By Michael Balsamo
Associated Press
August 13, 2020
WASHINGTON -- A
Justice Department investigation has found Yale University is illegally
discriminating against Asian American and white applicants, in violation
of federal civil rights law, officials said Thursday.
Yale denied the allegation, calling it “meritless” and “hasty.”
The
findings detailed in a letter to the college’s attorneys Thursday mark
the latest action by the Trump administration aimed at rooting out
discrimination in the college application process, following complaints
from students about the application process at some Ivy League colleges.
The Justice Department had previously filed court papers siding with
Asian American groups who had levied similar allegations against Harvard
University.
The
two-year investigation concluded that Yale “rejects scores of Asian
American and white applicants each year based on their race, whom it
otherwise would admit,” the Justice Department said. The investigation
stemmed from a 2016 complaint against Yale, Brown and Dartmouth.
“Yale’s
race discrimination imposes undue and unlawful penalties on
racially-disfavored applicants, including in particular Asian American
and White applicants,” Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband, who
heads the department’s civil rights division, wrote in a letter to the
college’s attorneys.
Prosecutors
found that Yale has been discriminating against applicants to its
undergraduate program based on their race and national origin and “that
race is the determinative factor in hundreds of admissions decisions
each year.” The investigation concluded that Asian American and white
students have “only one-tenth to one-fourth of the likelihood of
admission as African American applicants with comparable academic
credentials,” the Justice Department said.
“Unlawfully
dividing Americans into racial and ethnic blocs fosters stereotypes,
bitterness, and division,” Dreiband said in a statement. “It is past
time for American institutions to recognize that all people should be
treated with decency and respect and without unlawful regard to the
color of their skin.”
The
investigation also found that Yale uses race as a factor in multiple
steps of the admissions process and that Yale “racially balances its
classes.”
The
Supreme Court has ruled colleges and universities may consider race in
admissions decisions but has said that must be done in a narrowly
tailored way to promote diversity and should be limited in time. Schools
also bear the burden of showing why their consideration of race is
appropriate.
In a
statement, Yale said it “categorically denies this allegation,” has
cooperated fully with the investigation and has been continually turning
over “a substantial amount of information and data.”
“Given
our commitment to complying with federal law, we are dismayed that the
DOJ has made its determination before allowing Yale to provide all the
information the Department has requested thus far,” the university said
in a statement. “Had the Department fully received and fairly weighed
this information, it would have concluded that Yale’s practices
absolutely comply with decades of Supreme Court precedent.”
The
university said it considers a multitude of factors and looks at “the
whole person when selecting whom to admit among the many thousands of
highly qualified applicants.”
“We
are proud of Yale’s admissions practices, and we will not change them
on the basis of such a meritless, hasty accusation,” the statement said.
The Justice
Department has demanded that Yale immediately stop and agree not to use
race or national origin for upcoming admissions. The government also
says that if Yale proposes that it will continue to use race or national
origin as a factor in future admission cycles, the college must first
submit a plan to the Justice Department “demonstrating its proposal is
narrowly tailored as required by law, including by identifying a date
for the end of race discrimination.”
The Justice Department has also previously raised similar concerns
about Harvard University, which prosecutors accused of “engaging in
outright racial balancing,” siding with Asian American students in a
lawsuit who allege the Ivy League school discriminated against them.
A federal judge in 2019 cleared Harvard
of discriminating against Asian American applicants in a ruling that
was seen as a major victory for supporters of affirmative action in
college admissions across the U.S. That ruling has been appealed and
arguments are scheduled for next month.
In
the Harvard case, the Justice Department had argued that the university
went too far in its use of race, but the judge disagreed. Though the
Supreme Court has ruled that colleges’ use of race in admissions must be
“narrowly tailored” and can be only a “plus factor,” past rulings still
give colleges wide latitude in considering a wide range of factors,
including race, as they build their classes.
1 comment:
Don't stupid people have a place at Yale too, in the interest of diverstiy?
Post a Comment