Sunday, September 17, 2017

ACQUITTED FORMER COP TELLS HIS SIDE OF THE STORY

'I did nothing wrong': AK-toting, West Point graduate cop whose acquittal for murdering black suspect sparked two days of protests in St Louis speaks out

By James Wilkinson

Daily Mail
September 17, 2017

The cop whose acquittal on Friday over the 2011 shooting of a black man has led to massive protests in St Louis says he has nothing to apologize for.

Jason Stockley, now 36, shot Anthony Lamar Smith, 24, on December 20, 2011 after a drug deal bust spiraled into a car chase.

Despite concerns over Stockley taking his personal AK-47 on duty that night and remarking that he was 'going to kill this motherfucker' during the chase, he was found not guilty of first-degree murder on Friday, leading to an outcry.

But he told the St Louis Post-Dispatch that their anger is misplaced, and said he was speaking out 'Because I did nothing wrong. If you’re telling the truth and you’ve been wrongly accused, you should shout it from a mountaintop.'

Because I did nothing wrong. If you’re telling the truth and you’ve been wrongly accused, you should shout it from a mountaintop.

Stockley's claim that he would 'kill' Smith during the pursuit - which was captured by his car's dashcam footage - had seemed to many like incriminating evidence.

But in Friday's ruling, St Louis Circuit Judge Timothy Wilson said that because the other remarks made before and after that comment were inaudible, it lacked context.

Stockley himself told the Post-Dispatch that he didn't recall making the remark.

As for carrying an AK-47 - modified with a pistol grip and drum magazine - and 100 rounds of ammunition in his car, Stockley is unrepentant.

He says he started packing the powerful 'pistol' after the streets became too dangerous, and said that while he may have broken the rules, he didn't do anything wrong.

'I used it as a deterrent, and I believed it was better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it,' he said.

'I accept full responsibility for violating the rules. But it's not a moral crime. It's a rule violation.'

He also denies the claim made by prosecutors that his swift entry into Smith's car was to plant the weapon that would justify killing the young man.

Wilson said there was no evidence the gun had been planted, and that it was reasonable for Stockley to think Smith might fire on him.

Stockley said he already knew what the gun looked like and wanted to make sure Smith hadn't thrown it out of the window, and that the only thing he would do differently is 'take the day off.'

'I don’t know how changing any number of my actions that day would have changed the outcome,' he said.

He does acknowledge that the video doesn't put the killing in an entirely favorable light, but says that's common to every piece of dashcam video.

'Every resisting [arrest] looks bad, it never looks good,' he said. 'But you have to separate the optics from the facts.'

Those optics have led to two nights of protests in St Louis - protests that led to 32 people being arrested on Friday, as well as several police officers being hurt.

And on Saturday a day-long peaceful protest was followed by violence late that night as demonstrators smashed windows and threw rocks at police officers.

At least six were arrested in that incident in University City, which also saw pepper spray being used on rioters.

Stockley - who had served a tour in Iraq before becoming a cop five years before the shooting, and is now working for an oil company in Houston - says anger against him from Smith's family, friends and supporters is misplaced.

'I can feel for and I understand what the family is going through, and I know everyone wants someone to blame, but I'm just not the guy,' he said.

He added that 'My main concern now is for the first responders, the people just trying to go to work and the protesters. I don't want anyone to be hurt in any way over this.'

On Friday at least 10 police were hurt, including one who had his jaw broken.

For Stockley, the shooting has had a profound effect on his day-to-day living.

'My life has been in turmoil for some time,' he said. 'I've been in a holding pattern. I haven't been able to be with my family. … I'm trying my best not to let this dictate my life.'

And while his six-year court case is finally done, he says he's still not free.

'It feels like a burden has been lifted, but the burden of having to kill someone never really lifts,' he said.

'The taking of someone's life is the most significant thing one can do, and it's not done lightly.'

He added: 'The decision to use force could be the most important decision you'll ever make because it could be your last. And regardless of what happens, nobody wins.'

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

I'm glad he spoke out. His side needed to be heard. Instead of a fair trial, cops are crucified by the left wing media and a prosecutor with a win at all costs attitude.

This cop was still responding to calls as most cops should. Still doing his job when others would not. He is a hero not a criminal!

I'm glad he left town, His life in St. Louis will never be the same. It will never be the same anyway. I'm glad he moved to Texas. I'll bet his family has been through hell. God Bless him and his family!

Anonymous said...

I wonder if BGB will still stand by the comments he made yesterday now that both sides have been heard. Everything isn't as it seems.

EDITOR'S NOTE: Get his job back? Not in your lifetime. Not with him being heard saying during the chase that he was going to kill the guy and not with only Stockley's DNA found on the gun he claimed the victim was holding.

BarkGrowlBite said...

Yes Anon, I still stand behind the comment I made. There is something wrong with a cop who carries an AK-47 loaded with a 100-round capacity drum magazine.

I too am glad Stockley is now in Texas where I hope he and his family will have a good life.

Anonymous said...

I carried a rifle with two thirty round banana mags taped together for years against policy. I was the supervisor. We all did, especially in South Texas. My people would come to firearms qualifications and shoot with these weapons. My boss from Austin witnessed it and even shot them. These policies are made for CYA. They all knew these weapons were a must when running up against a cartel smuggling ring in the middle of no where. Common sense policing trumps policy every time. Shortly after I transferred these weapons were allowed. I can't think of more dangerous places to police than St. Louis or South Texas. Not many people can say they never broke a policy. Now I know there are. Good job!

"It's better to have one and not need it than to need it and not have it". Capt. Woodrow Call

BarkGrowlBite said...

A 100-round magazine in St. Louis ..... you gotta be kidding! Our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan do not carry rifles with that kind of round capacity. As far as I can tell, the Russian troops no longer carry those drum magazines.

Our cops in South Texas and St. Louis need to be more heavily armed than our soldiers? Are you smoking that funny tobacco?

Anonymous said...

No wacky tobacco. I'm telling you what is going on. 100 round magazines are not that uncommon and they are not that large. The cops in South Texas do carry full auto weapons. Where do you think a big portion of the state budget is going? The border. It's how Greg Abbott got elected. I can't believe you don't know this. Don't be so naïve.

BarkGrowlBite said...

I'm not being naive. If cops need to carry firearms with 100-round magazines, we do not need cops any longer, we need to have the military keep law and order for us.

I've been in South Texas and seen some of the overweight cops and deputies down there. They are most certainly not representative of today's modern law enforcement officers.

I can see officers carrying high-capacity, high-powered military rifles in the trunks of their police cars for those occasions when those weapons may be needed in a SWAT situation. But to carry an AK-47 with a 100-round drum magazine in the passenger compartment of a police car, like Stockley did in St. Louis, borders on sheer madness.

Anonymous said...

If you are talking visiting South Texas 20 to 30 or even 10 years ago then you shouldn't really comment.

Sheer madness is patrolling a place like St. Louis with out equal or superior fire power.

By the way, the military is on the ground near the border. The U.S. Coast Guard and Texas DPS are patrolling the Rio Grande with military gun ships and helicopters. Don't you remember the DPS chopper blowing that smuggler off the road killing one. They weren't shooting pistols from that helicopter.

Please check into this stuff before you comment. I cannot add anything new to this string of comments.