Saturday, August 30, 2025

ISRAELI AIR STRIKE TAKES OUT HOUTHI OFFICIALS

Yemen’s Houthis confirm prime minister, other top officials killed in Israeli strike

It remains unclear whether the Houthi defense minister, a key target of the strike, was among the casualties

 

The Times of Israel

Aug 30, 2025 


 

Ahmed al-Rahawi, the prime minister of the Houthi-controlled government,  was killed, along with other officials, in Thursday's Israeli strikes on the capital, in Sanaa, Yemen, Saturday, Aug. 30, 2025.
 

The prime minister of Yemen’s Houthi government and several other ministers were killed in an Israeli strike on the capital Sanaa, the news agency run by the group said on Saturday, citing a statement by the head of the Houthi Supreme Political Council, Mahdi al-Mashat.

A number of others were wounded in Thursday’s strike, it said, without providing details.

Israel said on Friday that the airstrike had targeted the Iran-aligned group’s chief of staff, defense minister and other senior officials and that it was verifying the outcome.

Channel 12, without citing any sources, reported that the IDF assesses the entire Houthi cabinet, including the prime minister and 12 other ministers, were likely killed. The network said the assessment was not definitive and that the IDF was still working to reach a clearer understanding of the strike’s results.

Mashat’s statement did not make clear whether the defense minister was among the casualties.

Ahmad Ghaleb al-Rahwi became prime minister nearly a year ago, but the de facto leader of the government was his deputy, Mohamed Moftah, who was assigned on Saturday to carry out the prime minister’s duties.

 

Houthi fighters take part in a weekly anti-Israel rally in Sanaa, Yemen, Friday, Aug. 29, 2025. 
 

Rahwi was seen largely as a figurehead who was not part of the inner circle of the Houthi leadership.

The Israeli military said its fighter jets had struck a compound in the Sanaa area where senior Houthi figures had gathered, describing the attack as a “complex operation” made possible by intelligence-gathering and air superiority.

On Thursday, Israeli security sources said the targets had been various locations where a large number of senior Houthi officials had gathered to watch a televised speech recorded by leader Abdul Malik al-Houthi.

The Houthis — whose slogan calls for “Death to America, Death to Israel, [and] a Curse on the Jews” — began attacking Israel and maritime traffic in November 2023, a month after the October 7 Hamas massacre in southern Israel.

The Houthis held their fire when a ceasefire was reached between Israel and Hamas in January 2025. By that point, they had launched over 40 ballistic missiles and dozens of attack drones and cruise missiles at Israel, including one that killed a civilian and wounded several others in Tel Aviv in July 2024, prompting Israel’s first strike in Yemen, which has since been followed by numerous others.

 

Yemenis brandish weapons and daggers during a rally in solidarity with Palestinians and in condemnation of Israel and the US, in the Houthi-run capital Sanaa on August 29, 2025.  
 

Since March 18, when the IDF resumed its offensive against Hamas in the Gaza Strip, the Houthis in Yemen have launched 72 ballistic missiles and at least 23 drones at Israel. Several missiles have fallen short.

At a situational assessment held Friday on the military’s ongoing operations across the region, IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir said, “The Houthis operate as an additional terrorist branch of Iran, continue to attack Israel, and threaten regional and international stability. Our message is clear — there will be no tolerance.”

Israeli intelligence provided real-time details of the gathering, enabling the strike, which was carried out despite heavy air defenses in the area, the IDF said.

The defense minister, Muhammad Nasser al-Attafi, has been in his role since 2016 and is considered the senior-most official in the organization’s military establishment, according to Channel 12.

 

Yemeni Defense Minister makes sharp threat to Saudi Arabia

Houthi Defense Minister Muhammad Nasser al-Attafi  

 

He is reported to have established a close relationship with Iran’s Revolutionary Guards and with Hezbollah.

Also targeted was Houthi chief of staff Muhammad Al-Ghamari, who was reportedly seriously hurt, but not killed, by an Israeli strike in Yemen in June, carried out during Israel’s brief war with Iran.

Thursday’s strikes marked the 16th time that Israel has attacked the Iran-backed rebel group in Yemen, located some 1,800 kilometers (1,100 miles) away.

A REBUKE OF BELGIUM FOR ITS REBUKE OF TRUMP

Sa’ar slams Belgian support for PA: Serving ‘interests of terrorists’

Instead of criticizing Washington, you should focus on the P.A.’s “legal warfare against Israel,” said the Jewish state's foreign minister. 

 

JNS

Aug 30, 2025

 

 

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar speaking at a press conference.“It is regrettable that even when Israel is fighting an existential threat which is in Europe's vital interest—there are those who can’t resist their anti-Israeli obsession,” Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar tweeted on June 19, 2025. “Shameful!”

 

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar rebuked on Saturday his Belgian counterpart Maxime Prévot over the latter’s support for the Palestinian Authority, saying that it “serves only the interests of the terrorists, not dialogue, not peace.”

The P.A. has never stopped compensating Palestinian terrorists and their families and inciting violence against the Jewish state, policies that stand in clear violation of its diplomatic commitments, Sa’ar tweeted.

“Therefore, your support for a Palestinian state is clearly a support of a terror state, a basis for further attacks on Israel and October 7-like atrocities,” Israel’s top diplomat continued, referring to the Hamas-led massacre in 2023.

Sa’ar said that instead of criticizing the United States over its decision to deny visas to Palestinian representatives ahead of the 80th session of the U.N. General Assembly in New York, Belgium should focus on the P.A.’s “legal warfare against Israel.”

On Friday, the U.S. State Department announced that it is denying new visas and revoking old ones from individuals associated with the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority, ahead of the U.N. General Assembly annual debate on Sept. 9-23.

“The Trump administration has been clear: It is in our national security interests to hold the PLO and P.A. accountable for not complying with their commitments and for undermining the prospects for peace,” read a memo. “Before the PLO and P.A. can be considered partners for peace, they must consistently repudiate terrorism, including the Oct. 7 massacre, and end incitement to terrorism in education.”

The department, headed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, rescinded the visas of P.A. chief Mahmoud Abbas and 80 other Palestinian officials, according to the Associated Press.

Prévot, who also serves as the deputy prime minister, attacked Washington’s decision, tweeting that it is a “blow to diplomacy.”

“At a moment when there is a renewed momentum toward a two-state solution—with concrete commitments being made and international support growing—hindering the Palestinian voice is not only unjust, it is counterproductive,” the Belgian minister claimed.

“Excluding Palestinian representatives undermines the very principles of multilateralism and international law,” he said.

 

Palestinian President Abbas addresses the Turkish parliament in Ankara
Mahmoud Abbas

Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat, attending Friday Muslim prayers, in the West Bank city of Ramallah, on June 7, 2002. (AFP PHOTO / Thomas COEX/ File)

When President Ronald Reagan denied PLO leader Yasser Arafat entry into the US in 1988, the UN moved the annual meeting of the General Assembly to Geneva. 

 

P.A. presidential spokesperson Nabil Abu Rudeineh told AP in Ramallah on Saturday: “We call upon the American administration to reverse its decision. This decision will only increase tension and escalation.

“We have been in contact since yesterday with Arab and foreign countries, especially those directly concerned with this issue. This effort will continue around the clock,” Abu Rudeineh said.

A high-level conference in New York on Sept. 22, led by France and Saudi Arabia, is slated to discuss ideas on how to revive the two-state solution, AP reported.

P.A. diplomatic staff will continue to operate in New York, but senior figures are banned from entry.

The last time the U.S. denied visa to a Palestinian leader was in 1988 under the Reagan administration. PLO chairman and terror master Yasser Arafat was denied entry into the U.S., drawing global protests. The General Assembly’s annual meeting eventually took place in Geneva.

TRUMP IS DETERMINED TO END THE REIGN OF WOKE LEFTISM IN ACADEMIA

Year three of the siege on Jewish students begins

Blood libels against Israel may reignite campus antisemitism. Administrators who tolerate the targeting of Jews, however, will have to reckon with President Donald Trump. 

 

By Jonathan S. Tobin 

 

JNS

Aug 29, 2025 


 

Pro-Palestinian protesters are confronted by police.

New York City police arrested dozens of Pro-Palestinian protesters at Columbia University in New York on May 7, 2025.

 

By the end of the second academic year since the Hamas-led Palestinian Arab attack against southern Israeli communities on Oct. 7, 2023, the unprecedented increase in antisemitism on American college campuses appeared to have abated. Some of the steam seemed to have gone out of the organized mobs of pro-Hamas demonstrators who took part in encampments and building takeovers while chanting for the destruction of Israel and Jewish genocide (“From the river to the sea”) and for terrorism against Jews wherever they lived (“Globalize the intifada”).

More importantly, the administrators who tolerated and encouraged the abuse of Jews—something they never would have stood for had the victims been any other minority group—had met a force they feared just as much, if not more, than truculent leftist faculty members and students. President Donald Trump came into the picture with an aggressive and ambitious plan to make campuses safe for Jewish students and roll back factors that had made the post-Oct. 7 surge of antisemitism possible.

By the time this past spring semester had ended, the second-term president’s effective threats of defunding those institutions that had tolerated and encouraged Jew-hatred had forced many schools to shut down the wave of illegal activity. The high tide that had flooded colleges under the Biden administration seemed to have ebbed.

Two forces collide

Still, as students return to campus for the fall semester, complacency about the problem would be a mistake. If anything, the coming months could turn out to be even more problematic for Jewish students as two equally powerful forces collide: the anti-Israel and antisemitic fervor that is the result of the war in Gaza eclipsing every other left-wing cause in importance, and the determination of Trump to end the reign of woke leftism in academia.

In recent months, as the campuses quieted down for the summer, the drumbeat of incitement against Israel, Zionism and Jews has increased rather than died down. Hamas propaganda about Israel committing “genocide” in Gaza and deliberately starving Palestinians in the Strip has been mainstreamed by corporate media outlets, making headlines worldwide.

These blood libels have become part of the conventional wisdom about the Middle East among liberal and left-wing elites in journalism, academia, cultural establishments and unions, as well as in the Democratic Party. That has caused even many Jews who fear being out of sync with liberal fashion to engage in unfair criticism of Israel, which essentially legitimizes anti-Zionist invective and the cause of letting the Hamas monsters behind the unspeakable atrocities survive the war they started on Oct. 7.

Most schools now understand that Trump means business and that he fully intends to punish academic institutions that let Jew-hatred flourish with defunding measures that will devastate their budgets. While most of them are far from ready to comply with the full range of demands, none want their campuses to become the focus of administration or congressional inquiries, let alone wake up and discover that Washington is pulling the money that represents the lifeblood for even the richest of universities.

That means they will, as many were in the spring, be ready to suspend and expel students who engage in campus takeovers. Nevertheless, the forces behind the pro-Hamas mobs are just as determined to exploit the successes in the information wage that the terrorists, their funders and enablers in the media have won.

So, as American higher education reopens for business, it’s far from clear which of these two immovable forces will prevail. The one thing we do know is that the stakes in this battle of wills between liberal educational bureaucrats and the Republican administration are not merely a matter of political advantage for Trump or his opponents.

Those at risk if the administration’s defunding threats and justified demands for reforms to abolish the root causes of campus antisemitism are ignored or fail to have the intended effect will not be Trump’s appointees. It is Jewish students who will suffer if administrators believe that they are better off appeasing leftist antisemites instead of the president. Their ability to move about their schools without fear of intimidation and even violence, as well as to engage in academic life without having to disavow their people, their faith and Israel, hinges on whether the administration makes it clear that the consequences of another antisemitic surge will prove serious.

A woke bureaucracy

The forces behind the pro-Hamas agitation on campus have not been eliminated by Trump. The same factors that had ignited the firestorm of Jew-hatred throughout many of the country’s institutions of higher learning remain in place.

The administration’s campaign to deal with campus antisemitism came down like a ton of bricks on elite institutions like Columbia and Harvard. The president’s task force dealing with the subject demanded that they not only take stringent measures to curb the activities of the pro-Hamas mobs but also address the inherent factors that had made them possible.

Trump’s ambitious goal was not only to make schools safer for Jewish students but to roll back the hold of leftist doctrines that made the post-Oct. 7 troubles inevitable. While a turning point may have been reached in which these forces will now start to decline, these institutions have not been converted from woke strongholds to their previous position as defenders of the Western canon, the neo-Marxists have warred against.

The reign of bureaucrats implementing the woke catechism of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) that sought to exacerbate racial divisions, as well as falsely labeling Jews as “white” oppressors, is largely still there. So, too, are the overwhelmingly leftist faculties and administrators who have been thoroughly indoctrinated in the toxic myths of critical race theory, intersectionality and settler-colonialism.

The progressive takeover of academia has been slowly unfolding as the left has completed its long march through American educational institutions for decades. It reached its high point during the moral panic of the Black Lives Matter summer of 2020, following the killing that spring of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer. But as interest in dividing all Americans along immutable racial lines waned, the neo-Marxist ideas that animated this movement are held up as a new orthodoxy throughout the humanities and among educational bureaucrats.

Woke policies didn’t just predispose people to dislike Israel. They influenced the curricula taught at schools, as well as the hiring of professors and admissions, creating left-wing bubbles where antisemitic denial of Jewish history and rights became normative. And as “free Palestine,” the phrase that has come to encapsulate a belief in destroying the State of Israel and demonizing Jewish peoplehood, became the primary obsession of the American left, the Oct. 7 terrorist attacks helped mobilize students, faculty, school employees—aided and abetted by outside agitators and funders—to turn campuses into hostile environments for Jews.

Foreign students and funding

So, while the people who run American higher education understood that the election in 2024 of a president who prioritized the fight against antisemitism endangered their businesses, the inmates of these academic asylums remain just as interested in turning the fall 2025 semester into another ordeal for Jews and supporters of Israel.

Nor has the funding for these antisemitic groups, like Students for Justice in Palestine and others, from both foreign sources, such as the emirate of Qatar and left-wing foundations like those controlled by the Soros family, dried up.

One factor that may alleviate the problem has been Trump’s focus on the role of foreign students in campus disturbances.

Trump hasn’t yet banned the entry of students from abroad, especially Muslim-majority countries. Nor has he succeeded, as he still hopes to do, in deporting some of the leaders of the pro-Hamas and antisemitic illegal demonstrations and takeovers.

Syrian-born Mahmoud Khalil, who helped lead the chaos at Columbia, has (with the support of many liberal Democrats who have wrongly depicted him as a martyr to free speech and some empathetic judges) been able to remain in the country, despite the administration’s best effort to deport him.

Many other foreign students, who make up significant percentages of the student bodies of many leading schools like New York University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard and Columbia, have essentially self-deported since they, like Khalil, have undoubtedly lied on their visa applications and are vulnerable to legal action. Others who were similarly intent on coming to the United States to benefit from the education system here while undermining the values of the American republic and spreading Islamist doctrines have taken Trump’s hint and decided not to come to the United States this fall.

But there are likely enough still here, along with a cadre of leftist activists, to create havoc at schools in the name of the supposedly starving Palestinian people and against Israel.

Trump must double down

Averting another situation such as the one that unfolded after Oct. 7 will require two things to happen.

One is that the Trump administration must be prepared to double down on its threats against colleges and universities that behave as they did two years ago and let antisemites run amok.

Moreover, rather than work solely toward striking more deals with schools, such as the one they struck with Columbia, Trump’s team must escalate their efforts to pull funding and force them to give up their DEI bureaucracies, as well as dismantle those departments, like those in Middle East studies, that are engines of antisemitism.

At the same time, those whose job it is to defend Jews, in general, like the Anti-Defamation League and American Jewish Committee, and Jewish students, in particular, such as Hillel International, need to understand that they must cease opposing Trump’s efforts to reform academia and end DEI. Measures that are supposed to aid Jewish students that do not attack the reasons why they are under attack are useless and say more about the bankruptcy of many leading mainstream Jewish groups than anything else.

The coming months may prove trying for American Jews as they undergo another trial by fire, fueled by lies about Israel. The same leftist-Islamist alliance that has done so much damage in the last two years seeks to ignite another storm of antisemitism on campuses.

Still, they need to remember that they are not alone in this fight. Trump’s prioritization of the battle against Jew-hatred has put colleges and universities that would otherwise be inclined to abandon their Jewish students on notice that there will be a cost to doing so. We can only hope that this will be enough to force school administrations into actions that will finally rid academia of this scourge.

OF THE 20 PALESTINIANS KILLED NEAR NASSER HOSPITAL, SIX WERE CONFIRMED HAMAS OPERATIVES ... THIS WAS A MIXED ENVIRONMENT WHERE FIGHTERS AND CIVILIANS WERE PRESENT SIDE BY SIDE

When hospitals become battlefields: The strain on Israeli soldiers

In Khan Yunis and elsewhere in Gaza, there is no surgical way to fight an enemy that tunnels beneath your feet and hides behind patients’ walls. 

 

By Shlomo Dubnov 

 

JNS

Aug 27, 2025

 

Palestinians gather outside of the Nasser hospital in Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip following Israeli airstrikes on Aug. 25, 2025,. Photo by AFP via Getty Images.

Palestinians gather outside of the Nasser hospital in Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip following Israeli airstrikes on Aug. 25, 2025,
 

The headlines coming from the Gaza Strip on Aug. 26 told a grim story: A strike near Nasser Hospital in Khan Yunis left roughly 20 Palestinians dead. International reactions quickly condemned the Israel Defense Forces for firing tank shells in the shadow of a major medical facility.

But the fuller picture is far more complex—and far more troubling.

The IDF has acknowledged that its target was not the hospital itself or the civilians inside, but a Hamas surveillance camera affixed near the hospital grounds. Intelligence showed that the camera was being used to track IDF troop movements in real time. Such surveillance is no minor matter; in the urban war of Gaza, information equals ambush, tunnel raids and kidnappings.

After the strike, the IDF announced that six of those killed were confirmed Hamas operatives. Some were directly linked to the terrorist attacks and atrocities in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. One individual was seen in a video entering Israel with a Palestinian flag during the massacre. This was not an incidental gathering of civilians, but a mixed environment where fighters and civilians were present side by side.

The strike must also be viewed against the operational backdrop of Khan Yunis. Only days earlier, 18 Hamas gunmen burst from a tunnel shaft within 50 yards of an IDF encampment. They hurled grenades, fired an anti-tank missile and even brought along a stretcher in an effort to kidnap soldiers. Ten of them were killed in fierce close combat; others retreated underground.

Geographically, these events are linked: Nasser Hospital sits in the center of Khan Yunis, while the ambush occurred along the “Magen Oz” corridor that cuts through the city. Both incidents unfolded in the same dense urban tunnel network and combat zone, underscoring that they are part of a single battlespace rather than separate theaters.

Kidnapping, in this context, is the IDF’s worst nightmare. For Israel, the capture of a soldier is a personal tragedy and a strategic vulnerability. Hamas has built a long-term strategy around abductions, using hostages as leverage in prisoner exchanges and as psychological warfare against Israeli society. Every surveillance camera, tunnel and ambush must be understood against that backdrop.

Critics ask why the IDF resorted to tank fire instead of a precise sniper shot. The answer lies in the nature of the threat. A sniper would have required exposure near the hospital perimeter—exposure in an area where tunnels had already disgorged armed squads just days earlier. In such an environment, “precision” is not just about the caliber of the weapon but the survivability of the soldier asked to pull the trigger.

Tank fire, while more destructive, allowed crews to remain protected, act immediately and guarantee that the surveillance device was destroyed. In a battlespace where kidnappings are a constant risk, speed and protection for one’s troops are not luxuries. They are necessities.

The IDF prides itself on its ethical code, the doctrine of tohar haneshek, or “purity of arms,” which obligates soldiers to use force only for legitimate purposes and to minimize harm to civilians. At the same time, it binds commanders to safeguard their troops. These obligations often clash most painfully in Gaza’s crowded neighborhoods.

The IDF Military Advocate General routinely investigates such incidents. This culture of self-scrutiny is rare in wartime, but it comes at a cost: Soldiers know that in addition to risking their lives, they may later face criminal inquiries for choices made under fire. Some see this as over-caution; others as vital accountability. For the men and women on the front line, it is an added strain that Hamas surely counts on.

International law does not demand perfect outcomes in war. It demands distinction, proportionality and feasible precautions. The Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions (Art. 57) states that attackers must take “all feasible precautions” to avoid civilian harm—but feasible means “that which is practicable or practically possible, taking into account all circumstances ruling at the time.” Scholars like Yoram Dinstein, professor emeritus at Tel Aviv University, emphasize that commanders are not required to sacrifice their soldiers’ lives for marginal reductions in collateral damage.

Comparable practices exist elsewhere: “U.S. Joint Publication 3-60” on targeting notes that collateral damage estimation must always be balanced against “force protection and mission accomplishment.” NATO’s doctrine on urban operations similarly acknowledges that standoff firepower may be necessary in asymmetric conflicts where insurgents exploit civilian structures.

Here, the target was a legitimate military objective; at least six of the dead were confirmed combatants, including participants in Oct. 7; and feasible alternatives that posed less risk to civilians would have required unacceptable risks to IDF soldiers.

No ethical system requires troops to walk into the jaws of a tunnel war to shave down collateral damage that the enemy itself engineered. When Hamas embeds cameras, launchers and fighters in and around medical centers, it is Hamas that erases the line between combatant and civilian.

The tragedy at Nasser Hospital was not born of reckless IDF firepower but of Hamas’s calculated tactic of using civilian cover to wage war. The IDF is left balancing the impossible: protect its soldiers, fulfill its ethical code and fight an enemy that thrives on turning hospitals and homes into battlefields.

Six of the dead were not innocents. They were armed actors in a brutal conflict, some with blood from Oct. 7 already on their hands. That does not erase the grief of the other lives lost, though it does shift the moral calculus.

The hard truth of Khan Yunis is this: There is no surgical way to fight an enemy that tunnels beneath your feet and hides behind patients’ walls. The burden on IDF soldiers is immense, and the responsibility for civilian casualties rests first and foremost with those who made hospitals into fortresses.

AND ANOTHER NEWSPAPER BITES THE DUST

By Bob Walsh

 

Printed copies of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution are shown on Thursday, Aug. 28, 2025, in Atlanta. (AP Photo/Jeff Amy)


The Atlanta Journal-Constitution has been around more or less since shortly after the Unpleasantness Between the States (sometimes known as the War of Northern Aggression).  It will cease publication as a hard-copy newspaper at the end of this year.  I will, with a bit of luck, continue as an electronic publication.

I am glad they will maybe be able to hang in there in some form.  The decline of print newspapers in this country is perhaps to be expected but is in any event a shame.

LISA COOK ADMITS SHE IS GUILTY BUT REALLY ISN'T

By Bob Walsh

 

 Senate Banking Committee Hears Testimony From Nominees For Federal Reserve Board Of Governors

 

Federal Reserve Board Governor Lisa Cook is blaming her mortgage fraud on a clerical error.  She isn't being really clear whose error it was or where or when it happened.  So maybe she did it but didn't mean to.  Or maybe somebody else did it but didn't mean to and she didn't notice because she is too stupid.  Or maybe she just signs shit without reading it.  


That is the problem with financial crimes.  By definition they sort of leave a paper trail.  

If they prosecute her (Black female) in D.C. I am not willing to bet she will be found guilty of anything let along go upstate for a while.  That being said I am not sure that having her go to prison is what this is all about.  I strongly suspect it might be about Trump marking his territory.  

FEDS GOING AFTER CAL EPA AND CARB

By Bob Walsh

 


The Dept. of Justice Civil Rights Division is going after the California Environmental Protection Agency and the California Air Resources Board for civil rights violations.  It appears that they are still operating a vigorous "don't hire White males" program in apparent violation of federal civil rights law.  Ain't that some shit?

Friday, August 29, 2025

RISE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

By H. Lee Lawrence

 

Adam Raine.Adam Raine, 16, was encouraged and coached by Open AI to commit suicide.
 

I read a very disturbing article in Epoch Times a couple days ago.  Geoffrey Hinton, the 'creator' of AI, is warning that if controls are not very soon put in place, AI will eventually find it has no use for humans and we will become extinct.  We're already seeing many workers being fired and replaced with AI, and this could lead to unemployment, poverty, hunger, rioting, crime, etc, etc.

His warning begs the question of why would you help create something so powerful yet also so frightening and dangerous?  I can't help but think of an analogy with Dr. Frankenstein.  Playing God, ostensibly to make us immortal, but in the process, creating a monster.  What motivated him to do this - power, fame, money, all the above??

Just this morning I saw a story of a teen who was coached by OpenAI on the best ways to commit suicide.  OpenAI even offered to help him write his suicide note!  And ultimately, he did kill himself.

The parents are suing now, of course, but where were they before this tragedy??  Nevertheless, it seems we really are bent on  self destruction - I can't joke about it, but I really have seen all the Terminator movies.  

WHEN I USED TO GO TO VEGAS IN THE 1960S, EVERYTHING WAS DIRT CHEAP AND A TOP SHOW COST ONLY $15

The extreme tactics Las Vegas hotels are using as hotspot faces worst crisis in years

 

By Alice Wright 

 

Daily Mail

Aug 29, 2025

 

LAS VEGAS, USA - JANUARY 1, 2018: New Year fireworks on Las Vegas Strip on January 1, 2018 in Las Vegas, USA. The Strip is home to the largest hotels and casinos in the world.


Las Vegas hotels are rolling out big incentives — including free nights and thousands of dollars in casino credits — to lure visitors back to the city. 

Sin City saw an 11.3 percent drop in visitors in June compared with the same month last year, an astonishing fall that means almost 400,000 people stayed away. 

That decline translates to less spending in restaurants, shops, shows and at hotels, where occupancy fell nearly 10 percent, according to the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority. 

Desperate hotels are rolling out the red carpet and freebies to fill rooms.  

'The reason we came was my wife got offered four free nights, $125 in food and beverage credit and $150 in casino credit,' Tom Connolly told The Telegraph.

'The hotel solicited us to come out here. To me, that suggests they need the business,' 70-year-old Connolly said of MGM's New York-New York hotel. 

Other visitors have detailed similar generous offers.

'I’ve got two options - four comp nights at a high-end MGM property and $350 food and beverage or four comp nights at Excalibur and NYNY with $1,000 food and beverage,' one excited tourist explained on Reddit. 

 

Tourists are receiving generous deals from Las Vegas hotels worried about lack of bookings

Tourists are receiving generous deals from Las Vegas hotels worried about lack of bookings

 

MGM Resorts reported a nine percent fall Las Vegas earnings in the quarter ending in June. 

'Headed to the airport now for a week in Vegas. Starting at Fontainebleau for three free nights, $500 in free gambling and $200 in resort comps,' another guest said. 

'Over to Paris for four free nights $400 in free gambling and $300 in resort comps. Ending at Nomad with four free nights, $1000 in free gambling and $750 in resort comps. 

'Also going to two shows and a hockey game on them,' the guest added.  

'Five nights completely comped including fees,' a third added without specifying the hotel.

'All food and drink for my wife and I comped for the entire six days. Couples massage comped and $200 in free play.'  

MGM Resorts did not immediately respond to the Daily Mail's request for comment. 

Retail expert Neil Saunders of Global Data told the Daily Mail that Las Vegas as a destination has itself to blame for the slowdown. 

'What used to be a reasonable trip is now much more expensive,' Saunders explained.

 

Sin City saw an 11.3 percent drop in visitors in June compared to the same time last year

Sin City saw an 11.3 percent drop in visitors in June compared to the same time last year

400,000 less people visited the city in June compared to the same month in 2024

400,000 less people visited the city in June compared to the same month in 2024 

 

'There are all kinds of fees that people have to pay at hotels and some of the service standards and generosity with things like free drinks while in casinos have tightened.'  

'Some people now don’t see Vegas as worth the money and that hits visitor numbers.' 

A visitor recently shared her shock after she was charged $26/£19.11 for a bottle of Fiji water from the minibar in her room at the Aria Resort & Casino. 

And a British magician was also left outraged after he was billed $74.31/£54.63 for two drinks at Sphere in Las Vegas. 

Las Vegas is considered a 'canary in the coalmine' for the wider economy because, unlike many other tourist hotspots in the US, its visitors are primarily domestic rather than international. 

'The reduction that we've seen is largely domestic, and at its core is a concern that consumers have about the economy, about their financial situation and their jobs,' Steve Hill, chief executive of the LVCVA told The Telegraph. 

GREAT! ... ABBAS BELONGS IN AN ISRAELI PRISON, NOT AT THE UN

US to block Mahmoud Abbas from attending UN General Assembly in September

According to a New York Post report, internal State Department documents recommend barring Palestinian Authority representatives from entering the UN General Assembly in New York. The recommendation includes revoking visas issued before July 31. This marks the first time the US has denied an entire foreign delegation entry, a move that could be seen as a violation of its host country agreement with the UN.

 

by Or Shaked  

 

Israel Hayom

Aug 29, 2025

 

President Donald Trump directed Secretary of State Marco Rubio (left) to revoke and deny the visas of members of the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority
President Donald Trump directed Secretary of State Marco Rubio (left) to revoke and deny the visas of members of the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority

 

Secretary of State Marco Rubio has instructed that senior Palestinian Authority officials be barred from attending the gathering of world leaders from September 23 to 29. The move comes after the Palestinian Authority and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) were placed under sanctions for breaching US laws, including the 1989 PLO Commitments Compliance Act and the 2002 Middle East Peace Commitments Act. 

According to the memo obtained by the New York Post, all visas issued to Palestinian officials before July 31 are to be revoked, and no new visas will be granted, including to Abbas himself.

State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott said the decision was taken "in accordance with US law and national security interests." He added, "Secretary Rubio is revoking the visas of senior Palestinian Authority and PLO officials ahead of the General Assembly. To be considered serious partners for peace, the Palestinians must reject terrorism, abandon lawfare campaigns at the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice in The Hague, and halt unilateral moves toward recognition of a Palestinian state."

 

Mahmoud Abbas, President of the State of Palestine, addresses the general debate of the General Assembly’s seventy-ninth session.

Mahmoud Abbas tells UN General Assembly that Israel is perpetrating "the crime of a full-scale war of genocide" and that Israel has killed more than 15,000 children in Gaza, September 26, 2024

 
The United Nations General Assembly 
 

Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau said the sanctions were imposed due to "unilateral declarations of statehood, glorification of violence, encouragement of antisemitism and material support for terrorism, including paying salaries to terrorists."

The memo further noted that Abbas had planned to announce a "constitutional declaration" at the Assembly, including a proclamation of Palestinian independence. Washington views the move as a deliberate escalation, particularly after last month's "Two States Conference" hosted by France and Saudi Arabia at the UN, with a follow-up session planned during the upcoming General Assembly. Several Western countries, including the UK, France and Canada, have already indicated their intention to recognize a Palestinian state at the session.

US officials fear that boosting the Palestinian Authority's international legitimacy would also be seen as a political victory for Hamas and could reward terrorism. The State Department memo warned that the planned French-Saudi conference would serve as a "propaganda victory for Hamas" and undermine Washington's ability to shape cease-fire talks and post-war arrangements in Gaza.

 

 יחסים עכורים ומתוחים לפני מותו. אבו מאזן סופד לעראפת , רויטרסMahmoud Abbas eulogizes Yasser Arafat. 

 

The move sets a precedent: this is the first time the US has blocked an entire foreign delegation from attending the UN's high-level week. However, it is not the first time Washington has barred a Palestinian leader. In 1988, the Reagan administration denied a visa to PLO chairman Yasser Arafat due to his ties to terrorism. The decision drew protests and ultimately led the UN to relocate its meeting to Geneva, where Arafat addressed the Assembly.

Despite the sweeping restrictions, the State Department clarified that the Palestinian UN mission will continue to operate under special exemption as required by the host country agreement, allowing diplomatic staff to work in New York. However, senior political figures will not be included.

TRUMP EMBRACES AN UBER-EVIL QATAR ..... NO WONDER QATAR GIFTED TRUMP WITH A LUXURY AIRCRAFT

Behind the wealth and diplomacy: Qatar's hidden human rights nightmare

Persecution of minorities, encouragement of IDF soldier kidnappings, support for terrorism, oppression of women, and a legal system that enables modern slavery – all this and more can be found in Qatar.

 

by Shachar Kleiman 

 

Israel Hayom

Aug 29, 2025  

                                               

US President Donald Trump (L) speaks with Qatar's Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani at the start of a state dinner at the Lusail Palace in Doha on May 14, 2025. (Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP)

US President Donald Trump with Qatar's Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani at a state dinner at the Lusail Palace in Doha on May 14, 2025.
 
 
Persecution of minorities, encouragement of IDF soldier kidnappings, support for terrorism, oppression of women, and a legal system that enables modern slavery – all this "goodness" and more can be found in Qatar. It's hard to think of another country in the world where such a large gap exists between declarations about human rights and the actual human rights situation. In the Gulf emirate, headed by ruler Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, they know how to talk endlessly about the importance of international law, and occasionally, the capital Doha even hosts human rights conferences on behalf of UN organizations. But what about the situation at home?
 

Minorities: Endless harassment

One answer to this question is provided by a recent ruling in Qatar's court, which decided to send the chairman of the Bahai community assembly in the country, Remy Rouhani, to five years in prison. The reason: The 71-year-old Rouhani simply dared to express himself and voice his opinions on equality between men and women. Consequently, the Bahai religious leader was accused of promoting "a doctrine or ideology that casts doubt on the foundations of Islam," according to a section in Qatar's penal code. The authorities accused him of "violating social principles and values through information technology," as well as disseminating material promoting the adoption of "destructive principles."

A fair trial? Not in this country. The representative of the international Bahai community at the UN, Saba Haddad, warned that Rouhani was imprisoned on a series of baseless charges, relying solely on his religious identity. She added that the attack on him is an attack on all Bahais in Qatar – and on the very principle of freedom of conscience.

Rouhani, it should be noted, is a Qatari citizen and is regarded as a prominent businessman. He previously served as CEO of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry in the country. His daughter, Nora, told the BBC Arabic network that his activities had been conducted transparently and encountered no significant opposition in recent years. Despite this, in December 2024, he was sentenced to one month of suspended imprisonment, along with a fine of approximately $50,000, for "collecting funds without regulatory approval for charitable activity."

The Ministry of International Communications in Qatar published a response to the publications on the subject, which attempted to portray the story in a completely different light. It stated, among other things, that "Qatar's constitution guarantees the right to freedom of worship for all, and this right must be exercised in accordance with the law. It must not threaten or harm public stability or security. Qatar's judicial system guarantees to provide all parties in any issue a fair legal process."

Really a fair process? The charges against Rouhani were based on social media posts dealing with justice and equality between men and women, respecting parents, and a general call for good deeds – not exactly "radical" ideas. The authorities, for their part, claimed he "violated public order," arrested him in April this year, and held him in detention until his trial. Despite the Qatari announcement, according to human rights organizations, he did not receive legal assistance from a lawyer.

In an interview with her, Rouhani's daughter added details about the terrible treatment the family has faced for years. She herself now lives in exile in Australia with her husband and daughter, after being forced to leave Qatar following the inclusion of her Iranian husband, a member of the Bahai faith, on a "blacklist," without explanation from the authorities. This step prevented him from entering the country's territory or residing in it – part of the systematic discrimination, according to Nora, that Bahais in Qatar endure.

"I am Qatari and received my education in Doha's schools and universities. We didn't come from another planet. But because of our Bahai faith, we became strangers in our homeland," she said painfully. Indeed, human rights organizations report many manifestations of discrimination against Bahais by the authorities in Qatar, including deportations, arrests, and even deliberate bureaucratic delays, such as delays in granting permits to rebuild a cemetery.

Foreign workers or foreign slaves? "Forbidden to leave the employer"

This is not the only group discriminated against in Qatar. Many of the emirate's residents are foreign workers without rights, who are in the status of de facto slaves. Take, for example, Amit Gupta, a senior technology professional from India, on charges that remained classified. For months, his family was not even updated on what crime he was accused of. Gupta is the head of an Indian technology company operating in Kuwait and Qatar, and in 2013, he moved to work in Doha. In early January, he was arrested by Qatar's security apparatus while sitting in a restaurant, without being told the reason for the arrest.

In Qatar, it should be emphasized, hundreds of thousands of Indians like Gupta work. Last year, the country's court released eight former Indian Navy officers after they were sentenced to death. According to foreign reports, they were accused of "spying for Israel."

According to Human Rights Watch, more than 91 percent of Qatar's population are foreign workers. These are controlled by an abusive sponsorship system (according to the "kafala," the guarantee system practiced in many Arab countries), which gives employers almost complete control over workers. Despite publicized initiatives to improve their situation, workers still struggle to change jobs – even if employers have stopped paying them. Not only that, but when a worker leaves his workplace without employer permission, it is considered an "escape" that is considered a crime under the country's law. This is probably also the reason why to this day Qatar has not opened an investigation regarding the deaths of masses of foreign workers – between hundreds to thousands, according to estimates – as part of the 2022 World Cup.

Discrimination against women: Raped and sent to prison

The status of women in Qatar is no better – unless they are members of the emir's family. Women are subject to guardianship laws that prevent them from making any significant decisions about their future. For example, they can only marry if their guardian, a male family member, approves of it. Men, by comparison, can marry up to four women simultaneously, without needing anyone's approval. Additionally, women are required to obey their husbands and may lose the right to alimony if they refuse to have sex with their husband "without a justified reason." Working outside the home also requires permission from the guardian.

Beyond that, Qatar's penal code prohibits sex outside of marriage. Anyone who violates the law could be sent to up to seven years in prison. A Muslim who does so could receive flogging if unmarried, and if he has consensual relations with an unmarried woman – the death penalty.

This law affects the authorities' treatment of rape crimes. For example, a few years ago, a tourist from the Netherlands was drugged and raped in a nightclub in Doha. When she complained to the local police, she was sent to prison for several months and fined $800 before being deported from the country.

LGBT community: Set a date on Grindr – and got arrested

The situation of the LGBT community in the country is particularly severe. Just last year, Qatar's security apparatus arrested Guerrero Avinia, a foreign citizen who lived in the country for seven years and worked at an airline company, shortly after he agreed to meet with a man through the Grindr app. His family told human rights organizations that they believe the profile he contacted was fake and was operated by the police.

Over the years, there have been reports of other arbitrary arrests of lesbians, gay men, and other LGBT community members. Qatar is one of 64 countries where homosexuality is prohibited by law. According to various reports, Nepalese were imprisoned in Qatar solely because of their sexual orientation, a move that caused the country to warn its citizens about working in countries like Qatar.

And of course, alongside the systematic violation of human rights, there is the sour cherry on the Qatari whipped cream: support for Hamas and attacks against Israeli targets. During the war, Education Minister Lula al-Khater praised senior Hamas officials and terrorists who were eliminated, including Mohammed Deif and Yahya Sinwar; and this week, after the attack on IDF forces in Khan Yunis, journalist Jaber al-Harami – close to the government – published a post expressing a wish that Hamas would kidnap soldiers; he later deleted it.

The absurdity is that Qatar continues to conduct a foreign policy in parallel, in which it purports to portray itself as a champion of human rights. In 2022, Qatar's ambassador Hind al-Muftah even ran for the position of chair of the UN Forum for Human Rights, Democracy and Rule of Law; until, at the last moment, the organization UN WATCH exposed a series of statements by the celebrated diplomat, who described Jews as "our enemies" and homosexuals as "repulsive."

The organization noted at the time that Qatar has significant influence on the UN in Geneva, and as part of this, the country funded a hall in its name worth $20 million. And this, in essence, tells the whole story: behind the big money and self-glorification, lies corruption that is no less substantial.

WHY HIS SON DIED

My son died because IDF spares civilians, Israeli envoy to US says

Ambassador Yechiel Leiter cited his son’s death while fighting in Gaza as an example of the sacrifices the Jewish state makes to save Palestinian lives.

 

By Canaan Lidor 

 

Israel Today

Aug 29, 2025

 

Israeli Ambassador to the United States, Yechiel Leiter. Photo by Yonatan Sindel/Flash90

Israeli Ambassador to the United States, Yechiel Leiter.
 

Israel’s ambassador to the United States, Yechiel Leiter, said in a televised interview on Thursday that his son Moshe, who did fighting Hamas in 2023, would be alive today if Israel really did what it is accused of doing in Gaza.

“My own son was killed because we do not kill innocent civilians. He went in on foot into Gaza and led the troops at the beginning of the war, and was killed when he went into a Hamas booby trap,” Leiter told Jake Tapper on CNN.

Maj. (res.) Moshe Yedidyah Leiter, 39, was killed in action in the northern Gaza Strip on Nov. 10, 2023. A reservist, he served as a paramedic and was due to start a training placement at a hospital as part of his studies to become a doctor. He and his wife had six children, the youngest of whom was about three months old when his father died.

Near the end of the interview, Tapper asked the ambassador his son’s name. Tapper then repeated it and said: “May his memory be a blessing.” Leiter replied: “Thank you, I appreciate that.”

 

 Mourning Moshe Yedidya Leiter at his Nov. 12 funeral on Mount Herzl (credit: FLASH90)

Major Moshe Yedidia Leiter's funeral at the Mount Herzl Military Cemetery in Jerusalem on November 12, 2023. 
  

Leiter used the example to discredit the claims that Israel was perpetrating genocide in Gaza and killing civilians indiscriminately.

“A country that’s capable of taking out the control of all of Iranian airspace in 72 hours, allowing for the B2s of the United States to come in and obliterate the nuclear weapons operations in Iran, is not capable of ending this war sooner? Of course we are, but it’s because we’re taking precautions that no other country has ever taken,” Leiter said.

No other country, he also said, “has had to face a situation of 450 miles of terror tunnels under an area that’s 24 miles long. We’re dealing with a ghoulish, fiendish organization that’s not only hiding behind civilians, but is using civilians as cannon fodder. They enjoy this. This is a death cult. They say this.”

In the interview, Leiter reiterated Israel’s insistence, backed by US President Donald Trump, that the war end with Hamas dismantled.

“This war ends when Hamas ends. We need to see this war end where Gaza is disarmed, Gaza is demilitarized and all of our hostages are out. None of this, as the president has said repeatedly, none of this drip-drab kind of thing, a few hostages now, a few hostages later. If we are not careful, what’s going to happen is we’re going to get a few hostages out now and we’re never going to see the rest of the hostages again.”

Leiter stressed that, alongside protests by Israelis demanding Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu end the war in Gaza, the government is under pressure by others demanding Hamas’s total defeat.

“There are families of soldiers who are saying to the prime minister, you have to end this war with a defeat of Hamas because otherwise we’re going back to Oct. 6,” Leiter said.

ON ISSUE AFTER ISSUE - WHETHER IMMIGRATION, CRIME, TRANS OBSESSION, COLLEGE CAMPUS RADICALISM - DEMOCRATS HAVE CONSISTENTLY PLACED THEMSELVES ON THE LOSING SIDE OF 80% TO 20% SPLITS AMONG AMERICANS

The last stand of pro-Israel Democrats

The DNC could have sent a message of partial support for the Jewish state. Instead, it encouraged the pro-Hamas left and delayed hopes for a comeback. 

 

By Jonathan S. Tobin 

 

JNS

Aug 28, 2025 


 

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., left, greets Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., as they speak during a stop of their "Fighting Oligarchy" tour that filled Civic Center Park, Friday, March 21, 2025, in Denver. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski)

Sen. Bernie Sanders, (I-Vt.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez (D-N.Y.), leaders in the Israel-hating faction of the Democratic party, speak to supporters during the “Fighting Oligarchy: Where We Go From Here” rally at Civic Center Park in Denver on March 21, 2025. 
 

There was a time when the moderate adults in charge of the Democratic Party weren’t afraid to use their power to marginalize radical leftists who hate Israel. But as was evident at last week’s meeting of the Democratic National Committee in Minneapolis, that is no longer the case.

The good news is that the party establishment, which is to say, most officeholders and officials like the national committee members, hasn’t yet been completely bulldozed by the far left. That was made clear when the DNC voted down a resolution declaring its support for a Palestinian state and a total arms embargo on Israel with no condemnation of Hamas, the terrorist attacks of Oct. 7 or a call for the release of Israeli hostages. It’s also true that a majority of those present were prepared to back a competing resolution proposed by chairman Ken Martin that, while calling for “secure and unrestricted delivery of humanitarian assistance” to Gaza and a ceasefire, also demanded the release of hostages held in the Strip and a two-state solution.

Such a resolution was far from a ringing endorsement of the U.S.-Israel alliance since it envisioned an end to the war without a surrender of Hamas. That, of course, would essentially reward the Palestinians with a state for starting the current war with the unspeakable atrocities in southern Israel on Oct. 7 . Since it included mention of the hostages and envisioned a future in which the Jewish state would exist—albeit via a two-state scheme that the Palestinians have repeatedly rejected—that’s what passes for pro-Israel sentiment among Democrats these days.

A party divided

Just at the moment when pro-Israel Democrats could have rightly celebrated the defeat of the intersectional and antisemitic wing of their party, Martin decided that even as weak an expression of support for Israel as the one that he had proposed was a bridge too far for the Democratic Party in 2025.

Instead of proceeding with the vote, Martin withdrew the resolution, declaring that “there’s a divide in our party on this issue.”

Explaining his puzzling move to surrender to his party’s left-wing members just at the moment when he could have sent a message making it clear that they weren’t in charge, Martin resorted to the kind of contemptible double talk that ought to cause even the most cynical partisan hacks to blush.

“This is a moment that calls for shared dialogue,” Martin said. “It calls for shared advocacy, and that’s why I’ve decided today, at this moment, listening to the testimony and listening to people in our party, to withdraw my amendment and resolution,” he said.

Which is to say: He lacked the courage to stand up for even a watered-down expression of support for the Jewish state. Either that, or he is too much of a realist to pretend that the DNC members who voted down the pro-Hamas resolution weren’t truly representative of sentiment in a party whose voters have largely abandoned support for Israel.

Some Jewish Democrats did their best to spin this discouraging decision as somehow a victory for their side or at least a defeat for their opponents. But the truth is that Martin’s waving of the white flag on the issue exemplified that the last stand of the pro-Israel Democrats has already taken place and that, far from courageously defending their position, they have already surrendered.

The formal takeover of the DNC by the intersectional Israel-hating left wing of the party will likely have to wait until at least 2028. At that point, the faction led by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) may finally vanquish the last vestiges of the old party establishment that forced Hillary Clinton and former President Joe Biden down the throats of Democrats in 2016 and 2020. They’re also the same crowd that set in motion the coup against Biden in 2024 after his mental incapacity became too great to cover up, and then former Vice President Kamala Harris’s incompetent and ultimately losing campaign against President Donald Trump.

Martin’s timorous retreat at the DNC gathering reflected the growing hate for the Jewish state among Democrats, who have swallowed Hamas propaganda about Israel committing “genocide” in the Gaza Strip and deliberately starving Palestinian Arabs. With the legacy liberal media mainstreaming such blood libels, it comes as little surprise that the latest Gallup poll showed that only 8% of Democrats back Israel in its war against Hamas, while 71% of Republicans side with it.

A viral moment

Martin’s decision illustrated how far the party establishment has moved away from its traditional pro-Israel positions. It also brought to mind a time when one of his predecessors was prepared to lie on national television to ensure that Democrats went to voters with a pro-Israel platform.

At the 2012 Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C., the delegates were asked to adopt a change to the party’s platform declaring their recognition of the fact that Jerusalem was the capital of Israel. The measure was deemed necessary by party operatives who understood that President Barack Obama’s re-election campaign had prioritized a Jewish charm offensive to make up for the way he spent his first three years in office attacking Israel.

But to the consternation of Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, who was then serving as chairman of the Democratic National Committee, the two-thirds majority needed in the voice vote to make the change was clearly lacking.

In an epically embarrassing viral moment, Villaraigosa asked the delegates three times to vote. Each time he did so, it was clear that a majority of those voicing their opinion were opposed to affirming that Jerusalem was the capital of Israel. The platform plank was meaningless, since everyone knew that Obama had no intention of moving the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem—something that happened after Donald Trump won the 2016 election. But the convention delegates, who were largely grass-roots party activists and very much to the left of the leaders of the Democrats, were having none of it.

Rather than admit defeat, Villaraigosa simply declared that the platform plank had actually passed with a two-thirds majority, despite the fact that everyone in the hall and the millions watching on television knew that most of those present actually had opposed it.

That was the first time the shift among Democrats became obvious to the general public. But it was not something their leaders were ready to concede, and if it required them to falsify convention votes to deny it, then that’s what they were prepared to do, even if it made them the butt of late-night comedy show jokes.

Fast-forward 13 years to the DNC meeting in Minneapolis, and instead of engaging in Stalinist-style democracy like the Charlotte “vote,” Martin believes that there’s no way to keep his party in the pro-Israel column.

That shouldn’t have surprised anyone after his response to the victory of Democratic Socialist and BDS-supporter Zohran Mamdani in the New York City mayoral primary in June. Like other party leaders, not even Mamdani’s refusal to condemn pro-Hamas chants like “Globalize the intifada” was enough to warrant a disavowal of his candidacy from Martin. To the contrary, he said that Mamdani and, by extension, his supporters who favor the destruction of Israel, are valued members of the Democrats’ “big tent.”

Clueless about why they’re losing

Martin’s choice not to try to pull Democrats back to the political center on Israel was consistent with much of what went on at the DNC meeting. Much of the proceedings demonstrated that the party is still primarily concerned with appeasing the woke left. It started with a cringeworthy “land acknowledgement” about meeting on stolen Native American property and got progressively worse after that. Subsequent presentations and speeches aligned the party with extreme trans activism, support for illegal immigrants, and opposition to enforcing the law and securing America’s border, as well as assertions that an interest in cracking down on crime was a symptom of authoritarianism.

The party’s priorities seem to be affirming Trump derangement syndrome and pandering to left-wing ideologues.

Taken as a whole, it was a reminder that the Democrats are still clueless as to why they lost to Trump last year. As even The New York Times conceded in a recent article, the party is “hemorrhaging voters long before they even go to the polls.” As the analysis pointed out: “Of the 30 states that track voter registration by political party, Democrats lost ground to Republicans in every single one between the 2020 and 2024 elections—and often by a lot.”

These numbers show that there has been a staggering 4.5 million voter swing toward the GOP in the last four years.

This realignment is being fueled by a sense that the Democrats have abandoned the interests of the working class of all races for those of the credentialed elites. Part of that is their embrace of woke leftist ideas on a host of cultural and political matters, of which their abandonment of Israel plays just a small part. On issue after issue—whether immigration, crime, trans obsession, college campus radicalism—Democrats have consistently placed themselves on the losing side of 80% to 20% splits among Americans. All their complaints about Trump or even the administration’s failings can’t make up for that kind of poor political judgment.

Liberal power is also being severely cut back by Trump’s efforts to squelch the left-leaning administrative “deep” state that enabled them to stay in control even after losing elections. The fact that the corporate mainstream press is not nearly as powerful as it once was is also crucial. The media landscape is changing as alternative, independent media outlets and podcasts are where more Americans are now consuming news and opinion. As was evident in 2024, it’s a factor that is hurting the Democrats.

That doesn’t guarantee that Democrats can’t take back at least partial control of Congress in next year’s midterm elections, especially the already evenly divided House of Representatives. The GOP could be tripped up by a variety of factors, including extremism on the far right, some of whose adherents are starting down the same woke antisemitic and anti-Israel rabbit hole as the Democrats.

The path to a comeback

No victory in politics is permanent, and—for all of the triumphalism we’re currently hearing from Trump and the Republicans—sooner or later, the Democrats are going to be back in power.

For that to happen, they’re going to have to stop being hostages to the radicals on the intersectional left. That was how their revival after the last period of total GOP dominance in the 1980s was able to happen. That was when President Bill Clinton dragged them back to the center after Ronald Reagan took advantage of that generation’s Democrats’ willingness to anchor themselves to unpopular left-wing positions.

The same thing is going to be necessary for that inevitable turning of the political tables to occur. Suffice it to say that if the latest DNC meeting is any indication of how Democrats are thinking, then perhaps Vice President JD Vance (who is now the frontrunner to succeed Trump as the Republican candidate in 2028) could be forgiven for thinking that the current GOP moment could last beyond the next four years.

One of the main differences between the early 1990s, when centrist Democrats took back their party, and today is the role social media plays in strengthening extremists, as well as the sort of political discourse in which any deviation from ideological purity (whether on the left or right) is severely punished. The ideological bifurcation of journalism—in which Americans on different sides of the political aisle no longer read, listen or watch the same media outlets—also makes it harder for centrists to prevail in intra-party struggles.

That’s why the inability of centrist Democrats to make a stand at the DNC on the Middle East ought to discourage more than just the pro-Israel community.

With grassroots Democrats so thoroughly captured by the intersectional left—and therefore willing to swallow pro-Hamas propaganda—there may be no way to reconstruct a bipartisan pro-Israel consensus. But as Martin’s decision indicated, by allowing their party to be intimidated by extremists when it comes to hostility to Israel, Democrats are signaling to the country that they are uninterested in the sort of sensible centrism that might carve out a path for their return to power.

By refusing to confront the pro-Hamas left, Democrats are doing more than harming Israel. They’re also pigeonholing themselves as a party that is currently too enamored of extreme ideology to be assured of success. As long as that is true, their time in the wilderness of political opposition is likely to continue.