CONCEALED CARRY FOR RETIRED COPS?
Retired law enforcement duel with Illinois over concealed carry gun license privileges
By Chuck Goudie, Barb Markoff, Christine Tressel and Tom Jones
WLS
April 3, 2024
CHICAGO -- Correctional officers and courthouse deputies are in a
duel with the State of Illinois that has lasted more than a decade
focused on whether those retired officers are entitled to special
concealed carry gun permits, the ABC 7 I-Team has learned.
Gov. JB Pritzker initially said yes, and signed a new law that took
effect on Jan. 1, 2023, allowing all retired law enforcement officers to
qualify for special permits.
But the state agency tasked with issuing those permits has since refused
to enforce the law, arguing it conflicts with federal guidelines.
The
duel could be decided this Thursday by a Cook County circuit court
judge, and many retired law enforcement officers tell the I-Team they
are frustrated it has taken so long for their arguments to be heard.
"We're
asking what we're entitled to legally by law: a right to defend
ourselves legally if something happens," said retired Cook County
Sheriff's Deputy Tom Kush. "After 30 years of qualifying, and
everything, I just don't understand why they think that they can do
this."
During his career Kush served eviction notices, orders of
protection, and child custody decisions, arresting criminals that he
said he's been confronted by in public since he retired.
"When
you're out at a restaurant with your family, or something like that,
you'll see these guys," Kush explained, "Which happened to me twice. And
I had to leave right away because I didn't want to put my family in
that situation."
The threat to retired law enforcement officers was recognized by Congress in 2004, with passage of the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act or LEOSA.
The law allowed qualified retired officers to carry concealed weapons, even in places where firearms are not allowed.
Here in Illinois, it's called an "Illinois Retired Officer Concealed Carry" or IROCC card.
But for nearly two decades, Illinois correctional officers and court
deputies, including Kush, have not been eligible for that privilege.
State officials argue the federal law wasn't meant to cover this class of law enforcement.
Lawmakers here disagree.
"Congress
intended correctional officers and court deputies to have this
privilege," said Chicago State Senator Bill Cunningham (D- IL 18th
District). "We said, 'Okay, then we will change the state law.'"
Cunningham did just that, authoring HB 4667, which passed with a majority of support, and in 2022, Gov. Pritzker signed it.
The law went into effect last year.
But
the Illinois Law Enforcement Training and Standards Board (ILETSB), the
state agency in charge of permitting, has refused to do so, claiming
these retired officers and deputies are not "qualified law enforcement"
under federal guidelines.
Cunningham said no one from the state board has offered to work with him to refine the language of the already existing law.
"I
believe they've gone rogue," Cunningham said. "I think they don't like
this concept and they are finding excuses not to execute the law."
ILETSB declined to be interviewed by the I-Team, but said in an
email that Cunningham's law, "does not bring Illinois correctional
officers under [federal] requirements."
"It is the ILETSB's
position that currently, the Federal LEOSA statute and Illinois law are
in conflict with respect to whether Illinois correctional officers are
qualified law enforcement officers," a statement reads.
Months
after the ILETSB refused to enforce the new law, a class-action lawsuit
was filed last July against it by a group of retired officers who want
the state board to issue permits as the law requires.
The
Illinois Attorney General's office, representing ILETSB, has since filed
a motion to dismiss the case and on Thursday a judge could decide
whether the case will move forward or not.
"We welcome guidance from the courts," the ILETSB spokesperson said.
When
asked about the legal debate on the state law signed by Gov. Pritzker,
his spokesperson Alex Gough told the I-Team, "ILETSB did an in-depth
legal analysis of this law and reached the conclusion that it conflicts
with the federal [LEOSA]... When federal and state law are in conflict,
state agencies and officers must follow federal law."
"ILETSB
looks forward to receiving a ruling from the court on the interpretation
of this law and its relation to existing federal law and preemption,"
Gough said.
Kush feels the state's denial disrespects his years of firearm qualifications and training.
"I
know part of the issue was [the state] wanted everybody to feel safe,"
Kush said. "Well, what about all the officers over the last 20 years
who've retired and now legally can't carry their weapon to defend
themselves? It's a slap in the face."
2 comments:
Even the formerly great state of CA, which hates it's own cops, recognizes that if you had powers of arrest and could carry a gun on duty you are covered by LEOSA. The desk jockey assholes in Illinois are just being dicks.
It's all Bullshit. I would still conceal carry because Federal law trumps state law. Hmm. Except in Texas. (USA)
Post a Comment