EAST TEXAS JUSTICE (2)

Ever since I returned to Texas (from California) to start a new career as a criminal justice educator, I have been trying to figure out what century East Texas law enforcement is operating in. It’s certainly not in the 21st century, and not even in the 20th century.

In my blog, “East Texas Justice” (2-9-09), I reproduced a Houston Chronicle article by Lisa Sandberg about how the law enforcement authorities in the East Texas town of Tenaha, population 1,000, were pirating passing-through motorists of their valuables on trumped up drug-related traffic stops.

Now Lisa Falkenberg, a Chronicle columnist, is reporting that the district attorney with jurisdiction over the piracy cases, is trying to use some of the loot stolen from innocent motorists to pay for defending herself in lawsuits filed against her for her complicity in stealing that loot in the first place. Now that defines CHUTZPAH!

Before going any further, here is a repeat of that part of Sandberg’s report which described the highway piracy:

PROPERTY SEIZURE BY POLICE CALLED 'HIGHWAY PIRACY'
by Lisa Sandberg

Houston Chronicle
February 8, 2009

TENAHA — A two-decade-old state law that grants authorities the power to seize property used in a crime is wielded by some agencies against people who are never charged with, much less convicted, of a crime.

Law enforcement authorities in this East Texas town of 1,000 people seized property from at least 140 motorists between 2006 and 2008, and, to date, filed criminal charges against fewer than half, according to a San Antonio Express-News review of court documents.

Virtually anything of value was up for grabs: cash, cell phones, personal jewelry, a pair of sneakers, and often, the very car that was being driven through town. Some affidavits filed by officers relied on the presence of seemingly innocuous property as the only evidence that a crime had occurred.

Linda Dorman, a great-grandmother from Akron, Ohio, had $4,000 in cash taken from her by local authorities when she was stopped while driving through town after visiting Houston in April 2007. Court records make no mention that anything illegal was found in her van and show no criminal charges filed in the case. She is still waiting for the return of what she calls "her life savings."

Dorman’s attorney, David Guillory, calls the roadside stops and seizures in Tenaha "highway piracy," undertaken by a couple of law enforcement officers whose agencies get to keep most of what is seized.

Guillory is suing officials in Tenaha and Shelby County on behalf of Dorman and nine other clients who were stripped of their property. All were African-Americans driving either rentals or vehicles with out-of-state plates.

Guillory alleges in the lawsuit that while his clients were detained, they were presented with an ultimatum: waive your rights to your property in exchange for a promise to be released and not be criminally charged. Guillory said most did as Dorman did, signing the waiver to avoid jail.

...in Tenaha, a town of chicken farms that hugs the Louisiana border, critics say being a black out-of-towner passing through with anything of value is almost evidence of a crime.
----------

And here is Lisa Falkenberg’s column on the East Texas district attorney who wants to use stolen loot to pay for defending herself in lawsuits filed against her for stealing that loot:

IDEA ON USING SEIZED ITEMS TOPS THEM ALL
By Lisa Falkenberg

Houston Chronicle
October 8, 2009

The allegations of highway piracy leveled against Shelby County District Attorney Lynda Russell last year were outrageous enough.

Now, it seems, the alleged pirate wants to use some of the loot to defend herself against the lawsuit accusing her of stealing it in the first place.

Russell and several other officials in the Deep East Texas county are accused of using the state's asset forfeiture law to pillage everything from cash to Blackberrys to jewelry from dozens of out-of-town motorists, many of them black, in a moneymaking scam run under the guise of drug-fighting.

Like a well-oiled speed trap, the confiscations were apparently so commonplace that the plaintiffs' attorney reportedly discovered pre-notarized, pre-signed police affidavits complete with blanks for an officer to fill in the items being collected.

Officials in the map dot of Tenaha seized property from at least 140 motorists between 2006 and 2008, according to the 2008 civil lawsuit, but had filed criminal charges against fewer than half.

Tenaha officials have defended the practice. Russell didn't return my call for comment. Her private attorney, Tom Henson, maintains his client did nothing wrong and, with regards to the racial profiling allegations, wasn't among the officers choosing who to stop.

But both the local county commission and the state have refused to defend Russell in the lawsuit. The county argues Russell is a state employee and should be represented by the attorney general.

“I think it's a frivolous lawsuit,” said newly appointed Shelby County Judge Rick Campbell, but he added, “I think that the commissioners are concerned about ‘what if it goes bad,' and ‘what if it bankrupts this county.’”

REQUEST DENIED

Meanwhile, the attorney general's office wrote Russell in November that “under the circumstances of this case, we are not able to extend representation to you.” The letter provided no details, and a spokesman wouldn't elaborate.

So, in August, Russell inquired with the attorney general about her options.

In the brief, Russell's assistant district attorney Kenneth Florence argues that either the county or the state should be required to defend her, but, if they don't, he asks if her use of asset forfeiture monies could be construed as an “official purpose” since the lawsuit arose out of acts she took while “fulfilling the scope of her duties.”

The audacity of the question is breathtaking. Russell's attorney fees in a civil lawsuit have nothing to do with crime-fighting, for which the Legislature intended such funds to be used.

THE OPPOSITE PURPOSE?

And, considering the severity of the allegations Russell — that she personally coerced innocent people into handing over their valuables or else face felony charges such as money laundering — the idea of defending her alleged actions with forfeiture money would seem to represent the very antithesis of the crime-fighting purpose.

(It's even more disturbing than a certain former DA's habit of using forfeiture funds for things like margarita machines and gifts for political buddies.)

The American Civil Liberties Union last week filed a brief opposing the request, and argued that the government — either the county or the state — should pony up to “account for the misconduct of officials who operate in its name.”

David Guillory, a Nacogdoches attorney who represents eight plaintiffs in the lawsuit seeking class-action status, said the money in Shelby County's forfeiture fund belongs to the people it was stolen from: his clients.

“Imagine someone breaking into your home and doing a bunch of damage and they get prosecuted for it,” he said. “Then they go hire Racehorse Haynes [a prominent defense attorney] and use your wedding ring that they pawned to defend themselves.”

Sen. John Whitmire, D-Houston, whose bill to tighten the law regarding how forfeiture funds can be seized and used failed last session, called Russell's request “nuts.”

“I'm not sure she's dealing with a full deck of cards,” Whitmire said. “Her practice was deplorable, illegal, unjust and abusive. For her now to think she can use ill-gotten gains to defend herself, it's horrible.”

AN UNCLAIMED IDEA

Yet, there's some dispute about who came up with the idea to use forfeiture funds for Russell's defense. Florence, the ADA who wrote the AG request, said county commissioners asked him to include it. But the county judge said commissioners had nothing to do with it.

And he doubts it will fly with the AG: “Using common sense,” he said, “I would think not.”