Monday, July 30, 2012

WILL AN ISRAELI STRIKE ON IRAN’S NUCLEAR FACILITIES BEFORE THE ELECTION HELP OR HURT OBAMA?

An Israeli attack on Iran would have consequences regardless of whether it was successful or not – Iranian retaliatory strikes, the price of oil, the world economy and the stock market. An attack before November would play a decisive role in the presidential election depending on how Obama was judged in the way his administration dealt with the consequential crisis.

REPORT: US SEES ISRAELI STRIKE ON IRAN IN OCTOBER
By Ryan Jones

Israel Today
July 29, 2012

A senior and widely respected analyst with Israel's Channel 2 News said in Friday's pre-Shabbat newscast that top American officials have become convinced that Israel will launch a military strike against Iran's nuclear facilities in October, just one month before the US presidential election.

Ehud Yaari had just returned from a trip to Washington, where he told viewers that he had met with "the people one needs to talk with about this matter," and that "my impression is that the Americans are convinced that there is very high chance that Israel will decide to attack in Iran before the elections in the US."

According to Yaari, American officials see an Israeli strike on Iran as almost a foregone conclusion, and are focusing on their response to the possible outcomes of such an action.

Israel's Ha'aretz daily newspaper reported on Sunday that the Obama Administration had recently briefed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on its own back-up plan to bomb Iran should ongoing international diplomatic efforts fail.

An unnamed American official cited by the newspaper suggested that the Obama White House was increasingly seeing the futility of the diplomatic tug-of-war between Iran and the international community, and was working feverishly to put together a viable attack plan.

That source said that Netanyahu had received a detailed overview of the developing American attack plan and the weapons that would be brought to bear on Iran's nuclear facilities should it be enacted.

Last week, Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak stated that as much as both Israel and the US may want to avoid striking Iran, attacking its nuclear program now would be far less costly and deadly than dealing with a nuclear-armed Iran in the future.

"It is perfectly clear to me that dealing with this challenge when it matures, if it matures, will be inestimably more complex, inestimably more dangerous and inestimably more costly in human life and resources," Barak said during a ceremony for the graduating class of Israel's National Defense College.

2 comments:

bob walsh said...

My guess it that unless it appears to be toally gratuitous an Israeli strike would hurt Obama slightly.

Anonymous said...

I think the real question should be..."Would an Israeli Strike On Iran's Nuclear Facilities Help or Hurt Israel?"

One question asks about the survival of a country. The other, merely the survival of a politician.

_________
Centurion