Tuesday, May 13, 2025

HAMAS OPERATIVES CONTINUE TO USE HOSPITALS TO PROTECT THEMSELVES

Israeli strike targets Mohammad Sinwar in Khan Younis

The attack in Khan Yunis was aimed at the brother of Yahya Sinwar, Mohammed, who has been effectively in charge of Hamas' military wing. The IDF emphasized that measures were taken to protect civilians and hostages.

 

 
Osrael Hayom
May 13, 2025 


Mohammed Sinwar, brother of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar, travelling in a car through a tunnel near the Erez crossing, close to the Israel-Gaza border, as seen in this screengrab taken from the Israeli army video released on Dec. 17, 2023.
 
 
Israeli forces conducted a precise strike on Tuesday, targeting members of the Hamas terror organization operating from a command and control center located in an underground facility beneath the European Hospital in Khan Younis, located in the southern Gaza Strip.

The target of the strike was Mohammed Sinwar, the brother of the dead Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar who launched the Oct. 7 attack and was later killed by IDF troops. Muhammed Sinwar has effectively taken over his dead brother's role as the leader of Hamas' military wing for the past several months.
 

A destroyed room is seen at the hospital following an overnight Israeli army strike that killed two patients in Khan Younis, Gaza Strip on Tuesday, May 13.

A joint statement from the IDF and the Israel Security Agency, known as Shin Bet, revealed that Hamas continues to exploit hospitals in the Gaza Strip for terrorist activities, callously using the civilian population within and around the hospital as a shield.

The statement noted that prior to and during the operation, steps were taken to minimize the risk of harm to civilians and hostages. These measures included the use of precision munitions, aerial surveillance, and additional intelligence information.

The IDF and Shin Bet vowed to maintain intense operations against Hamas, working to eliminate any threat to the citizens of Israel, according to the statement.

1 comment:

bob walsh said...

Why should they change something that more-or-less still works for them?