INTELLIGENCE CHIEFS CANNOT ALL BE UNINTELLIGENT IN CONTRADICTING TRUMPETING BY TRUMP

Trump attacks intel chiefs after they contradict him on Iran, North Korea, ISIS

By Meridith McGraw

ABC News
January 30, 2019

President Donald Trump on Wednesday declared "tremendous progress" has been made defeating ISIS and there is a "decent chance of denuclearization" in North Korea, pushing back at assessments top intelligence officials made to Congress.

He also insulted the intelligence community's report on Iran as "extremely passive and naive," adding "Perhaps Intelligence should go back to school!"

On Tuesday on Capitol Hill, top intelligence officials, including Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, FBI Director Christopher Wray and CIA Director Gina Haspel, painted a much different picture of global threats, including from Iran, the Islamic State's position on the ground in Syria, and North Korea's willingness to denuclearize.

Their "worldwide threats" report Coats presented said Iran has not been undertaking activities that could develop a nuclear device, a position the president in a tweet on Wednesday called "wrong." The president said, "Be careful of Iran."

In a series of foreign policy focused tweets Wednesday, the president undermined his own stated position that ISIS had been "defeated," saying that the "Caliphate will soon be destroyed."

"When I became President, ISIS was out of control in Syria & running rampant," the president tweeted. "Since then tremendous progress made, especially over last 5 weeks. Caliphate will soon be destroyed, unthinkable two years ago."

But the tweet contradicted the president's claim six weeks ago at the U.S. has "defeated ISIS in Syria." Vice President Pence also declared two weeks ago that we have "crushed the ISIS caliphate and devastated its capabilities" -- just hours after ISIS claimed responsibility for a terrorist bomb attack that killed four Americans in Syria.

Coats disputed that as well, saying that while ISIS has suffered losses, it is "intent on resurging and still commands thousands of fighters in Iraq and Syria."

Ahead of a second summit with Kim Jong Un slated for next month, the president said the relationship with North Korea is the "best it has ever been" but he seemed to hedge his bets on the odds of North Korea denuclearizing.

After last summer's summit in Singapore with Kim Jong Un, Trump tweeted that “there is no longer a Nuclear Threat from North Korea.”

But that is not the assessment of top intelligence officials, who on Tuesday asserted that despite ongoing negotiations between the United States and North Korea, the regime has not been straightforward about its intentions.

"The regime is committed to developing a long-range armed missile that would pose a direct threat to the United States," CIA Director Gina Haspel said.

The White House maintains that the goal is still complete denuclearization.

“Our goal is to achieve the final, fully verified denuclearization of the DPRK as Chairman Kim committed to in Singapore,” a White House spokesperson said in response to the intelligence community's testimony.

The president's foreign policy positions aren't only at odds with his own intelligence chiefs but even some of his Republican allies on Capitol Hill.

Senate Majority Leader McConnell on Tuesday rebuked the president's decision to withdraw troops from Syria -- a decision that prompted the resignation of Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis. McConnell said he would offer an amendment that would “acknowledge the plain fact that al Qaeda, ISIS, and their affiliates in Syria and Afghanistan continue to pose a serious threat to our nation.”

ABC News asked the White House about McConnell's amendment, but they would not offer any comment on the record.

President Trump was scheduled to receive an intelligence briefing at the White House Wednesday morning.

EDITOR’S NOTE: I’m sure a lot of people voted for Trump and continue to support him because they know that Trump won’t buy the crap put out by the nation’s intelligence services and that he is smarter than the intelligence chiefs.