Who IS she? Trump's beauty queen prosecutor suffers the ultimate courtroom humiliation
By Phillip Nieto
Daily Mail
Jan 7, 2026
A Trump-appointed federal judge has demanded answers over why the Justice Department's prosecutor, Lindsey Halligan, is pretending she still has a job.
US District Judge David Novak of Richmond ordered Halligan to explain why she continues to identify as the US attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia despite another judge ruling in November that she had been unlawfully appointed to the role.
Judge Novak sent out a three-page order on Tuesday demanding answers from Halligan regarding her role. The order is a part of a carjacking and attempted bank robbery case involving Halligan as the prosecutor.
Halligan, an ex-beauty queen who defended Donald Trump during the classified documents case, unsuccessfully prosecuted former FBI Director James and Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James last year.
Judge Novak ordered Halligan to respond to his order in writing by 'explaining the basis for ... identification of herself as the United States Attorney, notwithstanding Judge Currie's contrary ruling. She shall also set forth the reasons why this Court should not strike Ms. Halligan's identification of herself as United States Attorney from the indictment in this matter.'
He goes on to demand Halligan 'shall further explain why her identification does not constitute a false or misleading statement.'
The judge suggested disciplinary action against Halligan could come down the line and order her to sign her response.
Novak noted that his order to Halligan came at his own initiative and not from the defense attorneys involved in the case.
A separate judge ruled in November that the DOJ had unlawfully appointed Halligan to her position
The Daily Mail has contacted the Justice Department for comment.
In November, US District Judge Cameron Currie ruled that the Justice Department had violated the Constitution by unlawfully appointing Halligan as US attorney.
The judge's ruling led to the dismissal of Comey and James' criminal cases.
Currie wrote that all criminal indictments 'flowing from Ms. Halligan's defective appointment, including securing and signing Mr. Comey's indictment, were unlawful exercises of executive power.'
The judge issued another ruling in James' criminal prosecution by claiming Halligan had exercised power she 'did not lawfully possess.'
Novak, who was appointed by Trump in 2019, noted that Currie's ruling against Halligan's appointed had been appealed but that the order had not been paused by the courts.
Therefore, according to Novak, the prior ruling remains the 'binding precedent of the district and is not subject to being ignored.'
Halligan was appointed to her role after her predecessor refused to bring criminal charges against Trump's political enemies
Halligan was placed into the role as US attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia after her predecessor refused to bring forward criminal charges against Trump's perceived political enemies.
Former US attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, Erik Siebert, declined to prosecute James for mortgage fraud over what he said was a lack of evidence.
In September, Trump posted a brutal attack Truth Social message demanding Attorney General Pam Bondi replace Siebert with Halligan, who served as a member of the White House counsel at the time.
He described Siebert as a 'Democrat Endorsed 'Republican'' and said Halligan will 'be Fair, Smart, and will provide, desperately needed, JUSTICE FOR ALL!'
Although Currie's November ruling did sink Halligan's prosecution against Comey and James, it did not remove her from office.
No comments:
Post a Comment