I'm not a racist and neither is Sharon Osbourne but that didn't stop
the woke mob lynching her just for defending me in a shocking episode
that shames the Cowardly Broadcasting System and should horrify anyone
who values free speech
By Piers Morgan
Daily Mail
March 29, 2021
Imagine for a moment that I went on stage
in a comedy club and said: 'There's still two rules in the fucking
Morgan family: Don't marry somebody black and don't park in front of our
house.'
Then imagine that a black
female member of the audience sitting in the front took exception to my
horribly racist remark, stood up and flipped me her middle finger.
Then
imagine me turning on that black woman and sneering: 'Sit your fucking ass down. I'm talking, bitch. You paid to see a show, sit your ass down.
[If] you can't take a joke, you're at the wrong motherfucking place.
You got two choices…sit your fucking ass down or get the fuck out of
here.'
Then imagine me continuing to rant 'I'm
going to make that choice for you – get the fuck out of here. Bye. Bye.
Bye', at which point the black woman and her friends get up and leave
the venue.
Then imagine me, two days
later, doubling down on the incident when it provoked public uproar and
tweeting: 'You have 2 choices, have a good day or get the fuck out.'
Now imagine my friend Sharon Osbourne
appearing on her hit show The Talk two days after that tweet, defending
me and also mocking the woman by blaming HER for the abuse she endured
and saying: 'I would have said, 'bitch, that's why nobody's going to
marry you cause you talking in my show'.'
That would be outrageous, right?
I
mean, it would be incontrovertible evidence of Sharon publicly
supporting a racist, sexist, misogynist pig who had shockingly abused a
young black woman.
And frankly, she would have deserved to be fired for it.
But obviously, I didn't do or say any of those things.
And nor did Sharon Osbourne.
No, it was Latino comedian George Lopez who racially abused the black woman at a gig in Phoenix, Arizona in February 2017.
In 2017, Sheryl Underwood vigorously defended comedian George Lopez after he subjected a black woman in the audience to a racist rant
And
the person on The Talk who mounted such a passionate defence of his
appalling behavior was Sheryl Underwood, one of Sharon's long-time
co-hosts.
Underwood, herself a black
woman, told the panel: 'Once you throw up the bird twice and you are in
the first few rows, you have now inserted yourself into the show and it
depends on the mood of the comic on how they handle it. I am pro-black
female, but if you put yourself into it, you goin' get lit up. I
would've said: 'bitch, that's why nobody's going to marry you cause you
talking in my show.'
In other words,
the black female victim of the sickening abuse had it coming for
reacting badly to a disgusting racist slur and deserved all the abuse
she got.
It's hard to imagine a more shameful thing
to say on national television but Ms Underwood was applauded for it by
the audience and suffered no disciplinary action from her CBS bosses.
Now
cut forward four years to the episode of The Talk that aired on CBS on
March 10, the day after I quit my UK breakfast show Good Morning Britain
after refusing to apologize for disbelieving Meghan Markle's
disingenuous load of fact-devoid baloney in her lengthy Oprah
whine-athon with Prince Harry, much of which has now been proved to be
untrue.
Sharon Osbourne had tweeted her support
for me, saying: 'I am with you. I stand by you. People forget that
you're paid for your opinion and that you're just speaking your truth.'
And Sheryl Underwood wasn't happy with her about it.
Sheryl Underwood accuses Sharon Osbourne of being a racist for defending Piers Morgan
'What
would you say to people,' she demanded, 'who say that while you're
standing by your friend, you appear to be giving validation or a safe
haven to something he has uttered that is racist?'
This was a staggering, bare-faced lie.
I've never said a single thing about Meghan Markle that could possibly be construed as racist, either in print or on television.
In
fact, the only time I've ever mentioned her race has been to repeatedly
say how great it was that a bi-racial woman was marrying into the very
white British royal family.
It's true
that having once been friendly with her, I've been very critical of her
in the past three years because I believe she's a fake virtue-signalling
hypocrite who ruthlessly exploits her royal titles for financial gain.
But
none of that honestly held opinion is based on anything to do with her
skin color. I've been equally critical of Harry for his own ludicrous
antics and he's white.
Sharon was stunned by Underwood's question.
'Tell
me what he said that's racist?' she retorted, several times, but
Underwood was unable to say because she knows I never have.
'It
is not the exact words of racism,' she eventually clarified. 'It's the
implication and reaction to it. To not want to address that because she
is a black woman, and to try to dismiss it or make it seem less than
what it is. That's what makes it racist.'
So,
let me get this straight: to disbelieve Meghan Markle, even when she's
demonstrably lying about very serious and incredibly damaging claims –
her son Archie was NOT banned from being a Prince because of his skin
color, just as she's now admitted they didn't get secretly married three
days before their wedding - is now an automatic confirmation of racism?
'I
don't understand,' said a bemused Sharon. 'If Piers doesn't like
someone, and they happen to be black, does that make him a racist?'
'No,' said Underwood.
'Right, so why can't it be he just doesn't like her? Why does it have to be racist?'
Underwood didn't answer.
Instead, she said: 'I don't want anybody here to watch this and think we're attacking you for being racist.'
Sharon chuckled ruefully. 'I think it's too late, that seed's already sown.'
Yes, it had been, just as the seed had been sown about my own supposed racism with zero evidence to support it.
And it was done very deliberately, and utterly disgracefully.
As a result of their emotion-charged
debate, during which Sharon became understandably enraged by the sheer
injustice of seeing a friend who she knows isn't racist being branded a
racist with nothing to back it up, and seeing herself smeared in the
process as a racist-sympathiser, she's now been forced out of her job at
The Talk after ten years in which she's been by far its biggest star
and most interesting panellist.
I've
been friends with Sharon for over 20 years, and we became particularly
close when we worked together for five seasons on America's Got Talent.
She's one of the smartest, feistiest, funniest and most outrageous people I know - and I love her for it.
What you see with Sharon is what you get, on and off camera.
Like me, she's incredibly opinionated and loves a good argument.
As
she told DailyMail.com last week: 'Piers and I have got a great
friendship. But we fight—we have huge fights. I've slapped Piers. Piers
has seen my breasts! We get drunk together, we argue a lot over things
we don't agree on but at the end of the day, that's it. I don't agree
with his opinion all the way, I don't. But the difference is, he knows
Meghan and I don't. The guy has a right to his opinion – I'm sure I say
things and he goes, she's fucking nuts!'
(Factcheck: I do.)
I've
also appeared many times with her on The Talk, including last October
when ironically, I warned of the increasingly sinister cancel culture
that was destroying free speech.
'I
never want to have an argument with someone like Sharon,' I said, 'and
then say at the end, right because I don't agree with you, I want you
fired from The Talk immediately. That is not democracy.'
'I agree with him,' said…. Sheryl Underwood!
Yet
here we are, just five months later, and the same Sheryl Underwood's
sat back and watched Sharon Osbourne get driven off the show for
disagreeing with her, after deliberately rattling her cage with a fake
racism slur against me.
It's an
absolute disgrace and given how Underwood defended HER friend George
Lopez when he DID say racist things that were caught on camera, it's
disgustingly hypocritical of her.
As is
the behaviour of CBS, the Cowardly Broadcasting System, who've so
pathetically bowed to the woke mob illiberally baying for blood like a
bunch of crazed language-policing fascists.
In
their statement announcing Sharon's departure, CBS made it clear she
was leaving specifically for what happened on that episode and not
because of any of the other historic allegations of alleged
inappropriate behaviour made against her by aggrieved former panel
members, all of which Sharon vehemently denies.
CBS
said: 'The events of the March 10 broadcast were upsetting to everyone
involved, including the audience watching at home. As part of our
review, we concluded that Sharon's behavior toward her co-hosts during
the March 10 episode did not align with our values for a respectful
workplace.'
What a load of sanctimonious, two-faced twaddle.
So,
it's OK for Sheryl Underwood to passionately defend someone who spews
racist abuse at a black woman, but it's not OK for Sharon Osbourne to
passionately defend someone who didn't?
This is such an outrageous double standard.
And how can it even be happening in a country so proud of its First Amendment constitutional right to free speech?
But
then, this is the same CBS that allowed Meghan and Harry to spray-gun
the British royals and media with all sorts of unsubstantiated highly
damaging garbage, the veracity of which has been unravelling faster than
Sharon Osbourne was jettisoned at the altar of politically correct
bullshit.
Oprah Winfrey barely challenged a word her
two friends said, leaving Americans and the woefully gullible US media
to assume every sensational bombshell of self-serving tittle-tattle was
fact when much of it wasn't.
It's hard
to overstate the pain and hurt these claims have caused the Queen, and
to make it even worse, they were made at a time when her 99-year-old
husband Prince Philip lay seriously ill in hospital.
This sham of an 'interview' was a shameful betrayal of journalistic standards by CBS.
And
when it comes to the company's 'values', this is the same CBS which has
just given a platform to shamed film director Woody Allen to dismiss
serious sex abuse allegations made by his daughter Dylan.
They seem to specialise in allowing people to peddle THEIR version of the truth without any regard for what THE truth may be.
Sharon Osbourne was entitled to defend me without being deemed a racist.
Just as I was entitled not to believe Meghan Markle without being deemed a racist.
The
fact we've both lost our jobs is not just an appalling attack on free
speech, but it's also a terrible indictment of woke cancel culture
bullshit and the stinking hypocrisy that lies at the heart of it.
Every journalist and commentator in America should be as incensed as I am about this, because they could all be next.