The not guilty verdict in Casey Anthony’s trial for the murder of her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee has shocked most of the nation, a la O. J. Simpson’s acquittal for the murder of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman in 1995.
The main difference between the two trials is that Simpson’s acquittal was racially motivated because the eight black jurors, who had already made up their minds not to convict Simpson long before his trial was over, quickly persuaded the other four jurors to go along with a not guilty verdict.
Anthony's attorney Jose Baez, who had never tried a capital case before, silenced his critics who thought he was a minor leaguer playing in a major league game. Baez succeeded in convincing this jury that there was enough reasonable doubt to bring in a not guilty verdict for his client in the murder of little Caylee.
After everything I’ve read about this case and considering all the lies told by her mother, I am convinced that the slut, who partied for 31days after her daughter disappeared, is guilty as sin of murdering little Caylee.
When he learned of the not guilty verdict, actor Ashton Kutcher quipped, "OJ Simpson finds this verdict outrageous."
Casey Anthony is another shining example of a murderer who is LEGALLY INNOCENT BUT MORALLY GUILTY.
1 comment:
Part of this is no doubt a facet of "THE CSI EFFECT." Jurors are somewhat reluctant to convict in the absence of hard evidence, they are inclined to believe that there SHOULD BE such evidence and absence of it equates absence of guilt. It is sometimes even true.
Bob Walsh
Post a Comment