Joe Biden has indicated that as president he would rejoin the disastrous nuclear deal drafted by former President Barack Obama and his Foreign Secretary John Kerry
By Howie Katz
Big Jolly Times
November 20, 2020
In 2015, former President Barack Obama and his Foreign Secretary John Kerry drafted s a nuclear deal with I ran that was joined by China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom and the European Union. The deal also lifted a freeze on $150 billion of Iran’s assets that were being held by US and foreign banks.
The deal was disastrous from the get-go because it allowed Iran to eventually develop nuclear weapons with which to destroy Israel. And the freed-up $150 billion has been used to fund terrorist militias throughout the Middle East.
President Trump pulled out of the disastrous deal in May 2018. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Iran had been violating terms of the agreement even before Trump pulled out of the deal.
On November 14, the IAEA verified that Iran began feeding uranium gas into recently installed advanced 174 IR-2m centrifuges at its Fuel Enrichment Plant deep underground in Natanz,. That will allow Iran to produce a nuclear weapon in a relatively short time.
If Israel had any bombs that could penetrate the underground facilities at Natanz, the Israeli Air Force would have destroyed them after Obama's appeasement deal. But Israel does not have any such bombs.
The US, however, does have bunker-buster bombs that penetrate deep underground and could cause serious damage to Iran's nuclear facilities.
Israel is not the only country that wants the US to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities. Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates also want the US to attack the Natanz facilities, and they want it done now.
Joe Biden has indicated that as president he would rejoin the disastrous nuclear deal drafted by former President Barack Obama and his Foreign Secretary John Kerry in their attempt to appease Iran.
Although Trump has not conceded the election, it is quite clear that on January 20, Biden will become President of the United States. All those affidavits attesting to voter fraud that Rudy Giuliani claims to have do not constitute hard evidence, and without hard evidence Trump cannot prevail in the courts.
According to reports, last week it took the combined persuasive powers of Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Mark Milley and acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller to talk Trump out of bombing the nuclear facilities at Natanz.
During his four years in office, Trump has often disregarded the advise of senior government officials. Why he followed their advise in this instance is rather puzzling, especially since Iran is now close to acquiring a nuclear weapon.
Biden will allow Iran to acquire nuclear weapons just like Obama allowed North Korea to become a nuclear powerhouse. And Kamala Harris will kiss the feet of the mullahs rather than risk a war with Iran.
In order to keep Biden from appeasing the mullahs by allowing Iran to develop nuclear weapons, Trump should order a devastating air strike on the Natanz nuclear facilities, and he should do it now. And if not now, most certainly before January 20!
If that creates a big mess for Biden-Harris, so much the better.
2 comments:
Such an action would bring a HUGE amount of heat onto Israel. It is, however, better than the heat they would get if a few nukes get dropped on their ass. That is one thing I will give the Israeli government credit for. They will consider the situation, make a decision in the best interest of their people, and then do what they feel that have to do.
As a former police officer and criminal justice professor did you ever see a criminal case decided on witness testimony? When did witness testimony not count as evidence in a court? Some statements have come from Democrat Poll Watchers. The on screen televised manipulation of votes does not count? How about more votes cast than the number of registered voters in certain areas. Again I ask, Where do we draw the line on voter fraud and election tampering? Instead of being appalled at the evidence you give up on the criminal case.
Post a Comment