FORMER BARKGROWLBITE STUDENT IN THE NEWS AGAIN

Jury sides with former deputy in his sexual harassment lawsuit against former Constable Pam Matranga

Pam was one of my best students. She was very bright and had a quick wit about her. I will always remember when I asked her to spell defecate. Within the blink of an eye she answered s-h-i-t. That was about five minutes before the end of the period. My students were still laughing as they left the classroom. I have been saddened ever since the sexual harassment charges against Pam surfaced in 2011.

JURY: FEMALE BOSS SEXUALLY HARASSED DEPUTY
By Harvey Rice

Houston Chronicle
March 22, 2014

GALVESTON – A Galveston County jury has awarded $567,000 to a former deputy constable who was allegedly sexually harassed by his female boss.

The jury made the award Friday to James P. Gist, 51, after deciding that former Precinct 7 Constable Pam Matranga, 55, sexually harassed him from May 2011 until October 2011.

Gist accused Matranga of repeatedly making suggestive comments, of pressing his head between her breasts and of making numerous other sexual advances. He alleged that he was fired after Matranga discovered that he was attempting to record her advances.

Gist could not be reached for comment, but his attorney, Anthony Griffin, said the jury refused to absolve Matranga because of her gender. "They rejected this whole notion that you get away with it because you are a female," Griffin said. He said the jury awarded his client $200,000 more than he asked.

Matranga called the verdict unfair and said that her former employee filed the lawsuit because she had refused to promote him. "It was a circus for the last two years," she said about the lawsuit, filed days before the 2012 election in which she was defeated after eight years as constable.

"It was a horrible, horrible time," Matranga said. "Mr. Gist said he would make my life a living hell and that's what he did."

Nevertheless, she is holding no grudges. "It's over, we closed the door," Matranga said. "I wish everybody good luck"

During testimony rife with sexual content, Matranga admitted that she joked with Gist about his attending "chunky chick night" at a strip club where Matranga would have a chance to perform. She said she did not recall mimicking a topless dancer performing a lap dance at his office chair.

Matranga denied pulling her blouse over Gist's head, but said she did it to other deputies. "If anybody was in a bad mood, like if Phil was in a bad mood, I would say, 'Phil,' or to anyone, 'Do you need to go under the shirt?," she testified in a deposition.

She said in the deposition that she did not "shirt" Gist because he found the behavior "creepy."

Two former employees also testified that Matranga often put other employees "under the shirt," incessantly used profanity and constantly made references to her body parts.Matranga was dropped from the lawsuit, leaving only the county responsible for the damages.

The attorney representing the county, Barry Willey, could not be reached for comment. Griffin said the county argued that it bore no responsibility because Gist never complained to the Human Resources office. District Judge John Ellisor refused to dismiss the county from the lawsuit, accepting Griffin's argument that Gist complained to his supervisor, Matranga.