Friday, June 28, 2024

A LONG READ, BUT A VERY INTERESTING ONE

Like sadistic Nazis: Secret Hamas papers reveal step-by-step action plan for Oct. 7

Uncovered documents and eyewitness accounts obtained by Israel Hayom and Bild reveal the chilling extent of Hamas' meticulous planning for how to kidnap women and children and brutally take over homes. "The cruelty was supposed to be as graphic as possible because that's how you show your superiority," expert says.

 

By Itay Ilnai and Filipp Piatov

 

Israel Hayom

Jun 28, 2024 


 

Like sadistic Nazis: Secret Hamas papers reveal step-by-step action plan for Oct. 7

The captured Hamas documents with battle orders

 

Izz ad-Din al-Haddad, known as "Abu Saheeb," a senior Hamas official and commander of the Gaza Brigade, held a secret meeting with his battalion commanders on October 6, hours before the surprise attack on Israel. He personally handed them a printed page bearing the logo of Hamas' military wing, the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades.

"With faith in crushing victory, the leadership of the brigades has approved the start of the major military operation 'Al-Aqsa Flood'," Abu Saheeb declared at the top of the page. "Place your faith and trust in Allah, rely on Him and fight bravely, act with a clear conscience, and let the cries of 'Allahu Akbar' be the crowning glory."

The document, captured by the IDF during the ground operation in Gaza and revealed here for the first time in a joint article by Israel Hayom and the German newspaper Bild, outlines the preparations required for the incursion into Israel: "Ensure that no operative leaves the assembly point; ensure that there is no use of mobile phones under any circumstances; conduct battalion meetings underground; forces will receive an explanation (only) in the last two hours."

Abu Saheeb emphasizes one of the brigade's main objectives: "Ensure that there is a live broadcast of the assault and takeover of the outposts and kibbutzim. The brigade's information (department) has permission to upload the footage (to the internet). You may take flags of Arab and Islamic countries with you to hoist them atop the outposts and kibbutzim."

The order concludes by summarizing the main goal of the October 7 operation: "Take a large number of soldiers prisoner in the first moments (of the fighting) and send them into the Gaza Strip (emphasis in original). Signed: Your brother, the jihad fighter, Abu Saheeb al-Haddad, commander of the Gaza Brigade."

While Abu Saheeb's military order does not explicitly instruct his men to kidnap and murder civilians or commit atrocities such as beheadings and sexual crimes, such horrors occurred on a wide scale during that catastrophic day in all areas of the Gaza border communities. "These acts were not committed by one person or in one place alone," says a police source, relying on forensic evidence, testimonies, interrogations of terrorists, and hundreds of hours of video footage. "You see these atrocities everywhere during that day."

Yahya Sinwar, the Hamas leader in Gaza and architect of the surprise attack, claimed in communications with his people during the war that "things got out of control." He stated, "People got carried away, and it shouldn't have happened." An official Hamas document from January also claimed that the October 7 attack was aimed only at military sites to capture soldiers and release prisoners in exchange. "The religion of Islam forbids intentional harm to women, children, and the elderly," it stated. "Hamas, as a disciplined movement, adheres to these rules."

However, the evidence suggests that Hamas is indeed a disciplined movement. The Gaza Brigade's operation order is just one component of a complex, extensive, and sophisticated system that Hamas efficiently and cunningly wove in preparation for its murderous attack. Additional documents captured during the maneuver in Gaza – some of which are revealed here for the first time – along with conversations with survivors from the Gaza area kibbutzim, sources involved in interrogating terrorists, and researchers of Palestinian society, give for the first time the full scope of this system and underscores the lengths to which it was an engineered, planned, and precise operation that is very unlikely to have "gotten out of control."

Moreover, the October 7 massacre was not only explicitly directed at Israeli civilians but was deliberately carried out by Gazan civilians who were an inherent part of the grand plan Hamas had devised. According to academic researchers in Germany and Israel, parts of this plan are reminiscent of practices used by the Nazis to exterminate European Jews, such as the use of Einsatzgruppen, the SS "operational units" that advanced in the wake of the German army's invasion of Eastern Europe and participated in the planned and systematic extermination of Jews.

"Hamas is not just a terror army, but also an organization that holds a modern ideology for the extermination of Jews," says Prof. Michael Wolffsohn from the Federal Army University in Munich, one of the world's leading researchers on the analysis of German-Israeli relations. According to him, students in Europe and the U.S. who express solidarity with Hamas "are actually expressing solidarity with the 'values' of the Nazi Einsatzgruppen."

Chilling efficiency

At two-thirty in the morning, October 8, under the protection of Maglan and Duvdevan elite IDF commandos, Gila Mizrahi emerged from the safe room, having being trapped in it for 20 consecutive hours. During this long time, her beautiful home in Kfar Aza, where she had lived for more than 40 years, became a military outpost for terrorists. "Everything in the house was broken and destroyed," she recalls this week the moments of leaving the safe room. "But before I left the house, I saw out of the corner of my eye, amid all the chaos, the cookie jars I had left on the kitchen counter. They were intact and empty. My youngest son was supposed to have a birthday that Saturday, and I had prepared the date cookies he loves. The terrorists, who were in our house for hours, apparently enjoyed them very much."

A few hours earlier, under a barrage of missiles and rockets, dozens of Nukhba terrorists, Hamas's elite unit, invaded Kfar Aza. They wore olive uniforms, were armed from head to toe, quickly breached the border fence and entered Kfar Aza on pickup trucks. Photojournalist Roi Idan, a resident of the kibbutz, even managed to photograph two terrorists making their way towards him, hanging on paragliders. Idan was murdered along with his wife, Smadar. Their daughter, Avigail, was kidnapped and celebrated her fourth birthday in Gaza. She was released in the first hostage deal.

The Nukhba forces in Kfar Aza were not only well-trained but also equipped with maps, accurate intelligence, and orderly commands. This was also the case with the other Nukhba forces, which simultaneously overtook the military bases in the sector, including the nearby Nahal Oz outpost, which was completely captured.

The Nukhba force that entered Kfar Aza operated with chilling efficiency. Dozens of terrorists, who knew exactly where the armory and the private home of the kibbutz's security coordinator, Shahar Avian, were located, conducted a brief battle against the local standby squad, which was numerically inferior, and eliminated seven out of its 14 members. From that moment on, they controlled the kibbutz without challenge. They had plenty of time to eat Gila Mizrahi's date cookies. "Around eight in the morning, we started hearing automatic weapon fire and shouts in Arabic around the house," says Yossi, Gila's husband. "The first thing I did was send a message to the security coordinator, Shahar Aviani. Only after that did I realize that at this stage he had already been murdered."

After hearing the gunshots, Yossi and Gila, both 73 – he's a landscape architect and she managed Kfar Aza's "mini-mall" for years – locked themselves in the safe room along with one of their granddaughters and her partner. At one point, the four heard terrorists entering the house and wandering through the different rooms, just beyond the door. "They tried to open the safe room, but fortunately the handle is tricky and you need to know how to operate it," Yossi recounts. "They didn't succeed, and one of them asked in a heavy Arabic accent, 'Is anyone there?' We, for our part, huddled in the corner and tried to keep quiet." Yossi even held a kitchen knife in his hand. "Not that it would have helped me with anything, but that's what I had," he says.

From inside the safe room, the Mizrahi family could hear Hamas terrorists breaking all the windows in the house and piling up the living room furniture to serve as a military position. The special treatment given to the Mizrahi family's house, located at the southern end of Kfar Aza, was not accidental: It faces the kibbutz's perimeter fence, not far from the access road and the entrance gate to the community. The terrorists used this house as an outpost to prevent IDF forces from approaching the kibbutz and recapturing it. Later, a Toyota pickup truck loaded with many weapons would be found on the lawn in the yard. The terrorists apparently failed to bring all the extensive equipment into the fortified house.

The Mizrahi family's house was not the only one carefully chosen and converted into a military position. At one o'clock in the afternoon of October 7, when a small force led by the Maglan commander finally arrived at Kfar Aza, the settlement's gate had already become a killing zone controlled by Hamas terrorists, who had positioned machine guns and RPG launchers on the roofs of nearby houses. Along the perimeter fence, numerous explosive devices had been placed in advance. "Our goal was just to kill, not to kidnap," a captured Nukhba terrorist said in his Shin Bet interrogation. "To kill women and children too."

 

 

Israeli soldiers remove bodies in Kibbutz Kfar Aza, Oct. 10, 2023.

 

According to IDF documents, in the prolonged time at their disposal, the terrorists also managed to boobytrap some of the houses inside the kibbutz, leaving weapons outside to tempt and lure soldiers inside. In some houses, even the windows were booby-trapped, assuming soldiers would try to enter through them. The terrorists even placed grenades without pins under bodies, both of dead terrorists and Israeli casualties. In several cases, terrorists pretended to be dead, to ambush IDF soldiers after they passed them. These methods were also common in other places captured by Hamas that day.

The second wave

The Shin Bet and Military Intelligence Directorate define the Nukhba terrorists, hundreds of whom first stormed the Gaza border communities and bases, as the "first wave" of the attack, the one that paved the way for the waves that followed. Shortly after the first wave attack began, an announcement started to be heard in Gaza's mosques: From the powerful loudspeakers came the voice of Mohammed Deif, the head of Hamas's military wing, calling on anyone who could take a rifle, even a knife or an axe, to join the raid into Israel.

Similar instructions were given simultaneously through Hamas' media outlets in the Gaza Strip and passed by word of mouth. These incitement calls, a move undoubtedly carefully planned in advance by Hamas, were intended to flood the Gaza border communities with as many vengeful and hate-filled Gaza residents as possible, who would enter Israel under the cover of the breaches provided by the first wave of the Nukhba force. If you will, a reserve mobilization.

Hundreds of those who quickly responded to these calls were armed Hamas members not affiliated with the Nukhba forces, or members of other terrorist organizations who were not privy to the attack plans. The people of the "second wave" may not have all trained for the attack and were not equipped with orderly commands, but somehow they knew exactly what to do.

For example, in footage published on social media, filmed by a GoPro camera carried by a Hamas terrorist, you can see the house of the Mizrahi family in Kfar Aza, and the huge Brachychiton tree planted in their yard. In the video, about ten terrorists surround the house, all dressed in civilian clothes (unlike the Nukhba men who wore olive uniforms, some of them IDF uniforms), which doesn mean they were not equipped with Kalashnikov rifles and combat vests.

In the video, you can see how these terrorists wander around the Mizrahi family's house and shout "Allahu Akbar," and when a red alert siren is heard, they hide behind the wide trunk of the tree. Other than that, no one interferes with their actions. One can get the impression that these terrorists are less professional and orderly than the Nukhba men, but within the comfortable envelope in which they operated, there was no one to prevent them from turning the Mizrahi family's house into their temporary base. From this base, they went on an indiscriminate killing spree.

"Throughout the day we heard them talking for hours, leaving the house and coming back," says Gila Mizrahi. "In hindsight, we know that during this time, in the row of houses behind us, they entered every house and murdered the residents – adults and children. If there's any luck, it's that the apartments in Kfar Aza share a common wall, and apparently the terrorists didn't understand that each house actually consists of two separate apartments. In each building in the row, they only entered one apartment and didn't bother to enter the adjacent one. That's how some of the people were saved: One family was murdered, one family wasn't. Every time they killed someone, it sounded like it made them feel really good. It was very hard to sit in the safe room and hear all this happening around us."

At the end of the conversation, Yossi sends us a two-minute video clip, filmed immediately after the IDF's recapture of Kfar Aza. You can see the house's kitchen riddled with bullets, and the living room completely overturned. In the front yard, the body of a terrorist in military uniform, perhaps a Nukhba man, still lies. On the back porch of the house, under the shade of the huge tree, lies a pile of additional bodies. On the nearby wall, someone sprayed in red spray paint "7 dead terrorists." All these dead terrorists are dressed in civilian clothes. Most of them are wearing sandals.

Kidnapping organized down to a tee

Those who took over the southern neighborhood in Kfar Aza, that of the Mizrahi couple, didn't waste time on kidnapping civilians. But in the "Young Neighborhood," which is closer to the Gaza border, the terrorists acted systematically to kidnap as many as possible. They entered each and every one of the 16 houses there. In total, they murdered three residents and kidnapped seven others. Only four of the neighborhood's residents who were at home that day were spared after managing to lock themselves in the safe room. "Those who resisted them were murdered, and those who didn't resist – were kidnapped," one of them recounted.

In a nearby town, the terrorists tried to use a slightly different method to kidnap the residents. On one of the terrorists' bodies, a note was found, on which a surrender order was written in Hebrew by hand: "All residents of the Kibbutz must surrender themselves as prisoners to the al-Qassam Brigades."

It seems that when it comes to kidnappings, Hamas was perfectly organized. Luis Har, who was kidnapped from Kibbutz Nir Yitzhak and released in a military operation in Rafah, described in testimony given in Nadav Peri's podcast about his "kidnapping chain": One group of terrorists pulled him out of the house, a second drove him across the border fence, a third led him through the intricate tunnel system beneath Gaza, and another led him from the tunnel entrance to a hideout, where he was held captive along with his relatives – another man, two women, and a teenage girl.

The 70-year-old Har said that each of the units in his "kidnapping chain" was composed of different people, who acted in full cooperation and knew exactly what to do. Hamas, as mentioned, is a disciplined movement.

Popular mass mobilization

The conquest of the Gaza border communities was a move long planned by the Hamas leadership. Another shocking handwritten document, also captured during the IDF ground maneuver in the Gaza Strip, details the full scope of "Al-Aqsa Flood." According to the document, Hamas' original goal was to take control of 221 settlements in the south, including the cities of Netivot, Ofakim, and Sderot, and expel the "settlers" from them. These were supposed to flee the using their own cars, with "priority to (expelling) women and children, and taking men aged 17-50 as hostages." The Hamas leadership estimated that Israel would respond forcefully to the attack, "not only with strikes but also with an atomic bomb." According to the document, they were prepared to absorb even that.

The conquest operation was planned to be accompanied by an international media and legal effort, branded as "Returning Home." Gaza civilians also had a role in the plan. "For extra security, a popular mass mobilization should be carried out for a symbolic return to villages and their re-conquest," it stated. "This war is a war of life and death." This grandiose plan didn't ultimately materialize. But even during October 7, Hamas carried out a "popular mass mobilization."

The "first wave" and "second wave" of armed individuals were not the only forces that invaded Israeli territory. They were joined by an additional wave, a third, of what is called in the Israeli intelligence community "looters" or "mob." These were civilians, not necessarily armed with firearms, who simply took advantage of the opportunity presented to them. "There were civilians who got the understanding — and someone took care to create this understanding – that the fence had fallen," says a military source. "As a result, so many civilians entered Israel, some of whom say in interrogations that they just wanted to infiltrate Israel to look for work. There was a mixed crowd of all types of people there, including 12-year-old children." According to testimonies obtained by Israel Hayom and Bild, Gazan women also participated in the attack.

In police interrogations of some of the "mob" caught in Israeli territory, they said that the calls in the mosques and the rumor about the breached border fence were the catalyst that caused them to storm the Gaza border communities. "There are quite a few people who say in interrogations, 'We heard Mohammed Deif in the mosque, we took a knife, and our goal was to slaughter Jews,'" a police source said.

Some of the looters "settled" for slaughtering Jews, while others kidnapped people as if finding great spoil. According to a source familiar with the information, a kind of "price list" developed in real-time around the issue of Israeli hostages, with Hamas offering money to anyone who had an Israeli hostage. "In one case, someone holding a hostage was offered an apartment in exchange," says the same source.

Singing in Arabic

The "first wave" and "second wave" of armed individuals were not the only forces that invaded Israeli territory. They were joined by an additional wave, a third, of what is called in the Israeli intelligence community "looters" or "mob." These were civilians, not necessarily armed with firearms, who simply took advantage of the opportunity presented to them. "There were civilians who got the understanding - and someone took care to create this understanding - that the fence had fallen," says a military source. "As a result, so many civilians entered Israel, some of whom say in interrogations that they just wanted to infiltrate Israel to look for work. There was a mixed crowd of all types of people there, including 12-year-old children." According to testimonies obtained by Israel Hayom and Bild, Gazan women also participated in the attack.

In police interrogations of some of the "mob" caught in Israeli territory, they said that the calls in the mosques and the rumor about the breached border fence were the catalyst that caused them to storm the Gaza envelope. "There are quite a few people who say in interrogations 'we heard Mohammed Deif in the mosque, we took a knife, and our goal was to slaughter Jews'," says a police source.

Some of the looters "settled" for slaughtering Jews, while others kidnapped people as if finding great spoil. According to a source familiar with the information, a kind of "price list" developed in real-time around the issue of Israeli hostages, with Hamas offering money to anyone who had an Israeli hostage. "In one case, someone holding a hostage was offered an apartment in exchange," says the same source.

The different waves that crashed with force on the Gaza envelope mixed with each other and operated in parallel. "These were 'breathing' waves," as a military source defines it. From testimonies and videos, one can get the impression that everyone who entered Israel from the Gaza Strip that day, regardless of which wave they were in, acted in synchronization that seemed to be dictated in advance. One of the places where this synchronization can be closely examined is Kibbutz Nir Oz.

IDF forces arrived at Nir Oz only in the afternoon hours of October 7 and found it almost completely empty of terrorists. In the many hours that passed until then, the kibbutz became completely exposed and Palestinians from Gaza did as they pleased. So much so, that a Palestinian journalist entered the kibbutz with a camera crew and broadcast live on television. In total, 77 people were kidnapped from Nir Oz, and 40 were murdered – one out of every three residents who were in the kibbutz that Saturday.

Hamas' method worked well in Nir Oz. The first to arrive were the Nukhba men dressed in olive uniforms. They breached the gate at exactly 6:35 AM, entered on about ten Toyota pickup trucks, dispersed throughout the kibbutz according to orders received in advance, and quickly neutralized the standby squad. On the body of the only terrorist found in the kibbutz was a map dividing Nir Oz into different sectors. Attached to the map was one operational instruction: "Kidnap everyone you can. If there's resistance – kill."

Irit Lahav, a 57-year-old resident of Nir Oz, was born and raised in the kibbutz. In her youth, she went on a long trip abroad, including long stays in India, Japan, and Brazil, and five years ago returned to live in Nir Oz, in the new expansion neighborhood. When the invasion began, Lahav locked herself in the house's safe room along with her daughter and their dog. "I had to clean and organize," says Lahav, but in the pictures she shows us on her phone, one can see the total chaos left behind by the terrorists and looters on October 7.

"It was clear from the messages running in the kibbutz that the terrorists were going from house to house, and that at some point they would reach us too," Lahav continues. "We started thinking about how we would lock ourselves in. The problem is that the whole body is shaking, and it's very hard to think clearly." With a little instruction she received on the phone from her brother, and a lot of resourcefulness, Lahav turned for a moment into MacGyver: she took the rod of the Dyson vacuum cleaner, tied it with a thin leather cord to an oar that happened to be in the safe room, and fitted the improvised lock on the door handle. "I knew our lives depended on this thing," she says.

An hour and a half after completing the construction of the lock, someone entered her house. "It sounded like seven or eight men," she recounts. "They were here for 20 minutes, banging on the safe room door and shouting. At this stage, there's no fear anymore, there's acceptance of death. The shaking stops, the body is limp, you know these are the last moments. My daughter and I said goodbye words to each other and 'I love you'. Until the terrorists gave up and went to the neighbors' house. The lock I built worked."

Those who weren't resourceful that day in Nir Oz didn't survive. They were kidnapped or murdered. Out of 135 houses in the kibbutz, only five weren't entered by terrorists. If you didn't manage to lock the safe room door, your fate was bitter. "They came to me, and came back again and again, about every hour," Lahav recounts. The first people who entered her house still tried to open the safe room door by force, those who came after barely bothered. They settled for looting. "Each time someone else came to see what else they could steal," says Lahav. "Around four in the afternoon we heard two teenagers entering the house. They were inside for 45 minutes. They were the last to 'visit' us."

A Gazan woman entered one of Lahav's neighbors' houses. "The family, who was locked in the safe room, heard her turn on the TV, exit Netflix, put on some program in Arabic, and for four hours prepare food and sing in Arabic."

The Gazans who entered the houses in Nir Oz barely left any property behind. "They took everything," says Lahav. "Shoes, sandals, bicycles, children's toy cars, mobility scooters, scooters, tractors, agricultural machinery, electrical appliances – microwave, TV, mixer. All the computers, phones, wallets. They even took my kettle, spoons, and knives."

Some of the "mob" in Nir Oz also engaged in kidnapping. According to testimonies of female hostages from the kibbutz who returned from Gaza, some were taken out of the house by unarmed people, driven to the border by an armed person in civilian clothes, and from there taken further. "In my opinion, the trend was first to kidnap, then to loot, and finally – to burn," says Lahav. "The pyromaniacs didn't reach my neighborhood, but 60% of the houses in Nir Oz were set on fire. They simply cut the gas pipe in the kitchen and lit it."

According to Lahav, "This is probably a gimmick they thought of on the spot, because some of the terrorists came to Nir Oz with fuel containers, and people reported hearing them pouring something in the house before it was set on fire. In one of my rounds in the kibbutz, I even saw a pile of tires, tied with a rope. At first, I didn't understand why they were there. Only later did it dawn on me – they dragged the tires with them from Gaza to set the houses on fire." In other words: The Gazan mob knew, from within, that they should set the kibbutz houses on fire and burn them down. The only question was what was the most efficient way to do it.

Murderous and raping mob 

Sources involved in interrogating Palestinians caught in Israeli territory say that the wave of "looters" didn't settle for just kidnapping, stealing, and burning. Some committed the most horrific atrocities.

In one of the kibbutzim in the Gaza area we visited, for example, several beheaded bodies were found, and at least one woman was raped. Two terrorists caught by the Shin Bet, a father and son, even confessed to this rape in their interrogation.

Among the acts attributed to the wave of "looters" are additional sex crimes. The "Association of Rape Crisis Centers in Israel" relied on open publications on the subject, and with the help of additional testimonies they collected, compiled the report "Silent Cry," which was published in February. While Hamas vehemently denies that sex crimes occurred intentionally and initiated during October 7, according to the report, the attack included "brutal sexual abuse, carried out systematically and intentionally against Israeli citizens."

This determination is based, among other things, on the fact that recurring patterns of sex crimes appeared both at the Nova music festival, in the kibbutzim, and in IDF bases. Due to the sensitivity of the matters, we won't quote the report in full, but we'll note that a large part of the bodies of sex crime victims were found tied and bound, and in some cases, bodies were found with their genitals mutilated.

"Not in a Vacuum" 

Where does the pure evil come from, which allowed Gaza residents – terrorists and civilians – to commit such horrific crimes against innocent people? Here too, the answer is part of Hamas' grand plan, which had been ongoing for years in preparation for the attack. "October 7 didn't occur in a vacuum," as Dr. Ido Zelkovitz, a researcher and the Chaikin Chair for Geostrategy at the University of Haifa and head of the Middle Eastern Studies program at the Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, puts it. "This was an orderly work plan, the result of Hamas' poison machine, which built this event over a long time. This was accompanied by a long mental preparation, which allowed people to commit the atrocities they committed. The massacre is an unequivocal product of Hamas' religious preaching system in the Gaza Strip over the years.

"Hamas took control of the Strip in 2007, and in the period that has passed since then, it has exclusively controlled the media, the education system, the preaching networks in mosques, etc.," Zelkovitz continues. "The younger generation in Gaza has grown up all their lives under a regime that promotes ideas that present the Jew in a dehumanized way, as an inferior creature who deceived the Palestinians and stole their land, in an illegitimate and illegal manner. When you take all this incitement that people were exposed to for years, not only informally but as raw material in the education system, and add to it the fact that most of the Gazan public are refugees, who just by crossing the border feel an exaltation of returning to their lands – you get a very strong cocktail. This thing was aggressively fueled for years and exploded on October 7."

The main component in this poison cocktail, according to Dr. Zelkovitz, is religious fundamentalism. "In Hamas, they learned religious rulings that allow them to harm any Jew, since even a child and an elderly person were or will be soldiers," he says. "Hamas commanders gave orders on October 7, while quoting verses from the Quran and highlighting cases from Islamic history where famous commanders beheaded and dismembered during battle."

Zelkovitz gives as an example a note whose contents were previously published by the IDF spokesperson and found in the possession of a dead terrorist. "Know that the enemy is a disease that has no cure, except for beheading and tearing out hearts and livers," it stated. In a conversation that an official Israeli source had with Israel Hayom and Bild, it was reported that in at least one case of an Israeli casualty, the head was severed and even taken into the Gaza Strip, where it was held as a bargaining chip by Hamas. The body parts were eventually located during the ground operation and returned for burial in Israel.

"When you talk about killing and abusing Jews as a commandment that promises you reward in the afterlife, it has a significant impact," explains Dr. Zelkovitz. "Even an ordinary Gazan citizen who enters Israel doesn't feel that he's acting for something material, but performing these actions – murder, rape, looting – for the sake of a religious war. It's no coincidence that in the terrorists' GoPro videos, you can see them singing songs of praise and glory to the Prophet Muhammad and Allah, and not talking about liberating Palestine. The idea of a religious struggle is what accompanies them, not the idea of national liberation. This allows you to commit atrocities out of a sense of mission and belief."

The connection between religious belief and the action of Hamas forces on the ground is expressed in another document captured from a Nukhba terrorist who infiltrated Israel on October 7. It's a combat page for "morale boosting" to be carried in the vest pocket, a long table aimed at encouraging the fighters of Hamas' military wing and lifting their spirits, using religious and Islamic motifs. The table includes various verses from the Quran alongside quotes from Muslim commanders and preachers, which are to be recited before, during, and after battle, and even in case of injury.

Thus, for example, a wounded terrorist is supposed to pull out the table from his vest pocket and mumble "Do not let your hands slacken from pursuing the infidels, and even if you are wounded, behold their wounds hurt as much as yours." Another quote calls: "O jihad fighters, the qualities of men are revealed in battlefields and not on speaking platforms." The IDF Military Intelligence Directorate claims that the document shows that in Hamas' military wing, faith is an integral part of the fighting.

The Nazis may not have been religious fundamentalists, but their fanatical ideology allowed German soldiers and civilians to commit genocide against European Jews. According to academic experts, there are indeed parallel lines between Nazi methods and those of Hamas. "October 7 was part of Hamas' attempt to eliminate the Jewish population in Israel by killing as many people as possible and expelling others," says historian Prof. Danny Orbach from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. "Both in the case of Hamas and in the case of the Nazis, there was an 'attempt at mass extermination', but the logic behind the extermination mechanism was different. While the Nazis wanted to eliminate the Jews as quickly and efficiently as possible, Hamas knew it couldn't kill all the Jews of Israel, only those who would be under its control during the invasion hours."

 


Gaza civilians joining the terrorist attack on Nir Oz

 

Orbach refers to the huge quantities of video material that Hamas produced during the massacre and uploaded to the internet, the result of a clear strategy dictated in advance. "Hamas' goal was not only to murder people, but to demonstrate the dominance of one group over another through torture and mutilation," he says. "Therefore, the cruelty had to be as graphic as possible, because that's how you show your superiority in this culture." According to him, this is exactly the core of Hamas' ideology. "Hamas believes that Israel is an artificial state. It believes that we will simply disappear if our security is shaken, that Israel will disintegrate.

"This is actually very similar to the Nazi way of thinking," Orbach continues, "Hamas sees all Jewish presence in 'Palestine' as a kind of pollution. And if you think something is pollution, you want to clean it with fire."

TRUMP: 'HE [BIDEN] BECOME LIKE A PALESTINIAN. BUT THEY DON'T LIKE HIM BECAUSE HE'S A VERY BAD PALESTINIAN, HE'S A WEAK ONE'

Biden ‘a very bad … weak’ Palestinian, Trump says at debate

The current and former U.S. presidents clashed briefly but explosively on Israel in a debate that raises questions about Biden’s age and fitness for office. 

 

BOWMAN WILL SOON HAVE TO FIND SOME PLACE OTHER THAN CONGRESS TO PULL A FIRE ALARM

Bowman lost because of his unhinged radicalism, not AIPAC

The left’s hypocritical narrative about a landslide loss in New York is to resurrect an antisemitic trope about Jewish money. The “Squad,” however, is far from finished. 

 

By Jonathan S. Tobin

 

JNS

Jun 27, 2024

 

  

Leftists put down Bowman’s fate as just another example of wicked pro-Israel Jews taking down a proud black man.

 

The narrative about Rep. Jamaal Bowman’s (D-N.Y.) impending landslide primary loss from “progressive” Democrats was already being set up the weekend before the votes in New York’s 16th Congressional District were counted. While some might have considered the presence of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) as the featured speaker, a video from the Bronx rally for the congressman in which Bowman and one of his leading allies and fellow “Squad” member, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.), danced around like teenagers at a rock concert before he launched into a profanity-laden tirade that went viral. While the main point of their presentations was expressed in varied ways, Bowman summed it up in two words: f*&%k AIPAC.”

 

U.S. Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY), U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) attend a rally at St. Mary’s Park on June 22, 2024 in the Bronx borough of New York City. Supporters gathered three days before New York’s primary elections as incumbent Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) attempts to retain his seat in a heated primary race.

U.S. Rep. Jamaal Bowman, Sen. Bernie Sanders and U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez danced around like teenagers at a rock concert before he launched into a profanity-laden tirade that went viral.

 

The same profound sentiment was widely shared on the left after the results came in on Tuesday evening when Bowman was routed in his bid for re-election by a longtime moderate Democrat. Westchester County Executive George Latimer trounced Bowman by 58.6% to 41.4%.

Other members of the “Squad” and some leftist pundits like Peter Beinart put down Bowman’s fate as just another example of wicked pro-Israel Jews taking down a proud black man. Axios published a story packed with anonymous quotes from Democratic congressmen saying that $14.5 million spent on advertising by an AIPAC-affiliated PAC was unseemly, if not overkill. In The Guardian, Ben Davis conceded that AIPAC had won, but he termed it a “pyrrhic victory” that actually marked a turning point. According to Davis, “the result of this election masks a considerable shift in the balance of power within American politics away from unconditional support for Israel as an unquestioned political consensus.”

AIPAC knocks off a sure loser

Their point was that Bowman was too weak to resist the power of the mighty “Israel Lobby,” but the fact that this all-powerful force in American politics had to go to so much trouble and expense to take down one member of Congress was actually a sign of weakness.

By contrast, many supporters of Israel, while decrying the conspiratorial nature of these accusations, were still quick to point to the outcome as a sign of things to come for other “Squad” members like Rep. Cori Bush (D-Minn.), who also faces a stiff primary challenge next month from a more moderate Democrat. Their hope was that Bowman’s loss would be a turning point in which centrists would begin to roll back the victories of the progressive wing of the party in recent years that has so much such leverage over the Biden administration on a host of issues, only one of them being anti-Israel sentiments.

Both of these far-reaching conclusions are wrong.

Bowman didn’t lose his race because of AIPAC. The pro-Israel lobby didn’t spend a penny on the race until after a poll was published in March that showed Bowman trailing Latimer among likely primary voters by the same 17% margin—52% to 35%—that he wound up losing in the actual count.

The congressman’s problems stemmed from a basic conundrum: He was out of sync with the sentiments of his own constituents. When first elected in 2020, his district was drawn in a manner far friendlier to left-wing views. But the district that emerged from the post-census reapportionment of New York’s representatives was decidedly less amenable to progressives, even if it still remained overwhelmingly Democratic. Although partly based in the New York City borough of the Bronx, which has a high minority population, it is now mostly situated in neighboring Westchester County, an area with a considerable Jewish population. It was too suburban to be a good fit for the former middle-school principal’s AOC-style radicalism, and where he reportedly largely ignored the locals in his bid for national celebrity and attention. That was reflected in the results, which showed Bowman winning the sliver of the district that was in the Bronx by a whopping 84%-16% margin but losing in the far larger Westchester segment by 64%-36%.

Nor was Bowman just another “Squad” member. He earned notoriety last year for pulling a fire alarm in the U.S. House of Representatives when the Democrats were trying to delay a vote, leading to panic at the Capitol and then his colleagues censuring him. He also had to pay a fine and do community service.

All of this leads to the conclusion that Bowman would have been in deep trouble against any non-left-wing Democrat, let alone one as well-established and as good a campaigner as Latimer.

Democracy in action

It’s true that part of his problem was the fact that the 16th has a significant Jewish population, which made his increasingly anti-Israel stand an obstacle to re-election. Bowman flirted with anti-Zionism throughout his three and a half years in Congress but went overboard after the terrorist attacks in Israel on Oct. 7, when he denied the truth about Hamas using rape as a weapon of war and then falsely accused Israel of committing genocide in Gaza once Israel’s ground war started. It got even worse when he accused Jews of living in “separated” communities, a classical antisemitic trope.

 

 George LatimerWestchester County Executive George Latimer speaks to supporters after winning his race against Democratic incumbent Rep. Jamaal Bowman in the 16th Congressional District of New York’s Democratic primary, June 25, 2024. 


So, while anti-Israel propagandists look to AIPAC’s intervention as proof of the unhealthy influence of the “Israel lobby,” the fact that Jewish voters were desperate not to have him represent them in Congress was not merely understandable. It was democracy in action.

It’s possible that he won’t be the only “Squad” member to lose his seat this year. The equally radical and fervently anti-Israel Rep. Cori Bush (D-Mo.) is also facing a spirited challenge to her St. Louis-based seat with her opponent being the recipient of generous help from AIPAC’s PAC and other pro-Israel donors, like the Democratic Majority for Israel. Unlike Bowman, who was doomed to defeat once moderate Democrats brought forward a plausible alternative, the polls show that race to be neck and neck, with St. Louis County prosecuting attorney Wesley Bell leading her 43%-42% in the most recent survey of voter opinion.

But even if Bush loses, it would be just as much of a mistake to read too much into that race as it is with Bowman’s defeat. Members of Congress who don’t pay attention to their district’s needs and who are more intent on gaining national attention are always vulnerable to challengers better attuned to regional sensibilities (as the saying goes, “all politics is local”). Both of these races are low-hanging fruit for AIPAC. They say nothing about national trends that show the Democratic Party continuing to trend more to the left and especially away from past positions of strong support for Israel.

Nor are the AIPAC-bashers correct.

The money dumped into Bowman’s district by pro-Israel donors may seem egregious to some Democrats, but it needs to be put into the context of spending in the hyper-expensive New York media market. The fact that Bowman raised approximately $6 million for what knowledgeable political observers knew from the start was a forlorn hope of victory shows that plenty of money is available for Israel-haters.

The myth of the ‘lobby’

The talk of excessive spending is also pure hypocrisy since Democrats think there’s nothing wrong with pro-abortion rights groups like Emily’s List pouring money into a district or when billionaire pro-gun-control donors like former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg get involved. And that’s not even mentioning the efforts of leftist billionaire philanthropist George Soros. He has targeted district attorney races around the nation for massive spending to elect prosecutors soft on crime, such as Manhattan’s Alvin Bragg, who recently added the pro-Hamas rioters and destroyers of private property at Columbia University to the long list of criminals against whom he refused to press charges.

AIPAC won in the NY-16 race and might win in Missouri. Yet as the pressure that was exerted on President Joe Biden to step back from supporting Israel from within his own party showed, Democrats are deeply divided on the Jewish state and the loss of a couple of radicals won’t change that. There are still plenty of pro-Israel Democrats like Latimer, but their numbers get fewer with each election cycle. The notion of the bipartisan pro-Israel consensus while always aspirational, is, like it or not, now more myth than reality, regardless of campaign spending totals.

Even more troubling is the ease with which much of the left-wing media segued straight from Bowman’s defeat to cycling the talk about the ominous impact of “dark” Jewish money. Pro-Israel campaign spending can have an impact on specific races, but it is a pittance when put in the context of overall national spending totals on all races. Business lobbies like those that represent the oil and pharmaceutical industries make the “Israel lobby” look like small change. But that doesn’t stop those who think there is something unwholesome about Jews who wish to defend their interests and beliefs by exercising their democratic right to take part in elections via speech, spending and voting.

At this point, no one in the pro-Israel community should have the least reticence about mobilizing efforts to defeat candidates like Bowman and Bush, or their “Squad” colleagues Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.). They have long since crossed the line that separates “criticism” of Israel’s policies to the opposition of Israel’s right to exist and straight-out antisemitism. Such words and actions should be opposed by all decent Americans, regardless of political affiliation.

Neither should Jews labor under the delusion that picking off a couple of “Squad” members is enough to cope with a sea change of opinion on the left. The rise of woke ideology, intersectionality and critical race theory have made it inevitable that left-wing Democrats would start mimicking old Soviet-era propaganda about Zionism and the Jews. As long as the U.S. educational system—and much of the media and popular culture—is controlled by those who believe in these toxic lies, the anti-Israel left will continue to grow in influence inside the Democratic Party. In that sense, The Guardian’s evaluation of the Bowman race may be sadly correct. That victory, however welcome it might be, is nothing more than a successful rear-guard action—not a sign that the Democratic Party as a whole is coming to its senses about the woke left’s anti-Israel bigotry.

IT'S BEGINNING TO LOOK LIKE THE 1930S IN NAZI GERMANY

Down and out in Paris and London

It’s hard to avoid the conclusion that while the 2020s may not be the 1930s, they certainly feel like the 1930s. 

 

By Ben Cohen

 

JNS

Jun 28, 2024

 


Members of the Jewish community in Stamford Hill

Jews were victims of anti-Semitic abuse as they walked through the London borough of Hackney.

 

In my previous column, I wrote about the rape of a 12-year-old Jewish girl in Paris at the hands of three boys just one year older than her, who showered her with antisemitic abuse as they carried out an act of violation reminiscent of the worst excesses of the Oct. 7 Hamas pogrom in southern Israel. This week, my peg is another act of violence—one less horrifying and less traumatic, but which similarly suggests that the writing may be on the wall for the Jews in much of Europe.

Last week, a group of young Jewish boys who attend London’s well-regarded Hasmonean School was assaulted by a gang of antisemitic thugs. The attack occurred at Belsize Park tube station on the London Underground, in a neighborhood with a similar demographic and sensibility to New York’s Upper West Side, insofar as it is home to a large, long-established Jewish population with shops, cafes and synagogues serving that community. According to the mother of one of the Jewish boys, an 11-year-old, the gang “ran ahead of my son and kicked one of his friends to the ground. They were trying to push another kid onto the tracks. They got him as far the yellow line.” When the woman’s son bravely tried to intervene to protect his friends, he was chased down and elbowed in the face, dislodging a tooth. “Get out of the city, Jew!” the gang told him.

Since the attack, her son has had trouble sleeping. “My son is very shaken. He couldn’t sleep last night. He said ‘It’s not fair. Why do they do this to us?’” she disclosed. “We love this country,” she added, “and we participate and we contribute, but now we’re being singled out in exactly the same way as Jews were singled out in 1936 in Berlin. And for the first time in my life. I am terrified of using the tube. What’s going on?”

The woman and her family may not be in London long enough to find out. According to The Jewish Chronicle, they are thinking of “fleeing” Britain—not a verb we’d hoped to encounter again in a Jewish context after the mass murder we experienced during the previous century. But here we are.

When I was a schoolboy in London, I had a history teacher who always told us that no two situations are exactly alike. “Comparisons are odious, boys,” he would repeatedly tell the class. That was an insight I took to heart, and I still believe it to be true. There are structural reasons that explain why the 2020s are different from the 1930s in significant ways. For one thing, European societies are more affluent and better equipped to deal with social conflicts and economic strife than they were a century ago. Laws, too, are more explicit in the protections they offer to minorities, and more punishing of hate crimes and hate speech. Perhaps most importantly, there is a Jewish state barely 80 years old which all Jews can make their home if they so desire.

Therein lies the rub, however. Since 1948, Israel has allowed Jews inside and outside the Jewish state to hold their heads high and to feel as though they are a partner in the system of international relations, rather than a vulnerable, subjugated group at the mercy of the states where we lived as an often hated minority. Israel’s existence is the jewel in the crown of Jewish emancipation, sealing what we believed to be our new status, in which we are treated as equals, and where the antisemitism that plagued our grandparents and great-grandparents has become taboo.

If Israel represents the greatest achievement of the Jewish people in at least 100 years, small wonder that it has become the main target of today’s reconstituted antisemites. And if one thing has been clear since the atrocities by Hamas on Oct. 7, it’s that Israel’s existence is not something that Jews—with the exception of that small minority of anti-Zionists who do the bidding of the antisemites and who echo their ignorance and bigotry—are willing to compromise on. What’s changed is that it is increasingly difficult for Jews to remain in the countries where they live and express their Zionist sympathies at the same time. We are being attacked because of these sympathies on social media, at demonstrations and increasingly in the streets by people with no moral compass, who regard our children as legitimate targets. Hence, it’s hard to avoid the conclusion that while the 2020s may not be the 1930s, they certainly feel like the 1930s.

And so the age-old question returns: Should Jews, especially those in Europe, where they confront the pincer movement of burgeoning Muslim populations and a resurgent far-left in thrall to the Palestinian cause, stay where they are, or should they up sticks and move to Israel? Should we be thinking, given the surge in antisemitism of the past few months, of giving up on America as well? I used to have a clear view of all this. Aliyah is the noblest of Zionist goals and should be encouraged, but I always resisted the notion that every Jew should live in Israel—firstly, because a strong Israel needs vocal, confident Diaspora communities that can advocate for it in the corridors of power; and secondly, because moving to Israel should ideally be a positive act motivated by love, not a negative act propelled by fear.

My view these days isn’t as clear as it was. I still believe that a strong Israel needs a strong Diaspora, and I think it’s far too early to give up on the United States—a country where Jews have flourished as they never did elsewhere in the Diaspora. Yet the situation in Europe increasingly reminds me of the observation of the Russian Zionist Leo Pinsker in “Autoemancipation,” a doom-laden essay he wrote in 1882, during another dark period of Jewish history: “We should not persuade ourselves that humanity and enlightenment will ever be radical remedies for the malady of our people.” The antisemitism we are dealing with now presents itself as “enlightened,” based on boundless sympathy for an Arab nation allegedly dispossessed by Jewish colonists. When our children are victimized by it, this antisemitism ceases to be a merely intellectual challenge, and becomes a matter of life and death. As Jews and as human beings, we are obliged to choose life—which, in the final analysis, when nuance disappears and terror stalks us, means Israel.

OCTOBER 7 DEMONSTRATED THAT THE TWO-STATE SOLUTION SPELLS DISASTER FOR ISRAEL

Sovereignty from statements to action

The people of Israel are increasingly open to the idea of sovereignty and how to implement it. 

 

By Yehudit Katsover and Nadia Matar

 

JNS

Jun 28, 2024

 

 

Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich holds a press conference in Jerusalem, December 26, 2023. (Chaim Goldberg/FLASH90)
Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich announced this week of his intention to promote through legislation the application of Israeli sovereignty over Judea and Samaria 
 

For decades, we’ve repeatedly heard the claim that it’s not the right time to promote sovereignty. On the other hand, it has become evident that waiting for precisely the most opportune moment never yields any tangible results on the ground.

There will always be reasons and excuses to postpone this step, although history has proven that despite the “poor timing” of applying sovereignty over the Golan Heights and Jerusalem, determined Israeli leadership knew how to take critical steps essential for Israel’s future.

This was accomplished by leaders (from the Likud and Labor, from the right and left) guided by unwavering ideological conviction, firmly convinced of the justice of the Jewish people’s cause, and willing to act despite international pressure and threats from both adversaries and allies worldwide.

This is the kind of pioneering, ethical leadership that is needed today to promote sovereignty over Judea and Samaria. Moreover, the current timing may be the most opportune in decades.

The concept of sovereignty as a practical political goal is now much more widely accepted in Israel than at any time in the past. The vast majority of Israelis have become completely disillusioned with dreams of coexistence and peace after the ruthless determination of its adversaries to annihilate Israel through various brutal and monstrous means became so painfully evident on Oct. 7.

The people of Israel understand today, unlike at any other time in the past, just how dangerous the idea of a Palestinian state is to Israel’s physical survival and are increasingly open to considering the idea of sovereignty and the ways to implement it.

Experts in the Middle East, including those not necessarily aligned with the right, believe that the most vulnerable issue for Israel’s enemy is that of land. Consequently, it is imperative to use land to respond to the enemy’s brutal acts of aggression.

The Arab enemy is indifferent to the loss of life, civilian or otherwise, and is unfazed by international pressure, interpreting it as a sign of divine mission. However, the loss of territory it misguidedly believes belongs to it will undoubtedly cause considerable distress.

That is why the application of sovereignty, on the ground and through legislation, is not only historically just and the fulfillment of a vision, but also the most effective response to terrorism. This fact underscores the simple logic that in the wake of Oct. 7 and the cruel attack on Israel’s sovereignty—in our communities, IDF bases, and vast areas of the Land of Israel in the north and the south—we must respond decisively and emphatically by asserting Israel’s sovereignty over the Land of Israel.

Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich’s announcement this week of his intention to promote through legislation, and not only on the ground, the application of Israeli sovereignty over Judea and Samaria comes at precisely the right time. This declaration embodies the self-evident historical justice of the return of the people of Israel to its land and constitutes the realization of the Zionist dream of sovereignty over the Land of Israel.

It is also the most appropriate response to the murderous intentions of Sinwar and his savage cohorts, who have never hidden their desire to destroy Israel by any means.

Out of concern for the people and Land of Israel, and based on a deeply rooted historical perspective, we the citizens of Israel must support and empower our leaders who promote the vision of sovereignty wherever we can.

Most importantly, we must unite our voices and urge Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, as one who is profoundly committed to safeguarding the survival and future of the State of Israel, to promote the vision of sovereignty both in legislation and on the ground. This momentous historic achievement will be forever enshrined in the annals of our nation as his legacy.

THE IDIOT ORDERED OFFICERS TO CLEAR THE BUILDING AND NEGOTIATE WITH THE SHOOTER

Former Uvalde schools police chief indicted for role in Robb Elementary shooting response

Pete Arredondo, the former chief, and former officer Adrian Gonzales face felony charges of abandoning or endangering a child.

 

 
The Texas Tribune

Former Uvalde school police Chief Pete Arredondo (left) and former school police officer Adrian Gonzales (right) have been indicted on charges of child endangerment in connection with the 2022 mass shooting at Robb Elementary School, the San Antonio Express-News reported.


A Uvalde County grand jury has indicted former school district police Chief Pete Arredondo and another former district officer on charges of child endangerment, the first criminal charges brought against law enforcement for the botched response to the deadliest school shooting in Texas history, the San Antonio Express-News first reported.

Arredondo and Adrian Gonzales face felony charges of abandoning or endangering a child, the newspaper reported.

The charges come more than two years after the May 24, 2022 shooting, in which a lone gunman killed 19 fourth graders and two teachers.

Uvalde County District Attorney Christina Mitchell convened a grand jury in January to investigate law enforcement’s delayed response and to determine whether to bring criminal charges against any of the nearly 400 federal, state and local officers involved in the response. Law enforcement officers waited 77 minutes to confront the gunman, who was ultimately shot and killed by Border Patrol officers.

The botched law enforcement response has been widely criticized, including in a January U.S. Justice Department report. That report documented failures in leadership, and U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland noted that lives could have been saved had law enforcement acted sooner.

In the months following the shooting, about a dozen officers were fired, suspended or retired. Arredondo was fired about three months after the shooting. He was listed as incident commander on the school district’s active shooter response plan.

On Thursday, the district attorney briefed some families of victims about the indictment, said Jesse Rizo, whose niece Jacklyn Cazares was among the children killed in the shooting. Rizo said he was hopeful that the indicted officers would be prosecuted.

“I’m really hoping this is just the beginning of indictments that may be coming down,” Rizo said. “There are a lot of officers that need to be held accountable.”

Lalo Castillo, a local activist who said he learned of the indictments about an hour after they occurred, said he had expected state officials to face criminal charges, too.

“Especially the state troopers because they were the first ones there,” Castillo said, referring to officers from the Texas Department of Public Safety

The DA’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Efforts to reach Arredondo and Gonzales were unsuccessful.

It is not clear whether any other officers will face criminal charges. Grand jury proceedings in Texas are secret, so witness testimony is not open to the public. Twelve grand jurors have been hearing evidence presented by the district attorney’s office.

DPS Director Steve McCraw is among those who have testified before the grand jury. McCraw previously blamed local officers for the bungled response. In 2022, he testified before the Texas Senate and said it wasn’t feasible for his officers to assume command, even though Arredondo was not acting quickly. In total, 91 of the responding officers were from DPS.

Police officers have legal protections that make it difficult to successfully bring criminal charges against them. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that officers don’t have a constitutional “duty to protect,” even if they are trained to do so. Legal experts have said prosecutors may have a difficult burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that officers were under a legal duty to act and in failing to do so, caused harm.

The grand jury investigation is one of at least six official probes launched after the shooting. Those investigations have largely left family members of the victims frustrated. They, along with community activists, have continued to push for increased transparency and accountability.

Most recently, the city of Uvalde released an independent review that cleared all local officers of wrongdoing, frustrating parents of the children killed in the massacre and at least some local government officials.

Private investigator Jesse Prado, who conducted that review, identified lapses in leadership but also commended some officers and said they acted in “good faith.” Prado also blamed the district attorney for not cooperating with his investigation. Mitchell is in possession of a state police report but has yet to make that report public.

Days after Prado’s review became public, Uvalde Police Chief Daniel Rodriguez, who was on vacation when the school shooting occurred, announced his resignation. On the day of the shooting, Rodriguez spoke with acting chief Lt. Mariano Pargas and asked him to set up a command post, according to the city-commissioned review. Pargas did not set up a post. He stepped down from the Uvalde Police Department in November 2022.

Rizo, whose niece died in the shooting, said he is hopeful that Pargas also faces criminal charges.

“He’s just as guilty as Arredondo,” Rizo said.

In the absence of concrete action by elected officials, some families have filed civil lawsuits. Relatives of 17 of the children killed and two who were injured sued DPS in May, the day before the second anniversary of the shooting. The families also reached a $2 million settlement with the city of Uvalde, and the city committed to providing enhanced training for current and future law enforcement officers.

Relatives also filed a separate lawsuit against Daniel Defense, the company that manufactured the shooter’s gun, as well as California-based companies Meta and Activision. 

___________________

 

CRIMINALIZING INCOMPETENCE

by Bob Walsh
 
 
He was later fired from the school district police force and resigned from the Uvalde City Council

Former Uvalde school police chief Pedro 'Pete' Arredondo pictured in an orange jumpsuit after being indicted over their botched response to a school massacre on May 24, 2022

Former Uvalde school police chief Pedro 'Pete' Arredondo is pictured in an orange jumpsuit jail mugshot after his indictment over the botched response to a school massacre on May 24, 2022

 

A Texas grand jury has just indicted the former Chief of the Uvalde School District Police and one of his subordinates have been indicted on felony charges of abandoning or endangering a child.

Former Chief Pete Arredondo and Officer Adrian Gonzales are facing the charges from the May 24, 2022 incident in which 19 4th grade children and two teachers were murdered.  It took the 400 officers who were there 77 minutes to actually move to the sound of the gunfire.  Arredondo was sacked three months after the incident.  He was officially the incident commander.

Under the current law and supreme court decisions police agencies do not owe a duty of protection to individual persons but rather to the community at large.  It will be difficult though perhaps not impossible to make these charges stick.

FALLOUT FROM YESTERDAYS DEBACLE ?

By Bob Walsh

 

Donalf Trump Trump GIF

 

So, will the ChiComs jump on Taiwan and the Goat Fuckers jump on Israel before Biden fades completely into the rear view mirror?

My personal guesstimate is maybe yes on #1 and probably not on #2, for what my guesstimates may be worth to you.

Elections have consequences, even for people not directly effected by them.

DUMPSTER FIRE IN THE MIDDLE OF A TRAIN WRECK

By Bob Walsh

 

TOPSHOT - US President Joe Biden and former US President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump participate in the first presidential debate of the 2024 elections at CNN's studios in Atlanta, Georgia, on June 27, 2024.

 

I made a point of watching the after debate analysis on CNN rather than Fox.  I wanted to see what the hard-core Biden supporters had to say.  They had a total of nine talking heads behind a structure that looked like the judges bench in a courtroom.  All nine of them agreed that it was anywhere from BAD to an UNMITIGATED DISASTER.  Several of them said they were getting text messages from people they knew in the DNC along the lines of OMG.  HOW CAN WE GET RID OF HIM?

It might not be that great for Trump.  It might have been so bad that the Democrat-Socialists will actually try very hard to move Joe out.  I am confident that Hillary would agree to come in and save the day.  MAYBE even Michelle.  The trouble is they can't FORCE Joe out.  He has the votes.  If he still believes his own people's bullshit ONLY HE can defeat the evil orange man.  Even Kamal Harris in her CNN spiel after the crash-and-burn said that Joe has a huge advantage in that HE has the support of his Vice President while Trump's Vice President threw him overboard.  She seemed to really believe it, though it is possible her speech writers could not come up with anything better on short notice.  They probably really though Joe was going to nail it.  

Plus of course Joe and his family are legitimately afraid they might end up in prison for corruption and tax fraud. Not a bad reason to hold on with both hands if you can. 

I am confident in saying we will NOT have four more years of Senile Joe The Hairsniffer.  Whether or not we will have another four years of Trump is still an open question. One thing for sure, the next 18 weeks or so will be very interesting to watch. 

IT OFTEN COMES DOWN TO MONEY

By Bob Walsh


Eric Abril has been taken into custody following his firing at Mahany Park.

Eric James Abril 

 

A year ago Eric James Abril was a guest of the Placer County Sheriff's Office.  He was accused of killing a person he was holding hostage and shooting two others in April of 2023 in a stand-off with the cops.  On July 9 he was housed at Sutter Roseville Medical Center in Roseville due to various medical issues where he was guarded by one sheriff's deputy, who was often not in the room.  Abril escaped and was out for 33 hours, costing the county over $100,000 in overtime.

The Placer County Civil Grand Jury has just issued their report on the escape.   They faulted various procedures, protocols, and training issues for the escape.  The Grand Jury asserted that there had been both willful misconduct and negligence.

Among other things the S.O. had no formal training for deputies on off-grounds security details or transport details.  The prisoner was wearing a belly chain but was not secured to the hospital bed.  He was supposed to be.  The single deputy on security duty was outside of the room for a total of 27 minutes around the time Abril escaped.  The 12 instances including making personal phone calls and chatting up nurses.  Apparently there is a camera on one of the medical devices Abril was hooked up to that gave a pretty fair record of what was going on and when.  When the deputy left the room for his 13th trip Abril got one of his hands out of the restrain on the belly chain.  On the 14th trip, to make a head call, Abril beat feet. When the deputy left the area he left his body armor, spare ammunition and baton behind.  Abril took off at about 3: a.m. and simply ran out of the hospital.  He managed to elude capture for 33 hours.

The deputy is still on the job.

CA PRISON SYSTEM STOMPED BY FEDS

By Bob Walsh

 

California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation California Health Care Facility

 California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation California Health Care Facility

California prison system's California Health Care Facility (CHCF) – Stockton

 

The medical system in the CA state prison system has been operating under federal oversight for something like 30 years.  It has been alleged (accurately) that the system has been somewhere between deficient and grossly deficient in providing medical care and mental health care to prisoners.  Today the feds slapped the state with a fine of $111 million.

The state is running way behind on hiring.  It can take months for a prisoner who is not actively suicidal to see a psychiatric social worker or psychiatrist or psychologist.  The judge says NOT GOOD ENOUGH and is using a big hammer to get the state's attention.

The state has asserted, probably correctly, that the medical and mental health care available to prisoners is better than they would get on the streets, even it its current mediocre level.  About 30% of the mental health professional positions are unfilled.

The state is, of course, appealing both the ruling and the fine.