It’s tempting to ignore the ravings of U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Georgia.
Even when her rantings are a spectacular combination of insanity and ignorance.
Maybe especially when her rantings are a spectacular combination of insanity and ignorance.
The
problem, though, is that she’s no longer a marginal player in American
politics, no longer a sideshow freak performing far away from the main
stage of U.S. power.
Her party now controls,
however tenuously, the U.S. House of Representatives. She has the ear of
the House Speaker, U.S. Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-California. And she’s a
possible 2024 running mate for former President Donald Trump, should
Trump become the Republican nominee for president in the next election.
Would Trump seriously consider Greene as his running mate?
Thus, what Greene says — even when what she says is completely bonkers — now matters.
Particularly when it’s about something as serious as civil war.
A few days ago, Greene tweeted:
“We
need a national divorce. We need to separate by red states and blue
states and shrink the federal government. Everyone I talk to says this.
From the sick and disgusting woke culture issues shoved down our throats
to the Democrat’s traitorous America Last policies, we are done.”
We’ll set aside the fact that divorce may be
foremost on Greene’s mind these days, given that her own split following
27 years of marriage and several allegations of marital infidelity on
her part, traditional values exemplar that she is, was finalized at the
end of last year. We’ll also ignore her shaky grasp of basic grammar.
Instead, let’s focus on what she’s trying to say and examine its sheer lunacy.
We Americans tried what she’s suggesting from 1861
to 1865. It resulted in one of the bloodiest — if not the bloodiest —
civil war in human history.
One quarter of the
men in America between the ages of 18 and 45 died during that period,
devastating families so thoroughly that many required decades to recover
from their losses. An entire region of the country — the South from
which Greene hails — saw its economic fortunes so derailed by the
conflict that it spent almost a century clawing its way back to
prosperity.
Even though it is often romanticized in American
memory, our civil war was a cataclysm, a near-death experience for the
experiment in self-government that Abraham Lincoln — to whose party
Greene claims to belong — called “the last best hope of earth.”
Before
that huge tragedy occurred, there were voices as delusional as Greene’s
saying separating the republic would be a simple thing.
As the resulting body count demonstrated, it turns out that it wasn’t.
If anything, things would be both more complicated and worse now.
In
the 1860s, the divide over slavery could be accounted for in regional
terms between north and south. Even so, the split was horrific, with
many families in the border states and here in the Midwest — mine
included — torn apart by the fighting.
Now,
though, red states and blue states live side by side. Even assuming we
could do this act of separation peacefully — a huge and unrealistic
assumption — how would it work?
Indiana, for example, is a red state with blue
states Illinois and Michigan to the west and north, respectively. Do we
stop trading with them — or will they have the right to impose tariffs
on us and us on them?
I have a sister in
upstate New York, in-laws in Manhattan and Connecticut and cousins with
whom I’m close in Minnesota, blue states all. Would I have to use my
passport to visit them and they to visit me?
And what do we do about the purple states, such as Greene’s own Georgia, where the will of the people is not easily determined?
For
that matter, what do we do about the military? The blue states pay the
most in taxes and thus provide the greatest support for the federal
government and the armed forces. Do they get to call the shots, or do we
have two armies?
I point all this out not to educate Marjorie Taylor Greene.
No comments:
Post a Comment