BISEN HAS RETURNED THE US TO, AND RESUMED FUNDING THE MOST ANTISEMITIC AGENCY OF THE ANTISEMITIC UN

UN agency flaunts anti-Israel agenda: Time for the U.S. to resign again

 

By James Sinkinson

 

FLAME

June 21, 2022

 

Trump took the US out of UNHRC and stopped funding it. Biden has returned the US  to UNHRC and resumed funding it

 

The fact that the UN is biased against Israel comes as no surprise. Indeed, UN agencies have mounted more attacks against the world’s only Jewish state and the Middle East’s only democracy than against all of the world’s greatest criminal actors combined.

But now the so-called UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) has just mounted what is surely the world body’s most concerted effort, not about possible instances of Israel’s misdeeds, but rather to condemn the Jewish state for its very existence—and in the process destroy it.

The UNHRC’s extraordinary year-old “Commission of Inquiry” (COI) has just issued its first of a perpetual schedule of screeds against Israel. Unsurprisingly and unashamedly, the document attempts to delegitimize and demonize Israel using double-standards—the classic “3Ds” recipe for antisemitism.

The COI manages to do all this while utterly ignoring the fact that Israel’s behavior has been necessitated by its defense against Arab aggressors—both genocidal foreign armies crossing its borders and murderous terrorists on its streets—for every one of its first 74 years.

Encouragingly, some 22 nations have already criticized the new COI’s first report for its blatant anti-Israel bias. No wonder voices like that of former US Ambassador to Israel David Friedman are calling on the Biden Administration to rescind its recent decision to rejoin the UNHRC.

The only permanent item on the UNHRC’s meeting agendas is Item #7, a scheduled hate-fest directed at Israel. Most Western democracies—to their credit—exit UNHRC headquarters in Geneva when that item is brought up for discussion.

Over the past two decades, nine special UNHRC commissions have been established to investigate or criticize Israel alone. Perhaps the most notorious of these was the 2009 Goldstone Commission, which viciously attacked Israel until Richard Goldstone—the panel’s namesake and chief—formally renounced and retracted the Commission’s error-infested report.

This latest COI is unusual in several ways:

• It is not limited to the investigation of a specific conflict or incidents. The events of March, 2021, which saw 4000 missile attacks from Gaza against Israeli civilian centers—and Israel’s counter-attacks on Gaza—were the trigger for the COI, but its charter is actually unbounded.

• It is not limited to a particular time period. The COI’s charter allows it to evaluate all Israel-Arab interactions since Israel’s birth in 1948 . . . and even has the mission to investigate future conflicts.

• It is not limited to a particular geography. The COI’s charter allows for the investigation of Israel-Arab interactions and conflicts that happen anywhere in the world.

• It is not limited in duration. The COI is now a standing institution of the UN, much like the UNHRC’s Agenda Item #7. Unlike all other such UN Commissions, this one has no expiration date.

• It is not limited by resources. Its generous budget this year is around $5 million, and its charter calls for at least two reports annually and indefinite funding renewals.

• It is not limited in its bias. COI Chairperson Navi Pillay of South Africa and each of her two fellow commissioners, Chris Sidoti of Australia and Miloon Cothari of India, all have an extensive and years-long public record of anti-Israel speeches, writings and actions that make them completely unfit to serve as impartial arbiters of the COI.  

   
  

 

Navi Pillay, former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and longtime critic of Israel, once accused the IDF of "targeting children playing" in Gaza

 

The recently issued COI report, in fact, has few surprises, given its authorship. This first report examines the “root causes” of the problems and discovers that . . . they are Israel’s doing.

Nowhere to be seen are mentions of Arab-launched wars; or waves of Palestinian terror—just “activism” and “resistance to occupation”!

Also missing are references to the Hamas charter calling for the genocide of the Jews, or even Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas’ comment about “filthy” Jews, or the lavish bounties Abbas pays to Palestinians who murder Jews in his Pay-for-Slay program.

Reading the report, one can only conclude that the racist, hate-filled Jews of Israel just woke up one morning and—without any real provocation—decided to persecute and murder Arabs.

Far worse than these individual lies, however, is the report’s condemnation of Israel for being a Jewish state—including its right of return for Jews from anywhere in the world. The COI’s mission is not to criticize Israel’s policies, but rather is a bigoted “star chamber” whose job is to undermine Israel’s reason for being.

The COI’s conclusion was foregone before it began: Israel’s existence is evil and must be eliminated.

The report is so detached from Middle East reality and honest history that 22 nations have submitted a protest letter against it, led by the United States, and including other American, European, Asian, and African countries.

The letter begins, “We believe the nature of the COI is further demonstration of disproportionate attention given to Israel,” adding the concern that, “the COI will contribute to the polarization of [the] situation.”

Hillel Neuer of Geneva-based UN Watch has demanded that the COI’s chair, Pillay, recuse herself or be removed by the UNHRC. Both UN Watch and the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs (JCPA) submitted to the COI in advance of the latest report hundreds of thousands of pages documenting Arab persecution and forced exile of Jews, as well as belligerence against Israel for decades. This preponderance of evidence was not even acknowledged in the COI document.

JCPA’s Anne Bayefsky states that “the report’s overriding standard of ‘proof’ that the Jewish state is allegedly a moral affront to humankind is this: the UN said so.”

Former US Ambassador to Israel David Friedman believes the Biden Administration’s decision to rejoin and resume funding the UNHRC after the U.S. left it in 2018 was a mistake.

“The U.S. never should have gone back in. It’s a terrible organization and has no credibility,” Friedman stated, responding to the UNHRC report.

“This is an organization that is deeply, deeply antisemitic. The U.S. has no business being part of it and contributing to it,” he added.