollar bill on my dick,' he said proudly. 


'What the hell were you thinking? She said; shaking her head in disgust... 'Why on earth would an accountant get a hundred dollar bill tattooed on his dick?' 


Well, one, I like to watch my money grow. 


Two, once in a while I like to play with my money. 


Three, I like how money feels in my hand. 


And, lastly, instead of you going out shopping, you can stay right here at home and blow a hundred bucks anytime you want.

Ralph is recovering in the IC unit at the hospital!

Saturday, June 06, 2020

KAEPERNICK'S FREEDOM FIGHTERS LIBERATE AN OAKLAND MERCEDES DEALERSHIP

They suffered no casualties in their sortie against the white enemy and they destroyed a bunch of the enemy's spanking new luxury cars



And they met no resistance from the enemy's troops, the cops, who were nowhere in sight.

SAINTS QUARTERBACK GETS SINGED FOR CALLING FOR RSPECT OF FLAG AND COUNTRY

Drew Brees catches heat from Malcolm Jenkins and other star athletes for 'disrespecting the flag' remark

 

His response came Wednesday in an interview with Yahoo Finance, when asked his opinion about players kneeling to protest police brutality once the NFL season begins this fall.

Brees said respecting the National Anthem is not just about showing respect to the military, but also to anyone who sacrificed for this country, including those in the civil rights movement.

"And is everything right with our country right now? No, it's not," Brees said in the interview. "We still have a long way to go. But I think what you do by standing there and showing respect to the flag with your hand over your heart, is it shows unity. It shows that we are all in this together, we can all do better, and that we are all part of the solution."

Shortly after the interview was posted, NBA superstar LeBron James called out the quarterback.

"You literally still don't understand why Kap was kneeling on one knee??" James said in a tweet, referencing Colin Kaepernick. "Has absolute nothing to do with the disrespect of (the flag of United States) and our soldiers."

James went on to discuss his own father-in-law who was in the Army, saying that he never found Kaepernick -- who famously knelt during the national anthem to protest police brutality -- disrespectful, "because he and I both know what's right is right and what's wrong is wrong!"

Michael Thomas, a wide receiver on the Saints, didn't call out Brees specifically -- but he did retweet a comment from a journalist, reading "How can anyone watch George Floyd get murdered and their first response when asked about it is ResPEcC tHe fLAg." Thomas added a puking emoji.

Malcolm Jenkins, a safety for the Saints, had stronger words. In a tear-filled four-minute video posted to Instagram, Jenkins expressed his hurt and disappointment in Brees, saying that he is part of the problem.

"When I step off the field and I take my helmet off, I'm a black man walking around in America and I'm telling you I'm dealing with these things, I'm telling you my communities are dealing with these things, and your response to me is don't talk about that here ... where is the place, Drew?"

"When the world tells you that you're not worthy, that your life doesn't matter, the last place you want to hear it from are the guys that you go to war with and the guys you consider to be your allies and your friends," Jenkins said. "Even though we're teammates, I cant let this slide."

Green Bay Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers also spoke up -- though he didn't reference Brees or his comments specifically.

"A few years ago we were criticized for locking arms in solidarity before the game," Rodgers said in an Instagram post. "It has NEVER been about an anthem or a flag. Not then. Not now. Listen with an open heart, let's educate ourselves, and then turn word and thought into action."

Black players make up about 70% of the NFL. In 2018, the NFL passed a policy to fine players for kneeling during the anthem, which was done to protest police brutality and racial injustice in the US. The punishment associated with the policy was later nixed, though the policy itself still remained.
__________

Drees couldn't stand the heat, so he apologized

Here is his sniveling apology:

I would like to apologize to my friends, teammates, the City of New Orleans, the black community, NFL community and anyone I hurt with my comments yesterday. In speaking with some of you, it breaks my heart to know the pain I have caused. In an attempt to talk about respect, unity, and solidarity centered around the American flag and the national anthem, I made comments that were insensitive and completely missed the mark on the issues we are facing right now as a country. They lacked awareness and any type of compassion or empathy. Instead, those words have become divisive and hurtful and have misled people into believing that somehow I am an enemy. This could not be further from the truth, and is not an accurate reflection of my heart or my character. This is where I stand: I stand with the black community in the fight against systemic racial injustice and police brutality and support the creation of real policy change that will make a difference. I condemn the years of oppression that have taken place throughout our black communities and still exists today. I acknowledge that we as Americans, including myself, have not done enough to fight for that equality or to truly understand the struggles and plight of the black community. I recognize that I am part of the solution and can be a leader for the black community in this movement. I will never know what it's like to be a black man or raise black children in America but I will work every day to put myself in those shoes and fight for what is right. I have ALWAYS been an ally, never an enemy. I am sick about the way my comments were perceived yesterday, but I take full responsibility and accountability. I recognize that I should do less talking and more listening...and when the black community is talking about their pain, we all need to listen. For that, I am very sorry and I ask your forgiveness.

EDITOR'S NOTE: Drees didn't owe anyone an apology.  Instead of having "completely missed the mark," he was spot on!  It is sad to see a man who stood up for respect of flag and country completely cave in to a bunch of ungrateful, unpatriotic assholes..       

DID SENILE JOE JUST HAVE HIS "BASKET OF DEPLORABLES" MOMENT ?

by Bob Walsh

Good old Senile Joe The Hairsniffer make a comment, that may or may not have been off the cuff, when talking to a couple of Black liberal talking heads yesterday.  He asserted that about 10-15% of the population of America were "just not very good people."

So, what did he mean, or more precisely who did he mean?  Trump supporters?  White Trump supporters?  Black Trump supporters?  Gun owners?  People who disapprove of looting?  Black people who don't support democratic-socialism?  Anybody who doesn't hate cops?  Anybody who doesn't suck ass on BLM or AntiFa?  Anybody who has an IQ above 85?  Anybody capable of critical, independent thought?  Anybody who disapproves of pigeon-holing people to ensure their victimhood is categorized properly?  Anybody who thinks that Barbara Streisand is full of shit and Nancy Pelosi is deranged?

The possibilities are almost endless.

Now if he had said that 10-15% of Americans were not very smart I would have agreed.  48% of the voters voted for Hillary (46% voted for Trump).   

YES, THINGS ARE LOOKING UP

And Experts Are Often Full Of Shit

by Bob Walsh

The April job numbers came out yesterday.  The "experts" predicted about 7.5 million or more new jobless claims.  In fact there were 2.5 million NEW jobs in April.  So they were only off 10 million.  By the way, that is the biggest one-month number since they have been keeping track. 

On that news (among others) the DJIA bounced up over 800 points, closing above 27,000 for the first time in 90 days.  A lot of big names in leisure and transportation took huge jumps yesterday.  

Things are definitely looking up.