Thursday, October 30, 2025

SOCIETY MUST BE PROTECTED FROM THIS 6-YEAR-OLD HOODLUM

Terrifying moment teacher was SHOT by six-year-old boy in her Virginia classroom

 

By Natasha Anderson 

 

Daily Mail

Oct 30, 2025 

 

 

Zwerner was hospitalized for nearly two weeks after the shooting, required six surgeries and still today does not have full use of her left hand. A bullet also remains in her chest

Abby Zwerner was hospitalized for nearly two weeks after the shooting, required six surgeries and still today does not have full use of her left hand. A bullet also remains in her chest

 

Paramedics rushed to save a Virginia elementary teacher's life after she was shot in her classroom by a six-year-old student, newly released body camera footage shows. 

Abby Zwerner was shot in the hand and chest in January 2023 as she sat at a reading table in her classroom at Richneck Elementary School.

Distressing police body camera footage presented to the jury Wednesday showed Zwerner lying on the floor as first responders applied gauze and pressure to the bloody gunshot wound on her upper chest, near her left shoulder.

The first-grade teacher, whose face was pale and displayed a pained expression, was carried out of the building on a stretcher and taken to a nearby hospital for treatment. 

Zwerner was hospitalized for nearly two weeks, required six surgeries and still today does not have the full use of her left hand. A bullet also remains in her chest.

She believed she had died in the incident, Zwerner testified at the trial Thursday.

'I thought I was either on my way to heaven or in heaven,' she told the jury. 'But then it all got black. And so, I then thought I wasn't going there. 

'My next memory is I see two co-workers around me and I process that I'm hurt and they're putting pressure on where I'm hurt.' 

Zwerner has filed a $40 million lawsuit against a former assistant principal who is accused of ignoring multiple warnings that the young boy had a gun.

 

Distressing police body camera footage presented to the jury Wednesday showed how paramedics rushed to render aid to teacher Abby Zwerner after she was shot in January 2023

Distressing police body camera footage presented to the jury Wednesday showed how paramedics rushed to render aid to teacher Abby Zwerner after she was shot in January 2023

Zwerner laid on the floor at Richneck Elementary School as first responders applied gauze and pressure to the bloody gunshot wound on her upper chest, near her left shoulder
Zwerner laid on the floor at Richneck Elementary School as first responders applied gauze and pressure to the bloody gunshot wound on her upper chest, near her left shoulder
 

Several of Zwerner's doctors took the stand Wednesday, detailing the scope of her injuries to the court. 

A physician testified that Zwerner can no longer make a tight fist with her left hand, which has less than half its normal grip strength. 

One noted that her fingers were nearly severed during the incident, WAVY reported. Another alleged the bullet barely missed her heart.

'[This] was much more similar to a war injury than anything I’d normally see,' one doctor added. 

The jury was shown images of the gun that the six-year-old used in the horrific attack and the very classroom where the shooting occurred.

The court also heard from how, on the day of the shooting, former assistant principal Ebony Parker was allegedly notified of a potential threat posed by the boy.

Parker is accused of failing to act after several people went to her with concerns in the hours before the shooting that the student had a gun in his backpack. 

Zwerner's attorney, Diane Toscano, said in opening statements on Wednesday that Parker made 'bad decisions and choices that day.'

 

Zwerner (pictured in court Tuesday) has filed a $40 million lawsuit against a former assistant principal who is accused of ignoring multiple warnings that the young boy had a gun

Zwerner (pictured in court Tuesday) has filed a $40 million lawsuit against a former assistant principal who is accused of ignoring multiple warnings that the young boy had a gun

The jury was shown images of the gun that the six-year-old used in the horrific attack

The jury was shown images of the gun that the six-year-old used in the horrific attack

This is the classroom where Zwerner was shot in the hand and chest in January 2023 as she sat at a reading table

This is the classroom where Zwerner was shot in the hand and chest in January 2023 as she sat at a reading table

The gun is seen laying on the classroom floor after the horrific shooting

The gun is seen laying on the classroom floor after the horrific shooting 

 

Parker had the authority but failed to search the student, remove him from the classroom and call law enforcement, Toscano added.

The shooting occurred on the first day after the student had returned from a suspension for slamming Zwerner's phone two days earlier, the defense said. 

'No one could have imagined that a 6-year old, first-grade student would bring a firearm into a school,' Parker's attorney, Daniel Hogan, told jurors. 

'You will be able to judge for yourself whether or not this was foreseeable. That's the heart of this case.'

Hogan said that decision-making in a public school setting is 'cooperative' and 'collaborative.' He also warned of hindsight bias and 'Monday morning quarterbacking.'

'The law knows that it is fundamentally unfair to judge another person's decisions based on stuff that came up after the fact,' Hogan said. 'The law requires you to examine people's decisions at the time they make them.'

Parker is the only defendant in the lawsuit. A judge previously dismissed the district's superintendent and the school principal as defendants.

 

DejaTaylor, the mother of the 6-year-old shooter, was sentenced on November 15, 2023 to 21 months in prison on federal charges.of using marijuana while in possession of a firearm and making a false statement about her drug use during the purchase of the firearm, both felonie
 
Former Richneck Elementary School assistant principal Ebony Parker (pictured in court Tuesday) is accused of failing to act after several people went to her with concerns in the hours before the shooting that the student had a gun in his backpack

Former Richneck Elementary School assistant principal Ebony Parker (pictured in court Tuesday) is accused of failing to act after several people went to her with concerns in the hours before the shooting that the student had a gun in his backpack

Zwerner no longer works for the school district and has said she has no plans to teach again. It was revealed in court Wednesday that she has become a licensed cosmetologist

Zwerner no longer works for the school district and has said she has no plans to teach again. It was revealed in court Wednesday that she has become a licensed cosmetologist

 

Parker faces a separate criminal trial next month on eight counts of felony child neglect. Each of the counts is punishable by up to five years in prison upon a conviction.

The student's mother was sentenced to nearly four years in prison for felony child neglect and federal weapons charges. 

Her son told authorities he got his mother's handgun by climbing onto a drawer to reach the top of a dresser, where the firearm was in his mom's purse.

Zwerner no longer works for the school district and has said she has no plans to teach again. It was revealed in court Wednesday that she has become a licensed cosmetologist. 

THE DUMBEST THING POSSIBLE THAT WON'T WORK

Plans to kill half a million owls in three US states sparks outrage in Congress

 

By Stacy Liberatore 

 

Daily Mail

Oct 30, 2025

 

 

Republican Senator John Kennedy blasted parts of the US government for targeting so many birds unnecessarily, calling it, in his words, 'the dumbest thing possible that won't work' Republican Senator John Kennedy blasted parts of the US government for targeting so many birds unnecessarily, calling it, in his words, 'the dumbest thing possible that won't work' 

 

A Biden-era plan to kill nearly 500,000 owls is moving forward despite widespread criticism from officials who say it is unnecessary and unlikely to succeed. 

The initiative will see trained hunters unleashed in California, Oregon and Washington to take out Barred Owls because they are 'better hunters' and are outcompeting the native Spotted Owl. The former originates from eastern North America.

These hunters would broadcast Barred Owl territorial calls to attract the birds and shoot on sight, but in areas where firearm use is inadvisable, the protocol would be to capture and euthanize the creature. 

Republican Senator John Kennedy blasted parts of the US government for targeting so many birds unnecessarily, calling it, in his words, 'the dumbest thing possible that won't work.' 

'The Department of Interior says it wants to kill over 10 percent of the Barred owl population because the Barred owl is a better hunter than the Spotted owl and they want to tip the scales of nature in favor of the spotted owl,' said Kennedy.

'Even though the Spotted Owl is not on the endangered species list, my resolution, which will be voted on tomorrow, will stop this nonsense.'

The strategy to save one species has also sparked outrage among 75 groups, which claimed such actions could disrupt the wildlife and cause 'mistaken-identity kills.'

To block the owl-culling plan, Congress must pass a joint resolution signed by President Trump, which would bar the agency from issuing a similar rule without explicit approval. 

Kennedy spoke on the Senate floor, standing between images of the Spotted and Barred Owls, along with a shot of the Looney Tunes character Elmer Fudd.

'There are 19 species or kinds of owls in the United States. Did you know that? 19. I want to talk about two of them. The spotted owl and the barred owl. Both of them are God's creatures,' he said.

'The federal government, which can't even deliver the mail when it has the address right there on the front, and more specifically, the Department of the Interior, has promulgated a rule, and this rule says that unless Congress stops them, they're going to hire hunters right here to kill 453,000 barred owls. 

'There are only four million in the United States, but the Department of Interior wants to kill 453,000 male Barred Owls, daddy barred owls, and baby barred owls because the Department of Interior thinks that the Barred Owl is a better hunter than the spotted owl.'

The two owls look very similar, with both having rounded heads, brown and white-colored bodies, and black eyes and are only distinguished by their slight size difference and the colors of their beaks.

Spotted owls measure about 1.5 feet in length and have a wingspan of up to four feet, while barred owls are bigger, standing about two feet tall with a wingspan of up to four feet.

Barred owls started migrating to the forests of Washington, Oregon and Northern California from their native region in the northeastern US in the early 1900s due to climate change and deforestation.

In 1990, the spotted owl was added to the Endangered Species Act because of habitat loss. Now, the migration of the barred owl over the past century has allegedly worsened the situation.

 

The US Fish and Wildlife Service has proposed culling 500,000 Barred Owls that are encroaching on spotted owls' territory

The US Fish and Wildlife Service has proposed culling 500,000 Barred Owls that are encroaching on spotted owls' territory

 

Organizations led by Animal Wellness Action and the Center for a Humane Economy penned a letter to Interior Secretary Deborah Haaland on Monday, accusing her of a 'reckless' plan to shoot down 500,000 barred owls over the next 30 years.

Issues first arose in the late 1980s and 1990s when environmentalists fought loggers who were trying to harvest timber in the Northwest forests - the conflict became known as the Timber Wars.

During this time, the Spotted Owl, which lived in the old trees, started dwindling and leading to protections for the bird and its habitat.

Last week, Politico's E&E News reported that Kennedy said Interior Secretary Doug Burgum asked him to stand down from his effort to stop the owl-killing plan. The legislator told the outlet he would charge ahead anyway.

'I don't think the federal government ought to be telling God, nature, whatever you believe in, in this one can exist, this one can't,' Kennedy told E&E. 

'The barred owl is not the first species that has ever moved its territory, and it won't be the last.'

 

The plan was due to Barred Owls out competing Spotted Owls (pictured)

The plan was due to Barred Owls out competing Spotted Owls (pictured)

 

Travis Joseph, president and chief executive of the American Forest Resource Council, told the outlet: 'It's strange that a Republican in the south is taking on the owl issue, specifically, when its consequences will impact western Oregon managed by the Bureau of Land Management timber sales.

'It will lead to lower revenues for counties, it will impact jobs and it will put them on a trajectory towards extinction.'

The American Forest Resource Council, a trade association representing mills, loggers, lumber buyers and other stakeholders in the region, is on board with the cull, as avoiding it would slow down timber harvesting in western Oregon managed by the Bureau of Land Management.

Travis Joseph, president and chief executive of the organization, said that scrapping the plan would slow timber harvesting across about 2.6 million acres of western 

Oregon forest managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), whose resource plans depend on the barred owl cull moving forward.

'It's strange that a Republican in the south is taking on the owl issue, specifically, when its consequences will impact western Oregon BLM timber sales,' Joseph said in an interview. 

'It will lead to lower revenues for counties, it will impact jobs and it will put them on a trajectory towards extinction.'

DOG'S WORST ENEMY

Utah man hurled terrified puppies to their deaths out of car window because he thought 'it would be easier to get rid of them that way,' police say

 

By Will Potter 

 

Daily Mail

Oct 30, 2025

 

 

Utah man Memphis Lor, 25, allegedly flung six puppies out of a car window while driving down a highway because he thought 'it would be easier to get rid of them.' One of the rescued puppies is pictured

Utah man Memphis Lor, 25, allegedly flung six puppies out of a car window while driving down a highway because he thought 'it would be easier to get rid of them.' One of the rescued puppies is pictured 

 

A Utah man allegedly flung six puppies out of a car window while driving down a highway because he thought 'it would be easier to get rid of them.' 

Memphis Lor, 25, was arrested on seven counts of torturing a companion animal after witnesses said they found a number of abused puppies on US-89 in Davis County, Utah, on October 22. 

According to the Davis County Sheriff's Office, Lor was driving at highway speeds when he allegedly threw six puppies out of his window. 

Two of the puppies, aged just three-weeks-old, died and another was seriously injured, and two were not injured. Another of the puppies has not been found. 

Lor also allegedly left the mother of the puppies on the side of the highway, and the mother was found by witnesses and was severely malnourished, reports ABC4

The sheriff's office said that witnesses called 911 saying they had seen the puppies scattered across the road, and some stopped to help law enforcement save the dogs. 

Lor was identified by law enforcement after a neighbor of the suspect told investigators they knew he owned the mother of the puppies. 

The 25-year-old, who has been arrested but not formally charges, reportedly admitted to throwing the puppies when interrogated by deputies. 

 

Witnesses said they found a number of abused puppies on US-89 in Davis County, Utah, (pictured) on October 22 after Lor allegedly threw the puppies out of his car window

Witnesses said they found a number of abused puppies on US-89 in Davis County, Utah, (pictured) on October 22 after Lor allegedly threw the puppies out of his car window 

 

DOG'S BEST FRIEND

Grateful dog kisses rescuers as it is rescued from side of San Francisco cliff

 

By Anna Wright 

 

Daily Mail

Oct 30, 2025

 

 

The brown and white pup slipped on grassy terrain and fell over the cliff, but miraculously landed on a narrow cliff below 

The brown and white pup slipped on grassy terrain and fell over the cliff, but miraculously landed on a narrow cliff below 

 

A four-legged friend was heroically rescued after he fell 40ft and landed on an oceanside ledge.

Stunning video captured the moment fearless San Francisco firefighters saved a distressed pup from near disaster.

The dog - whose name and breed is unknown - was playing with another pooch on Tuesday at Fort Funston coastal park.

The brown and white pup slipped on grassy terrain and stumbled over the cliff, but miraculously landed on a narrow ledge below.

A San Francisco police drone operator was able to capture an aerial view of the dog's location and relay it to the rescue team.

After safely locating the canine, the tense video showed the firefighter heroically rappelling down the seaside cliff.

The courageous rescuer harnessed the 40-pound dog and used a 'high angle rigging system' to safely return back to flat land. 

 

A San Francisco firefighter saved a distressed pup from an almost detrimental disaster

A San Francisco firefighter saved the distressed pup from an almost detrimental disaster

 

Both the brave firefighter and hound were in good spirits, as officials noted the dog was 'conscious, alert, and able to walk on its own after being brought to safety.'

'He was happy. He knew he got rescued,' Rescue Captain Samuel Menchaca of the San Francisco Fire Department said.

'He was wagging his tail. He was giving everyone kisses,' he added.

This is not the first furry friend Mechanca has rescued from this coastal park, the seasoned firefighter has saved loads of people from disastrous falls before.

'Firefighters unfortunately have to rescue people a lot in this area', he said. 'They train for it, and will always be there, but they don't want people to get hurt'

Menchaca urged people to be aware when taking in the scenic views of the area, adding what may seem like a little hill could be a steep significant drop.

He warned visitors to stay on marked paths, keep their dogs on leashes and their small children close.

'One of the best ways to not get hurt on these cliffs and our beautiful seaside parts of San Francisco is to stay on the marked paths,' he said. 

 

This is not the first furry friend Mechanca has rescued from this coastal park

This is not the first furry friend Mechanca has rescued from this coastal park

The courageous rescuer harnessed the 40-pound dog and used a 'high angle rigging system' to safely return back to flat land

The courageous rescuer harnessed the 40-pound dog and used a 'high angle rigging system' to safely return back to flat land

A San Francisco police drone operator was able to capture an aerial view of the dog's location so the firefighters could safely rescue him

A San Francisco police drone operator was able to capture an aerial view of the dog's location so the firefighters could safely rescue him

Both the brave firefighter and dog were in good spirits after the nearly tragic fall, the rescued dog was wagging it's tail and giving everyone kisses

Both the brave firefighter and dog were in good spirits after the nearly tragic fall, the rescued dog was wagging it's tail and giving everyone kisses

The courageous San Francisco Fire Department team that rescued the four-legged friend

The courageous San Francisco Fire Department team that rescued the four-legged friend

 

The 200ft tall bluffs on the western edge of San Francisco make Fort Funston the premier hand-gliding location, according to its website.

The spot is also known for its accessible hiking, horseback riding, and dog walking trails.

The park's website warns visitors 'that if your pet gets stuck on the bluffs, do not go after it, the risk of falling is greater for you than your pet.' 

TRUMP'S FRIEND ERDOGAN CONTINUES TO ACCUSE ISRAEL OF COMMITTING GENOCIDE

Erdogan to German Chancellor: 'It's genocide. Don't you see it in Germany?'

Friedrich Merz visited Ankara in an effort to strengthen relations with Turkey, hoping it would pressure Syria to take back refugees. Merz refused to define the war in Gaza as genocide and criticized Hamas, saying, "Hamas should have released the hostages earlier and laid down its weapons." Erdogan fired back, saying, "Israel has always sought to oppress Gaza through starvation and genocide."

 

Israel Hayom

Oct 30, 2025

 

 

Turkey's President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan welcomes German Chancellor Friedrich Merz at the presidential palace in Ankara, 30 October, 2025

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan 

 

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz met Thursday in Ankara with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in an effort to strengthen bilateral relations and persuade Turkey to help return Syrian refugees to their country. 

Earlier this week, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer visited Ankara, where he signed a deal with Erdogan for the sale of 20 Eurofighter jets to Turkey, a move made possible after Germany lifted its veto on the deal.

At a press conference with Erdogan, Merz said his government has stood by Israel since the Hamas-led October 7 massacre and supports its right to self-defense. "There was only one decision that could have prevented countless unnecessary casualties. Hamas should have released the hostages earlier and laid down its arms. This war would have ended immediately," he said. Merz added that he hopes the war is nearing its end with a cease-fire agreement mediated by the US and Turkey.

Erdogan rejected Merz's statements, saying, "Hamas doesn't have bombs or nuclear weapons, but Israel has all of these, and it uses them against Gaza, for example with last night's bombings. Don't you see what's happening in Germany? Don't you follow it? Beyond the attacks on Gaza, Israel has always sought to oppress it through hunger and genocide."

The clash came during a visit intended to strengthen relations, at a time when Turkey is in a favorable position with the West and NATO following what is seen as a series of diplomatic gains in Syria and in the mediation of a Gaza cease-fire.

Merz welcomed Turkey's purchase of 20 Eurofighter jets, made possible by Germany's lifting of its veto, and said Russia's aggressive policy poses a threat to NATO. "In this context, the German government explicitly welcomes Turkey's decision to buy the jets," he said. "They will serve the alliance's collective security."

Merz also criticized Turkey's suppression of its opposition, referring to the arrest of Istanbul's opposition mayor, Ekrem Imamoglu, in a purported corruption investigation. "Turkey has taken decisions that still fall short of the standards of rule of law and democracy as we understand them," he said. "I expressed my concern about issues that do not meet our expectations, such as judicial independence."

According to AFP, a source in Turkey's Defense Ministry said Ankara hopes to gain support for joining the European defense program, an initiative facing Greek opposition that could block the required consensus. The report said Germany has indicated it would support Turkey's accession.

During the talks, Merz asked Turkey to take back more rejected asylum seekers. Germany also seeks to advance the return of migrants to Syria and hopes for Ankara's assistance, given its close ties with Damascus. German Foreign Minister Johann Wadpfuhl visited Syria Thursday, meeting with President Ahmad al-Sharaa.

Erdogan reiterated Turkey's desire to join the European Union. Merz said he views Turkey as "a close partner of the European Union" and expressed his wish to develop bilateral economic relations, "including in the fields of transportation and migration.

THE BIG FAMINE CON

UNICEF data show there was no famine in Gaza

The food-security agency that made the famine determination relied on unweighted sampling of data, while weighted data failed to meet famine conditions. 

 

By Mike Wagenheim 

 

Israel Today

Oct 30, 2025

 

 

Palestinians shop at Sheikh Radwan Market, west of Gaza City, before the Iftar, the fast-breaking meal, during the holy month of Ramadan on Monday, March 3, 2025. (AP Photo/Jehad Alshrafi)

Palestinians shop at Sheikh Radwan Market, west of Gaza City, before the Iftar, the fast-breaking meal, during the holy month of Ramadan on Monday, March 3, 2025.

 

When the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, a United Nations-linked food-security agenda, determined in August that a famine was indeed ongoing in parts of Gaza, those behind the report said that the sheer devastation in Gaza did not allow for an accurate accounting of starvation-related deaths.

Instead, they said, they were using another key criterion for famine that generally goes hand in hand with malnutrition deaths, and that extrapolating on the former to determine the latter was taking place.

That key criterion, called mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), appears to have never been met, according to data recently released by the Global Nutrition Center, which is staffed by UNICEF, the U.N.’s agency for children. The measurement serves as an easy and generally accepted way to gauge malnutrition. The IPC standards say that when 15% of children sampled show signs of malnutrition, it’s indicative of a famine.

The IPC’s August alert, determining that famine was already taking place, said there was a rapid rise in child malnutrition, based on a two-week data sample from mid-to-late July.

The newer information, released on Sept. 17 by the “State of Palestine” Nutrition Cluster, reveals that IPC-standard age-weighted MUAC data—as opposed to the unweighted data in the IPC’s famine report—did not meet the IPC’s own famine criteria.

And without MUAC data showing famine levels, it becomes impossible for the IPC to extrapolate famine level deaths, said Mark Zlochin, a former artificial intelligence researcher who has spent months poring over data from Gaza.

“They said that because the malnutrition was rising so rapidly, they can reasonably infer that the mortality is also rising, and they’re not just catching all the deaths that are actually occurring,” Zlochin said of the IPC. “So they need both of those parts, both the crossing of this threshold, but also the very, very rapid crossing of this threshold. So once you see that it didn’t happen, everything falls apart.”

The difference between weighted and unweighted data can be substantial, as MUAC inherently classifies smaller, younger children as malnourished at much higher rates.

“Using unweighted averages without age adjustment inflates the results,” Zlochin explained, pointing to UNRWA’s own data showing the gap between the unweighted average and the age-adjusted estimate in July to be 3.4%. A weighted average would have brought it below the fame threshold.

“This is precisely why age-weighting is mandatory under IPC methodology, and why it was applied in every previous Nutrition Cluster and IPC output,” Zlochin wrote.

The IPC’s famine report cited few examples, though, of age weighting.

“As a result, the malnutrition rate estimates are strongly skewed upwards,” Zlochin wrote.

‘Based on fabricated data’

The Global Nutrition Cluster’s Sept. 17 data release, though, shows the age-weighted MUAC-focused mean malnutrition rate in the Gaza City area to be approximately 14.8% in the second half of July before falling substantially in August back to rates previously seen in June.

That 14.8% measurement falls below the 15% necessary to meet famine criteria, and significantly below the 16.2% unweighted mean. At no point, according to the Palestinian Authority data, did the MUAC rate cross 15% before it began to decline substantially in August back toward the 10.5% to 11% rate it hit in June.

According to Zlochin, the updated data confirms that the IPC’s determination was “based on fabricated data that misrepresented the raw, unweighted malnutrition statistics as if they were the properly age-weighted data required by IPC guidelines.”

“It was always a hoax, and those hacks knew it all along,” Zlochin wrote.

A U.N. World Food Program official told JNS in August that his agency was indeed relying on the MUAC rate in the IPC report to infer an ongoing famine.

Jean-Martin Bauer, director of food security and nutrition analysis service at the World Food Programme, told JNS that despite any evidence of malnutrition-related deaths on a scale typical under famine conditions, the reality of famine in Gaza City and surrounding areas was based on solid evidence, citing the IPC’s usage of MUAC.

“The prevalence of malnutrition amongst children has tripled between May and July. When you have that exponential increase, it means that there’s also an exponential increase in mortality risk,” Bauer said at the time.

JNS asked Bauer how the United Nations and IPC went from mortality risks to determining that there had actually been a famine.

“The indicator we use for nutrition is mid-upper arm circumference, and it is very clear that there is a tight correlation between mid-upper arm circumference and mortality,” he said. “That is indisputable. It’s peer reviewed.”

“That’s why we feel confident that’s a good indication of the problems taking place in Gaza,” Bauer said.

Bauer said at the time that “no liberties were taken with any data here,” adding that “there’s evidence of collapsing health systems and treated illnesses, a surge in child disease, and all that is combined with widespread malnutrition.”

Due to those factors and “exponential increase in child malnutrition in Gaza governorate and specifically in Gaza City,” the report “concludes that the famine thresholds have been exceeded in the case of Gaza City,” Bauer said. (JNS has asked the WFP for comment on the complete Nutrition Cluster data.)

MUAC-related data, however, were tenuous at best, critics say. The IPC relied on only two weeks’ worth of data for July, as opposed to a full month, and even those two weeks barely broke the MUAC threshold for famine.

And now, with the full month of data having been published by UNICEF, along with an entire month of data from August, Zlochin said all of the previous criticism of the IPC’s Gaza methodologies, including its questionable data collection, its overreliance on UNRWA’s sampling, its inclusion of extreme outlying data and its questionable decision to rely on a two-week data subset—as opposed to a complete month—all become magnified.

“The malnutrition data is not only important by itself, but they also used it to fill the gap in the mortality data. And their argument was basically not just that malnutrition crossed the 15% threshold, but there is a very strong upward trend,” Zlochin told JNS.

“They were talking about exponential growth; not just the 15% threshold being broken, but the additional claim that it was broken very rapidly and there was a very strong upward trend,” Zlochin said of the IPC’s claims.

But the updated UNICEF data, cross-checked against other sources, shows that the IPC employed questionable methods, such as taking MUAC data from a provider that showed lower malnutrition rates in the second half of July and moving that data to the first half.

“They drove the data for the second half higher, and artificially, they created a huge increase. They’ve spent a lot of effort to manufacture this appearance, as if the threshold wasn’t only crossed, but that it was crossed very rapidly,” he told JNS.

A new analysis from HonestReporting board member Salo Aizenberg corroborates Zlochin’s claims. “The IPC declaration of famine on Aug. 22 would have predicted about 10,000 starvation deaths through the Oct. 10 ceasefire,” Aizenberg wrote, basing his claims on IPC standards.

However, data from Hamas and the United Nations show that 192 malnutrition-related deaths occurred from the time of the famine claim until the ceasefire, including those with pre-existing conditions, reaching only 2% of the predicted total.

SILENCE IS NOT GOLDEN IN THE FACE OF ANTISEMITISM

There’s no room for neutrality when it comes to antisemitism

Jews for Mamdani are blind and shameful. Jewish leaders who won’t take a stand about an antisemite becoming mayor of New York City may be worse. 

 

By Jonathan S. Tobin 

 

JNS

Oct 30, 2025

 

 

Zohran Mamdani, a New York state assemblyman and the Democratic mayoral candidate in New York City, speaks during a press conference in the Belmont neighborhood of the Bronx, N.Y., on Oct. 29, 2025. Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images.

Zohran Mamdani, a New York state assemblyman and the Democratic mayoral candidate in New York City, speaks during a press conference in the Belmont neighborhood of the Bronx, N.Y., on Oct. 29, 2025.
 

The latest poll about the race for mayor of New York City revealed something that everybody already knew. According to the survey published by Quinnipiac University this week, a not insignificant percentage of Jewish respondents—16%—say they are voting for Democratic Socialist Zohran Mamdani.

Given the state assemblyman’s record of support for the openly antisemitic Students for Justice in Palestine and Council on American Islamic Relations, his refusal to condemn calls for genocide (“From the river to the sea”) and terrorism against Jews (“Globalize the intifada”), coupled with his invocation of traditional tropes of Jew-hatred in which Israel is depicted as the source of the world’s problems, it is shocking that any Jews at all would be in favor of such a person becoming the mayor of the largest Jewish city in the world outside of the State of Israel.

Who is voting for Mamdani?

Yet anyone who is surprised that one out of six New York Jews will likely vote for Mamdani hasn’t been paying attention to what has been happening not only in the Jewish community but in the United States as a whole. This result demonstrates how much of the American Jewish left has abandoned Israel. But it also shows how toxic ideas like critical race theory, intersectionality and settler-colonialism have caused some people to identify with those who have been supporting Palestinians who murder Jews.

Yet as the campaign goes into its final days, the most troubling aspect of the increasingly bitter debate about Mamdani does not concern the candidate’s open Jewish backers. Rather, it is the fact that so many Jewish leaders, including rabbis, have chosen silence or neutrality on a race with potential life-and-death consequences for the community. At a time of genuine crisis, a great many of those tasked with guiding their fellow Jews are hiding behind their pulpits rather than using them to help mobilize people to avert a potential catastrophe.

Under the circumstances, the failure to stand up against antisemitism may actually be far worse than the stances of those who are making no secret about taking sides with Mamdani.

The Quinnipiac poll show that Mamdani, the Democratic Party candidate, still holds a double-digit lead over former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who is running as an Independent, and Republican Curtis Sliwa, founder of the Guardian Angels. It did show that his advantage has been cut down to 10 points after leading by far bigger margins since he won his party’s June primary, with Mamdani getting 43%, Cuomo 33% and Sliwa 14%. That’s encouraging those clinging to hope that Cuomo can come from behind and pull out a victory, even though Sliwa stubbornly refuses to get out of the race, a move most observers have long believed is necessary for those opposed to Mamdani to prevail.

A deeper dive into the numbers, which reveals the religious affiliations of those responding, gives a clear insight into where the candidates are getting support and who constitutes the current electorate of the nation’s largest city. Cuomo leads among Protestants, Catholics and Jews. But he is still trailing by a significant margin because 50% of those who define themselves as “other” when it comes to faith are for Mamdani. This, along with the even more significant fact that he is leading among those under 50, is one of the main reasons why Mamdani remains the overwhelming favorite to win.

Do Muslims outnumber Jews?

If accurate, these results raise questions about whether the growth of the Muslim population has been underestimated. Most demographers have claimed that Muslims constitute anywhere from 8% to 10% of the total of city residents, while Jews make up about 12%. It will be interesting to see if, as some have speculated, we are approaching the point where the growth of the Muslim and Arab community, combined with the decline in the number of Jews (other than among the Orthodox), is contributing to a change in the balance of political power in New York.

As for the Jewish vote, according to Quinnipiac, Cuomo has an overwhelming lead with 60% while Mamdani gets 16%, Sliwa 12% and another 12% either voting for a minor candidate or undecided.

On the one hand, that gives the lie to those among leftist Jewish groups like J Street, as well as openly anti-Zionist and antisemitic organizations like Jewish Voice for Peace and IfNotNow, that the majority of Jews are now against Israel.

Cuomo is despised by many due to his well-deserved reputation for political thuggery during his time as governor and even long before that, as well as for his dictatorial and disastrous policies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Not to mention the fact that he was driven from office during his third gubernatorial term over accusations of sexual harassment and bullying.

Still, Cuomo has a long record of solid support for Israel and remains the most viable of the alternatives to Mamdani in large measure because he is clearly opposed to his Marxist policies, as well as his antisemitism.

The likelihood of Mamdani winning the mayoralty has set off a fierce debate among Jews, especially among rabbis.

More than 1,100 rabbis around the nation have signed a letter opposing Mamdani titled “A Rabbinic Call to Action: Defending the Jewish Future.” The document quoted Rabbi Ammiel Hirsch of the Reform movement’s Stephen Wise Free Synagogue’s statement that “when public figures like New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani refuse to condemn violent slogans, deny Israel’s legitimacy, and accuse the Jewish state of genocide, they ‘delegitimize the Jewish community, and encourage and exacerbate hostility toward Judaism and Jews.’”

It also quoted Conservative Rabbi Elliot Cosgrove’s speech from the pulpit of the Park Avenue Synagogue, when he said, “Zionism, Israel, Jewish self-determination—these are not political preferences or partisan talking points. They are constituent building blocks and inseparable strands of my Jewish identity. To accept me as a Jew but to ask me to check my concern for the people and State of Israel at the door is a nonsensical proposition and an offensive one, no different than asking me to reject God, Torah, mitzvot or any other pillar of my faith.”

The letter called upon Jews to unite against Mamdani.

Solidarity with antisemitism

It was answered by a competing rabbinic letter that said Mamdani’s “Support for Palestinian self-determination stems not from hate, but from his deep moral convictions.” That is utterly disingenuous since Mamdani has made it clear that he supports the elimination of the one Jewish state on the planet, rather than merely advocating for a Palestinian one beside it. The letter also went on to equate the mythical threat of Islamophobia with the documented surge of Jew-hatred in the United States since the Hamas-led Palestinian Arab attack on Israeli communities on Oct. 7, 2023.

Another letter from Jewish Voice for Peace reiterated Mamdani’s blood libels about Israel committing “genocide” and claiming the Jewish majority that supports Israel is trying to suppress anti-Zionist voices. It also claimed that “Palestinian and Jewish liberation are interconnected.” But since the majority of Palestinians have—as the most recent poll of those living in Gaza as well as Judea and Samaria made clear—shown that they still support Hamas’s goals for the destruction of Israel and the genocide of its people, that is a rather bizarre idea about what would constitute “Jewish liberation.”

Those two letters opposing the call to mobilize against Mamdani make it obvious that some Jews who will vote for him are either ignorant about what he and others in the “pro-Palestinian” camp believe or actually share his hateful opposition to Jewish rights and survival.

That was certainly the case with a much-publicized effort to promote a “Jews for Zohran” campaign led by a group of four hard-left female rabbis. One of them, Abby Stein, is a trans person and a vitriolic advocate for a ceasefire in Gaza in order to let Hamas survive the conflict. She also provided Jewish cover to an event sponsored by the Islamist regime in Iran. But she is best known for getting herself thrown out of the White House’s “Pride Month” celebration lsat year for disrupting former first lady Jill Biden’s speech because she thought that the administration was too supportive of Israel. 

Some of this is the result of the shift in American culture in which toxic leftist ideologies have branded Israel and Jews as “white” oppressors of “people of color” as part of a distorted vision of the conflict in the Middle East as a rerun of the struggle for civil rights during America’s past. In this way, some Jewish liberals have come to accept the false characterization of Zionism—the Jewish national liberation movement—as somehow being racist while seeing nothing wrong with Palestinian nationalism, even though it is inextricably tied to intolerance for the presence of Jews in the country where they are indigenous.

It is hardly surprising, therefore, when Jewish celebrities like actor Mandy Patinkin, who also supports “Palestinian liberation,” have spread blood libels about Israel committing “genocide” and opposed the post-Oct. 7 war against Hamas would endorse Mamdani.

It’s equally true that some young Jews have been seduced by Mamdani’s socialism—something that also reflects their ignorance about the way Marxism has failed every time it has been tried and the way it empowers tyrannical minorities. As author Batya Ungar-Sargon put it: “Zohran Mamdani, the Pied Piper of Bushwick, offers trust-fund socialism to over-credentialed, downwardly mobile 20-30-somethings who can’t become adults due to the job/housing markets. A nepo baby, he legitimizes living off your parents in a rent-stabilized apartment into your 30s.”

All of these pro-Mamdani Jews are under the mistaken impression that a city run by someone hostile to Jewish life in Israel wouldn’t impact their existence. They’re wrong about that. New York has experienced a steady decline over the past decade due to the blunders of leftist former Mayor Bill de Blasio, and the incompetence and corruption of incumbent Mayor Eric Adams (who dropped out of the race and endorsed Cuomo when it was clear his independent run would fail). But putting City Hall in the hands of a Democratic Socialist would marginalize Jewish security, especially when you consider Mamdani’s support for the pro-Hamas mobs that targeted Jews on the city’s college campuses.

As discouraging as the blindness or malevolence of those who will vote for Mamdani may be, what is truly alarming is the apathy of leaders who prefer to be silent about this threat at a moment of genuine crisis for the Jewish community. While some may deplore the arguments between rabbis opposed to and in favor of Mamdani, the real puzzle concerns the large numbers of Jewish leaders, both rabbis and communal leaders, who are simply standing on the sidelines and doing nothing to avert an impending disaster.

In strong contrast to the leadership exhibited by Hirsch and Cosgrove, both of whom have been critical of Israel’s government but rightly understand what the mainstreaming of Mamdani’s antisemitism will mean, are those like Reform’s Rabbi Angela Buchdahl of Manhattan’s Central Synagogue, who told her congregation that she would honor the political “pluralism” of her congregation by not taking a public stand on the election.

Some might defend this stance in keeping with the tradition of religious leaders avoiding partisanship. But with the Trump administration gutting the Johnson Amendment, which threatened to strip religious institutions of their nonprofit status, that excuse is gone. Moreover, we all know that many religious leaders and congregations, especially those in the African-American community, have long been active participants in electoral politics.

It’s true that virtually all synagogues, even in deep-blue New York City, have congregants that sit on both sides of the political aisle, and that avoiding endorsements or condemnations of candidates can be safer than taking a stand on them.

But this is no ordinary election for New York Jews.

Disgraceful neutrality

So, while the support for Mamdani from those Jews who are his ideological bedmates is tragically wrongheaded and dangerous, I can at least understand it.

What is hard to comprehend is how anyone, even those like Buchdahl, who have been harshly critical of Israel while still supporting its existence, can think the election of an openly antisemitic and anti-Zionist mayor is something Jews must agree to disagree about.

To stand aside and proclaim neutrality while a man who believes that Israel is at the center of a conspiracy to destroy the world—a standard trope of antisemitism, whether you’re on the right or the left—is not merely indefensible. It is a contradiction of every notion of Jewish ethics, in addition to the obligation for all Jews to be responsible for one another’s well-being and safety. And when sent out from a bastion of Manhattan elites, it’s a signal to the rest of New York Jewry and the people of Israel that they are on their own. And that, perhaps even more than the stands of those deluded Jews who share Mamdani’s ideological obsessions or don’t realize how dangerous his victory would be for their community, is truly disgraceful.

TUCKER CARLSON CLAIMED THAT HE HATED CHRISTIAN ZIONISTS LIKE SEN. TED CRUZ ABD AMBASSADOR MIKE HUCKABEE 'MORE THAN ANYBODY' BECAUSE THEY ARE PRACTITIONERS OF 'CHRISTIAN HERESY'

Is Tucker Carlson normalizing antisemitism on the right?

If the White House and conservative thought leaders don’t condemn the former “Fox News” host’s platforming of Jew-hatred, a tipping point may soon be reached. 

 

By Jonathan S. Tobin 

 

JNS

Oct 29, 2025

 

 

Conservative political commentator Tucker Carlson speaks during the memorial service for Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA who was shot and killed while speaking at Utah Valley University on Sept. 10, at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Ariz., on Sept. 21, 2025.

Extremists always pose a dilemma for mainstream politicians and journalists. Ideally, the best way of dealing with them is to ignore them. Hate-mongers thrive when they are able to seize the spotlight and hold onto it. Deprived of attention, they wither on the vine when they are confined to the fever swamps of the far right or left, where most people don’t seem to notice or care about them.

However, if their audiences are sufficiently large and they are treated by people who matter, whether national figures or opinion leaders, as falling within the proverbial Overton Window of acceptable discourse, ignoring them isn’t really an option.

And that is the problem with Tucker Carlson.

The former Fox News host turned podcaster doesn’t just have a massive audience of viewers of his program and followers on social media. He’s also still treated as someone who not only matters but is acceptable company to keep for the president and vice president of the United States, as well as lesser figures in the conservative ecosphere of politicians, pundits, podcasters and journalists.

That is how the ideas he promotes—whether in his own voice or by platforming them on his podcast—are, by extension, also treated as something that normal people should consider as worth debating, if not acceptable in their own right.

Platforming hate

So, when Carlson hosts an open antisemite like Nick Fuentes, who speaks of his desire to drive “Zionist Jews” out of American public life, in the course of what can only be described as a friendly conversation in which they debate how far to go in their opposition to Israel and its Jewish supporters, it’s not only deplorable. It’s an obvious sign of how antisemitism on the right is not a problem that can be dismissed as unimportant or uncommon. Rather, it’s a moment when a tipping point may be about to be reached, when it will no longer be possible to describe conservative Jew-hatred as insignificant.

That’s long been the position of most Jewish conservatives, and they weren’t wrong to think that way. In recent decades, antisemitism has been mainstreamed on the political left while remaining marginal on the right.

The intersectional left-wing base of the Democratic Party has largely adopted the mindset of fashionable academic ideology that conceives of Israel and Jews as “white” oppressors of people of color. They falsely view Israel as a product of “settler-colonialism,” instead of an expression of self-determination of the Jewish people in their ancient homeland, where they are indigenous.

That is the basis for the willingness of so many on the political left to accept the blood libels about the Jewish state committing “genocide” in the Gaza Strip that have flooded the liberal media since the Hamas-led Palestinian Arab attacks in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. And it’s why Democrats are now overwhelmingly an anti-Israel party, as polls now show and as has been demonstrated in congressional votes, where most of the members of their caucuses have supported banning weapons sales to Israel. Even those Democrats who long claimed to be strong backers of the Jewish state, like Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), have started to largely abandon it.

Extremists are going mainstream

The most prominent manifestation of the rising tide of Jew-hatred that has swept the globe in the last two years has emanated from the red-green alliance of Marxists and Islamists. The best American example of this is the way that New York state assemblyman Zohran Mamdani, a veteran Israel-hater and member of the Democratic Socialists of America, is on the verge of becoming the next mayor of New York City with support from mainstream Democrats.

This has stood in strong contrast to Republicans, who have become largely a lockstep pro-Israel party in the last few decades. Conservative Christians and others on the right have been ardent supporters of Israel, even eclipsing most Jewish groups in their willingness to stick with it in the face of the vilification that has rained down on it since the terrorist atrocities of Oct. 7. While the left and its leading publications have continued to mainstream and normalized antisemitism as well as the demonization of Israel, the right has stood firm with few exceptions, backing President Donald Trump’s historic pro-Israel policies.

In this way, critics of the left could argue that while antisemitism remained alive on the far right, it was marginal and contradicted by the stands of anyone who counted in the Republican Party and mainstream conservative thought.

But the tsunami of post-Oct. 7 Jew-hatred, driven by animus for Israel, has also made itself felt on the right.

Various figures who might have been characterized as part of the lunatic fringe have in recent years been gaining a toehold in the public square. Fuentes and Daryl Cooper are two such examples. And the person who is giving them a leg up is Carlson, who had them on his podcast.

Cooper is the amateur historian, Holocaust denier and antisemite hosted by Carlson last fall. Carlson praised him as the “most important popular historian of our time” and allowed him to float his bizarre theories about Winston Churchill being the villain of the Second World War, as opposed to Adolf Hitler, and that the deaths of the Jewish victims of the Holocaust were the result of logistical problems caused by the war rather than a deliberate campaign of extermination by the Nazis and their collaborators.

He was widely criticized after that episode for platforming and endorsing lies about history. Though this was far from the first time that Carlson had made clear his animus for Israel and the Jews—something that had become a staple of his program since Oct. 7—he continued to be treated as a member of the Trump family inner circle and a friend of Vice President JD Vance, as well as embraced by most of the mainstream conservative pundits as a legitimate public figure.

Demonizing Jews

But his latest show with Fuentes, in which he plays the same “I’m just asking questions” role while giving a boost to a hate-monger, makes his comfort with open antisemitism even more obvious.

The 27-year-old Fuentes is a notorious white nationalist, antisemite and Holocaust denier who has a wide following on the far right. He and his supporters are known as groypers and, as is typical of such extremists, have long been more focused on opposing mainstream and even deeply conservative Republicans because they are supporters of Israel than in opposing the left.

His opinions are unvarnished neo-Nazism, replete with dark warnings about slaughtering Jewish “devil-worshippers” once he and his followers take power. He has said “I love Hitler” and attacked “Talmudic Jews” (i.e., Jews of all denominations who practice post-biblical Judaism) as a threat to the world. He blames the Jews for everything, even alleging that Israel was responsible for the fact that he accidentally live-streamed LGBTQ pornography on his website.

He was an avowed opponent of the late conservative activist Charlie Kirk because he was a Christian Zionist. Kirk, who has taken on the reputation of a secular saint since his assassination last month, went so far as to deride the hate-monger as “vermin” and vowed never to have anything to do with him. But in an odd twist, Fuentes has seemed to gain prominence since Kirk was murdered. And that was apparently the cue for Carlson to invite him onto his program, where the two engaged in an amicable exchange for more than two hours during the course of which Fuentes vented his hate for Jews.

It is true that at one point in the conversation, Carlson contrasted his own brand of hate with that of Fuentes, saying that he liked Jews who shared his opposition to Israel, like journalist Glenn Greenwald. He claimed that his Christian beliefs led him not to seek to target Jews per se, though he regarded Israel and its supporters as a threat to America and claimed that he hated Christian Zionists like Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Mike Huckabee, the U.S. ambassador to Israel, “more than anybody” because they are practitioners of “Christian heresy.”

That’s an astonishing confession for someone who was allowed to speak at the Kirk memorial service, where he engaged in traditional tropes of antisemitism without rebuke from the organizers or other speakers.

That is also a position that he often mentions in his newsletter, claiming that Israel and AIPAC control U.S. foreign policy while defending Qatar’s far more extensive information and influencing buying operations as exemplary—something that has fed suspicions that his efforts are being financed, either directly or indirectly, by Doha.

By treating Fuentes as a legitimate figure whose opinions ought to be known, Carlson did exactly what he attempted to do with Cooper. In platforming Fuente’s rants, replete with standard antisemitic tropes about Jews being a “stateless people and unassimilable,” as well as a unique threat to the United States that must be ended, Carlson was going beyond his previous dalliances with Jew-hatred that were mostly focused on bashing the State of Israel.

The far left and far right agree

Listen closely to their exchanges, and it becomes clear that there is little difference between that and the positions of Mamdani. While the New York mayoral candidate’s opposition to Israel and the Jews is dressed up in different language, Fuentes, Carlson and Mamdani all believe that Israel is at the center of a conspiracy against their vision of justice. 

Jew-hatred isn’t just being unkind to Jews or prejudiced against them. It’s an idea rooted in politics which alleges that the Jews are the obstacle to all that is good, in much the same way that some religions depict Satan.

For Mamdani and others among the intersectional left, Israel is the lynchpin of international settler-colonialism and racism, such as when—in the course of supporting the defunding of police in 2023—he said “that when the boot of the NYPD is on your neck, it’s been laced by the IDF.”

For Carlson and Fuentes, Israel is the obstacle to a true “America First,” or rather, “America only” foreign policy in which the United States will achieve freedom from the foreign influences that they think are dragging it under and suborning white Christian dominance.

Whether you lean left or right, if your guiding principle is that all of the evil in the world always leads back to Jews and/or Israel, then you are a textbook example of antisemitism.

Barring a turnabout in the next few days, Mamdani is about to become mayor of New York, and his allies are entrenched as the leaders of the Democratic Party with a real chance of attaining power in the coming years, while Carlson, Fuentes and fellow antisemite Candace Owens are merely prattling away on podcasts.

But that is no reason for conservatives to dismiss Carlson as insignificant.

Just as the intersectional left slowly gained traction during the “progressives” long march through educational, cultural and political institutions, so, too, could right-wing antisemites do the same—or at least make major inroads among conservatives if left unchecked.

A line must be drawn

More to the point, so long as Carlson is welcome at the White House and other conservative pundits like Megyn Kelly not only won’t condemn him, but take umbrage at the suggestion that they are morally obligated to do so, his attitude toward antisemitism will become normalized on the right.

Trump blundered back in 2022 when he publicly dined with rapper/antisemite Kanye West and Fuentes at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. He subsequently disavowed the former’s hate and said he had no idea who Fuentes was. And he characteristically refused to apologize.

Since then, he’s stayed away from that pair, but he also set an example by which others on the right have been able to continue associating with people like Carlson. In opposing calls to isolate or condemn him, some conservatives have said that they are supporting free speech and don’t want to mimic the left’s attempts to “cancel” people whose views they don’t like.

Nevertheless, unless a line in the sand is drawn between the Trump administration and other leading conservatives and such open antisemites, it isn’t going to be possible to go on pretending that there is a tangible difference between the attitudes of the right and the left when it comes to antisemitism. Anyone who isn’t willing to do that, no matter where they are on the political spectrum, must stand accused of complicity in the normalization of Jew-hatred.

JEWS SUPPORTING JEW-HATER MAMDANI ARE OUT OF THEIR EVER-LOVING MINDS

New York holds its breath

Appallingly, progressive Jews are supporting an unhinged Jew-hater because they define this stance as conscience. 

 

By Melanie Phillips 

 

JNS

Oct 30, 2025 

 

Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez rally for Zohran Mamdani

New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., react on stage during a "New York is Not for Sale" rally at Forest Hills Stadium in the Queens borough of New York City on Oct. 26, 2025.

 

With the Islamist Zohran Mamdani poised to be elected mayor of New York City next week, many have been scratching their heads over how any Jew could be voting for him.

Mamdani is an Islamic terrorism sympathizer. He supports a boycott of Israel and doesn’t believe that the Jewish state should exist. He sees nothing wrong in chants of “globalize the intifada.”

He also subscribes to the “Twelver” Shia Muslim sect, the creed of Iran’s genocidal Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei that proclaims an apocalypse will bring the Shia messiah to earth.

Mamdani sheds tears not for the nearly 3,000 Americans murdered on 9/11 but for his “aunt”—who, when it was revealed she wasn’t his aunt at all, suddenly turned into another relative altogether—who, in his view, was the real victim of that Islamist atrocity because she was too frightened afterwards to wear her hijab.

Recent revelations suggest he is driven by an unhinged obsession with hating Jews. It emerged this week that in September 2023, he had said: “When the boot of the NYPD is on your neck, it’s been laced by the IDF.”

Asked this week if he stood by that comment, he dodged the question. If there had been any doubt that he’s an out-and-out antisemite, that remark alone should have nailed it. The belief that the Jews are behind problems that have nothing at all to do with them is a core trope of classical antisemitism.

There are signs that more people are beginning to wake up to Mamdani’s extremism. His polling numbers have recently started to slide. The latest Quinnipiac poll—of admittedly a very small sample of 170 Jews—suggests that 60% of them will vote for Andrew Cuomo, the former governor of New York, and only 16% will vote for Mamdani.

Yet four self-described rabbis—three female and one trans—were filmed in a promotional ad for Mamdani on a street in Manhattan cooing that he wanted to make the city affordable and safe. “We know fellow Jews want to be able to afford housing, transportation and childcare,” simpered one. There was no acknowledgment that fellow Jews might be appalled at his anti-Israel and anti-Jewish obsession and might even be put at risk by his victory.

The actor and limousine liberal Mandy Patinkin and his wife, actress, writer and producer Kathryn Grody, have produced an election video in which Patinkin gushes, with his arm round Mamdani’s shoulder: “We are going to win this because we have this extraordinary human being who is going to lead our city—and if we’re really thinking, our nation and the world—to a better, safer all-inclusive existence.”

Mamdani laughed along with this jovial hyperbole. Of course, as an Islamist, he is indeed committed to conquering the world—for Islam.

This is a man whose mother, in a newly surfaced interview, said he thinks of himself as a Ugandan and as an Indian, and is “not an American at all.” This is a man who, dressed in Islamic garb at a street demonstration filmed three months before the Hamas-led terrorist attacks in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, was screaming like a rabble-rouser that U.S.-based charities helping people in Israel should be stripped of their tax-exempt status.

More than 1,100 rabbis from around America have now signed an open letter voicing concern that, if elected, Mamdani would threaten “the safety and dignity of Jews in every city.”

Yet a coalition of left-wing, anti-Israel Jewish New Yorkers released its own letter accusing Israel of “genocide and apartheid,” and rejecting attempts to silence the “progressive and anti-Zionist voices among us.”

More than 880 other “rabbis” signed a third letter claiming that Mamdani’s support for Palestinian self-determination “stems not from hate, but from his deep moral convictions.”

Appallingly, “progressive” Jews are supporting an antisemite obsessed with hating Jews and Israel because this stance has been defined as progressive conscience. Worse still are the Jews who themselves demonize Israel with lies and who claim that by doing so, they are upholding Jewish values.

An important new book analyses this tragic phenomenon. Kenneth Levin is a psychiatrist who previously wrote The Oslo Syndrome, in which he pondered the self-destructive Israeli appeasement of the Palestinian Arabs. Now in The Canary on the Couch, he turns his attention to “the psychology of Jewish self-delusions in the face of rising antisemitism.”

Diaspora Jews have long feared that the idea of Jewish nationhood risks undermining their civil rights as American or British citizens. In the United States, many Jews subscribe to left-wing ideologies that have venomously turned against Israel. As a result, these Jews have also turned against the Jewish state.

Stung by the charge that Jews are only concerned with parochial Jewish interests, they’ve been anxious to demonstrate their commitment to causes outside the Jewish community, even where these run counter to Jewish interests, like the anti-Jew, anti-white and anti-West Black Lives Matter movement.

The fear that the wider community might turn against Jews has meant that—even now that it has indeed done so at an unprecedented level—these cowed Jews don’t blame the haters, but instead blame Israel for allegedly turning the community against them. As Levin states, even some Jews genuinely concerned with Israel’s well-being are thus sickeningly blaming Jewish victimization on other Jews.

For similar reasons, there’s a fixed belief among Jewish leaders that the principal threat to diaspora Jews comes from the extreme right, despite the fact that most of this threat emanates from the progressive radicals of race, gender and climate politics.

This helps explain why there has been no concerted opposition to Mamdani from America’s Jewish community leadership. Many of these leaders believe not that people like Mamdani have incited the current explosion of antisemitism but that Israel has tarred their own standing in society, particularly among the intelligentsia, media and other cultural icons with whom they identify.

Levin calls out a range of U.S. communal bodies and leaders, including the Anti-Defamation League, the New Israel Fund, J Street and Rabbi Rick Jacobs, the leader of Reform Judaism, for effectively siding with the mortal enemies of Israel and the Jewish people or failing to do enough to counter them.

Rather than call out the demagogic black community leader Al Sharpton, who has spewed anti-Jewish invective and has been involved in anti-Jewish violence that goes back to the Crown Heights riots in 1991 in Brooklyn, N.Y., Levin notes that Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO and national director of the Anti-Defamation League, effectively embraced him as an ally against the right.

Along with the campus-based Hillel organization, says Levin, the ADL has also failed to take adequate action to counter the threats to Jewish students on campus, and no other legacy Jewish organization has stepped up to fill this void.

And none of them has called out the rampant antisemitism that is standard fare throughout the Muslim world. Instead, these organizations parrot the leftist denunciation of anyone critical of Muslims as a bigot.

There’s another reason that Jewish community leaders don’t call out these enemies within. The Jewish world tells itself that the greatest threat it faces is disunity, which has brought disaster upon the Jewish people in the past because it has fatally weakened its defense against its enemies.

While it is undeniable that disunity is disastrous, an even greater catastrophe is surely threatened by Jews turning against their own. This provides both lethal weaponry and a protective shield for the mortal enemies of the Jewish people.

These anti-Jewish Jews have, in effect, joined forces with those who are intent upon the extermination of the Jewish state. They sanitize and incentivize these enemies while gaslighting Jews who support Israel and whom they demonize as nationalist bigots.

The damage that’s been done by Jews who have a pathological impulse to damage their own people, and who hurl against Israel and Zionism the same malevolent lies deployed by those who want Israel and the Jews removed from the world, is unconscionable.

The willful refusal by the Jewish community leadership to address this amounts to a betrayal of a Jewish community that’s under siege. If Mamdani is elected, they will have much more to answer for.