Thursday, May 01, 2014

WEEPING AND WAILING OVER A CRUEL MURDERER’S SUFFERING

The bleeding hearts are getting out their crying towels over the ‘cruel manner’ in which Clayton Lockett died

While all the bleeding hearts and death penalty abolitionists are weeping and wailing over the suffering Clayton Lockett experienced during his botched execution, no one seems to be taking note of the cruel manner in which that worthless piece of shit murdered Stephanie Neiman in 1999.

Here is a description of Stephanie’s suffering from NewsOn6.com:

Lockett murdered Stephanie Neiman on June 3, 1999. Stephanie, 19, had just graduated from Perry High School, where she played the saxophone in the band, two weeks earlier.

Neiman and a female friend had stopped to visit another friend named Bobby Boynt, 23, who was at his Perry home with his 9-month-old son.

Clayton Lockett, 23, his cousin, Alfonzo Lockett, 17 and Shawn Mathis, 26, were already there. While Boynt's baby son slept in another room, they had tied up and were beating Boynt because he owed money to Clayton Lockett.

When Neiman's friend went inside the home they hit her with a shotgun then forced her to call Neiman into the home.

They repeatedly raped Neiman's 18-year-old friend, tied up the two women then used Neiman's truck to take the adults and the baby to a rural part of Kay County. When Neiman refused to give Clayton Lockett the keys to her truck or provide him the alarm code, he ordered Stephanie to kneel while Mathis dug a grave.

Lockett shot her and the gun jammed. While Neiman lay there screaming, the attackers cleared the jam and Lockett shot her a second time. Even though she was still breathing, he ordered the other two attackers to drag her into the grave and bury her.


I say that Lockett, who had a long criminal history before he murdered Stephanie, did not suffer enough during that botched execution. Unfortunately, he will now become the poster boy for the death penalty abolitionists who have become energized over what took place in Oklahoma’s execution chamber on Tuesday.

Oh, by the way, you can call me a racist if you like, but where was Al Sharpton hiding back in 1999 after Lockett, a black man, did those horrible things to a young white woman?

EDITOR'S NOTE: In various news reports, Stephanie's last name had been spelled either as Neiman or Nieman.

6 comments:

bob walsh said...

Unfortunately too few people care about the suffering of the victims. Their sole concern is the "rights" of the prisoners. I guess they just mentally align themselves more with violent, vicious assholes than do most real people.

Anonymous said...

If you Bob (with your killing-happy mentality) can conclusively show us that the death penalty helps to diminish the suffering of crime victims you might have some credibility to your asshole comments. But considering that there is no increase in heinous crimes in Europe, Canada, Australia, and other abolitionist countries after abolishing the medieval death penalty, I will still continue to disagree. I am sure that the continued application of the death penalty in your punitive country leads to more brutalization of your society (aka The Incarceration Nation of The World).

I don't consider you Bob a 'real' person. If you were a 'real' man you wouldn't need to show the world your little gun in your hand for your scared-shit protection!

Everyone is entitled to their opinion - you and me also!

BarkGrowlBite said...

Anon, you are certainly entitled to your opinion, but you and your ilk just don't get it.

While the death penalty may not diminish the suffering of crime victims, it does bring most of them closure.

And when you talk about there being no increase in heinous crimes in countries without capital punishment, you are not taking into consideration how many fewer of those crimes would be committed if those countries had the death penalty.

Anonymous said...

Ever heard of various groups called Murder Victims/Families Against Death Penalty/Reconsiliation, etc???? Not every person touched by crime is a blood-thirsty revengeful barbarian.

Let's see how you will react when your veins are filled with liquid draino (sshhh it's a state secret). But then, you might get a stronger orgasm by Saudi Arabia's method of beheading in public. Oodles of blood'n'guts and a headless body will bring you lots of sexual satisfaction.

Eventually, you and your ilks will have to answer to a higher power and boy-oh-boy are you guys gonna get it!

BarkGrowlBite said...

Anon, it seems as though you are the same Anon who submitted the 2:27 AM comment.

Yes, I've heard of Murder Victims/Families Against Death Penalty. So what! They represent less than one percent of the families of murder victims. I've also heard of the Pope. So what if he is opposed to the death penalty.

You accuse any death penalty proponent of being 'a blood-thirsty revengeful barbarian.' I do not know if you live in the U.S., Europe or Australia, but should you be so fortunate as to live in the U.s., you should be glad that us barbarians are fighting to keep the death penalty intact. The fear of capital punishment has kept countless people from committing murder.

I don't have to worry about being injected with a lethal drug because I would never commit a heinous crime calling for the ultimate punishment. And your crack about those Saudi executions just shows what a jerk-off you are.

I'll bet that if your wife, mother or sister were shot and buried alive like Clayton Lockett's victim, you would sing a far different tune.

This barbarian will not publish any more of your comments. Fuck off jerk!



bob walsh said...

Dear anonymous chicken-shit bastard: I have my real name and my real photograph on my posts. You don't. You do though seem to be happy to fling insults from behind a screen of anonymity. (By the way the gun isn't little, it is a Colt 1917 .45, it is actually a pretty substantial weapon.) I understand the premise that it is wrong to kill to show that it is wrong to kill. I understand it. I just don't agree with it. I believe that there are some people who are such sub-human lumps of shit that they have forfeited there right to continue to suck air. I have no problem with jurisdictions that have abolished the (official) death penalty. The formerly great state of California, which is not noted for being a hotbed of reactionary conservatives, has chosen repeatedly to NOT do so. New York, another home of entrenched liberalism, also has a death penalty. You want to throw warm-fuzzies at vicious, dangerous cold-blooded murderers. I want to kill them. You are entitled to your whinny-ass opinion. As you note, I am also entitled to mine. At least I stand up and put my name on mine, which is more than I can say for you. Have a nice day, and go fuck yourself.