There can be no ‘Palestinian state’ after Oct. 7
Whoever supports the two-state solution supports the destruction of Israel.
While there are many lessons to be learned from the October 7, 2023 Hamas invasion of southern Israel, chief among them is that a Palestinian state must never be established in the Land of Israel.
That was the conclusion of the “Nation, Land & Sovereignty” conference held in Jerusalem on Thursday under the banner: “Wake-Up Call From Gaza: Putting an End to the Two-State Paradigm.”
Many had already argued the disastrous results of Gaza “disengagement” was already enough to end the fantasy of a two-state solution leading to peace. In 2005, Israel fully withdrew all Jewish civilians and IDF troops from the Gaza Strip in accordance with Arab demands, leaving the coastal enclave fully under the control of the Palestinians.
Just a year later, Gaza was seized by Hamas and became the world’s foremost terrorist haven. In the ensuing years, Hamas not only carried out routine attacks on Israel, but built up a full-fledge military force in Gaza, a force with but one purpose: to destroy Israel.
This was the outcome of trying to give the Palestinians a territory to govern for themselves.
The lesson was not learned then. Sponsors of yesterday’s conference hope it will be learned now.
“Whoever supports the two-state solution supports the destruction of Israel. Full stop,” Nadia Matar told JNS. Her group, the Sovereignty Movement, which she co-founded with fellow settlement activist Yehudit Katsover 10 years ago, sponsored the conference together with the Yesha Council.
“If you support the two-state paradigm, it means you believe in a Palestinian state that will expel Jews, build a terrorist army and attack Tel Aviv to push us into the sea. Some support this knowingly, others naively,” she continued.
‘The right was right’
According to a poll presented at the conference, 74% of Israelis now oppose the creation of a Palestinian state in Judea and Samaria, and 76% support the voluntary transfer of Palestinians.
The poll also found that center-left voters sided solidly with what had once been considered right-wing views with 61% of Yesh Atid voters supporting voluntary transfer.
A panel moderated by JNS Jerusalem bureau chief Alex Traiman discussed the various preconceptions that led to the tragedy.
“The right was right,” Knesset member Dan Illouz of the Likud Party, told Traiman. “Over the years, there has been this flawed strategy that as long as our enemies were building power, but not using it, it was OK. That was ridiculous.”
Also discussed was the international response to the war, including the current “genocide” hearings at the International Court of Criminal Justice in The Hague, and demands by the Biden administration to turn the Gaza Strip over to the Palestinian Authority, a proposal that earned catcalls from the audience.
Mark Zell, chairman of Republicans Overseas, called for the immediate development of Israel’s local arms production so that it will never again be dependent on any other country for its war materiel.
In another panel, titled, “No to a Palestinian State, Yes to Sovereignty,” Yishai Fleischer, international spokesman for the Hebron Jewish community, said that Israel would be in great shape if it just stopped doing “dumb things.”
Among those he listed: “allowing enemies to build tunnels under your nose,” “giving money to the PA,” “feeding your enemy while you’re at war with them” and “allowing mementos in Jerusalem to be sold with a map of Jerusalem and the word ‘Palestine’ printed under it.”
“Before we have sovereignty of the land, we need sovereignty of the spirit,” agreed Dror Eydar, former Israeli ambassador to Italy.
No comments:
Post a Comment