
As reported by The Center Square, the most recent report from the OIG, has assessed that the federal agencies ensconced within Homeland Security have been unable to prevent these "high-risk noncitizens without identification" from being flown about the country on domestic fights.
The report said in part,
"Under current processes, CBP and ICE cannot ensure they are keeping high-risk noncitizens without identification from entering the country."
"Additionally, TSA cannot ensure its vetting and screening procedures prevent high-risk noncitizens who may pose a threat to the flying public from boarding domestic flights.”
The
document exposed several stunning lapses in the security measures
undertaken by DHS to prevent the potential incursion of high-risk
non-citizens into the U.S.
Notably, in one instance OIG investigators "requested data on the number
of noncitizens who did not have identification and were released into
the United States from [fiscal years] 2021 through 2023." However, they
found that "because immigration officers are not required to document
whether a noncitizen presented identification in the databases, the data
we obtained may be incomplete."
This led to the stunning analysis that, "Therefore, neither CBP nor ICE
could determine how many of the millions of noncitizens seeking entry in
the United States each year entered without identification and whose
self-reported biographic information was accepted."
In the report's heavily redacted conclusion the OIG warned that "if
CBP and ICE continue to allow noncitizens — whose identities
immigration officers cannot confirm — to enter the country, they may
inadvertently increase national security risks."
Customs and Border Protection, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and
the Transportation Security Administration all disagreed with the
findings expressed by DHS's OIG in the report. The agencies gave a reply
of "non-concur" to the findings, essentially arguing with the DHS
ombudsman's view of their own inadaquacies.
1 comment:
You don't need to be a rocket scientist to figure that out. You don't know what you don't know.
Post a Comment