Los Angeles Democrat Mayor Karen Bass COVERED UP part of report into Pacific Palisades fire over fears it would lead to lawsuits, sources claim
By Melissa Koenig
Daily Mail
Feb 4, 2026
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass has been accused of a cover-up, with insiders claiming she watered down a report on the fire department's failures to respond to the deadly Pacific Palisades fire. She is pictured here in January
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass has been accused of a cover-up, with insiders claiming she watered down a report on the fire department's failures to respond to the deadly Pacific Palisades fire.
The LA Fire Department released its after-action report in October on the blaze that killed a dozen residents, destroyed 7,000 homes and caused damage worth $150 billion when it tore through the wealthy coastal neighborhood of Pacific Palisades for 24 days straight, beginning in January 2025.
But an investigation at the Los Angeles Times revealed that there were several edits made in the report to downplay failures by city and fire department officials.
Two sources with insider information now tell the outlet that after receiving an early draft of the report, Bass told then-interim Fire Chief Ronnie Villanueva that the report could expose the city to legal liabilities.
They said two people close to the mayor informed them how she wanted key findings about the LA Fire Department's response to the massive blaze removed or softened before the report was made public.
One of the confidants even reportedly told one of the unidentified sources who spoke to the LA Times that 'the mayor didn't tell the truth when she said she had nothing to do with changing the report.'
The source also said that the confidant advised Bass that altering the report 'was a bad idea' because it could hurt her political career.
Still, the two confidants told the unidentified source that Bass held onto the original draft of the report until after the changes were made.
Both confidants are now prepared to testify under oath to verify their accounts of what happened if there were a legal proceeding, the sources said.
Two sources with insider information told the LA Times that after receiving an early draft of the report, Bass told then-interim Fire Chief Ronnie Villanueva (pictured) that it could expose the city to legal liabilities
The fire killed a dozen residents, destroyed 7,000 homes and caused damage worth $150 billion when it tore through the wealthy coastal neighborhood of Pacific Palisades for 24 days straight, beginning in January 2025
Yet the sources who spoke to the LA Times said they were unsure whether anyone at the mayor's office or at the fire department made line-by-line edits at Bass's specific instructions or if they imposed the changes after receiving general direction from the mayor.
The fire department had also formed an internal crisis management team and brought in a public relations firm to help shape its messaging ahead of the report's release.
Still, one of the sources said, 'All the changes [the LA Times] reported on were the ones Karen wanted.'
According to the LA Times' investigation, the fire department's initial draft of the after-action report said the LA Fire Department's decision to pre-deploy all available engines 'did not align' with the department's policy.
The final version that was released to the public, however, said that the number of companies that were pre-deployed 'went above and beyond the standard LAFD pre-deployment matrix.'
Another deleted passage in the report said that some crews waited more than an hour for an assignment on the day of the fire, and a section saying fire department crews and leaders violated national guidelines on how to avoid firefighter deaths and injuries was similarly removed, the LA Times reports.
Other changes appeared to be more superfluous, including renaming a section on 'failures' to 'primary challenges' and changing the photograph on the front of the report from palm trees on fire to a simple LA Fire Department seal.
The changes wound up being so extensive that the author of the report, Battalion Chief Kenneth Cook, declined to endorse the final version because of changes that altered his findings and made the report, in his own words, 'highly unprofessional and inconsistent with our established standards.'
Bass has previously denied any involvement in making the edits to the report
Bass has previously denied any involvement in the edits, with a spokesperson for the mayor's office saying in December: 'The report was written and edited by the fire department. We did not red-line review every page or review every draft of the report.'
The spokesperson then claimed that the mayor's office asked only that the fire department fact-check any findings regarding the effects of the city's finances and high-wind forecasts on the department's performance in the fire.
In an interview with the LA Times last month, the Democrat mayor also insisted she did not work with the fire department on the changes, nor did the department consult her about any changes it was making.
'The only thing that I told them to do was I told them to talk to Matt Szabo about the budget and funding, and that was it,' she said, referring to the city's administrative officer.
'That's a technical report,' she added. 'I'm not a firefighter.'
In a statement to the Daily Mail, the Los Angeles Fire Department noted that the report was conducted before Chief James Moore was appointed to the position.
'Chief Moore has been clear that he is determined to foster a culture of transparency and accountability,' Public Information Director Stephanie Bishop said.
'He is committed to strengthening the department by taking corrective action wherever appropriate and to ensuring the Los Angeles Fire Department improves its operations and readiness to make Los Angeles a safer city for all Angelenos.'
Department officials also announced on Tuesday that most of the 42 recommendations in the after-action report have been implemented, including mandatory staffing protocols and red flag days, as well as training on wind-driven fires, tactical operations and evacuations.
In November, critics branded Bass a 'fraud' and 'incompetent failure' after she falsely announced that the city has issued its first certificate of occupancy for the reconstruction of a property in Pacific Palisades. A sign reading 'Fire Mayor Bass' is pictured on a construction site in the Palisades nearly one year after the fire
But this is not the first time Bass has faced backlash for the city's response to the destructive fire.
In November, critics branded her a 'fraud' and 'incompetent failure' after she falsely announced that the city has issued its first certificate of occupancy for the reconstruction of a property in Pacific Palisades.
The newly-constructed home on Kagawa Street was not a rebuild from the blaze. however, as the demolition project began before the Palisades Fire erupted.
Thomas James Homes applied for a permit to demolish the one-story single-family home and its attached garage in November 2024, LA building and safety records revealed.
Critics had earlier hit out at the mayor for neglecting to disclose when the builders applied for the permit in her statement. One even went as far as calling her the 'worst mayor in America.'
A resident-led watch group has also warned that the city's error may suggest LA leadership cannot 'manage the complexity of rebuilding an entire coastal town.'
Daily Mail has reached out to Bass's office for comment.
No comments:
Post a Comment