Tuesday, June 09, 2020

ABOLISH THE POLICE, BRING IN THE SOCIAL WORKERS

Minneapolis mayor and Trump face off against city vote to DISBAND 'toxic' 800-strong police force in wake of George Floyd death - after Ilhan Omar led rally calling it 'rotten-to-root cancer' 

 

Daily Mail 

June 8, 2020

 

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey on Monday balked at claims made by city council members that they vowed to dismantle the police department as President Trump weighed in on the increasing number of cities that are reducing funding to police departments amid growing national outcry over police brutality. 

 

On Sunday, officials including Ilhan Omar and the son of the Attorney General prosecuting the four cops responsible for Floyd's death - signed a pledge vowing to take it apart. They spoke to protesters at Powderhorn Park in Minneapolis and revealed their 'reimagining' of the police force. 

 

No actual vote has taken place yet. The officials at the rally said they had enough votes on the council though to secure a majority.

 

Rep. Omar led the calls to disband it. 
 
'I will never stop saying not only do we need to disinvest in police but we need to completely dismantle the Minneapolis Police Department.  The Minneapolis Police Department is rotten to the root. And so when we dismantle it we get rid of that cancer and allow for something beautiful to rise and that reimagining allows us to figure out what public safety looks like for us.'

 

By law, Minneapolis must maintain a police force of at least 723 police officers. It currently has some 800. To completely get rid of the department, the city charter would have to be amended - which would require a public vote or the full approval of all 13 council members, including the mayor. 

 

Mayor Frey appeared on Good Morning America to say he would not support the plan to disband the department and that he wanted to know exactly what the council had in mind. 'Am I for entirely abolishing the police department? No, I'm not.' 

 

Trump also weighed in with a tweet saying 'LAW & ORDER, NOT DEFUND AND ABOLISH THE POLICE. The Radical Left Democrats have gone Crazy!' 

WHILE NOBODY WAS LOOKING SENILE JOE GRABBED THE SMALL BRASS RING

by Bob Walsh

Last week Senile Joe the Hairsniffer got enough delegates to snag the Democrat-Socialist nomination for El Presidente.  Assuming he doesn't stroke out before then and assuming his delegates don't abandon him.  (The Faithless Elector legal action is currently before SCOTUS and a ruling should come out in a few weeks.)

It is still not real obvious who his Number Two is going to be.  I really do think that Amy Klobuchar is now out of the running.  I have serious doubts about Kamala Harris being competitive.   Stacy Abrams checks many of the boxes, but she is an idiot.  That, in and of itself, may not be an issue with many voters under normal conditions, but considering Senile Joe's situation this could be the most significant VP pick since FDR got rid of Henry Wallace and tapped Harry Truman.  Pocahontas maybe?  

You can almost smell the blood and see the elbows being thrown.  Ain't politics grand? 

CA IS LOOKING AT A HARD DEADLINE

by Bob Walsh

The legislature of the formerly great state of California has one week to pass a budget to the governor.  In years gone by that was routinely ignored.  However, after a general disgust by the taxpayers, a few years back a law was passed that cuts the pay off for the legislature if they do not get the budget passed by the constitutional deadline of June 15.  That has actually happened a time or two and the rapacious bastards in the legislature do not like it when they don't get to gorge themselves at the public trough.  

The problem right now is the legislature is trying to pretend that the money fairy is going to give them a shitload of money.  Unfortunately the congress of the United States has NOT voted any sort of aid package to state governments, and is certainly NOT going to do so prior to June 15.  This leaves the greedy shits in the legislature in an awkward position.

If they have big enough balls they can simply continue to pretend Congress is going to give them buckets of money and balance their budget with that proposal.  It would be dishonest as hell, but that does not tend to bother politicians.  If they don't do that, they have to find about $54 billion from under a rock or in someone's sock drawer.  Or else they have to drag out the chain saw and axe and CUT shit.  Not trim.  Cut.  Lay off cops.  Lay off fire fighters.  Cut back on money to schools.  Cut back on hiring whores and buying booze.  We are talking serious shit here.  If the legislature actually moves to lay off civil service workers or cut their pay (it is technically difficult to cut pay) the unions may quit giving legislators money and may quit voting for them, then they will loose the best gig they will ever have or could ever hope to have.  (A lot of the members of the legislature are really fairly dumb people and the only thing they are good at is taking money and buying votes for themselves.  They have no other real skill set.)

I will try to keep you in the loop.

SHALLOW POLITICAL POSTURING OR HONEST STUPIDITY?


Maybe A Fair Measure Of Both

by Bob Walsh

On Sunday afternoon a large majority of the Minneapolis City Council announced their commitment to totally disband the police department.  (Please note that this is NOT the same thing as actually voting to do that.)

City Council President Lisa Bender stated, "Our efforts at incremental reform have failed.  Period." Pajama boy mayor Jacob Frey is opposed, but if all the psycos on the council actually do vote for it, they can override his veto.

The P D does not have the best effectiveness record in the world.  They clear about 56% of their homicides and only 22% of their rapes.  Last year they "found" 1,700 rape kits that had never been processed.  I guess they were in somebody's desk drawer.

It is unclear what, if anything, the city council wants to replace the police department with.  

The Minneapolis public schools, the Parks and Rec Department the the University of Minnesota have already acted to disassociate themselves from the Minneapolis P D.  

I am sort of reminded of the recent vote by the city council in Seattle to fuck over Amazon by charging them a huge "fee" for the employment of their workers in their fair city.  Amazon said FUCK YOU, WE'RE LEAVING.  The city council "rethought" their position (meaning they pissed all over themselves) at the thought of Amazon leaving.  I wonder what will happen when (not if) businesses figure out that they have essentially zero police protection.  Perhaps their tax base will disappear in a puff of smoke and the city will collapse of it's own collective stupidity.

Maybe I am just a bad person, but I would like to see it happen.  Then see what these social justice warriors and virtue signalling assholes do.

'THE TRUE AMERICAN DREAM' WILL COST COP HER JOB

Brooklyn court officer suspended over post depicting Obama and Hillary ‘lynching’ 

 

A Brooklyn court officer was suspended and is under investigation for allegedly posting images that depict the lynchings of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, The Post has learned.

Sgt. Terri Pinto Napolitano’s gun was taken away and she was referred to the state court system’s inspector general for an investigation over the post on her Facebook page over the weekend, which shows doctored images of the former president and former secretary of state.

Titled “The True American Dream,” the post shows Obama hanging from a rope, with the words “We Will Not Yield” and “Your day is coming TRAITOR!”

The second photo appears to show Clinton as she is walked to the gallows by seven people, with the words “IT’S NOT OVER TILL THE FAT LADY SWINGS.”

The post, which has since been deleted, drew a sharp rebuke Saturday from New York Chief Judge Janet DiFiore.

“This conduct is abhorrent, by anyone, at any time, and under any circumstances,” DiFiore wrote to court system personnel. “But at this critical moment in our history — when our nation is reeling from the death of George Floyd and its aftermath — it is a sickening and unpardonable offense against every colleague in our court system, as well as the vast and diverse public we serve.”

“We assure you that we have already begun the process and will take every step within our power so that this conduct is condemned and punished appropriately.”

A spokesman for the state Office of Court Administration told The Post Sunday that “Sgt. Napolitano has been suspended for 30 days” and “had her gun taken” pending the inspector general’s review.

She was most recently assigned to Brooklyn Criminal Court, sources said.
Napolitano could not be reached for comment Sunday.

But the controversy drew the ire of some of the sergeant’s colleagues.

“She’s a disgrace,” said one court officer who worked with Napolitano in the past. “Absolutely. You’re going to boroughs where minorities are trying to move ahead and you disgrace the shield. She should be fired.”

A SOLUTION TO INCOME INEQUITY: DEFUND WHITES AND GIVE THE MONEY TO BLACKS

Behind virus and protests: A chronic US economic racial gap

 

By Paul Wiseman 

 

Associated Press

June 8, 2020

 

WASHINGTON — The United States has been here before, staring into the deep chasm that divides white and black Americans. 

It happened after cities burned in 1967, after Los Angeles erupted with the 1992 acquittal of police officers who beat Rodney King, after the 2014 police killing of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri.

After those upheavals came talk of change — of reforming policing, yes, but also of expanding economic opportunity to black Americans who have been disproportionately left behind in one of the world’s richest countries. Yet despite big pledges and high hopes, economic progress has come slowly, if at all, for black America.

African Americans still earn barely 60 cents for every $1 in white income. They have 10 cents in wealth for every $1 whites own. They remain more than twice as likely to live in poverty. And they’re about as likely to own a home as they were when Richard Nixon was president.

Now, demonstrators are out in the streets again, this time to protest what happened in Minneapolis to George Floyd, dead after a police officer pressed a knee into his neck for eight minutes and 46 seconds. 

Once again, racial inequality underlies rage and despair, especially because the unrest coincides with an economic and health calamity, one that’s falling hardest, yet again, on African Americans.

“We’ve got a perfect storm,” said Cecelia Rouse, professor of economics and public affairs at Princeton University. “COVID is wreaking economic havoc” for African Americans.

Black Americans are far more likely than whites to die of COVID-19. They work disproportionately in low-paying service jobs — the ones that were slashed when restaurants and movie theaters closed as a health precaution and customers stayed away from hotels and airports.

“We’ve been blindsided by the pandemic,” said Imani Fox of the Washington community group ONE DC.

Black workers who remain employed are more likely to work as front-line workers in warehouses, grocery stores and takeout eateries — jobs that leave them exposed to the virus.

“People are mad as hell,” said Monica Lewis-Patrick, president of the community group We the People of Detroit. “We can’t be the wealthiest nation or declare ourselves the wealthiest nation in the world and still have these major inequities and disparities that are glaringly based on race.’’

Rouse said she has reread portions of the Kerner Commission report, issued in 1968 to call for reform in the wake of the urban unrest of the late ‘60s. “It was so depressing,” she said. “What has changed?’’

A month after the Kerner report, for example, Congress passed the Fair Housing Act, meant to eliminate housing discrimination. Assessing the act on its 50th anniversary two years ago, Margery Turner of the Urban Institute wrote that African Americans and other minorities continued to face discrimination, though the “most blatant″ forms of bias had declined. 

“We still live in starkly segregated neighborhoods,” she wrote, noting that the typical white Americans lives in a neighborhood that is 75% white and 8% African American; a typical black American lives in a neighborhood that is 35% white and 45% black.

The coronavirus recession is especially disheartening because African Americans finally seemed to be making headway in the aftermath of the Great Recession of 2007-2009. The unemployment rate for black Americans hit a record low last fall. And black wealth, decimated by the financial crisis of the late 2000s, had in recent years outgrown white wealth.

Then came COVID-19.

“When something goes wrong for all American workers, it’s going to disproportionately affect African Americans, who are often the most fragile in the economy,” said Democratic Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey.

Amid the anger and anguish is optimism that policymakers will use this moment to find ways to narrow the economic gap between black and white Americans. Among the hopes is that political leaders can deliver reforms to America’s economic system: Paid sick leave. A higher federal minimum wage. Perhaps even direct payments to the needy — test-run, perhaps, by the $1,200 stimulus checks the government sent to many Americans as the economy shut down in the face of the pandemic.

But the United States has had watershed moments before. And the big changes didn’t come. 

Here’s a look at America’s economic racial divide and how it has and hasn’t changed after decades of protests:

INCOME 

From 1968 to 2018, median income for black households, adjusted for inflation, rose 37% from $30,155 to $41,361. In percentage terms, that outpaced the 31% growth in household income for whites (from $51,138 to $66,943), according to the Census Bureau. But black households still earn just 62 cents for every $1 earned by white households.

The income gap remains wide even though African Americans have vastly upgraded their educational attainment: The proportion of black Americans with a high school diploma has surged from 54% in 1968 to 92% in 2018. The share with a college degree rose from 9% to 23% over that period, according to government figures compiled by the Economic Policy Institute.

Yet black people are still more than twice as likely as whites to live in poverty. Their poverty rate has dropped from 55% in 1959 to 35% in 1968 to 21% in 2018. The white rate has barely budged at around 10%. The official poverty rate may understate African Americans’ progress because it excludes the effect of non-cash government programs such as food stamps and Medicaid.

JOBS

The unemployment rate for African Americans has typically hovered around twice the rate for whites. But beginning last year, the record-breaking economic expansion that began in June 2009 had finally begun to pay off for African Americans. Their jobless rate dropped from 16.8% in March 2010 to an all-time low of 5.4% in August last year.

That progress ended abruptly once the coronavirus recession wiped out tens of millions of jobs in March and April. Black workers, disproportionately laboring in low-wage service jobs, were less likely to be among the fortunate: The office workers who could keep their jobs while working from the safety of home. African Americans were likelier to either lose their jobs or to work as essential front-line employees who are more vulnerable to the virus.

On Friday, the government issued a surprisingly upbeat jobs report for May: The national unemployment rate unexpectedly dropped from 14.7% to 13.3%. But the jobless rate for African Americans ticked up, from 16.7% to 16.8%, the level where it had been 10 years earlier. 

WEALTH 

Black Americans face an even bigger long-term problem than lagging incomes and higher unemployment. They have struggled to build wealth — home equity and investment portfolios — that could be tapped in times of need, used as collateral for loans to start a business or passed on to children.

“Income helps you pay your bills,” said Olugbenga Ajilore, senior economist at the liberal Center for American Program. “Wealth moves you from poverty to the middle class to the upper class.’’

The median black family has wealth of just $17,200 — perhaps enough to buy a car — versus $171,000 for the median white family. The wealth gap persists even for African Americans in the top 10% of U.S. incomes: Their wealth comes to $343,160, less than one-fifth of the $1.79 million for whites in the top 10%, according to government numbers compiled by the Brookings Institution.

One ongoing culprit was the housing bust of the late 2000s. Commerce Department figures compiled by the Urban Institute show that black homeownership rose from 41.8% in 1970 to 47.3% in 2000 before being swept away by the financial crisis and the ensuing recession. As of 2015, black homeownership was 41.2% — lower than it had been 45 years earlier and far below the 71.1% for whites.

In February, researchers at the Brookings Institution reported other reasons for the wealth deficit: African Americans inherit far less money than whites. Even those who become top earners are likelier than whites to fall out of the ranks of the rich. And they are more likely to have to provide financial help to friends and family.

As a Democratic presidential candidate, Sen. Booker pushed a plan for “Baby Bonds” to provide $1,000 to every American child at birth. After that, they would receive up to $2,000 a year, depending on their family income. The idea would be to create a nest egg that could eventually be used to finance a college education or buy a home.

Bradley Hardy, a professor in American University’s School of Public Affairs, said that researchers and activists are working on plans like Booker’s to narrow the divide between black and white Americans, between rich and poor.

The current protests could provide momentum for those efforts.
“It’s absolutely an opportunity,” Hardy said. “And, yes, it could be squandered.’’

GARCETTI CANNOT DENY HE CALLED COPS 'KILLERS'

LAPD union decries Garcetti’s ‘killers’ comment. He says he wasn’t talking about police 

 

By Dakota Smith and David Zahniser 

 

Los Angeles Times

June 5, 2020

 

Officials with the Los Angeles police union assailed Mayor Eric Garcetti on Friday for comments he made about cutting the LAPD budget, saying police officers have lost confidence in the mayor’s ability to lead the city after days of demonstrations.

Speaking at the First African Methodist Episcopal Church in South Los Angeles on Thursday, Garcetti said that his proposal to reduce LAPD spending and shift the savings to minority communities was getting attention from mayors across the country.

“That’s exactly the point,” he said. “It starts someplace, and we say we are going to be who we want to be, or we’re going to continue being the killers that we are.”

A Garcetti aide later told The Times that the “killers” remark referred to police agencies across the country.

The following morning, an official with the Los Angeles Police Protective League, the union that represents rank-and-file officers, accused the mayor of “political pandering” and called him “unstable.”

“He smeared every single police officer in Los Angeles and across the nation by calling us killers,” said Jamie McBride, a board member with the union.

Hours later, Garcetti said his “killers” remark wasn’t about police officers at all — but was instead a reference to society’s “collective burden” to address high mortality rates among black Angelenos.

“I absolutely did not say that about the league, about police officers,” he said. “And I won’t have those words distorted.”

The back-and-forth between the union and the mayor played out in the wake of Garcetti’s announcement that he would seek to cut up to $150 million from the Los Angeles Police Department and put the money toward funding new youth jobs, health initiatives and “peace centers” to heal trauma.

The move to scale back police spending followed days of pressure from activists, labor unions and community groups and nationwide protests against police violence, including a large demonstration outside his home, over the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis.

Union leaders said they were caught off guard by the announcements from Garcetti and council members about new cuts to the LAPD. As recently as last weekend, Garcetti gave no hint that he would consider decreasing funding when asked about the size of the police force.

McBride said his union is “honestly concerned” about the mayor’s mental health in light of the coronavirus pandemic and the protests.

“I think he should seek some help and maybe have somebody to talk to — a counselor or something — and reflect on some of his decisions,” McBride said.

Union officials also said they have no intention of reopening negotiations on their contract, which provides them with 4.8% in raises and nearly $41 million in education bonuses in the fiscal year that starts July 1.

When Garcetti ran for mayor in 2013, the union pumped about $1.5 million into the candidacy of his opponent, then-City Controller Wendy Greuel.

Garcetti and the union patched things up, and by 2016 the mayor was working with the league on a union-backed measure to change the LAPD’s disciplinary process. Last year, Garcetti and the City Council signed off on a lucrative package of raises and bonuses for officers that is expected to add $123 million to the LAPD’s budget.

LOUISIANA POLICE CHIEF ANNOUNCES OWN ARREAT

Grayson Police Chief says $3.6K in missing money was stolen from patrol car

 

By  

 

Monroe News-Star

June 5, 2020

 

Grayson Police Chief Mitch Bratton is facing two counts of obstruction of justice and one count of malfeasance in office following a Louisiana State Police investigation.

Bratton announced his arrest in a Facebook post on Thursday.

"A few weeks back, I contacted an outside agency to come look into some concerns that I had with a town employee,” Bratton said. “Today, while cooperating with the state police investigators, they charged me with obstruction of justice and malfeasance in office. 

I won't debate the validity of the charge.  I wanted to be in full disclosure.  This does not affect me being the chief of police and I intend to be as accessible as I always have while I let the criminal justice system work this issue out.”

 

A warrant filed in connection with the case details three individual complaints investigated after Bratton originally contacted LSP’s Criminal Investigation Division on May 18.

 

In an interview with LSP, Mayor Melissa Bratton told LSP she was having problems with her clerk Rosetta Mercer and suspected Mercer was stealing money. No city officials could provide documentation to support the theft allegation. They said they were suspicious because of unpaid bills. 

On May 28, Mitch Bratton contacted LSP again and said he did not see anything indicating money was missing. He said there were discrepancies with Mercer’s salary that needed to be investigated and issues with reimbursement payments not matching receipts.

Complaint 1

In an interview, Mercer told LSP Mitch Bratton received approximately $8,000 in narcotics money in 2018 and 2019 and no arrests were made. The money was provided from the village general fund in various payments.

When Mercer asked Bratton about the payments, he told her “state police” audits him, a statement the warrant labels as a lie.

Mercer also told investigators various creditors would call the office because Bratton owed them money. She claimed Bratton used his influence as police chief to intimidate creditors into leaving him alone. The creditors later confirmed Mercer’s statements as did former city officials.

Village bank records showed Bratton used approximately $7,210 in 2018 and 2019 for narcotics investigations. The warrant states no documentation or witnesses were found to support that investigations occurred.

Bratton allegedly told investigators most of this work was performed outside Grayson city limits and implied the Caldwell Parish Sheriff’s Office would have most of the documentation. When asked for evidence vault access, Bratton said he lost his key on vacation in Florida. LSP opened the vault and reported no documentation or witness statements were found.

Complaint 2

An interview regarding a second complaint investigated by LSP was conducted on June 3. A woman told state police a man’s ex-wife offered her $5,000 to frame the man on a battery charge.

The woman contacted Bratton about the offer, and he started an investigation. The warrant states he told the woman he would fake the arrest so she could obtain the $5,000 bounty. LSP obtained pictures, recordings and a private investigator report confirming a false arrest report was prepared.

The woman collected the $5,000, and Bratton allegedly told her he only needed $2,500 to prosecute the case. Per the warrant, he asked her to drop the money off in the drop box at city hall and keep the rest. A recording was made of the delivery of the funds, and the woman provided a copy of her bank statements with the $2,500 deposit.

Bratton told the parties involved he would go forward with the prosecution of all involved in the framing operation and was discussing the case with a district judge. Per the warrant, LSP has not received any information confirming Bratton communicated with a district judge.

Per the warrant, Bratton said he received the $2,500, and it was in the evidence locker. After LSP obtained a search warrant for the locker, Bratton allegedly said he placed the money on the top of his patrol unit's console, and it went missing. He also said he did not allow the woman to keep $2,500.

Complaint 3

As LSP executed a search warrant at the police department, a resident entered city hall and asked for Bratton. The resident said her boyfriend was stopped by Bratton and two Xanax bars, one suboxone tablet and $1,150 in cash were seized.

Per the arrest warrant, Bratton said he also placed this money on his console, and it went missing at the same time as the other money.

When the drugs were not located in the evidence locker, a search of Bratton’s patrol vehicle followed. Xanax and suboxone were found in the cup holder along with suspected methamphetamine and other drug paraphernalia.

Per the report, Bratton told LSP he had not conducted a criminal investigation into the missing money or reported it missing.

LSP is accusing Bratton of intentionally concealing the missing funds.
The investigation remains active and ongoing.

Editors note: It is unknown whether the police chief and the mayor are related.

NY MAYOR CAVES IN TO CALLS FOR POLICE DEFUNDING

De Blasio to shift NYPD funding to local youth groups and social services

 

Mayor Bill de Blasio has caved to calls to pull funding from the NYPD.

Hizzoner announced on Sunday that the city would reallocate an unspecified chunk of the department’s budget toward city youth groups and social services — days after dismissing demands to defund the police force, which has seen nearly 300 injured members amid recent unrest.

“Policing matters for sure, but the investments in our youth are foundational,” the mayor told reporters in a City Hall press briefing. “We will be moving funding from the NYPD to youth initiatives and social services.”

No particulars were announced — including how much money would be shifted, what cuts would have to made at the NYPD and which groups would benefit — with de Blasio saying the details would be hammered out in the coming weeks’ budget talks.

The fiscal year ends June 30.

De Blasio insisted that any cuts made by the NYPD would not be at the expense of public safety.

“I want people to understand that we are committed to shifting resources to ensure that the focus is on our young people,” he said.

“And I also will affirm while doing that, we will only do it in a way that we are certain continues to ensure that this city will be safe.”

The apparent compromise comes after activists, along with some City Council members and educators, have called on lawmakers to “defund” the NYPD as part of effecting a larger systemic change following the fatal arrest of George Floyd in Minneapolis.

As recently as Friday, de Blasio dismissed the idea of raiding the $6 billion budget of the nation’s largest police department.

“I do not believe it’s a good idea to reduce the budget of the agency that’s here to keep us safe,” he said at a Friday briefing.

Council Speaker Corey Johnson cheered de Blasio’s change of course on Sunday.

“I am happy that the mayor had been listening to the council’s calls to make substantial cuts to the NYPD and reinvest that money in communities of color and our young New Yorkers,” Johnson (D-Manhattan) said in a statement.
“The devil is in the details, but we are fighting hard for a budget that reflects our values and our priorities. As we have said, a less than 1 percent cut to the NYPD and a 32 percent cut to DYCD [the Department of Youth and Community Development] is not representative of our values.”

But in Albany, Gov. Cuomo warned against forcing police departments to tighten their purse strings, citing looting that has spun off from Floyd protests.

“You have New York City that is still reeling from the COVID virus, and now you have this night of looting that I’m telling you shook people in the city to the core,” Cuomo said in a briefing, speaking generally and not in response to de Blasio’s remarks.

“You don’t need police? You don’t need police?

“That’s what happens when you don’t have effective policing.”

Although he slammed the NYPD as “not effective” in stopping the looting last week, Cuomo later clarified to stress that he disapproved of de Blasio’s leadership and the way the police deployed resources.

“It was frightening,” Cuomo said of the looting. “[With] no police, you get looting. That’s what you get. Nobody wants that.”

De Blasio did seem willing to make one addition to the NYPD’s budget, calling the idea of funding more lawyers to expedite departmental trials for cops accused of wrongdoing “a very good use of taxpayer dollars.”

He repeated calls for the Albany to change the state’s 50-A law that shields officers’ disciplinary histories, saying it “broken and stands in the way of improving trust between police and community.”

He also announced that the NYPD would no longer handle street-vendor enforcement, with the role to be transferred to an unspecified civilian agency.

MAROONED


Monday, June 08, 2020

ART ACEVEDO AND JESSE JACKSON

Like Jesse Jackson, Houston's poor excuse for a police chief never passes up a photo-op

By Howie Katz

Big Jolly Times
June 7, 2020












A police chief is supposed to have the backs of his officers.  When they do wrong he is supposed to punish them.  And he is right in condemning the wrongful actions of an officer from another department like the deadly kneeing of George Floyd by a Minneapolis cop.

Houston Police Chief Art Acevedo was about to be fired from a scandal-ridden Austin Police Department when he was rescued by Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner.  Not the smartest move Old Sly ever made.

Like civil rights activist Jesse Jackson, Acevedo has never passed up a photo-op ever since he became Houston's top cop.  He made a compete fool of himself when he appeared before the TV cameras to address the botched Harding Street raid.

Lately Acevedo has been photographed marching arm in arm with the George Floyd protesters, kneeling with them and hugging them.  He is too stupid to realize the protests are not just about Floyd's death, but that the protesters are also demonstrating against what Black Lives Matter claims is systemic police brutality against blacks and institutional police racism.  By demonstrating with the protesters, Acevedo appears to agree with the false accusations by Black Lives Matter.

Acevedo's participation in the protests even got him an interview on NBC's Today show.  Now that was a photo-op he'll relish the rest of his life.  And it probably made Old Sly proud too.











As a former law enforcement officer and criminal justice professor, I worked with many law enforcement agencies, including the Los Angeles and Houston police departments.  Yes, there are racist cops, but I can assure you that there is no systemic police brutality or institutional police racism.  Some have accused me of being unwilling to recognize racism when I see it, but believe me, I do recognize bigotry and discrimination where and when it occurs.  .   

Civil rights activist Jesse Jackson and race-baiter Al Sharpton who coined the phrase "No Justice - No Peace" can be expected to march in lockstep with the protesters, but in his role as Chief of the Police, Acevedo is not a civil rights activist.

In Houston, the police have shot dead six men in six weeks, five of them black or Latino.  The cops did not shoot them because they were black or Latino, but because at the time they were perceived to be an imminent threat to the lives of the officers.  The families of the deceased claim the shootings were not necessary.

What did Acevedo do in his latest photo-op?  He hugged some of the family members of the six men killed by his officers.











Acevedo is too ignorant to realize that by hugging the family members he appears to be agreeing with them that his officers should not have killed the six men.  How do you think that makes Houston's cops feel? 

The poor excuse for a police chief should have been canned after the Harding Street fiasco, but it looks like as long as Sly Turner is mayor, we will be stuck with dickhead Acevedo.

PRAYERS FOR HOUSTON POLICE CHIEF ACEVEDO

By David Morefield

This morning, the Houston Fire  Department responded to Acevedo's residence after reports that a man was in distress. Chief Acevedo had been trying to leave the house when his head would not make it through the french doors he had installed to accommodate his inflated ego. 

After several harrowing minutes, Houston firefighters were able to free Acevedo so that he can continue his childish attention seeking behavior.

HPD has announced that they will be widening the doorways at 1200 Travis in order to assure the Chief's safety.

Last year, a rookie officer was seriously injured when he unknowingly stepped between Chief Acevedo and a television camera.

FORMER STUDENT FROM THE 70S MADE MY DAY

By Howie Katz

When you are 93- years old with only a dog for a companion, there are few things to brighten your day.  One of those things happened to me Friday when one of my former students from back in the 70s paid me a visit.

And that student was some one special.  He was truly one of my best students ever.  He is a former US Army Ranger with combat service in Iraq and Afghanistan. He was also a sergeant with Houston PD's SWAT team.  As a Houston police officer he exemplified everything an outstanding cop is expected to be.

Lee Lawrence really made my day. Actually he made my week ... no, make that my month.

We talked for two hours, mostly about the sad state our country finds itself in at this time.  We are especially concerned that the protesters are making it appear as though all law enforcement officers are racists and that the police beat up and kill blacks only because they are black.

Lee retired several years ago and moved with his family to the Hill Country.  I haven't seen him since, that is until Friday.  He used to visit me and my wife regularly before he retired.  My dear departed wife and my son always thought the world of Lee.

So, it was a most pleasant surprise when he came to visit me Friday.  And for sure, Lee really brightened my day!

SOMETIMES REASONABLENESS AND COMMON SENSE PREVAIL

by Bob Walsh

Colinford Mattis, 32, and Urooj Rahman, 31, are good buddies.  They are also lawyers in New York.  They are also in deep shit.

On May 29 they were out "protesting" in New York city when the cops spot them driving slowly thru a neighborhood in a minivan.  The car stops nad one of them jumps out with a Molotov cocktail that they just happen to have in the car with them and firebombs a police car.

They were initially let out on GPS home confinement and $250,000 bail each. The prosecutor screamed bloody murder and a federal appeals court agreed that their presence in the community was a danger.  Their bail was revoked.  

It will be interesting to see if the feds prosecute them on bombing charges once the locals are done with them. 

EDITOR'S NOTE: But aren't they Colin Kaepernick's freedom fighters attacking an oppressive occupying police force?

BUT SMOKING POT IS SUPPOSED TO MAKE ONE BENIGN

People who regularly smoke cannabis 'are nearly three times more likely to be violent', study finds

 

By Stephen Adams 

 

The Mail On Sunday

June 7, 2020

 

People who regularly smoke cannabis are almost three times more likely to commit a violent offence as those who abstain from the drug, new research has found.

Scientists involved in a landmark study of almost 300,000 teenagers and young adults believe that over time, prolonged cannabis use profoundly alters the brain, making the user less able to control their temper.

In addition, the research found addicts may also suffer from withdrawal symptoms, making them irritable and prone to lashing out.

Psychiatrist Professor Sir Robin Murray, a world-leading expert on the neurological impact of the drug, said the link between cannabis use and violence was a ‘neglected area’. 

Commenting on the study’s findings, he said: ‘This is not a surprise for those of us who follow the scientific literature or see patients who heavily use cannabis.

‘However, it may be a surprise to the many who think cannabis is a chill-out, anti-violence drug.’

 

Britain has been plagued by a succession of brutal killings linked to cannabis in recent years. 

In some of the cases, lawyers have argued the perpetrators should not be found guilty of murder because they were suffering from psychosis, a mental condition now understood to be exacerbated by smoking strong cannabis.

Among the killers was student Femi Nandap, who, in December 2015, stabbed public health expert Jeroen Ensink to death outside his home in North London. 
Mr Ensink, 41, had popped out to post cards announcing that his wife Nadja had given birth to their daughter.

Forensic psychiatrist Dr Samrat Sengupta, of Broadmoor Hospital, told the Old Bailey that the student’s heavy cannabis habit had triggered a genetic psychotic illness. 

Nandap, then 23, was given an indefinite hospital order after admitting manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility.

The researchers decided to examine 30 individual studies examining the link between cannabis use and violence because ‘the [scientific] literature has shown that cannabis use may lead to violent behaviours and aggression; however, this association has been inconsistent’ – with some studies showing a relationship and others not.

The team from Montreal University in Canada discovered 26 of the 30 studies showed a tendency towards higher levels of violence among cannabis users. 

When they pooled the results – meaning they were looking at a combined group of 296,815 teens and adults under 30 – they found users were more than twice as likely (2.15 times) to have committed a violent offence as non-users. 

Among ‘persistent heavy users’, the risk of violence was 2.81 times higher.

Writing in the American Journal Of Psychiatry, they said: ‘This study suggests that cannabis use appears to be a contributing factor in the perpetration of violence.’

Even when accounting for different life circumstances which might mean cannabis users were more likely to grow up in violent surroundings, they concluded that ‘the effect remained significant’.

Citing neurological research, they said cannabis use during adolescence ‘may cause deterioration of neural structures associated with inhibition and sensation-seeking’, adding: ‘Such neural deficits are expected to limit one’s ability to suppress the urge to act out violently and heighten the risk of developing antisocial behaviours in adulthood.’