Since Oct. 7, American Jews have seen
their civil rights trampled every day. Jewish students are subjected to
constant intimidation, assault, battery and threats from Hamas
supporters on campus. And from coast to coast, the stories are
depressingly similar. University authorities refuse to protect them from
their pro-Jewish genocide peers.
Then, too, on Thursday, the New York
Police Department told the Jews of Brooklyn to stay off the streets on
Shabbat afternoon. Pro-Hamas will be demonstrating, and the police said
that they will be unable to protect Jewish residents as the terror
supporters march through their neighborhoods.
How is this happening? How is it that at a
time of maximum peril, law-enforcement bodies are doing all but nothing
to defend the Jewish community? Why is the FBI not arresting terror
supporters as required under U.S. law? Why is the U.S. Justice
Department not directing local authorities to defend the Jews?
A good place to begin to look for answers
is the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. That powerful
division is led by Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke.
Clarke’s appointment in 2021 caused an
uproar in Jewish circles because she has a record of anti-Semitic
activism and was an ardent supporter of the pro-Hamas, anti-Jewish Black
Lives Matter movement.
In 1994, as the head of the Black Students
Association at Harvard Law School, Clarke invited Wellesley College
Professor Tony Martin to speak at Harvard. Martin had just written a Protocols of the Elders of Zion-style anti-Semitic book called The Jewish Onslaught.
Clarke defiantly defended Martin at the
time and attacked the Jewish students who expressed concern about her
move. She never apologized for her actions. Instead, ahead of her Senate
confirmation, she told progressive, anti-Israel Jewish reporters and
activists that she “regretted” the invitation. That was enough for them
to declare that the allegation that Clarke remains hostile towards Jews
is slander.
U.S. President Joe Biden has a problem. He
staffed his administration at all levels and across departments with
hardened ideologues, many of whom have records of hostility towards Jews
and support for Hamas, Iran and other terror groups and regimes. Under
Biden, these officials have advanced his Middle East policies that until
Oct. 7 were largely aligned with the interests of Iran, Hezbollah,
Hamas and the Houthis.
Now that those policies have been shown to
be counterproductive, and at least partly responsible for the threats
America now faces to its core Middle Eastern interests, the same
officials remain in their positions and continue to direct the Biden
administration’s policies.
Consider the Palestinians.
U.S. policy towards the Palestinians is
directed by the U.S. Special Representative to the Palestinians, Hady
Amr. Amr is a longtime supporter of Hamas. In 2018, at the Qatar-based
offices of the Brookings Institute, Amr was the lead author of a
Brookings policy paper titled, “Ending Gaza’s Perpetual Crisis–A New U.S. Approach.”
Amr’s basic recommendations were to change
terror financing laws to permit U.S. contractors to work with Hamas, as
well as to use any new round of war between Israel and Hamas to launch a
new three-pronged policy towards Israel and Hamas.
Amr’s plan accepted Hamas as a legitimate
actor. It called for the Palestinian Authority to unite with Hamas and
reorganize under Hamas’s leadership in light of Hamas’s stronger support
among Palestinians. Finally, it called for the United States to coerce
Israel into making unreciprocated concessions to Hamas and the P.A.,
even though Amr acknowledged that the concessions would endanger Israel.
Among other things, he called for Israel to end its maritime blockage
of the Gaza coast and permit Hamas free access to the sea.
As the architect of Biden’s Palestinian
policies, Amr’s Brookings paper was a blueprint for many of the policies
adopted by the administration, including its willingness to fund Hamas
indirectly through the P.A. and U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA), the U.N. agency operating in Gaza. Some 90% of UNRWA employees are Hamas members.
Amr remains in his position.
The ongoing Iran problem
Then there is Iran. Biden appointed Iran
apologist Robert Malley to lead the administration’s Iran policy.
Malley’s policy was so pro-Iranian that several career U.S State
Department officials, not known for their hostility to Tehran resigned
in protest. As Semafor and Iran International exposed last month, Malley
surrounded himself with advisers in and out of government with records
of serving as Iranian regime agents in Washington. One of those aides,
Ariane Tabatabai remains in her position as Chief of Staff to the
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity
Conflict, with her security clearance intact, a month after her direct
ties to the Iranian regime became public knowledge.
Although Malley was booted from his
position under a cloud of suspicion of misuse of classified information
and is reportedly under FBI criminal investigation, his policy of
courting Iran and enabling its rise as a nuclear power and regional
power remains in place.
This week many observers, including former
U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo expressed shock when they
discovered the Biden administration gave a U.S. entry visa to Iranian
Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian to speak at the United
Nations. The move signaled that despite the fact that Iran trained Hamas
terrorists in Iran ahead of Oct. 7’s atrocities, oversaw the planning
of the Oct. 7 slaughter, green-lighted the atrocities and finances
Hamas, the administration is still implementing Malley’s Iran policy.
This comes despite the fact that Abdollahian used his speech to threaten
the United States with war if it continues to support Israel and
despite the fact that since Oct. 7, Iranian proxies in Syria, Yemen and
Iraq have repeatedly attacked U.S. forces in the region.
The Pentagon’s continued refusal to fully
acknowledge Iran’s direction of Hamas’s acts of genocide is further
indication that Malley’s policy remains Biden’s Iran policy.
Biden’s continued reliance on his
anti-Israel, pro-Hamas and pro-Iran officials is not merely a policy
disaster. It is a political problem. As Democratic pollster Doug Schoen
explained at The Hill
on Thursday, public support for Israel among both Democrats and
Republicans is sky-high. Americans don’t merely support Israel; they
support Israel passionately.
As Schoen noted, 81% of Republicans and
74% of Democrats support providing Israel with military support. Some
80% of Republicans and 72% of Democrats feel that it is important for
the United States to protect Israel. And 74% of Americans believe that
supporting Israel is the more important than other geopolitical
priorities.
Schoen concluded his article by noting,
“Frankly, in my five decades of experience in politics, including
polling extensively on issues related to Israel and the America-Israel
relationship, the current support for Israel’s right to defend itself
against terrorists who seek its destruction is like nothing I’ve seen
before.”
Sensitive to public opinion on the one
hand and his administration officials on the other, Biden tried to
thread the needle on Wednesday. The results weren’t pretty.
At a press conference with Australian
Prime Minister Tony Albanese, Biden restated his administration’s
commitment to provide Israel with the arms it needs to defeat Hamas. But
he then demanded that Israel resupply Hamas under the euphemistic
headline: “Humanitarian aid.”
A brewing rebellion
While Palestinian election results,
polling data and the wide-scale celebrations of Hamas’s atrocities
across Gaza, Judea and Samaria are evidence that Hamas represents a
large majority of Palestinians in Gaza, and Judea and Samaria, Biden
insisted that Hamas does not represent the Palestinian people.
His false assertion is a necessary
component of his administration’s strategic goal, which he restated at
the press conference—the establishment of a Palestinian state in Gaza,
Judea, Samaria and portions of Jerusalem.
To defend the proposition that Israel must
agree to establish a state in its heartland for a people that supports
and engages in acts of genocide of Jewry towards the annihilation of the
Jewish state, Biden turned to Amr’s playbook: He demonized the
half-million Israeli Jews who live in Judea and Samaria.
“I continue to be alarmed about extremist
settlers attacking Palestinians in the West Bank that—pouring gasoline
on fire is what it’s like. They’re … attacking Palestinians in places
that they’re entitled to be, and it has to stop. They have to be held
accountable. And it has to stop now,” he said angrily.
Biden’s broadside is unsupported by facts.
Although several dozen Palestinian terrorists in Judea and Samaria have
been killed in gun battles with IDF forces in Judea and Samaria since
Oct. 7, no Israeli civilians were involved in any of the clashes.
On the other hand, the morning after Biden
launched his slanderous broadside, a Palestinian mob outside a Jewish
farm in the Binyamin region attacked two Israeli shepherds, critically
wounding one.
Many Israeli media outlets responded with
shock and anger at Biden’s demand for Israel to accept that the goal of
the war is to establish a Palestinian state. One headline blared: “Biden
deceived us.”
In an effort to play to both sides, Biden
rejected claims by Hamas’s “Gaza Health Ministry” that Israel has killed
6,000 civilians, including 2,700 children in Gaza, saying, “I have no
confidence in the numbers the Palestinians are using.”
And whereas Israelis were stunned and
angered by his hostile messages directed against them, Biden’s rejection
of Hamas’s casualty propaganda enraged Hamas’s allies in Washington.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) demanded that Biden
apologize. Furious Hamas supporters at the State Department showed The Huffington Post 20 department cables where Hamas’s “Gaza Health Ministry” numbers were accepted as credible.
To quell the brewing rebellion of their
own officials, both National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan and
Secretary of State Tony Blinken have reportedly conducted “listening
sessions” with these pro-Hamas staffers to make sure they feel “listened
to” by their bosses. There have been no reports that any of these
pro-terror officials have been fired.
This is also a political issue. Biden’s
support for Israel, limited though it has been is costing him support
among Muslim Americans and pro-Hamas progressives. A Gallup poll of
Democrats from Oct. 3 to Oct. 23 shows that Biden’s support among
Democrats went down 11% in three weeks and now stands at 75%.
These numbers, aligned with Schoen’s data,
expose Biden’s conundrum. If Biden maintains his support for Israel,
then he will anger, alienate and perhaps permanently lose the support of
his administration and the activist progressive base of his party. And
if he stands with his base—and his pro-Iran and pro-Hamas officials and
voters—he will alienate the American public. Either way, he undermines
his standing as he moves towards an election year.
In “The Caroline Glick Show” this week, historian Victor Davis Hanson
argued that with the public’s stalwart support for Israel, and Iran’s
escalating attacks against the United States through its proxies, Biden
will be forced to stand with Israel even more forthrightly in the weeks
to come.
If the opposite occurs, if Biden opts to
stand with Hady Amr, Robert Malley’s acolytes, and their allies and
comrades throughout the administration, as well as with the Democrat
Party’s pro-Hamas camp, and against three-quarters of the American
public, it will be a testament to the brittleness of the
administration’s extremism. It will also constitute a rejection of the
democratic norms of governance that have underpinned American society
and politics for 250 years.
No comments:
Post a Comment