Thursday, January 29, 2026

HOPE PHYSICAL THERAPY AND AQUATICS

By Howie Katz

 

 














Hope Physical Therapy and Aquatics, 103 Davis Road, League City, Texas

 

Let me start out by saying that no one asked me to endorse Hope and I am not getting paid to do so. I an doing this strictly in appreciation of the great treatment I've been getting there.

I've been going to Hope on and off for several years and each time I have been very impressed by the professional staff and how they have treated me. That is why I am recommending Hope to anyone in need of physical therapy who lives in the Clear Lake area of Houston, in Friendswood, in Webster, in Dickinson and of course in League City, as well as other parts of Galveston County.

 
















Here is just some of the equipment at Hope. That's me on the Bike at the left

 

Hope is well equipped with all sorts of exercise equipment and other physical therapy paraphernalia. It also has a pool for aquatic exercises that are designed to treat a patient's problem.

The staff is well trained and very professional. They provide specialized treatment for whatever the problem is that brought a patient to them. In my case, this time it's loss of balance.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 




Hope is owned by Christiana Emrich. She makes sure that Hope lives up to its outstanding reputation.

You can get more information by Google-ing up Hope Physical Therapy and and Aquatics. 

HUNTER BIDEN IS TRULY A NO GOOD LOWDOWN ASSHOLE

Hunter Biden fires back at ex-stripper baby mama and says it 'doesn't matter' he ghosted his daughter, 7, because he never agreed to be a part of her life

 

By Will Potter 

 

Daily Mail

Jan 29, 2026

 

 

 Hunter Biden

Hunter Biden told a court it doesn't matter that he 'ghosted' his seven-year-old daughter with his ex-stripper baby mama because he never agreed to be a part of her life in a callous new filing

 

Hunter Biden told a court it doesn't matter that he 'ghosted' his seven-year-old daughter, whom he had with his ex-stripper baby mama, because he never agreed to be a part of her life. 

The former First Son, 55, made the callous move in a new legal filing in Arkansas as he attempts to stop a court from re-opening the child support case for his daughter Navy Joan Roberts. 

Navy's mother, Lunden Roberts, 34, said in a filing earlier this month that Hunter failed to live up to his side of a contentious settlement they reached in 2023, where he agreed to give Navy the profits from his artwork. 

The agreement, dated three years ago, also barred Navy from taking Hunter's famous last name, but Lunden claims that Hunter has refused to even talk to his daughter, and has not handed over any of his art. 

Roberts submitted her filing last month to seek an increase in child support payments from Hunter, however Hunter's response in court left little to the imagination over his feelings toward the child. 

'Any failure to communicate with the Child is not punishable by contempt, as the Order does not order Defendant to communicate with the Child,' Biden’s lawyer, Brent Langdon, wrote in the documents. 

Hunter also argued that his failure to hand over his artwork - which once sold for upwards of $500,000 before plummeting in value when his father left the White House - does not violate the order, because he never agreed a date by which he had to give them to his daughter. 

'Even if no paintings had been given to the Child to date, such would not violate the Order, because as long as thirty paintings are assigned to the Child by Defendant will have complied with the Order,' the response filing said. 

 

Lunden Roberts claimed Hunter has failed to follow through on his child support payments for their child Navy Joan Roberts, 7, who she says has been 'ghosted' by her father

Lunden Roberts claimed Hunter has failed to follow through on his child support payments for their child Navy Joan Roberts, 7, who she says has been 'ghosted' by her father 

 

The child support case in 2023 centered around Roberts' attempts to have Navy adopt the Biden family name, to which Hunter was opposed. 

The former exotic dancer was also demanding monthly child support payments of $20,000, but eventually lowered her demands to $5,000 to settle the case, per the New York Post

His agreement to hand over dozens of paintings to his young daughter was made at a time that the artworks raked in huge six-figure sums, and he would either give the artworks or the proceeds from their sales to his daughter. 

The artworks now sell for a fraction of what they were once worth, and Roberts slammed the former president's son in her filing on January 16, branding him 'classless' for 'ghosting' their daughter. 

Roberts said that their daughter has begun to realize she does not live the privileged life that her half-siblings enjoy. 

'It is axiomatic that no one can force Mr. Biden into being a good dad for MC1, but this court can make it so that MC1 has, at least, the same level of support as MC1’s younger half-brother,' she wrote, referring to her daughter as MC1, stood for minor child 1. 

In Roberts' filing earlier this month, she also sensationally asked an Arkansas judge to have Hunter arrested for failing to fulfil the child support agreement.

 

Lunden Roberts, 34, filed an emotional plea to the judge earlier this month, reopening her child support case against the felonious former First Son

Lunden Roberts, 34, filed an emotional plea to the judge earlier this month, reopening her child support case against the felonious former First Son

Hunter's artwork (pictured) once sold for upwards of $500,000 per piece, before plummeting in value when his father left the White House

Hunter's artwork (pictured) once sold for upwards of $500,000 per piece, before plummeting in value when his father left the White House

 

Roberts claimed Hunter has failed to follow through with their agreement - and asked Judge Holly Meyer to 'incarcerate him in the Independence County Detention Center as a civil penalty until he purges his contempt by complying with this court's orders'.

Roberts wrote in the filing that their daughter Navy Joan yearned for contact with her father, who allegedly 'ghosted' her.

'MC1, who believes her father will go to heaven, once stated that she 'could not wait to get to heaven' so she could 'be with [her] dad' because her dad does not see or talk to her because her dad 'lives far away and is really busy,' Roberts wrote in the legal filing.

Hunter initially denied paternity, but it was proven by a court-mandated DNA test, after which he began to engage with his youngest daughter, Roberts said.

'The child and her dad started building the foundations of a missing, but exceedingly important, father-daughter relationship,' her filing said.

'The defendant and his daughter talked several times during a series of scheduled calls and were able to bond.'

But she wrote that in 2024, 'suddenly and without warning or explanation, Mr. Biden ghosted sweet, little MC1—who was then only five-years-old.'

Roberts claimed that Navy Joan, 6, had 'recently experienced emotional trauma at a family member's wedding when she realized that her dad would not walk her down the aisle or dance with her at her own wedding reception.'

Roberts claimed that Hunter had sent some paintings to his daughter, but that they were not ones picked out by the child - and that what was important to her was the contact with the little girl that the agreement would entail.

'MC1 received some paintings, but they were the ones chosen by Mr. Biden and not MC1,' Roberts wrote in the filing.

'The defendant's actions are a willful and contemptuous violation of this court's prior orders.'

'This court should allow the child to select her paintings—which will be her only real connection to her father and his side of the family to date,' the filing continues.

'To this day, MC1 has not heard again from her father, and this is baffling to the plaintiff and her family because Mr. Biden said that he had 'lived in guilt and remorse every second of every day that [he] hasn't been in [MC1's] life.'

'It is now clear that Mr. Biden's statement was only meant for the purpose it accomplished—successfully inducing Ms. Roberts to agree to take less money for her daughter's support,' it adds.

 

Hunter Biden told a court it doesn't matter that he 'ghosted' his seven-year-old daughter with his ex-stripper baby mama because he never agreed to be a part of her life in a callous new filing

Hunter Biden was slammed as 'classless' by his ex-stripper baby mamma in a court filing earlier this month alleging he 'ghosted' their daughter, 7

 

Roberts also asked the judge to reassess Hunter's monthly child support payments, pointing to an apparent lavish lifestyle by the Biden family.

'All of MC1's siblings live at a means above that of the average American. For Thanksgiving of 2025, the Biden family (minus MC1, who is not allowed to participate in family activities) gathered at an exclusive Nantucket locale,' Roberts wrote.

'Additionally, all of Mr. Biden's children except MC1 were seen at renowned Nantucket restaurants and other social scenes.'

'No one can force Mr. Biden into being a good dad for MC1, but this court can make it so that MC1 has, at least, the same level of support as MC1's younger half-brother,' Roberts added.

Hunter claimed in his 2021 memoir that he had 'no recollection' of Roberts, after she sued him for paternity and child support.

But the Daily Mail revealed records from his abandoned laptop showing he employed her at his firm, after reportedly meeting her at a Washington DC strip club.

The two had a fling around December 2017, and the baby was born in August of 2018.

But Hunter's text messages from the laptop show he asked his assistant to make sure she had been kicked off his company's health insurance plan just three months after the birth.

Even after a DNA test proved he was the father, the former president's son claimed he did not have enough money to pay child support - despite living in a $12,000-per-month home in Hollywood and driving a Porsche at the time.

Roberts' filing was first reported by conservative nonprofit Marco Polo on social media site X.

The organization published an extensive report about Hunter's abandoned laptop and the evidence of alleged criminality therein.

The Daily Mail has contacted Biden and Roberts' attorneys for comment.  

A TERRIBLE TRAGEDY

Heroic young man uses his dying breath to save dog who fell into icy pond during friends' hunting trip

 

By Alyssa Guzman 

 

Daily Mail

Jan 29, 2026

 

 

Luke Kitterman, 23, of New Memphis, and his dog Bourbon were hunting with friends in Clinton County, Illinois on Monday when his pooch fell through the ice while attempting to get a downed bird around 3pm

Luke Kitterman, 23, of New Memphis, and his dog Bourbon were hunting with friends in Clinton County, Illinois on Monday when his pooch fell through the ice while attempting to get a downed bird around 3pm

 

A heroic young man was found dead after disappearing beneath the ice while desperately trying to save his beloved dog. 

Luke Kitterman, 23, of New Memphis, and his dog, Bourbon, were hunting with friends in Clinton County, Illinois on Monday when his pooch fell through the ice while attempting to get a drowned bird around 3pm. 

Kitterman immediately leapt onto the ice to save his dog, belly-crawling across to pull the animal out, but fell into the water himself, witness reports said, per WTSP

Shocked bystanders saw the dog fall back into the water. Kitterman was once again able to get his beloved pet out, but he quickly disappeared under the icy water and never resurfaced. 

The 23-year-old's friend attempted to reach Kitterman, but couldn't safely cross the ice, said Peyton Matthews, who works for the Illinois Department of Natural Resources Conservation Police.

'They were able to pull the dog out of the water and into a canoe, just unfortunately lost sight of their friend,' he told the outlet.

Emergency crews responded immediately and a dive team spent hours in the freezing water searching for Kitterman. Eventually, the rescue mission switched to a recovery and was paused around 9pm.

The recovery mission picked back up on Tuesday, and crews had to drill a hole through the three-inch ice to allow divers into the pond. 

 

Kitterman was able to pull the dog out of the water twice, before sinking beneath the surface. His body was discovered by dive teams the next day

Kitterman was able to pull the dog out of the water twice, before sinking beneath the surface. His body was discovered by dive teams the next day 

His body was found in the pond on Tuesday

His body was found in the pond on Tuesday 

 

Kitterman's friends also returned to the scene on Tuesday to be there while crews worked.  

Hours later, his body was recovered. 

Kitterman was an avid outdoorsman and being in nature was his favorite place, his family said in his obituary. 

He loved fishing, hunting, and was a conservationist and member of Ducks Unlimited.  

'He took great care to ensure that the forests, rivers, and lakes would be protected for future hunters and fishermen to enjoy,' the obituary read. 'Luke also loved boating, and hanging out, and drinking beer with family and friends. 

'Even though his life was cut short, Luke lived life to the fullest and will be missed by all those who had the pleasure of knowing and loving him.' 

He leaves behind his parents and a brother, among other relatives. 

NOEM REDUCED TO A PROP AT TRUMP CABINET MEETING

The telling sign Kristi Noem couldn't hide live on TV during Trump's Cabinet meeting... as White House reporters are left fuming

 

By Alex Hammer 

 

Daily Mail

Jan 29, 2026

 

 

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's body language spoke volumes during her boss's cabinet meeting on Thursday, according to a body language expert

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's body language spoke volumes during her boss's cabinet meeting on Thursday, according to a body language expert

 

Kristi Noem's body language spoke volumes during her boss's cabinet meeting on Thursday, an expert said.

The embattled Department of Homeland Security secretary, for one, sat 'in a spot almost out of reach of the span of the cameras,' leading communication and body language analyst Judi James observed.

Noem, 54, also was one of the few Donald Trump cabinet members to sit through the entire summit in complete silence, James told The Daily Mail after her own viewing.

There were also no comments from Attorney General Pam Bondi, a day after the FBI searched the election office of a Georgia county central to right-wing conspiracies about Trump's election loss in 2020.

Noem, who is facing calls for her resignation following her botched response to the fatal shooting of 37-year-old Minneapolis protester Alex Pretti, was even less visible.

'There were a couple of glimpses of her cheekbones here, sitting with her shoulders and arms looking tense as her hands clasped the arms of her chair,' James recalled.

'Her torso was slightly slumped to suggest she had no expectation of speaking, as those who did speak were seen popping mints or candy from pockets to mouths and sitting poised and upright in poses of expectation.'

Trump, meanwhile, spoke for about a half hour, while allowing most of his cabinet to speak. He did not allow reporters to field questions, however - a surprise to CNN's Kaitlan Collins, who attended the meeting and vented to her colleagues soon after.

 

The embattled Department of Homeland Security secretary sat 'in a spot almost out of reach of the span of the cameras' slumped and out of view

The embattled Department of Homeland Security secretary sat 'in a spot almost out of reach of the span of the cameras' slumped and out of view

CNN's Katilan Collins, after attending the meeting, complained about not being allowed to ask questions

CNN's Katilan Collins, after attending the meeting, complained about not being allowed to ask questions

 

'In a fairly unusual move, the meeting ended without the president taking questions from reporters,' Collins announced to News Central hosts Boris Sanchez and Brianna Keilar.

'He went around the room and called on a handful of cabinet secretaries, more than a handful, probably, actually,' the 33-year-old White House correspondent said.

'But one that he notably did not call on was standing to my left. And that was the Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.'

She pointed out how the Homeland Security chief has been under 'intense scrutiny' as of late due to her comments Saturday that cast Pretti as a domestic terrorist. Those claims were quickly contradicted by footage filmed by bystanders.

Border czar Tom Homan has since been handed the reigns of Operation Metro Storm, as Trump continues to distance himself from Noem's rhetoric.

Asked on Tuesday whether Noem would be stepping down because of her comments, Trump shook his head and simply stated: 'No.'

Earlier in the week, the president called Pretti's death - as well as the fatal shooting of another 37-year-old protester, Renee Good - 'terrible.'

At the meeting Thursday, the conservative did not mention Minneapolis once.

'And obviously no questions about it were asked to the president because he did not take questions despite talking during the cabinet meeting about how he believes they are the most transparent administration ever,' Collins noted.

'It is incredibly rare for the president not to take questions, and I do think it is.'

 

Noem was also not asked to speak, as no mentions of Minneapolis of Minnesota were maid

Noem was also not asked to speak, as no mentions of Minneapolis of Minnesota were maid

Instead, the president spoke about the economy, interest rates, and other unrelated matters

Instead, the president spoke about the economy, interest rates, and other unrelated matters

Noem is facing calls to resign after claiming - without evidence - that 37-year-old protester fatally shot by Border Patrol agents in Minneapolis on Saturday intended to harm law enforcement

Noem is facing calls to resign after claiming - without evidence - that 37-year-old protester fatally shot by Border Patrol agents in Minneapolis on Saturday intended to harm law enforcement

 

Noem claimed two Border Patrol agents who had been taking part in Operation Metro Storm in Minneapolis on Saturday were defending themselves when they shot and killed Pretti. 

Her only signal of joining in the discussion Thursday 'was a constant-looking nodding while anyone spoke,' James added. 

Homan confirmed that immigration agents would be moving forward with 'targeted, strategic, enforcement operations' at a press conference in Minneapolis on Thursday.

'This is common sense cooperation that allows us to draw down the number of people we have here. Yes, I said it. Draw down the number of people here,' Homan told reporters, while also taking what appeared to be a shot at a notoriously not camera-shy Noem. 

'I didn't come for photo ops or headlines'.

SINCE DEREK CHAUVIN WAS PROSECUTED FOR KNEELING ON GEORGE FLOYD'S NECK, IT STANDS TO REASON THAT THE TWO BORDER PATROL AGENTS WHO SHOT A DISARMED ALEX PRETTI MUST ALSO BE PROSECUTED

Handling of Pretti investigation has some prosecutors on verge of quitting

Federal prosecutors in Minneapolis, frustrated by the response to the shootings of Renée Good and Alex Pretti, have suggested they could resign en masse.

 

 
 
 
 
 

The Washington Post

Jan 29, 2026

 

 

 

A video shows the officer in the grey jacket emerging from the scrum, holding a firearm that appears to match Pretti’s weapon. 

 

 

 

Federal prosecutors in Minneapolis have told U.S. Attorney Daniel Rosen, the Trump administration appointee leading the office, that they feel deeply frustrated by the Justice Department’s response to the fatal shootings of Renée Good and Alex Pretti by immigration officers and suggested that they could resign en masse, leaving the office unable to handle its current caseload, according to two officials familiar with the office.

At least one prosecutor in the office’s criminal division has resigned since a meeting this week with Rosen during which the prosecutors aired their concerns, according to the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a personnel matter that has not been made public.

The threat of further resignations is the latest sign of how the federal judicial system in Minnesota has begun to crack under the strain imposed by the administration’s immigration enforcement surge in the state. On Wednesday, the chief federal district judge in the state wrote that Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials had violated 96 court orders since launching the crackdown in Minnesota, dubbed Operation Metro Surge.

“ICE has likely violated more court orders in January 2026 than some federal agencies have violated in their entire existence,” Chief U.S. District Judge Patrick J. Schiltz wrote.

When asked for comment about the Minnesota prosecutors, a Justice Department spokesperson responded with Attorney General Pam Bondi’s February 2025 “zealous advocacy” memo that said attorneys would face discipline or termination if they are not “vigorously defending presidential policies.”

The U.S. attorney’s office in Minnesota has been in turmoil since the administration sidelined the office in the investigations around the shootings of Good and Pretti, who were shot 2½ weeks apart during confrontations with immigration officers in Minneapolis.

At least a half-dozen prosecutors in the office — including the second-in-command — resigned earlier this month after top Justice Department officials told prosecutors not to investigate the shooting of Good but instead try to build a case against her partner.

In the aftermath of those resignations, the Justice Department sent prosecutors from other Midwestern states to help deal with the swelling caseload in Minnesota. The severe staffing shortage in the office is expected to worsen in the coming weeks as more prosecutors from the office’s criminal and civil divisions resign.

The Minnesota U.S. attorney’s office is down to about half of its full staffing level of approximately 70 lawyers. At least some of the resignations occurred in the final months of the Biden administration before President Donald Trump took office.

When Pretti was shot by immigration officials on Jan. 24, Trump administration officials said the Department of Homeland Security would be leading the probe, prompting confusion and frustration among Minneapolis prosecutors who felt they should be involved.

The shootings of Good and Pretti were captured on cellphone cameras and have prompted outrage from Democrats and Republicans over Trump’s immigration crackdown.

Typically, a federal investigation into an officer-involved shooting would involve FBI agents as well as criminal and civil rights prosecutors. Any federal use-of-force investigation into an officer’s conduct is considered a civil rights investigation because the provision under which officers can be charged is a civil rights statute that covers deprivation of a person’s rights “under color of law.”

The Washington Post reported that the FBI briefly opened a civil rights investigation into the Good shooting before changing course.

Law enforcement officers are rarely charged for using lethal force, in part because the law provides significant leeway for officers to decide when use of force is needed. Law enforcement experts said that an accurate conclusion can only be reached, however, if officials examine all relevant state and federal laws and their application to the facts in the case.

The immigration crackdown has strained U.S. attorney’s offices across the country. On the criminal side, prosecutors are handling a surge in cases involving allegations of residents impeding immigration officers. And on the civil side, attorneys are being inundated with an influx of petitions from immigrants contesting their detainments.

The Justice Department is also facing staffing shortages at its Washington headquarters and in U.S. attorney’s offices across the country. In 2024, roughly 10,000 attorneys worked across the Justice Department and its components, including the FBI. In 2025, Justice Connection, an advocacy group that has been tracking departures, estimates that at least 5,500 people — not all of them attorneys — had quit the department, been fired or taken a buyout offered by the Trump administration.

The department has struggled to find qualified candidates to fill these vacancies.

HAMAS HAS NOT AGREED TO DISARM

Senior Hamas official: We never agreed to disarm, no one’s raised it with us directly

Moussa Abu Marzouk says, despite White House claims, that the group didn’t talk ‘for a single moment’ about giving up its weapons, stresses Hamas regime still in control in Gaza

 

 

20231212N Hamas Abu Marzouk

Moussa Abu Marzouk

 

Senior Hamas official Moussa Abu Marzouk said Wednesday that Hamas never agreed to disarm, casting doubt on whether the terror group will fulfil a key US and Israeli demand included in the American-backed plan for postwar Gaza.

Abu Marzouk’s statement runs contrary to the insistence of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump that the terror group give up its weapons in the near future as part of the second phase of the Gaza ceasefire. Trump has repeatedly asserted that Hamas “promised” to lay down its arms, and has threatened the group over the issue.

Abu Marzouk also suggested Hamas has a de facto veto on any appointment to the new technocratic committee set up to run the Gaza Strip, and stressed that Hamas still rules over the part of the enclave that, in accordance with the ceasefire, is not under IDF control.

The comments came during an interview with Al Jazeera amid efforts to execute phase two of the US’s plan for the Strip, which envisions seeing Hamas disarmed and replaced as a governing force. The terror group has previously rejected disarmament.

“We haven’t discussed the weapons yet; no one has spoken to us directly about it. We haven’t spoken with the American side or the mediators on this issue, so we can’t talk about what it means or what the goal is,” Abu Marzouk told the Qatari outlet.

The senior official said a Hamas agreement to hand over its weapons “never happened, not for a single moment did we talk about the surrender of weapons, or any formula about destroying, surrendering, or disarmament.”

If Hamas was not disarmed in two years of war, “how can they obtain it through negotiations?” he asked.

Abu Marzouk indicated some disarmament was open for discussion, however, saying that at the negotiating table, “we will discuss which weapons will be removed, what will be removed, how they will be removed.”

His account contradicted that of Trump envoy Steve Witkoff, who said that senior Hamas officials told him and fellow Trump aide Jared Kushner, hours before the ceasefire was inked in October, that the terror group wanted to disarm.

Hamas has never publicly agreed to disarm

At least publicly, however, Hamas has never agreed to lay down its arms.

Trump’s 20-point plan for Gaza explicitly says that Hamas must give up its weapons, but the Hamas statement endorsing the plan contained significant conditions and did not directly mention disarmament.

Rather, the group said at the time that “other issues mentioned in President Trump’s proposal” — an apparent euphemism for disarming — would “be discussed within a comprehensive Palestinian national framework.”

Hamas, Israel and the mediating countries also signed a separate, one-page document in Sharm el-Sheikh the day before the ceasefire began. But that text focused specifically on the first phase of the Trump program, primarily the hostage-for-prisoners swap, while the terror group’s disarmament is envisioned as part of phase two.

Phase two — which has officially started, after the recovery this week of the body of Ran Gvili, the last slain Israeli held hostage in the Strip — calls for the day-to-day governance of Gaza to be handed from Hamas to the newly formed National Committee for the Administration of Gaza, or NCAG.

The 12-member, technocratic committee is headed by former Palestinian Authority deputy minister Ali Shaath. Several other bodies will oversee Gaza under the umbrella of the Board of Peace, a group of world leaders inaugurated by Trump last week.

Abu Marzouk stresses: Hamas still the governing force in Gaza

Israel’s defense establishment believes that Hamas — which currently controls just under half of the Strip — will soon formally relinquish authority to the NGAC. But an Israeli security official said Thursday that, de facto, the terror group will remain in control of that part of the enclave, at least for the short term.

In his interview with Al Jazeera, Abu Marzouk stressed that Hamas is currently running Gaza, presumably referring to that part of the Strip.

“The movement (Hamas) has restored order to the Gaza Strip to serve the Palestinian people and preserve their security,” he told the Qatari network.

Abu Marzouk hinted that Hamas has a veto over the NGAC, emphasizing that no one can enter Gaza without Hamas’s consent. At the same time, he said Hamas will facilitate the committee’s work and “provide security.”

The comments came after Netanyahu said in a press conference on Tuesday that the mission to disarm Hamas must come before the reconstruction of the devastated Strip.

“As I agreed with President Trump… there are only two possibilities: either this will be done the easy way, or it will be done the hard way, but in any case, it will happen,” Netanyahu said of disarmament, using a formulation he has employed previously, and specifying Gaza must be demilitarized before reconstruction begins.

Trump said Monday, after Israeli forces returned Gvili’s remains: “Now we have to disarm Hamas like they promised.”

A US official, briefing reporters this week, reiterated the Trump administration’s stance that Gazan operatives who agree to give up their weapons will be granted amnesty.

The official added: “They signed an agreement… If they decide to play games, then obviously President Trump will take other actions.”

The war in Gaza started on October 7, 2023, when thousands of Hamas-led terrorists invaded southern Israel, killing some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking 251 hostages. On October 10, 2025, a ceasefire agreement took effect that mostly stopped fighting and set into action a hostage-prisoner exchange.

The hostage crisis ended on January 26, 2026, with the recovery of the body of Gvili. His return marked the first time since July 20, 2014, that no Israelis, living or dead, were held hostage in the Gaza Strip.

NO REFERENCE MADE TO THE JEWS MURDERED IN THE HOLOCAUST

The emergence of Holocaust erasure

The world hasn’t learned the key point—that it was a uniquely monstrous crime aimed specifically at the extermination of the Jewish people. 

 

By Melanie Phillips 

 

JNS

Jan 29, 2026 


Jews from Czechoslovakia arrive at Auschwitz in 1944. To be sent to the right meant assignment to slave labor and to the left, the gas chambers.

 

International Holocaust Memorial Day has become a spur to write the Jews out of their own history.

The United Nations chose Jan. 27—the date of the liberation of the Auschwitz concentration/death camp—to commemorate the Holocaust, the term that developed specifically to describe the Nazi genocide of the Jews.

Yet the message the United Nations posted on X on Tuesday omitted any mention of the Jews. It said: “The genocide started with apathy & silence in the face of injustice, and with the corrosive dehumanization of the other. Today and always, we need to remember this. And we must stand up for our shared humanity.”

The post was quoting from a statement issued by the U.N.’s High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Türk, who also said that “a group of deluded killers inflicted unspeakable atrocities on millions of Jews and members of other minorities.”

As reflected in the U.N.’s abbreviated version of this statement on X, Türk universalized the Holocaust and thus blurred its real significance. But at least he mentioned the Jews. Others, shockingly, did not.

Throughout the day, the BBC’s news bulletins and presenters made no reference at all to the Jews murdered in the Holocaust. Instead, they referred to the “6 million people murdered by the Nazi regime.”

But the Nazis murdered many more people than that. Six million was the specific number of Jews who were exterminated, larger than any other group that suffered.

Later on Tuesday, after a storm of criticism, the BBC apologized for failing to mention the Jewish victims. But just think about the implications of that omission.

The BBC had in its collective head the universally known figure of 6 million, but nevertheless erased their Jewish identity. That isn’t just a careless mistake. It suggests something pathological and very dark indeed is at work in the BBC psyche.

And it was far from alone. A deeply disturbing example was the statement made on the day by U.S. Vice President JD Vance.

He said: “Today, we remember the millions of lives lost during the Holocaust, the millions of stories of individual bravery and heroism, and one of the enduring lessons of one of the darkest chapters in human history: that while humans create beautiful things and are full of compassion, we’re also capable of unspeakable brutality.”

Given his position, Vance will have crafted that statement with extreme care. Yet he carefully omitted any mention at all of the Holocaust’s Jewish victims, let alone their centrality to it.

And so, another baleful milestone has been reached. We’ve previously seen antisemitism and gaslighting of the Jews through Holocaust revisionism and Holocaust denial. Now we are seeing the erasure of the Jews themselves from the Holocaust, and therefore from both their own history and their presence in that episode in the history of the world.

That world clearly hasn’t learned the key point about the Holocaust—that it was a uniquely monstrous crime aimed specifically at the extermination of the Jewish people. Instead, the world learned something very different—that it demonstrated man’s general inhumanity to man.

Of course, many others perished in the Holocaust, including Poles, disabled people, gay people, Roma and Sinti. It’s right that their persecution should be commemorated, too. Nazism was a fanatical imperialist ideology that aimed to conquer and subjugate the whole of Europe and regarded various groups as subhuman.

But the driving force of the Holocaust was the Nazis’ obsessional and deranged intention to eradicate the Jewish people alone from the face of the earth. To that terrible end, it established an industrialized system of mass murder for the Jews.

It did not do that for any other people. The Final Solution was intended for the Jews alone. That’s what made the Holocaust of the Jews unique.

Yet those who established Holocaust education and memorialization have increasingly blurred this essential message, choosing instead to universalize it and thus obscure the singular victimization of the Jews.

The resulting message from much of this memorialization has been that anyone can be a Nazi. It was but a short step from there—for those intent upon exterminating the collective Jew in the State of Israel—to start calling Israelis “Nazis,” and to accuse Israel of perpetrating a “holocaust” or “genocide” of the Palestinian Arabs.

Mass murder is an evil wherever it takes place. The murder of tens of thousands of Iranians who have been rising up against their tyrannical regime is unconscionable.

But it’s not genocide, the deliberate and systematic destruction of a people because of their ethnicity, nationality, religion or race. That’s what the Iranian regime threatens against the Jews.

The modern world, however, does not accept that this is a distinction of any value. With moral responsibility and duty having been trumped by individual rights, dominant Western secular thinking has erased the significance of intention altogether, focusing instead on consequences.

One reason why Westerners argue so preposterously that Israel’s war of self-defense against genocide is itself genocide is that they’ve redefined the word as meaning merely “a lot of people who’ve been killed”—and necessarily of the kind of whom they approve or, at least, don’t disapprove, as with the Palestinian Arabs.

This has fed into the madness about Gaza, in which the serial lies about Israeli starvation, war crimes and the wanton killing of the innocent have become established as incontrovertible facts even though they are demonstrably the very opposite of the truth.

This madness has been further fueled by an unholy alliance between intersectional identity politics, liberal universalism, Islamist holy war and lightly buried Christian theological Jew-hatred.

In Britain, the number of schools commemorating International Holocaust Memorial Day has more than halved since Oct. 7 in the face of opposition from parents and pupils—many of these Muslims, but non-Muslims, too.

And it’s the madness over Gaza that not only ensured the Jews would be wiped out of statements made on this day, but has actually turned the Holocaust against them by accusing them of perpetrating a “holocaust” of the Palestinian Arabs.

In British Columbia, Canada, parliamentarian Yuen Pau Woo posted on X: “On this International Holocaust Remembrance Day, let us pledge that ‘never again’ means ‘never again,’ even when Israel is the perpetrator #Gaza.”

In Britain, Dov Forman, the grandson of a Holocaust survivor, found himself asked on BBC Radio’s flagship “Today” show what he’d say to the argument that, if we continue to talk about the Holocaust, “we need to talk about Gaza.” The interviewer went on: “What is the universal message you want to be heard on this Holocaust Memorial Day?”

Bad enough that this morally degraded equation puts the genocide of the Jews on the same level as Israel’s attempt to prevent another genocide of the Jews. Worse, Gaza is being used to wipe out the particularity to the Jews of the Final Solution.

Underlying all this erasure is the unmistakable, if incredible, belief that the Jews have no right to their claim of victimhood—because their tormentors view the memory of the Holocaust as a moral bludgeon that the Jews wield to gain special privileges, such as avoiding “legitimate criticism” over the “crimes” of Israel.

Accepting that the Jews are the world’s greatest and most enduring historic victims gets in the way of the only permitted narratives.

Palestinianism erases the Jews from their own history in their ancestral homeland. Universalism erases them from their history as victims in Europe. Anti-Zionism, which separates the Jewish people from the land that’s central to their ancient faith, erases Judaism altogether.

Erasing Jewish victimization is part of a global agenda by such people to erase the Jews—from their mind, from their conscience and from their world.

They won’t succeed. The Jewish Diaspora will need to change in the face of this onslaught, but Israel will emerge stronger than ever.

The more the West tries to erase the Jews, the clearer its suicide note becomes for the erasure of its own civilization.

GOOD HISTORY LESSON

The Greenland situation explained

There were some fraught days when U.S. President Donald Trump was threatening to use a big stick to take the island away from the Danes, but the situation seems to have settled down. 

 

By Clifford D. May 

 

JNS

Jan 29, 2026

 

 

“Summer in the Greenland Coast,” 1875, oil on canvas by Danish painter Carl Rasmussen. Credit: https://bruun-rasmussen.dk/ via Wikimedia Commons.
“Summer in the Greenland Coast,” 1875, oil on canvas by Danish painter Carl Rasmussen.
 

Readers of a certain age will recall the late, great Tina Turner introducing her iconic performances of “Proud Mary” by informing her audience: “We never, ever do nothing nice and easy. We always do it nice and rough.”

U.S. President Donald Trump could say the same about his style of policymaking. Greenland is the most recent example.

Trump understands that the Arctic island is essential for America’s national security and that of Europe as well. Look at the globe from above. The shortest routes for long‑range Russian or Chinese missiles targeting the United States pass over the polar region. There’s also the Greenland‑Iceland‑UK (GIUK) gap, a key chokepoint through which Russian submarines must pass to reach the Atlantic.

Because Greenland is a self-governing territory of Denmark, an American ally, and because Trump is the world’s greatest dealmaker, it seemed to me from the start that if any international dispute could be solved with a deal, it’s this one.

Nevertheless, there were some fraught days when Trump was threatening to use a big stick—tariffs or even military force—to take Greenland away from the melancholy Danes. Could that have just been a nice-and-rough negotiating tactic? Demand the stars, settle for the moon?

Readers of a certain age will recall the late, great Tina Turner introducing her iconic performances of “Proud Mary” by informing her audience: “We never, ever do nothing nice and easy. We always do it nice and rough.”

U.S. President Donald Trump could say the same about his style of policymaking. Greenland is the most recent example.

Trump understands that the Arctic island is essential for America’s national security and that of Europe as well. Look at the globe from above. The shortest routes for long‑range Russian or Chinese missiles targeting the United States pass over the polar region. There’s also the Greenland‑Iceland‑UK (GIUK) gap, a key chokepoint through which Russian submarines must pass to reach the Atlantic.

Because Greenland is a self-governing territory of Denmark, an American ally, and because Trump is the world’s greatest dealmaker, it seemed to me from the start that if any international dispute could be solved with a deal, it’s this one.

Nevertheless, there were some fraught days when Trump was threatening to use a big stick—tariffs or even military force—to take Greenland away from the melancholy Danes. Could that have just been a nice-and-rough negotiating tactic? Demand the stars, settle for the moon?

Maybe, but to my relief (and that of the stock market) at the World Economic Forum in Davos last week, Mark Rutte, the extraordinarily capable secretary general of NATO, came up with a “framework” for a long-term agreement that appealed to the American president. “This solution, if consummated, will be a great one for the United States of America and all NATO nations,” Trump exulted on Truth Social.

If he had his druthers, Greenland would become an American territory like Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa and the U.S. Virgin Islands—the latter, it so happens, purchased from Denmark in 1917 for $25 million in gold coin.

But if Washington now leverages an expanded authority to detect, deter, and, if necessary, defeat threats on the world’s biggest island while Denmark retains sovereignty, history will record that as a significant Trump achievement.

And would it not be better—more Trumpian, really—for the United States to make the key decisions on Arctic defense, while other NATO members pick up most of the checks?

Additionally, four in 10 Greenlanders are government employees. Moving them from Copenhagen’s payroll to Washington’s strikes me as not ideal. As to the notion that the island should become America’s 51st state, based on the evidence at hand, Greenlanders are more likely to vote like Minnesotans than Alaskans.

I think it’s always interesting (and occasionally, useful) to know a bit about the history of lands involved in conflicts and controversies with the United States, as Trump told a group of oil executives: “The fact that they [the Danes] had a boat land there 500 years ago doesn’t mean they own the land. I’m sure we had lots of boats go there also.”

Here’s the backstory: Norse settlers, led by Erik Thorvaldsson—his madcap Viking buddies nicknamed him “Erik the Red”—reached southern Greenland around 985 C.E. That was a couple of centuries prior to the arrival of the Thule Inuit, ancestors of most modern Greenlanders. The Inuit had migrated from northeast Asia across the North American High Arctic. The fact that tribes with only primitive tools and weapons could survive in these environments and climates is a testament to human adaptability.

Speaking of climates, between 800 and 1300 C.E., there was the Medieval Warm Period, during which southern Greenland experienced temperatures mild enough to allow for limited agriculture, as well as grazing sheep and cattle.

 

 North america

Erik the Red: "The people will be more easily persuaded to move there if the land has an attractive name."

 

That said, the bright idea by “Erik the Red” of naming the island “Greenland” was as purposely deceptive as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s (D-N.Y.) “Green New Deal.” Back then, ice covered about 80% of Greenland. That percentage hasn’t changed—bovine flatulence and CO2 emissions from soccer moms’ SUVs notwithstanding.

The Little Ice Age began in the 14th century and continued until the mid-19th century. That chill was among the reasons that in the 15th century, the Norse settlers disappeared—most likely, headed for the balmier climes of Iceland and Scandinavia.

Fast-forward to 1940: The Germans conquered Denmark in a matter of hours. America sends troops to Greenland. After World War II, Norway became a founding member of NATO.

In 1951, the United States and Denmark signed the Defense of Greenland Agreement. During the Cold War, more than 6,000 Americans were stationed on the world’s largest island. 

Today, only about 150 members of the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Space Force operate Pituffik Space Base in northwestern Greenland, focusing on missile warning.

The prospect of a new Greenland deal prevents what some argued could have been the collapse of NATO. I’m pro-NATO, but I think Trump is correct to insist that America’s allies be partners contributing to the collective security, not dependents.

Among the free-riders: Spain, Belgium and Canada.

And the United Kingdom needs to be called out. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has been eager to surrender another strategically vital island: Diego Garcia, in the Chagos Archipelago in the Indian Ocean.

Since the 1970s, the United States and the United Kingdom have maintained a military base on Diego Garcia. But as an act of atonement for the sins of British imperialism, Starmer wants to surrender sovereignty to Mauritius, a speck of an island nation 1,300 miles away, east of Madagascar, which is increasingly being pulled into Beijing’s empire.

Trump characterized that as “great stupidity.” British conservatives, to their credit, are trying to block the giveaway.

Sometimes, one can say about a Trump policy what no one would say about a Tina Turner song, but which a wit once said about the music of Richard Wagner: “It’s better than it sounds.”

 

Originally published in “The Washington Times.”

ABUSE OF THE H-1B VISA BROGRAM BY TEXAS BUSINESSES

Ken Paxton launches crackdown on H-1B fraud in Texas after exposé by BlazeTV host Sara Gonzales 

Paxton thanks Gonzales for getting the ball rolling on the crackdown in the Lone Star State.

 



Sara Gonzales Unfiltered | Replay


Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton credited BlazeTV host Sara Gonzales on Wednesday with getting the ball rolling on a new and "wide-sweeping investigation into abuse of the H-1B visa program by Texas businesses."

Standing outside a seemingly vacant single-family home in Irving — the supposed office of 3Bees Technologies Inc., one of the companies Gonzales scrutinized in a damning report on possible H-1B fraud earlier this month — Paxton told the BlazeTV host, "Thanks to you, we're here today."

"We've started an investigation into three different companies that we think might be scamming people with these H-1B visas," said Paxton.

"Thanks to you, we've sent them questionnaires," continued Paxton. "They're called Civil Investigative Demands, and they're designed to find out what the truth is, what is actually happening, what are their actual practices. Are they defrauding consumers? Are they misguiding people as to what they're actually doing?"

Paxton has ordered the companies to provide documents identifying all of their employees, records detailing the specific products or services they provide, financial statements, and communications pertaining to company operations.

Although the Texas Attorney General's Office is currently looking at three businesses in North Texas, Paxton indicated that is the start of a much larger investigation.

The Texas attorney general expressed confidence that potential fraudsters will be flushed out, telling Gonzales, "It's not our first rodeo, and we will definitely find out what's going on."

"Any criminal who attempts to scam the H-1B visa program and use 'ghost offices' or other fraudulent ploys should be prepared to face the full force of the law," Paxton said in a statement.

"Abuse and fraud within these programs strip jobs and opportunities away from Texans. I will use every tool available to uproot and hold accountable any individual or company engaged in these fraudulent schemes," added the Texas attorney general.

Gonzales' exposé evidently also captured the attention of Gov. Greg Abbott (R).

Citing "recent reports of abuse in the federal H-1B visa program" and the "federal government's ongoing review of that program to ensure American jobs are going to American workers," Abbott directed all state agencies on Tuesday to "immediately freeze" new H-1B visa petitions.

In addition to pumping the brakes on new H-1B visas, Abbott demanded that public universities and various state agencies provide an account of how many H-1B visa holders they are currently sponsoring; the countries of origin of their sponsored H-1B visa holders; the expected expiration date for each sponsored visa; and the efforts taken to ensure that Texan candidates were afforded a reasonable opportunity to apply for each position filled by an H-1B visa holder.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services' H-1B Employer Data Hub indicates that over 41,500 H-1B visa beneficiaries were approved for fiscal year 2025 in Texas.

Qubitz Tech Systems, one of the companies Gonzales scrutinized in her report, had 12 H-1B beneficiaries approved last year. The company, whose visa job contact is Hari Madiraju, has apparently been hiring "software developers" from abroad for years.

When Gonzales went to the address listed for Qubitz in Frisco, Texas — a four-bedroom house in a residential neighborhood — she was greeted by a man responding to "Hari" who was clearly not happy to see her.

At the mention of Qubitz and its supposed employees, Hari called the police, which Gonzales welcomed.

Gonzales later paid a visit to Qubitz's supposed worksite. Instead of finding a dozen or more workers engaged in the kind of software development that supposedly requires foreign talent, she found a vacant prison-cell-sized room with a single chair and some folding tables.

"Pretty cramped working quarters for 12 H-1B workers," said Gonzales. "I'm not buying it."\

DOUBTFUL AUTHENTICITY

By Bob Walsh

 

File:Hallmark Movie Channel.svg



I recently got some rumbles about a new Hallmark Movie Channel Christmas Movie.  The working title is CHRISTMAS IN ARKANSAS.

The plucky heroine is from down there.  Her name is Tanya and as the first member of her family to ever graduate from high school she moved out, made her way to New Hampshire and works for a PR firm specializing in political damage control.  She goes back home to convince her parents to sell the family hog farm and move to Westchester or Memphis or some other civilized place.  While down there she falls deeply in love with Leroy.  Trouble is Leroy is already married, to his cousin.  They have 1.5 children and he doesn't feel right about the prospect of dumping her before she graduates from high school.  So Tanya hooks up with Leroy's brother, Billy Ray.  He is a shift supervisor at the slaughter house and lives in a very nice double-wide on company property.  They get married, she gets a job at the slaughter house and they both wrench on ATVs on the side.  

They live happily ever after.