Monday, February 23, 2026

CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS WELCOME TO LOW TAX TEXAS

New York report declares Texas the new leader in finance jobs

Instead of Texas becoming New York or California, corporate America is adapting to Texas.

 

cost of living

Austin -  Dallas - Houston ... New York report says Texas is gaining ground in jobs, finance and HQ relocations.
 
 
For years, Texas leaders have warned against becoming more like New York or California. Now, a new report from a New York think tank suggests it may be the other way around, with Texas emerging as the model for economic competitiveness.
 
In its report, titled "Texas' Competitive Edge," Partnership for New York City (PFNYC) argues the shift is not just symbolic; it's years in the making. 

The business group argues New York is already losing thousands of jobs to pro-business Texas—and warns that New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani's push to raise corporate taxes would only accelerate the exodus. Mamdani has proposed increasing the state’s corporate rate from 7.25 percent to 11.5 percent, a move that would push New York City's top combined marginal corporate tax rate to 22.48 percent if approved by the governor and state lawmakers.

"New York is already ranked last nationally for tax competitiveness and is consistently ranked among the bottom states for starting a small business and for small business growth," the report states.

Since 2015, more than 300 companies have relocated their headquarters to Texas, many from higher-cost coastal states. The state's lack of a personal income tax, combined with incentive programs like the Texas Enterprise Fund and the creation of a specialized business court system, has strengthened its appeal to corporate leaders weighing expansion or relocation.

PFNYC backed up its arguments with a series of data points highlighting Texas' momentum: 

  • Texas surpassed New York in 2024 as the state with the most financial services employees, excluding insurance and real estate
  • 314 companies relocated their headquarters to Texas between 2015 and 2024, according to the Texas Economic Development & Tourism Office.
  • Nearly half of the relocations (156 companies) one of them moved from California, while 23 moved from New York. 
  • Financial services recruitment in Texas outpaced New York by nine percent in job postings in 2025.
  • While New York's financial sector remains larger—generating $330 billion in gross regional product in 2024, about 71 percent more than Texas—
  • Texas' sector grew faster over the past decade, with GRP rising 121 percent compared to New York's 72 percent.

PFNYC also highlighted high-profile corporate expansions, such as Wells Fargo opening a new Dallas campus in 2025,  and JP Morgan Chase announced in 2024 it employed more people in Texas than any other state, prompting them to open a Fort Worth office that will double the city's employee capacity by 2027.  

The report also points to structural shifts in finance and capital markets. A planned Texas Stock Exchange, backed by major institutional investors, is positioning Dallas as a potential alternative hub for trading and listings—a development that underscores what the report describes as a broader decentralization of traditional financial power.

For New York, the findings amount to a competitive warning that the state risks ceding ground in key sectors. For Texas, they reinforce a long-held claim: that its economic model—lower taxes, lighter regulation and aggressive recruitment—is translating into measurable gains in jobs and investment.

Still, the report raises a broader question about how much of Texas’s advantage is sustainable. While corporate relocations and financial sector growth have accelerated, companies often maintain a dual presence in both Texas and legacy hubs like New York. And critics argue that infrastructure strain, property tax burdens and workforce challenges could complicate long-term growth.

For Houston, the implications are just as significant; as Texas attracts more financial services firms and corporate headquarters, the state's largest city—already a powerhouse in energy, health care and logistics—stands to gain from the flow of capital and executive decision-making moving south. The question is whether Houston can convert that statewide momentum into local headquarters wins, or whether Dallas and Austin will continue to capture the lion's share.

The PFNYC report ultimately frames Texas not as an up-and-coming challenger, but as an established competitor reshaping the national economic map—one that even traditional power centers are now studying.

THINGS GETTING FRISKY IN MEXICO

By Bob Walsh

 

Mexican drug lord Nemesio Oseguera, commonly known as "El Mencho," killed in military operation, triggering blockades in M...


Thee is widespread violence going on in Mexico right now.  Major highways were closed down.  Air lines quit flying into Mexico.  The violence seems to be largely between the cartels and the government, with bystanders getting caught in the middle now and again.

The mess seems to have been triggered by an action against the cartels by the government, supported by U S intelligence.  

It remains to see if the elected government or if the cartels are the real, functional government in Mexico.  I strongly suspect that in much of the country it is the cartels. 

NO UNIFIED OUTCOME REACHED

By Bob Walsh

 

San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan
 
 
The CA Democrat Party was unable to get behind any single candidate this weekend.  No great surprise.  Every one of these (mostly) midgets seems to think that ONLY THEY can oppose the horrible orange man successfully.  The fact that Trump isn't on the CA ballot and isn't running for anything means nothing to them.  Erik Swalwell, that well-known fucker of Chinese spys, is at the lead of the pack of 3-legged blind incontinent Chihuahuas who are desperate to hold on to some level of personal power.  Tom Steyr, gazillionaire tech guy and Matt Mahan, San Jose mayor and tech guy, don't fit that mold but seem to be unable to gain any traction within the party.  There is actually a semi-official slogan out there already for Mahan.  SUPPORT MAHAN.  HE IS THE LEAST CRAZY OF ALL THE DEMOCRATS.  Really.

Of course a Republican govern can stop some of the crazy, but can not compel a heavily Democrat state legislature to actively do anything.  Stopping the crazy is not nothing.  It is not as positive as doing something right, but stopping the crazy, or at least slowing it down, is at least a start.  

Sunday, February 22, 2026

LIKE THE WOMEN, US MEN'S HOCKEY TEAM BEATS CANADA TO WIN OLYMPIC GOLD

USA finally wins Olympic gold 46 years after ‘Miracle’ with breathtaking overtime win over rival Canada

A SAD TALE WITH A FEEL GOOD ENDING

Tide turns for little abandoned monkey Punch who had no one to love but his stuffed toy... as he's finally accepted into family

 

By Anna Wright 

 

Daily Mail

Feb 22, 2-026

 

 

The story of Punch: Abandoned baby macaque in Japan who broke the internet’s heart

Punch the monkey with his sole companion after he was rejected by other monkeys 

 

A sweet baby monkey, who found comfort in an orangutan toy after his mother abandoned him, was finally welcomed into a family of monkeys inside his zoo. 

Punch, a six-month-old macaque at Ichikawa City Zoo in Japan, became an internet sensation after videos showed the lonely little primate finding comfort and companionship in his stuffed toy. 

After being constantly rejected by the other macaques, Punch finally found a forever friend named Onsing.

The baby's bumpy ride is finally over, as social media videos on Friday showed the adult troop member wrapping him in a tight embrace. 

One video showed the pair in their concrete enclosure, with Punch completely wrapped in Onsing's arms as they climbed the rock wall together. 

Onsing followed closely, grabbing Punch's side to help hoist him up the incline. 

The adult monkey never left his side. In the video, the chain fences clanged, startling Punch, who nuzzled into his new bodyguard for comfort. 

Another adorable video showed two monkeys resting against the stone wall, with Onsing on the left sitting next to another adult, holding little Punch close. 

 

Six-month-old Punch the monkey, he was finally accepted into the troop. His new 'bodyguard,; Onsinger' is seen hugging him

Six-month-old Punch the monkey, he was finally accepted into the troop. His new 'bodyguard' Onsinger is seen hugging him

The two are practically inseparable, with Onsinger even helping Punch climb up the rocky incline

The two are practically inseparable, with Onsinger even helping Punch climb up the rocky incline

Onsinger sitting to the left of another adult macaque, he is gripping Punch in a comforting tight embrace

Onsinger sitting to the left of another adult macaque, he is gripping Punch in a comforting tight embrace

 

The sweet pair is seen rocking back-and-forth slightly, in a comforting snuggle of love. 

Punch initially melted hearts worldwide when footage of him clinging forlornly to zookeepers and his stuffed orangutan toy was shared.

Because infant monkeys instinctively cling to their mothers from birth and he was rejected from his mother, staff offered Punch blankets and soft toys to ease his anxiety. 

He quickly chose the plush orangutan and has barely let go since. 

Viral videos showed Punch hugging the toy as he sleeps, wrapping his arms around it and burying his face into the fabric. 

In other clips, he can be seen clutching it protectively while cautiously approaching other young macaques.

The baby monkey was raised in an artificial environment after being born in July, and began training to rejoin his troop last month.

But videos circulated showing Punch being bullied by other monkeys at the zoo, with one adult scolding and dragging him. 

 

Other clips show Punch clinging tightly to the stuffed orangutan for comfort, as he used the stuffed today for companionship

Other clips show Punch clinging tightly to the stuffed orangutan for comfort, as he used the stuffed today for companionship

The baby monkey became an internet sensation, and has attracted hundreds of visitors to the Ichikawa City Zoo, in Ichikawa Japan

The baby monkey became an internet sensation, and has attracted hundreds of visitors to the Ichikawa City Zoo, in Ichikawa Japan

Punch drags a stuffed orangutan across the enclosure, he struggled to jive with the troop, but now has found a forever friend

Punch drags a stuffed orangutan across the enclosure, he struggled to jive with the troop, but now has found a forever friend

 

The zoo issued a statement asking fans to 'support Punch's efforts' to socialize, noting that his troop has not shown any serious aggression. 

'While Punch is scolded [by other monkeys], he shows mental strength and resilience,' it said. 

The trending hashtag #HangInTherePunch exploded, drawing hundreds of visitors to the zoo. 

More than 100 visitors have gathered around the zoo's monkey enclosure, straining to take photos and shouting 'hang in there!' as Punch tried to approach others in the troop. 

Now Punch has a fairy-tale ending with a forever friend by his side, letting fans breathe a sigh of relief for the once-lonely little macaque. 

HERZOG SHOULD SUE THE SUPREME SHIT OUT OF ASSHOLE TUCKER CARLSON, HIS LAME EXCUSE NOTWITHSTANDING

Tucker Carlson forced to apologize to Israel's president for implying he went to Epstein's pedo island

 

By Eliot Force 

 

Daily Mail

Feb 22, 2026

 

 

Celebrity journalist Tucker Carlson apologized for implying that Israel's president visited Jeffrey Epstein's island during an interview. Carlson is pictured in his apology video

Celebrity journalist Tucker Carlson apologized for implying that Israel's president visited Jeffrey Epstein's island during an interview. Carlson is pictured in his apology video

 

Tucker Carlson apologized for implying that Israel's president visited Jeffrey Epstein's 'pedo island' in a video posted to X on Saturday.

Carlson, the former FOX News host and celebrity journalist, made the suggestion during an interview with US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, which was released on Friday.

In a two-minute video that has received 1.5 million views in less than 24 hours, Carlson said that he received a 'long letter' from Israeli President Isaac Herzog's office, 'denying unequivocally that he had any contact with Epstein, ever.'

'I've gotten a lot of letters like this over the years from people alleging, "oh you got it wrong," but rarely do you get a denial this unequivocal,' Carlson said. 

'So for that reason, we are taking it seriously. There's nothing worse than impugning the reputation of an innocent man,' the journalist continued. 'So I just want to say, clearly, I'm sorry to imply that I knew something I didn't know.'

The Israeli president's office sent the letter after Carlson had asked Huckabee about an email in the Epstein files that said someone named 'Herzog' was going to Epstein's infamous island, Little Saint James. 

'The current president of Israel, whom I know you know, apparently was at "pedo island." That’s what it says,' Carlson told Huckabee during the two-hour interview. 

'Still-living, high-level Israeli officials are directly implicated in Epstein’s life, if not his crimes, so I think you’d be following this.'

 

Carlson said he asked about Israeli President Isaac Herzog (pictured) visiting Epstein's island, because an email in the Epstein files suggested he did so

Carlson said he asked about Israeli President Isaac Herzog (pictured) visiting Epstein's island, because an email in the Epstein files suggested he did so

Carlson referred to Epstein's pictured, infamous island of Little Saint James as 'pedo island' during the interview

Carlson referred to Epstein's pictured, infamous island of Little Saint James as 'pedo island' during the interview

 

The ambassador to Israel immediately replied that the claim was untrue. 

Carlson also referred to a false report made by The Times reporter Gabrielle Weiniger, who had recently posted a doctored photo of Herzog with Epstein. The reporter later corrected her mistake and said the photo was an 'AI fake.'

In his apology video, Carlson explained that the email he had asked Huckabee about was dated to 2014, and it was sent by Epstein to his friend Leon Black, the former CEO of Apollo Global Management.

In that email, Carlson said, Black was invited to Little Saint James and was told that other people, including someone named Herzog, would be there. 

Carlson said he asked Huckabee about the email twice, but the ambassador denied knowledge of it.

The celebrity journalist said: 'At the time I said that, there had been news items about this. In fact, there was a protest against Herzog on the basis of this email when he went to Australia recently, and he hadn't responded to any of that.'

Carlson concluded his apology video by saying: 'I also wanted to air his side of this. Again, President Herzog says he's never had any contact with Epstein, ever, and so I just want to say that in the interest of honesty and transparency.' 

Although Carlson was forced to apologize for some of his questions during the interview with Huckabee, the ambassador to Israel was criticized for comments he made as well. 

 

Carlson's interview was with the US Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee (pictured). The interview was published on Friday, and Huckabee denied Carlson's suggestion

Carlson's interview was with the US Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee (pictured). The interview was published on Friday, and Huckabee denied Carlson's suggestion

In his apology video, Carlson said he regularly receives letters alleging that he got something wrong, but 'but rarely do you get a denial this unequivocal'

In his apology video, Carlson said he regularly receives letters alleging that he got something wrong, but 'but rarely do you get a denial this unequivocal'

Herzog's office sent Carlson a letter that claimed the Israeli president did not know Epstein at all and that they never even spoke. Epstein is pictured in a photo released by the Justice Department in December

Herzog's office sent Carlson a letter that claimed the Israeli president did not know Epstein at all and that they never even spoke. Epstein is pictured in a photo released by the Justice Department in December

Carlson explained that he asked about the email suggesting Herzog had visited Little Saint James because it was in the news and had even sparked a protest in Australia. A moment from that protest is pictured

Carlson explained that he asked about the email suggesting Herzog had visited Little Saint James because it was in the news and had even sparked a protest in Australia. A moment from that protest is pictured

 

Carlson stated that, according to the Bible, the descendants of Abraham are entitled to land that today encompasses much of the Middle East.

In response to whether Israel had a right to that land, Huckabee said: 'It would be fine if they took it all'.

He added that Israel was not seeking to expand its territory and has a right to maintain security on the land it legitimately holds.

'We're talking about this land that Israel, the state of Israel, now lives in and wants to have peace in. They're not trying to take over Jordan. They're not trying to take over Syria,' Huckabee said. 

Despite that clarification, the ambassador's words drew rebukes from Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation and the League of Arab States.

The interview came amidst rising tensions between the US and Iran, with the two countries now on a war footing. 

The US has sent more than 60 attack aircraft to a military base in Jordan, satellite images showed on Friday. The fleet is triple the size that is normally stationed there.

Another US fleet was also seen at a Portuguese air base on Saturday.

 

Carlson's interview with Huckabee came amidst rising tensions between the US, Israel and Iran. The US has sent more than 60 attack aircraft to a military base in Jordan. Military aircraft at a Jordan airbase from an earlier date are pictured

Carlson's interview with Huckabee came amidst rising tensions between the US, Israel and Iran. The US has sent more than 60 attack aircraft to a military base in Jordan. Military aircraft at a Jordan airbase from an earlier date are pictured

Satellite images from January revealed the large buildup of aircraft at the Jordanian air base. President Trump has threatened to strike Iran in the coming days

Satellite images from January revealed the large buildup of aircraft at the Jordanian air base. President Trump has threatened to strike Iran in the coming days 

 

The US, Israel and Iran have been at odds before, including last year's 12-day war, when the US and Israel bombed key nuclear and military sites in Iran.

Donald Trump has alluded to striking Iran again in the coming days, telling reporters on Friday that he was considering military action to pressure Iranian officials to negotiate the terms of the country's nuclear program.

TRUMP'S IRAN WAR DILEMMA

Iran strike or electoral survival: the political clock pressing down on Trump

From a Supreme Court tariff blow to Epstein anger among young voters, a convergence of domestic pressures is forcing the White House to weigh military action against the political cost of getting it wrong.

 

 
Israel Hayom
Feb 22, 2026
 
 
        Ben Jennings on Donald Trump’s dilemma over the Israel-Iran conflict – cartoon, panel 1


Washington's political establishment has been tracking every hint from the White House about a possible strike on Iran. President Donald Trump has signaled he is weighing further military steps, but behind the scenes, pressure has been building – both from within the administration and from his own electorate – to avoid sliding into a broad war that could shake the political landscape eight months before the November midterms.
 

The fear of losing Congress

President Donald Trump is at a particularly delicate juncture vis-à-vis Congress, because Republican control of it hinges on a slim margin of seats to begin with. As of now, Republicans hold a relatively narrow majority of 218 seats against 214 Democrats, with three vacant seats set to be filled in special elections in 2026 – a dynamic that could narrow their advantage even further. On top of that, three Republican members occasionally vote against Trump's agenda on certain issues, which tightens the margin still more.

Historically, the president's party almost always loses seats in the midterms, and sometimes even control of one of the two chambers – a pattern that has recurred in recent decades and made it harder for presidents to advance their agenda in the final years of their term.

For Trump, the risk is not only legislative but personal: losing Republican control of the House could reopen the door to impeachment proceedings. Trump himself had warned previously that Democrats "are just waiting to return to power to launch another witch hunt" against him, following the two impeachment attempts he faced during his first term.

According to a Pew Research Center poll conducted at the end of January, the approval rating among Republicans and Republican-leaning voters stands at 73%. That represents a notable drop from the start of his second term, when the figure was around 84%, though it still reflects a clear majority within the Republican camp.

By comparison, the same poll found that among the general public the approval rating stands at 37%, and among Democrats and their supporters at just 5% – figures that illustrate how Trump's support base has remained almost exclusively Republican, amid deep partisan polarization.

Fox News cited Republican strategists as noting that a decision to strike Iran "carries domestic political risks heading into the midterms, where voters are far more concerned about the economy than about foreign conflicts" – precisely against this backdrop.

 

Congress 
 

The cost of living front and center

Growth figures for 2025 showed a 2.2% expansion in GDP – a respectable pace, though slightly slower than the previous year. Yet according to recent YouGov data, 24% of Republicans and 23% of all respondents identify inflation and prices as the most important issue facing the US today, placing it at the top of the national priority list.

According to a USA Today report, Republican members of Congress have been urging Trump to convey empathy for "grocery bills, rent, and prescription drugs." Fox News warned that a prolonged confrontation and disruption to the Strait of Hormuz could spike energy prices and hurt consumers already anxious about inflation.

The tariff crisis and the Supreme Court shock

The political backdrop grew more complicated still following the Supreme Court ruling on Friday, which struck down most of the tariffs Trump had imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, known as IEEPA.

The ruling, led by Chief Justice Roberts, determined that tariff authority rests with Congress – and dealt a blow to a central tool Trump had sought to use to fund his economic agenda. Against this backdrop, opening a new military front could be perceived as a dangerous distraction.

The Epstein affair and anger among younger voters

Adding to the equation is the Jeffrey Epstein affair. A New York Times report described how young Republicans are frustrated with the administration's handling of the document release, viewing it as a "betrayal."

The poll cited in the article found that more than a third of young Republican men consider the opposition to full disclosure of the files to be "very concerning." When that anger intersects with the cost of living, it creates a sense of disconnect between the populist base and the leadership.

In the middle of an election cycle, the White House can ill afford yet another source of erosion among a young audience that turned out in force in 2024.

 

US President Donald Trump (L), First Lady Melania Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, and 
Ghislaine Maxwell (R), at a party at Mar-a-Lago, 2000 
 

Trump voters and the aversion to "endless wars"

Trump was re-elected in 2024 on a promise to avoid "endless wars." The Washington Post reported that last year prominent figures in the MAGA camp warned against sliding into a broad war with Iran, arguing that the base has no interest in further military entanglements. While some of those voices quieted after the limited strikes in the summer, the fear of a prolonged campaign has remained.

At the same time, Reuters reported that Trump's advisers have been pushing him to train his attention on voters' economic worries ahead of November's midterms. A senior White House official acknowledged that despite the president's combative rhetoric, the administration has reached no consensus on military action against Iran. At a closed-door briefing last week attended by several senior administration members, those present were told that the economy is the central election issue – according to a source in the room. Trump himself was absent.

Republican strategist Rob Godfrey was unsparing in his assessment. A prolonged standoff with Iran, he said, would pose a real political threat to Trump and the party. "The president must remember that the base that carried him through three consecutive campaigns is deeply wary of military involvement abroad – ending the era of 'endless wars' was an explicit campaign promise of his," Godfrey said. For all the internal dissent, many in Trump's MAGA movement backed the operation that pushed Venezuela's president out of power last month.

Iran, however, is a far harder problem than Venezuela – militarily and diplomatically – and a war could generate real resistance from the very base Trump needs to hold together.

Republican strategist Lauren Cooley offered a narrower opening. Trump supporters could back military action against Iran, she said, but only if it were swift and decisive. "The White House will need to link any action directly to defending America's security and economic stability," she said. A White House official added that Trump "has made clear he always prefers diplomacy, and that Iran must close a deal before it is too late," and that the president has repeatedly stressed that Iran "cannot possess nuclear weapons or the capacity to build them, and must not enrich uranium."

A late-January Politico poll put support for US military action against Iran at 50% among Trump's 2024 voters – the highest figure for any target covered in the survey. Among self-identified Trump supporters and MAGA Republicans, that number climbs to 61%. But Amy Walter, editor of the Cook Political Report, drew a critical distinction: Trump's supporters differentiate sharply between targeted strikes and open-ended wars of the Iraq-and-Afghanistan kind. A limited operation, in their framing, is not a "war" – it is a contained military action. "If he were to say tomorrow that we're sending troops to the Middle East or putting boots on the ground in Venezuela, that's the kind of thing that could blow apart the coalition," she said.

 
         uss gerald r. ford cvn-78 aircraft carrier cvw-8 2026 166

The USS Gerald R. Ford 
 

The internal Republican rift over Israel

Running alongside all of this is a fracture inside the Republican tent over Israel. The New York Times described how "a rift over Israel is tearing MAGA apart," with prominent voices including Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens mounting sharp attacks on unconditional support for the Jewish state.

A December 2025 poll from the Manhattan Institute laid bare the divide. A solid majority of longtime Republican voters still regard Israel as a key US ally. But among "new Republicans" – younger or more recently registered party members – the picture is considerably more complicated. Roughly 24% of this group view Israel as a burden on the United States. Only about 39% call it an important ally. The poll also found that roughly 17% of Republicans overall hold a cluster of views classified as "antisemitic," including conspiracy theories and the belief that Israel pulls America into wars that do not serve American interests.

The State of the Union: the moment of reckoning

All of these pressures converge Tuesday evening – Wednesday morning, Israel time – when Trump delivers the State of the Union before a joint session of Congress. It will be the first formal State of the Union of his second term. The address he gave in March 2025, just weeks into the new administration, was a joint session speech rather than a formal State of the Union.

That speech ran for one hour and forty minutes. Trump declared that "America's golden age has only just begun," promising economic relief for working families, lower energy prices, and a tariff policy to power his economic vision. Nearly a year later, the picture looks different. The Supreme Court has struck down that tariff policy. Inflation remains the issue voters rank highest. His overall approval rating has hit a low.

Congressional Republicans are watching closely to see which version of Trump takes the podium – the one who tells the country everything is on track, or the one who shows he understands the real pressures bearing down on ordinary voters. An address that leans into further military confrontation risks reading as a leader out of touch with everyday anxieties. A balanced message – one that sidesteps any commitment to a prolonged war and keeps the emphasis squarely on American interests – could go a long way toward steadying the base.

ISRAEL IS PREPARING FOR A US WAR WITH IRAN

Israel’s courage between normal life and a looming war

Jerusalem continues its daily routine while preparing quietly for a possible confrontation with Iran. 

 

By Fiamma Nirenstein  

 

JNS

Feb 21, 2026

 

 

overhead shot of two american aircraft carriers along with fleet of other navy ships

Trump is amassing a huge military strike force in the Middle East for an attack on Iran
 

Everyone in Israel asks the same question. Not analysts or generals, but friends, relatives, colleagues and interviewers—anyone who cares enough to ask honestly: when will the war with Iran begin?

The only truthful answer is that no one knows. Yet almost everyone in Israel believes it will happen.

This is not prophecy; it is deduction. The United States does not reposition major naval strike groups, rare reconnaissance aircraft, refueling fleets and thousands of troops across the globe for diplomatic theater alone. Nor does Iran continue arming proxies, rebuilding missile arsenals and advancing its nuclear program to pave the way for a compromise at the final moment.

The decision point is approaching.

U.S. President Donald Trump, who signalled that he would decide on whether to pursue diplomacy or war in 10 to 15 days, has begun framing the confrontation not only strategically, but morally. On Friday, he stated for the first time that 32,000 people were killed by the Iranian regime during a recent crackdown on anti-government protests, calling it “very, very, very sad,” and indicating that failure to reach a fair agreement could justify military action. 

If diplomacy collapses, Iran will strike where it believes deterrence is most sensitive: Israel, together with American bases in the region.

Israelis understand this equation without drama. Eight months ago, in June 2025, ballistic missiles already demonstrated the scenario. Not theory—memory.

The next round would likely be broader.

And yet Israel is not frozen in anticipation. It is functioning in routine. Families prepare quietly before sleep—water near the door, jackets for shelters, radios on. Children ask whether the night will be quiet, and parents answer with the only honest word available: hopefully.

The army repeats readiness without extraordinary instructions. Schools open, restaurants fill, airports operate normally and supermarkets remain stocked. Television discusses weddings, small businesses started by reservists returning from service, ordinary life continuing under extraordinary circumstances.

This is not denial. It is experience.

For centuries, Jews faced destruction without the capacity to prevent it. Today they possess layered defenses—Iron Dome, David’s Sling, Arrow, Patriot and soon laser interception—a shield that changes not fear but expectation.

Israel’s leadership, therefore, confronts a familiar but existential calculation. If Iran launches an attack, Israel absorbs and responds. If intelligence reveals an imminent strategic attack, Israel may have to strike first. A regime built on apocalyptic ideology may gamble everything when threatened; hesitation could be fatal.

What is remarkable is not only military preparedness but civilian resilience. Any other country expecting heavy missile fire would empty markets and halt daily life. In Israel, people postpone trips, not existence.

The Jewish people reacts to danger as it has for millennia: living, studying, arguing, building families—but now with sovereignty and an army capable of defense. As Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, the Israeli military is ready for any scenario.

Israel may soon face the most dangerous confrontation in decades. Yet it will face it not as a society paralyzed by fear, but as one that continues to function while waiting with courage.

For most of Jewish history, threat meant helplessness. Today, any threat against the Jewish state meets readiness—and that alone marks a revolution in history.

BUT CARLSON'S FOLLOWERS ARE OVERJOYED IN WHAT THEY SAW AS HIM WIPING THE FLOOR WITH HUCKABEE

Mike Huckabee handles Tucker Carlson’s ‘Gish Gallop’ with grace

In the interview-gone-viral with his former “Fox News” colleague, the U.S. ambassador to Israel was uncannily unflappable. 

 

By Ruthie Blum 

 

JNS

Feb 22, 2026

 

 

 Mike Huckabee and Tucker Carlson.

Mike Huckabee and Tucker Carlson
 

As expected, U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee wiped the floor with Tucker Carlson—the “floor” in question being that of Ben-Gurion International Airport’s VIP lounge, since the hero of the woke right never actually ventured beyond the Tel Aviv terminal during his quick in-and-out publicity stunt.

Carlson’s method throughout the two-and-a-half-hour interview—conducted on Feb. 18 and aired on Feb. 20—was textbook “Gish Gallop”: a torrent of half-truths, selective history and outright falsehoods, frequently packing multiple allegations into a single question.

The aim of the interview from Carlson’s perspective wasn’t journalistic illumination, of course. The goal was to exhaust and push Huckabee into a defensive position.

Huckabee’s discipline lay in declining the trap. Instead of chasing every dart, he elegantly rejected the framing.

Before the sit-down was broadcast, Carlson appended a lengthy, pre-recorded prologue, complaining not only that he and his crew had been detained and interrogated by Israeli airport security, but that those who blasted him on social media for purposeful distortion were simply trying to defame him.

It was a ridiculous tantrum on his part, since anybody who enters Israel, including Huckabee, faces routine questions about the purpose of the trip. Nevertheless, Carlson made standard procedures and passport screening sound like evidence of Israeli paranoia and suppression. Typical Tucker.

Ditto for his portrayal of Israel as thuggish before Huckabee even appeared on screen, leaving the ambassador no choice but to refute the intro, post-interview, on X.

As for the content of the one-on-one itself: Since it’s impossible to list every outrageous assertion by Carlson framed disingenuously as a query, or to recap Huckabee’s fact-based replies, let’s zero in on the topic preoccupying the minds of most Israelis at the moment—a potential U.S. strike on the Islamic Republic.

In this segment, Huckabee’s composure was particularly notable. You know, considering Carlson’s warped worldview and equally egregious formulation of it.

This involved layering insinuations about Jerusalem’s manipulation of Washington, casting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a puppet master nudging America toward war with and regime change in Iran for the Jewish state’s benefit.

Huckabee refused to stoop to Carlson’s level or let himself get ruffled by being interrupted repeatedly. Instead, he pivoted to Tehran’s record: 47 years of chanting “Death to America,” the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ terror footprint around the globe and a documented history of targeting Americans.

By anchoring the exchange in Islamist conduct, Huckabee stripped the argument to its essentials. For instance, asked by Carlson what it cost the United States to “move the fleet off Iran into the Persian Gulf,” the ambassador replied, “A lot less than it would to bury a lot of Americans if [the ayatollahs] ever got a long-range ballistic missile. A lot less.”

He also pointed out that if Carlson cares so much about America, he should be concerned that Iran’s proxies are already “deeply embedded” in the Western Hemisphere.

This back-and-forth was among many fronts in the rhetorical battlefield of Carlson’s crazed conspiracy-theory arena, however. It might even have been the sanest section of the Q&A.

The looniest was his casting of aspersions on the authenticity of Netanyahu’s Jewish roots, since the prime minister’s family hails from Eastern Europe, and his sneering suggestion that Israelis might need DNA tests to prove their biblical connection to the land.

Other jibes were just as jaw-dropping, beginning with his impugning of a brief meeting Huckabee had with Jonathan Pollard after the death of the latter’s wife; declaring that Jeffrey Epstein was known to be connected with the Mossad (adding a lie about Israeli President Isaac Herzog having been a guest on the pedophile’s island—for which he later apologized but may still be sued); citing fabricated statistics about Israel’s persecution of Christians; and besmirching Israel Defense Forces behavior in Gaza. Oh, and insisting that Israel provide free abortions courtesy of U.S. aid.

It’s no wonder, then, that Carlson, who’s built a following among Israel-bashing antisemites, remains a groyper favorite.

It has to be said, though, that Huckabee knew what he was in for with Carlson. The pair had been sparring publicly on social media, which led to Huckabee’s challenging his former Fox News colleague to “come talk to me, instead of about me.” 

Because of Huckabee’s naturally cheerful demeanor and impeccable manners, the interview concluded on a cordial note, with his extending an invitation to Carlson to return to Israel and attend his church. It was a magnanimous gesture, to be sure.

But the rest of us would prefer that Tucker Carlson never darken our doorstep—or VIP lounge—again.

BARBADOS: A PLACE OF REFUGE FOR JEWS FLEEING PERSECUTION BY CATHOLICS

Little island, long memory: Barbados and Jews

Eager to develop the area economically, the English were willing to tolerate Jewish settlement in ways Catholic empires rarely were. 

 

By Michael Freund 

 

JNS

Feb 21, 2026

 

 

Bridgetown, the capital of the island of Barbados, 1914. Credit: Nationaal Museum van Wereldculturen, The Netherlands via Wikimedia Commons.

Bridgetown, the capital of the island of Barbados, 1914. 
 

A whole host of places in the Diaspora Jewish historical imagination loom large: Berlin, Vilna, Warsaw, Marrakech and others. And then there are places that seem, at first glance, unlikely repositories of Jewish history: remote, sun-drenched outposts where the past unfolded far from the great centers of power.

Barbados is one of them.

This small Caribbean island, just 166 square miles in size and home to fewer than 300,000 people, sits closer to Venezuela than to Florida. Palm trees sway as winds blow gently, and tourists arrive seeking sand and surf. Yet beneath the postcard serenity lies an often overlooked chapter in the Jewish story—one that speaks not only of exile and survival, but of ingenuity, resilience and the quiet shaping of the modern world.

The Jewish presence in Barbados dates back to the mid-17th century, possibly as early as the late 1620s and certainly established by the mid-17th century. Its origins lie in one of the most traumatic upheavals of Jewish history: the Iberian expulsions.

Amid Spain’s expulsion of its Jews in 1492 and Portugal’s forcible conversion of 1497, many Jews became conversos—outwardly Christian but secretly Jewish. For generations, they lived double lives under the shadow of the Inquisition, always searching for a place where they could finally breathe as Jews again.

Some found it across the Atlantic.

By the 1650s, a group of Sephardic Jews—many of them refugees from Dutch Brazil after the Portuguese reconquest in 1654—made their way to Barbados, then an English colony. The English, eager to develop the island economically, were willing to tolerate Jewish settlement in ways Catholic empires rarely were. And so, in a world that offered Jews few safe harbors, Barbados became one.

They did not arrive as passive victims of history. They arrived as builders.

The Jews of Barbados contributed important commercial and technical knowledge, drawn from experience in Brazil, to the development of the island’s sugar economy. In doing so, they participated in the economic model that would define the Caribbean for centuries. These former refugees became agents of economic transformation in a new land, not through conquest but through knowledge.

In 1654, they established the Nidhe Israel synagogue, among the oldest in the Western Hemisphere, in Bridgetown, the capital of Barbados. For generations, its walls witnessed Jewish life unfolding thousands of miles from Europe: weddings and brit milahs, prayers for rain and for peace, merchants discussing trade routes alongside rabbis discussing Torah.

 

nidhe israel synagogue barbados.JPGNidhe Israel Synagogue in Bridgetown, the capital of the island of Barbados, in 2016.  

 

Here was a Jewish community living openly, legally and confidently in the Americas decades before Jewish emancipation in Europe, reaching nearly 300 people by the late 1600s, and peaking at around 800, about 4% of the white population, by the mid-18th century.

Barbados offered something rare in Jewish history: normalcy.

Jews owned property. They traded internationally. They were not confined to ghettos. They could bury their dead in consecrated ground without fear that gravestones would be smashed overnight. Their cemetery, with Hebrew inscriptions weathered by centuries of salt air, remains a silent testimony to lives lived with dignity in an era when such dignity was often denied elsewhere.

And yet the story did not end on the island’s shores.

From Barbados, Jews moved onward to Suriname, Curaçao, Jamaica, and eventually, North America. In this way, the island became a bridge between Sephardic exile and American Jewish life. Some of the earliest Jewish commercial networks in the New World passed right through Bridgetown’s harbor before stretching toward Newport, R.I.; Charleston, S.C.; and New York.

It is not an exaggeration to say that a part of American Jewish history began in Barbados.

By the 20th century, however, the once-thriving community had dwindled, affected by shifting trade patterns and emigration, leading to the synagogue’s sale in 1928. Then history intervened once more.

As Nazi persecution tightened its grip on European Jewry in the 1930s, doors across the world slammed shut. Immigration quotas hardened, conferences produced sympathy, but few visas, and desperate families searched maps for any place, no matter how small, that would admit them as human beings rather than statistics.

In that dark hour, Barbados again became a refuge.

Beginning in the late 1930s, starting with arrivals like Moses Altman in 1931, the island admitted a modest number of Jewish refugees, primarily from Germany, Austria and Poland, including about 40 Polish Jewish families totaling 100 to 120 people by 1941. They arrived stripped of professions and property—doctors forbidden to heal, lawyers forbidden to practice, shopkeepers robbed of livelihood. They did not come to build fortunes; they came to escape annihilation.

The British colonial authorities imposed restrictions, and some refugees were initially classified as “enemy aliens,” a bitter irony for victims of Hitler. Yet they were alive. No deportation trains reached Bridgetown. No ghettos were sealed there. Children went to school, families prayed again, and German accents joined English and Bajan voices in the streets.

The island that had once sheltered Jews fleeing the Inquisition now sheltered Jews fleeing Auschwitz.

It did not save thousands. It saved dozens.

But Jewish history is not measured only in numbers. Every visa in the 1940s preserved a private universe: families, descendants and futures that would otherwise have been murdered. Some refugees later moved on to America or Israel; others remained, adding their memories to a community already centuries old.

Thus, Barbados became something extraordinary: a meeting point of two exiles, Sephardic and European, separated by 400 years but united by the same search for safety.

Today, the Jewish community in Barbados is tiny, numbering fewer than 100. For a time, the synagogue stood abandoned, reclaimed by sand and memory. But history has a way of resurfacing, sometimes literally.

When the site was excavated in 2008, archaeologists uncovered a mikvah buried beneath centuries of earth, its steps descending into still water, waiting. Dating to roughly 1650 to 1654 and fed by a natural spring, it is believed to be among the oldest ritual baths in the Americas. Nearby lies the synagogue cemetery, where roughly 400 graves—many from the 17th century, etched in Hebrew and worn by salt and time—form one of the earliest Jewish burial grounds in the Western Hemisphere.

 

 Nidhe Israel Synagogue Cemetery in Barbados 

The Jewish cemetery in Bridgetown, the capital of Barbados, in 2011. 

 

In recent decades, the synagogue has been restored, the cemetery preserved and the story retold as part of a UNESCO-protected World Heritage historic district. Visitors now walk its grounds and discover something quietly profound: Jewish history is not confined to the great capitals. It lives wherever Jews carried Torah, memory and stubborn hope.

Barbados reminds us that Jewish survival has never depended solely on numbers or power. Sometimes, it depended on trade winds, on tolerance born of economic pragmatism and on refugees who refused to surrender their identity.

We often imagine Jewish history as a march across continents driven only by catastrophe. But occasionally, it is also a story of opportunity, of communities that flourished in unexpected places and, in doing so, helped shape the modern Jewish world.

On a coral island in the Caribbean, Jews found freedom centuries before emancipation reached Europe, and refuge when Europe collapsed into barbarism. They built institutions, forged commerce and preserved tradition. And from that unlikely shore, their legacy quietly flowed outward into the Americas.

The beaches of Barbados may erase footprints within minutes. But the Jewish imprint there has lasted for nearly hundreds of years and is still going strong.