When Queen Elizabeth II died, people
mourned not only the loss of a beloved and admirable monarch but what
they believed was the passing of the beloved and admirable Britain that
she had embodied.
The country now seems to be going out of
its way to slide off the edge of the steadily crumbling civilizational
cliff. And the Queen’s own grandson has joined the lemming-like throng.
Earlier this week, Prince William said he
wanted to see an end to the fighting in Gaza as soon as possible because
“too many have been killed.”
The death of civilians in war is always a
tragedy. But the Prince of Wales didn’t say how many was “too many” in
this most just of wars against genocide. Nor did he acknowledge the many
Hamas terrorists among the number that he deemed excessive.
It’s an iron rule that the Royal Family
never makes political or controversial interventions. Yet Prince William
was playing politics, especially since he issued his statement on the
eve of a deeply divisive debate on Gaza in the House of Commons.
The late Queen would never, ever have done this.
Wednesday’s scheduled debate was on a
Scottish National Party motion calling for an immediate ceasefire in the
Israel-Hamas war. In the event, the debate was totally derailed by
procedural and political chaos.
Without getting into the weeds of
parliamentary procedure, the Speaker of the Commons broke the rules by
allowing for debate amendments to the SNP motion tabled by both the
government and the Labour Party.
The resulting fury led to a walkout by
both Conservative and SNP members of Parliament—who didn’t get the
chance to debate their own motion—while Labour’s amendment calling for
an “immediate humanitarian ceasefire” passed by default.
The Speaker, who was formerly a Labour MP,
was accused of buckling under pressure exerted by Labour leader Sir
Keir Starmer, who had been forced into a caveated call for an immediate
“humanitarian” ceasefire to stave off a massive revolt by his own
viscerally anti-Israel MPs who were threatening to vote for the SNP
motion.
The truth behind this chaos, however,
appears to have been far worse than political game-playing. The contrite
and near-broken Speaker said he had thought he was “doing the right
thing” by enabling all sides of the House to vote on their own wording
because MPs had told him they were being intimidated.
“I am very, very concerned about the
security of all members,” he said. “I was very concerned, I am still
concerned, and that is why the meetings I have had today were about the
security of members, their families and the people involved.”
Who could doubt it? Social media has been
ablaze with abuse and death threats against anyone deemed not to hate
Israel enough. Outside parliament, while MPs descended into chaos, a
baying mob of thousands waving Palestinian flags chanted: “There is only
one solution, intifada and revolution.”
What all this tells us is that the
demonization of Israel has now destabilized British politics
sufficiently to destroy democratic procedures through the intimidation
of MPs by an Islamist and Israel-hating mob.
While MPs turn on the hapless Speaker over
preventing them from indulging in a pointlessly performative
parliamentary gesture attacking Israel, they are spectacularly missing
the big picture.
On the day that parliament melted down,
Sir William Shawcross, the independent reviewer of the counter-extremism
program Prevent, was warning that Islamist extremism is still not being
effectively tackled by the government and is fueling the current
tsunami of antisemitism.
One year ago, Shawcross issued a report
warning that Prevent was perversely focused on tackling a rise in
right-wing extremism, even though the rising threat from Islamist
extremism was exponentially greater.
Yet even now, he said, the government has
failed to implement some of his key recommendations. A year ago, he
warned government ministers about the need to tackle the “pernicious”
threat from the Hamas support network in the U.K. They have not done so.
Since Oct. 7, that threat has become far
greater and is fueling the “horrific” increase in antisemitism and
encouraging antisemitic abuse and banners at pro-Palestinian marches.
“I have Jewish friends whose children are
at universities around the country who are frightened for the first time
in their lives,” Shawcross said. “I never thought that we would see, on
the streets of Britain, British citizens shouting ‘death to the Jews.’
It’s absolutely appalling.”
As if to illustrate his warning, The Jewish Chronicle
reports that the Islamist group Muslim Engagement and Development
(MEND), which has defended terrorists and led prayers for a “Palestinian
victory,” has been training the police, universities and National
Health Service staff in how to deal with “Islamophobia.”
The Shawcross review found that MEND has
“a well-established track record of working alongside extremists” and of
“seeking to undermine the state’s considerable efforts to tackle all
hate crime.” Yet MEND has taught courses to hundreds of public sector
staff on “the harsh realities of Islamophobia” and “innovative
solutions” to combat it.
The government’s former independent
reviewer of counterterrorism legislation, Lord Carlile, said he was
“astonished” that MEND was still being used by public sector bodies in
this way.
The insanity in Britain over Israel has
now metastasized. Lord Austin, a cross-bench peer who quit the Labour
party over its former leader Jeremy Corbyn’s handling of antisemitism,
was suspended from his post as chair of the Midland Heart housing
association over a series of tweets attacking Hamas.
Three female anti-Israel demonstrators
were found guilty under terrorism laws of showing support for Hamas only
a few days after the Oct. 7 pogrom by sporting on their jackets the
symbol of a paraglider, one of the devices Hamas employed to perpetrate
the slaughter.
Yet the women were handed only a
conditional discharge, the judicial equivalent of a slap on the wrist.
This was because the judge said the offenses had taken place at a time
of “much passion and polarization” when “emotions ran very high on this
issue”—thus appearing to excuse support for Hamas as an understandable
emotional reaction.
In yet another disturbing incident, a
baby’s birth certificate that had been sent for processing as part of a
passport application by a London Jewish couple was returned ripped and
with the father’s place of birth—“Israel”—defaced by a scribble.
The government is genuinely concerned by
the explosion of anti-Jewish and anti-Israel hatred. Yet it doesn’t seem
able to connect the dots. Instead of shooting down the falsehoods with
which Israel is being demonized, it’s reinforcing them.
Ever since the Oct. 7 pogrom, Britain and
America have been playing a double game. They declare that Israel must
defeat Hamas and to that end deployed aircraft carriers and supplied
essential weaponry. Yet while preventing Israel from losing to Hamas,
Britain and America have tried to prevent Israel from winning.
They forced Israel to allow aid into Gaza,
most of which was stolen by Hamas. They forced Israel into protecting
even more Gazan civilians than it was already doing, which has meant
more needless losses of Israeli boys serving in the IDF. They are
pressuring Israel not to advance into Rafah, thus handing Hamas a
prospective final victory.
And they are threatening to impose a
Palestine state without Israel’s consent, thus setting up a terrorist
entity posing an infinitely greater danger to Israel than does Gaza.
What America and Britain fail to
understand is that Israel’s fight is the West’s fight. Professor
Gwythian Prins, a former member of the British Chief of the Defense
Staff’s Strategy Advisory Panel, writes on Gatestone that the
West needs to carefully escalate war against the Iranian regime because
Israel’s cause is the cause of the free world. Instead, America and
Britain have been escalating their sniping against Israel.
It has often been said that those who
attempt to destroy the Jews invariably destroy themselves. We are
watching it happen to the West in real time.
No comments:
Post a Comment