Insists there is absolutely no global warming
At the start of his Tuesday radio show, Roach Limburger went ballistic by accusing the Democrats of ‘politicizing’ the Moore, Oklahoma tornado disaster. He ranted that a Democratic senator blamed the tornado on global warming only ‘five minutes’ after the scope of the disaster became known. “He couldn’t wait five minutes,” ole Roach said. Then Roach ranted on and on with his view that there is absolutely no global warming and no man-made warming whatsoever.
I do not know what world ole Roach is living in, but it sure as hell is not the world my friends and I are living in. 99 percent of the scientific community is convinced that we are in a period of global warming. There are some differences of opinion among scientists over how much of the global warming is cyclical or man-made, but there is no doubt that the earth is warming up and that greenhouse gases are a contributing factor.
If global warming is a fiction perpetrated by the left-wing as Roach insists, then why are the polar ice caps and the glaciers in Iceland, Greenland and other locations melting? Before-and-after pictures taken from outer space clearly show that the polar ice caps and glaciers have been shrinking. If global warming is a fiction, then why do before-and-after pictures of Mt. Everest show that ice and snow is no longer where it was before and since Sir Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay reached the summit exactly 60 years ago?
As late as August 2001, when I was at the base camp of Everest in Tibet, the whole mountain was covered in snow and ice. Tibet happens to be in nearly the same latitude as Texas, meaning that August would be the hottest time of the year there. The latest pictures show that much of the snow and ice that I personally saw is now no longer there. So, where does that buffoon get off insisting there is absolutely no global warming?
The sad part about Roach is that most of his huge army of dodoheads are buying his daily delusionary rants hook, line and sinker. Rush Limbaugh clearly has no credibility, at least not where the issue of global warming is concerned.
1 comment:
Sorry Howie, but I would have to argue with you on this one. I am mistrustful of politically sponsored science, especially when the major proponents of it in the scientific community have admitted to fudging the figures to fit the theory. That doesn't mean it isn't happening I grant you. I am just not impressed by the so-called scientific consensus on the issue.
Post a Comment