Wednesday, May 13, 2020

SHELLEY LUTHER SHOULD BE LOCKED UP AGAIN FOR THINKING WE ARE ALL SO STUPID AS TO BELIEVE HER STORY ABOUT THE PAYCHECK PROTECTION PAYMENT

Anti-lockdown martyr Shelley Luther who was jailed for defying stay-at-home order to open her salon and 'feed her kids' had received $18,000 PPP check

Daily Mail
May 12, 2020

Shelley Luther, the owner of Salon a la Mode in Dallas, repeatedly defied Texas's stay-at-home order saying she needed to keep her salon open to 'feed her kids' during lockdown.

It has emerged Luther applied for and received $18,000 from the government under the Paycheck Protection Program.

She defended herself Tuesday morning in an interview with Fox News, saying she did not learn she had been given the handout until two days before her court date and that the money landed in her account out of nowhere and she didn't know how to spend it.

7 comments:

Trey Rusk said...

Uh-Oh

Trey Rusk said...

The point is that she should have never been arrested for an unconstitutional law. I hope she sues the pants off Tarrant County and wins.

BarkGrowlBite said...

Come on Trey, she is a four-flushing phony. She says she opened her business to feed her kids when she got $18,000 from the government to do so. She belonged in jail.

Legal experts also disagree with you. Under emergency powers, government officials can impose some restrictions on the liberties of the citizenry.

Trey Rusk said...

Wake up, Howie. Emergency powers isn't martial law. They can recommend but not arrest. They can even pull licenses for offenses such as liquor, beauty shops and nail salons but not criminal cases. The mostly Democrat Mayors and County Judges were drunk with power. The Texas Supreme Court said so.

BarkGrowlBite said...

Trey, I am awake. I suggest you stick to what you know. Neither you or I know little, if anything about constitutional law. So I for one, will rely on the constitutional law scholars who say that the lockdown orders are constitutional and disobedience of those orders is punishable.

And that Texas Supreme Court ruling was clearly a political one, not a constitutional decision.

Trey Rusk said...

Howie, Wipe the sleep out of your eyes. The Texas Supreme Court ruled on the matter. It's over. How dare you suggest politics had anything to do with the Texas top court ruling. Those folks know the difference between Shit and Shinola. That's why we elected them!

BarkGrowlBite said...

"How dare you suggest politics had anything to do with the Texas top court ruling. Those folks know the difference between Shit and Shinola. That's why we elected them!"

If you believe politics had nothing to do with their decision, then you must still believe in the tooth fairy.