BLAS IS A WALKING MORAL HAZARD

De Blasio’s ‘crime’ is stiffing the NYPD

 

By Michael Goodwin

 

New York Post

April  27, 2021

 

 

The dictionary defines “moral hazard” as the “lack of incentive to guard against risk where one is protected from its consequences.” For an example, see Mayor Bill de Blasio’s budget. 

Thanks to the excessive federal bailout, the mayor is laughing all the way to the bank. He’s canceling pandemic-forced savings initiatives and throwing buckets of money at ideas without any concern about whether the ideas are good or the money will be well spent. 

At $98.6 billion, his spending plan is $7 billion more than the state of Florida’s. It’s $10 billion more than last year, and that’s before the City Council adds its expensive extras. 

Because de Blasio will be term-limited out of office next Jan. 1, he’s a walking moral hazard. He won’t face the consequences when the boom is followed by a bust and audits show gazillions were squandered or stolen. The next mayor will inherit the hangover and, inevitably, a sea of red ink. 

Unfortunately, there is one area where de Blasio is playing Scrooge: the NYPD. Its manpower budget is basically flat, except for a projected cut in overtime, according to the Citizens Budget Commission. 

Status quo, with about 35,000 uniformed members, would be understandable if dollars were tight and New Yorkers felt safe. But with the money spigots running full blast everywhere else and crime soaring, now is not the time to pinch pennies at the NYPD. 

Just one example: Transit officials agree with the vast bulk of riders that more cops are needed in the subways, to arrest criminals, deter others and give riders back the sense of safety they once had. 

De Blasio’s response was to scold the MTA for polling riders and releasing the results. To him, it’s better to suppress an inconvenient truth than tell it. 

Here’s another truth he won’t like: His failure to effectively address the bloody surge of criminal violence over the last two years will define his legacy.

It didn’t have to end this way. Back in 2016, the council and then-top cop Bill Bratton wanted to add about 1,500 cops to the force. De Blasio, trying to rebuild his relationship with the rank and file after a disastrous start, reluctantly agreed. 

By 2018, the uniformed force reached nearly 36,700, and crime, despite occasional spurts, was kept in check through 2019 and early 2020. 

But last year, in the midst of the pandemic, the protests and riots following the George Floyd police murder in Minneapolis went largely unchecked as the NYPD was held back. The criminals seized the upper hand and still have it. 

The 319 murders in 2019 grew to 468 last year. Burglaries went from 10,800 to 15,500 and car thefts soared. 

Meanwhile, the size of the police force has intermittently drifted lower because of increased retirements and because de Blasio agreed to cancel a rookie class at the height of the “defund the police” nonsense. 

Equally important, he keeps putting cops on an ever-tighter leash, making it harder for them to do their jobs and leaving many cops convinced City Hall doesn’t have their backs. Who can blame them? 

The result is the disaster New Yorkers see unfolding each and every day. Of course, some of those New Yorkers learn about the dangers and depravities from their new homes in safer climes. And who can blame them? 

Now an NYPD union has summed up the reality by giving New York a new name: City of Violence. 

The tag came from the Sergeants Benevolent Association, which cited the recent 250 percent surge in shootings, with NYPD data showing that 50 people were shot over the week ending Sunday. 

“Mayor de Blasio has allocated 30 million dollars to bring tourism to NYC,” the union tweeted Monday morning. “Welcome to the city of violence.” 

City of Violence. That is de Blasio’s legacy.

It will also be the next mayor’s problem. Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa would hire more cops, and some of the Democrats are talking sensibly about public safety, namely Eric Adams, Andrew Yang and Ray McGuire. 

But I know of no Dem talking specifically about adding to the force and using the police more aggressively. 

The next mayor will either do both — or reap the whirlwind. 

It will be no comfort or excuse that the rise in crime is a national problem. That was also true in the three decades before Rudy Giuliani became mayor and made New York an example of how to cut crime. The rest of the nation followed in what became a virtuous cycle. 

Now, with Chicago, Baltimore, Los Angeles, Detroit and most other major metropolitan areas also soaked in blood and grief, America needs another mayor and city to reverse the trend. 

Why not New York? It did it once and can do it again — if it picks the right mayor. 

And if that mayor picks the right police commissioner and has the right strategy. 

It’s also true that defeating crime is a team game. Albany, prosecutors and judges must get serious and stop coddling repeat offenders. Their kindness to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent. 

But somebody has to lead the way, and that’s what a mayor must do. Starting Jan. 1, job 1 is making New York safe again.