OUR TREATMENT OF AMERICA’S INDIANS WAS ABSOLUTELY ATROCIOUS

Gen. William Tecumseh Sherman decided on a ‘final solution’ for the plains Indians because “We are not going to let a few thieving, ragged Indians check and stop the progress of the railroads.”

If Colin Kaepernick were an American Indian, he would have a good reason to bitch about the oppression of his people. And during the playing of the national anthem, he would be justified to stand up by sitting down in protest.

The treatment of America’s Indians following the Civil War was absolutely atrocious. The war against the Indians was waged in order to ensure the progress and protection of the railroads. Gen. William Tecumseh Sherman’s ‘final solution’ for the Indians of the Great Plains was to kill off all the young men who were capable of warring against the railroads and white settlers.

Here is an excerpt from “Citizen Sherman: A Life of William Tecumseh Sherman” by Michael Fellman:

Almost three million soldiers had enlisted in the American Civil War. By contrast, it only took 25,000 soldiers after that to prosecute America's tragic war to subdue the Indians (Native Americans) in the West, largely because much of this terrible work was done by disease, settlement, and the slaughter of the buffalo. This ignominious war, in many respects over by time of the death of Sitting Bull in 1890, was led by the triumvirate of the most successful generals of the Civil War, President Ulysses Grant, William Tecumseh Sherman, and Philip Sheridan:

"With the south at last subdued, American public energies could return to the long-term project of economic development and westward expansion. ... The key to the realization of this great national and international project, which was the American version of the shared expansionist dream of the Western world, was the transcon¬tinental railroad. The chief impediment to this objective was the no¬madic, buffalo-hunting, warlike Indians of the Great Plains, with whom white Americans were convinced they never could cohabit. They would have to be dealt with while the railroads were abuilding. And they would be combatted only by a small army, as Congress re¬duced it to fifty thousand, then to thirty-five thousand, and finally to twenty-five thousand in the first few postwar years. ...

"When pushed by this or that incident, [General William Tecumseh] Sherman's racial contempt would emerge through his more distancing natural law justifications. 'We are not going to let a few thieving, ragged Indians check and stop the progress of [the railroads], a work of national and world-wide im-portance,' he insisted to Grant in 1867... Sherman noted to Grant that 'increased [U.S.] population [migrating West] ... will divide the northern and southern Indians permanently, when [the army] can take them in de¬tail.'

"Disease, slaughter of the buffalo, their economic base, and intrusion of white settlement, together with the extermination of the most war¬like younger men, all were serving to eliminate the Indians. The cap¬stone, literally uniting the white surge, was, as Sherman had always believed it would be, the railroad. Railroads began to move settlers west, and goods, like wheat and buffalo hides, to market. They also made the small army far more mobile and capable of concentration in their attacks on the shrinking bands of 'hostile' Indians. The army was able to guard the railroads so effectively that raiding Indians failed to slow construction. ... With the Union Pacific through, and three more lines to follow in swift succession, with all their atten¬dant social, economic, and racial ramifications, Sherman could shove the Indians out of his mind while he and Progress were in the process of finishing them off on the ground.

"The remaining Indians were nearing starvation. 'I think the Sioux are now so dependent on us that they will have to do whatever they are required to do,' Sherman told Sheridan triumphantly and only slightly prematurely, on November 20, 1875. After a bit more mopping up he could believe he had achieved the final solution to the Indian problem as he had defined it a decade earlier -- extermination for the hostile; re¬duction to dependency in out-of-the-way reservations for the rest. And it really had been cheap in white soldiers' lives: From 1867 to 1884, 565 officers and men were killed and 691 wounded, far less than in an average Civil War battle. Financially as well, the war had proved no great drain on the treasury: 'It is all moonshine about the great cost of the war,' Sherman bragged to a friend in 1875."

EDITOR’S NOTE: Obama and the Europeans want the Israelis to return the ‘occupied territories’ to the Palestinians . Those lands were captured by the Israelis after armies from several Arab countries attacked Israel with the intention of wiping the ‘Zionist entity’ off the map. In other words, unlike the U.S. war against the Indians, Israel battled the Arabs strictly in order to survive.

I say that Israel should return the ‘occupied territories’ to the Palestinians when the United States returns the lands it occupied that had belonged to and was taken from the Indians by military force..