Saturday, June 06, 2009

NO MORE DICTATING TO OTHER COUNTRIES: That Is Except For Israel

President Obama’s speech in Cairo was an attempt to woo the Muslim world. He was met with dead silence when he admonished the Palestinian Authority to stop its hateful depiction of Jews and to prevent acts of terrorism against Israel. But he asked nothing more of the Palestinians. (The audience also remained absolutley silent when he told them that the killing of 6,000,000 Jews was a "fact" and that denial of the Holocaust was "baseless," "ignorant" and "hateful.")

During an earlier interview, Obama was quick to refute Tom Brokaw’s outrageous comparison of the Holocaust to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. But when he was sucking up to the Muslim world in Cairo, Obama made remarks that sounded a lot like he was comparing the treatment of the Palestinians to the treatment of Jews by the Nazis.

When Obama stated that the Palestinian people have been subjected to "intolerable" suffering by the "occupation" and that Israel must freeze ALL settlement construction, the audience reacted with sustained applause. While the audience approved Obama’s shafting of the Israelis, it was clear that those in attendance gave tacit approval to terrorism against Israel and hatred of Jews.

In yesterday’s Townhall.com, columnist Charles Krauthammer noted that at the recent G-20 summit, Obama "declares that there will be no more ‘dictating’ to other countries. We should ‘forge partnerships as opposed to simply dictating solutions.’" Unfortunately for Israel, Obama's lofty declaration does not apply to the Jewish state.

In the same issue of Townhall.com, Oliver North wrote: To demonstrate empathy with "our Arab allies" -- and show improvement from his predecessors – he (Obama) did not visit Israel and pointedly condemned Israeli settlements, which, he said, "undermine efforts to achieve peace." And Pat Buchanan, who notes that the Obama administration no longer considers the interests of the U.S. to be the same as Israel’s, wrote that Obama has confronted Bibi Netanyahu and handed Israel an ultimatum: Halt all settlement growth, now, and come back to me with your plan for a Palestinian state.

It is obvious that Obama’s love affair with the Muslim world comes at the expense of the Jewish state. Krauthammer wrote that the settlement issue is a phony one. The settlements do not "undermine efforts to achieve peace" because the Palestinians have turned down many generous Israeli offers of land for peace, including the dismantling of some established settlements. Here is Krauthammers column:

THE SETTLEMENTS CANARD
by Charles Krauthammer

Townhall.com
June 05, 2009

WASHINGTON -- Obama the Humble declares there will be no more "dictating" to other countries. We should "forge partnerships as opposed to simply dictating solutions," he told the G-20 summit. In Middle East negotiations, he told al-Arabiya, America will henceforth "start by listening, because all too often the United States starts by dictating."

An admirable sentiment. It applies to everyone -- Iran, Russia, Cuba, Syria, even Venezuela. Except Israel. Israel is ordered to freeze all settlement activity. As Secretary of State Clinton imperiously explained the diktat: "a stop to settlements -- not some settlements, not outposts, not natural-growth exceptions."

What's the issue? No "natural growth" means strangling to death the thriving towns close to the 1949 armistice line, many of them suburbs of Jerusalem, that every negotiation over the past decade has envisioned Israel retaining. It means no increase in population. Which means no babies. Or if you have babies, no housing for them -- not even within the existing town boundaries. Which means for every child born, someone has to move out. No community can survive like that. The obvious objective is to undermine and destroy these towns -- even before negotiations.

To what end? Over the last decade, the U.S. government has understood that any final peace treaty would involve Israel retaining some of the close-in settlements -- and compensating the Palestinians accordingly with land from within Israel itself.

That was envisioned in the Clinton plan in the Camp David negotiations in 2000, and again at Taba in 2001. After all, why turn towns to rubble when, instead, Arabs and Jews can stay in their homes if the 1949 armistice line is shifted slightly into the Palestinian side to capture the major close-in Jewish settlements, and then shifted into Israeli territory to capture Israeli land to give to the Palestinians?

This idea is not only logical, not only accepted by both Democratic and Republican administrations for the last decade, but was agreed to in writing in the letters of understanding exchanged between Israel and the United States in 2004 -- and subsequently overwhelmingly endorsed by a concurrent resolution of Congress.

Yet the Obama State Department has repeatedly refused to endorse these agreements or even say it will honor them. This from a president who piously insists that all parties to the conflict honor previous obligations.

The entire "natural growth" issue is a concoction. It's farcical to suggest that the peace process is moribund because a teacher in the Jewish Quarter of Jerusalem is making an addition to her house to accommodate new grandchildren -- when Gaza is run by Hamas terrorists dedicated to permanent war with Israel and when Mahmoud Abbas, having turned down every one of Ehud Olmert's peace offers, brazenly declares that he is in a waiting mode -- waiting for Hamas to become moderate and for Israel to cave -- before he'll do anything to advance peace.

In his much-heralded "Muslim world" address in Cairo Thursday, Obama declared that the Palestinian people's "situation" is "intolerable." Indeed it is, the result of 60 years of Palestinian leadership that gave its people corruption, tyranny, religious intolerance and forced militarization; leadership that for three generations -- Haj Amin al-Husseini in 1947, Yasser Arafat in 2000, Abbas in December 2008 -- rejected every offer of independence and dignity, choosing destitution and despair rather than accept any settlement not accompanied by the extinction of Israel.

In the 16 years since the Oslo accords turned the West Bank and Gaza over to the Palestinians, their leaders -- Fatah and Hamas alike -- built no schools, no roads, no courthouses, no hospitals, no institutions that would relieve their people's suffering. Instead they poured everything into an infrastructure of war and terror, all the while depositing billions (from gullible Western donors) into their Swiss bank accounts.

Obama says he came to Cairo to tell the truth. But he uttered not a word of that. Instead, among all the bromides and lofty sentiments, he issued but one concrete declaration of new American policy: "The United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements," thus reinforcing the myth that Palestinian misery and statelessness are the fault of Israel and the settlements.

Blaming Israel and picking a fight over "natural growth" may curry favor with the Muslim "street." But it will only induce the Arab states to do like Abbas: sit and wait for America to deliver Israel on a platter. Which makes the Obama strategy not just dishonorable but self-defeating.

No comments: