Thursday, January 22, 2026

A NEW SHERIFF IN TOWN

A Caesar in the White House

The old world order is dead because Western universalists destroyed it. 

 

By Melanie Phillips 

 

JNS

Jan 22, 2026

 

 

Illustration of Donald Trump as Caesar.

This was the week when much of the West woke up to the realization that the old world order was dead. A new one was being born, and they didn’t like it at all. And it’s far from clear that Israel can rest easy either. 

The Trump administration came to the World Economic Forum in Davos—the very belly of the liberal universalist beast—to tell the rest of the West that globalization was dead. It had failed Europe and the United States, harmed their prosperity and growth, and made them dependent upon and even subservient to others, including their enemies.

The world leaders forced to listen to this lecture were still reeling from U.S. President Donald Trump’s threat to take over Greenland and punish countries that objected. At Davos, he retreated from that into a framework deal with NATO’s head Mark Rutte over Arctic security, which sounds long overdue for the defense of the free world.

Remarkably, no less committed a universalist than Canada’s prime minister Mark Carney told forum participants that the game was now up for the global order. Many countries were now concluding that they must develop greater strategic autonomy. “When the rules no longer protect you,” he said, “you must protect yourself.”

You don’t say. Better the sinner who repenteth, etc.? Not quite.

Carney and other liberal leaders lamenting the end of the globalist game are merely acknowledging that Washington will no longer tolerate it. They fail to admit, however, that they have been propping up an international order that promised liberal ideals but delivered the opposite.

These are the leaders who continue to develop economic ties with China, one of the principal threats to freedom and security in the world.

These are the leaders who, for more than four decades, appeased the fanatical Islamic regime in Iran as it exported terrorism and mass murder around the world, pursued the development of nuclear weapons, waged proxy war against Israel and oppressed its own people. Over the past few weeks, as at least 16,500 Iranians were murdered in their attempt to bring the regime down, these world leaders said virtually nothing and did even less.

Even now, France Spain and Italy are actually blocking the designation of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps—the main instrument of the regime’s global aggression—as a terrorist organization.

The leaders in Davos have continued to allow Russia to launder its ill-gotten money through their capitals and have done little more than wring their hands over Ukraine.

They say they don’t like bullying leaders like Trump. But these countries have themselves relentlessly bullied Israel at its time of maximum need.

They have punished it for defending itself against genocide, promoted Hamas lies as truths, and incentivized the Palestinian Arabs in their aim of exterminating Israel by continuing to fund the Palestinian Authority’s rewards for terrorist attacks and the indoctrination of its children in murderous hatred of Jews.

So their hypocrisy in throwing up their hands in horror at what America has become is epic. But Trump’s new world order should also cause more than a few qualms.

He has invited to join his Board of Peace—the body that supposedly will usher in a new era of peace and prosperity in Gaza—none other than Qatar and Turkey. Yet these two countries are mortal enemies of Israel, the Jews and the West.

As Khaled Abu Toameh has written on Gatestone, both countries don’t believe in any peace process between Israel and the Muslim world, and they continue to embrace and sponsor Islamists who support Islamist terrorists.

The International Union of Muslim Scholars, which describes Qatar and Turkey as its biggest backers, issued a fatwa last year obliging the Islamic world to wage jihadi holy war “against the Zionist entity and all those who participate with it,” urging the formation of a unified Islamic military alliance.

Earlier this month, it issued another fatwa that affirmed “the prohibition of normalization with the Zionist enemy [Israel] in all its forms.”

What has happened in Syria is no less alarming. Trump has fawned over Syria’s new president, the former Al-Qaeda and ISIS commander Ahmed al-Sharaa, as “tough” and “handsome,” and has treated him as a reformed character with a valuable part to play in a new peaceful Middle East.

Yet over the past few weeks, al-Sharaa’s forces, backed by Turkey, have been slaughtering the Kurds, America’s invaluable allies—whom it has now betrayed.

Earlier this week, Tom Barrack, the U.S. ambassador to Turkey, said of the Kurds’ militia, the Syrian Democratic Forces: “The original purpose of the SDF as the primary anti-ISIS force on the ground has largely expired. Damascus is now both willing and positioned to take over security responsibilities, including control of ISIS detention facilities.”

The result, appallingly, has been that the ISIS prisoners being guarded by the Kurds were left in limbo. Some of them promptly walked free, forcing U.S. Central Command to step in the next day to transfer such prisoners to Iraq and out of the Syrian regime’s hands.

Al-Sharaa has previously slaughtered Syria’s Druze, Christians and Alawites. Given half a chance, he will next turn his guns against Israel.

If anyone wonders how on earth an American administration can be so woefully ignorant of the implacable nature of Islamist fanaticism, just listen to the shocking inanities of Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff. He said at Davos: “Iran needs to change its ways … if they indicate that they’re willing to do that, I think we can diplomatically settle this.”

So even now, the Trump administration seems to believe that the Islamist fanatics in Tehran are reasonable people who will choose pragmatism over what they believe is their God-given duty to destroy Israel and the West.

But then Witkoff previously assured the world that the 800 protesters taken prisoner by Tehran and threatened with execution would be spared. If the regime hadn’t already started murdering them before he spoke, it has been doing so ever since.

Witkoff has also said that Hamas was not “ideologically intractable” and that the rulers of Qatar had renounced their radicalism and were now “our allies.”

It is simply astounding that such a man can be the “special envoy” for the president of the United States—and at such a deeply perilous time for the world.

More than two weeks ago, Trump told the heroic Iranian demonstrators that “help is on its way.” That help hasn’t yet arrived, and thousands have been murdered and tortured. The American military build-up in the region suggests that the United States will either strike Iran or is preparing for an Iranian strike. But who knows?

Opinion today is divided between those asserting that Trump is saving the world and those asserting that Trump is destroying the world.

The reality is that he’s not a fascist, racist or madman; he is rather a self-styled emperor. He demands fealty, is driven by transactionalism, narcissism and revenge, and gets his way through the exercise of raw power.

This is hardly desirable. Still, Trump is motivated by love of America, Western civilization and the Jewish people. His political opponents, on the other hand, are motivated by hatred of America, Western civilization and the Jewish people—or are chillingly indifferent to those who do.

There’s surely no contest.

Trump’s new world order has emerged because the old one has so catastrophically failed. International law and transnational institutions were created to destroy the power of imperial overreach in the interests of peace, freedom and justice. But that international order has betrayed and abandoned peace, freedom and justice. The outcome is a Caesar in the White House.

Trump is the best friend Israel has ever had in the Oval Office. That doesn’t make him perfect. He can be the Jews’ best shot and can do some brilliant things, and yet at the same time be a flawed individual. Those flaws may sometimes prevent him from doing the right thing and lead him instead into making terrible errors.

We must all just hold our breath.

ARRESTS MADE IN ST. PAUL CHURCH INVASION

By Bob Walsh

 

 

 

Various media outlets reporting that the feds have made several arrests of the nutters who invaded a Baptist Church in St. Paul over the weekend because they believed one of the pastors there was an employee of ICE.

Among those arrested was reportedly the angry white woman who was more-or-less in charge of the whole show.  

I wonder if they arrested Lemon?  He claimed he was there as a reporter but images from the scene prior to the entry into the church would seem to indicate otherwise.

Wednesday, January 21, 2026

I BELIEVE THE SUBPOENAS WERE NOTHING MORE THAN A CHEAP POLITICAL STUNT ... NEVERTHELESS, THE CLINTONS WERE OBLIGATED TO COMPLY WITH THE SUBPOENAS

Bill and Hillary Clinton staring down the Epstein barrel as GOP pushes explosive contempt of Congress vote

 

By Victoria Churchill 

 

Daily Mail

Jan 21, 2026

 

 

clinton
Republicans on the House Oversight Committee were behind resolutions criminally charging Bill and Hillary Clinton with contempt of Congress for defying subpoenas to testify about their ties to Jeffrey Epstein
 

The latest development in Congress's investigation into the Jeffrey Epstein files may spell trouble for Bill and Hillary Clinton.

Republicans on the House Oversight Committee led the advancement of two resolutions criminally charging both Clintons with contempt of Congress for defying subpoenas to testify about their ties to to the deceased pedophile. 

The committee votes were 34-8-2 in favor of Bill Clinton's resolution and 28-15-1 for Hillary Clinton's.  

Nine Democrats voted for Bill Clinton's contempt resolution while only three Democrats voted for Hillary's.

Committee Chairman James Comer succeeded in convincing a significant portion of members that the Clintons were defying the subpoenas.

Despite the Clintons' willingness to speak with committee staff and negotiate a date and format for questioning, Comer dismissed five months of talks as a 'stall tactic.' He accused them of trying to run out the clock on the Republican-led investigation until the next Congress.

To avoid contempt charges, the Clintons' lawyers offered Comer and ranking Democrat Robert Garcia a meeting with Bill Clinton alone in New York without an official transcript—an offer Comer rejected.

A Clinton spokesman pushed back on that assertion on Tuesday on X, saying the Clintons 'never said no to a transcript.'

 

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer (top right) (R-KY) speaks during a hearing at the U.S. Capitol January 21, 2026 in Washington, DC. The full committee was expected to vote on a markup of a resolution recommending that the House of Representatives find former U.S. President Bill Clinton and former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer (top right) (R-KY) speaks during a hearing at the U.S. Capitol January 21, 2026 in Washington, DC. The full committee was expected to vote on a markup of a resolution recommending that the House of Representatives find former U.S. President Bill Clinton and former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress

Former President Bill Clinton and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein picture in an undated photograph released by the Department of Justice

Former President Bill Clinton and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein picture in an undated photograph released by the Department of Justice

President Bill Clinton and first lady Hillary dance at the Arkansas Ball on inauguration night, January 20, 1993, in Wahsington, DC

President Bill Clinton and first lady Hillary dance at the Arkansas Ball on inauguration night, January 20, 1993, in Wahsington, DC

 

'Interviews are on the record and under oath. Whether it was written or typed isn't why this is happening. If that were the last or only issue, we'd be in a different position. You keep misdirecting to protect you-know-who and God knows what,' the spokesman said.

California Democratic Rep. Dave Min argued the contempt resolution amounts to political theater, not accountability. Min voted 'present' on both resolutions.

Asked by the Daily Mail about Min's 'present' vote following Wednesday's hearing, Comer said he doesn't even know why such a vote exists, but that it was 'probably better' than a no vote.

Wednesday's hearing focused on resolutions to hold former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress for failing to comply with subpoenas about their relationship with Epstein.

Republicans insisted the Clintons must testify, while Democrats called the focus politically motivated.

But Comer said he wanted information from any relevant source, also announced that Ghislaine Maxwell will sit for a congressional deposition on February 9.

'I agree that we need to hear from Ghislaine Maxwell,' Comer said. He admitted his staff has 'been trying to get her in for a deposition. Our lawyers have been saying that she's going to plead the fifth, but we have nailed down a date, February 9, where Ghislaine Maxwell will be deposed by this committee.'

However, Maxwell's lawyers have 'made it clear that she's going to plead the fifth.'

'I hope she changes her mind, because I want to hear from her,' Comer added.

Democrat Ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, Robert Garcia, claimed a victory for Comer, summoning Maxwell to testify, noting in a statement posted on X that the action was a result of his party's pressure campaign.

Garcia also noted that 'the coverup in continuing' as Maxwell has 'gotten special treatment from the DOJ for months.'

Democrats also tried to include the Department of Justice (DOJ) under Pam Bondi in the contempt of Congress charges, as all of the Epstein Files have still not been released despite the Epstein Files Transparency Act being passed by Congress and signed into law by President Donald Trump in November of 2025.

Ohio Democratic Representative Shontel Brown said during Wednesday's hearing that 99 percent of the Epstein Files are still with the Department. 

Comer himself said Wednesday that even he would like to see the files released at a faster pace.

'Attorney General Bondi, the Department of Justice, are producing documents, while the pace is slower than any of us would prefer, and must speed up,' Comer noted.

NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN DENMARK, GREENLAND AND THE US WILL GO FORWARD AIMED AT ENSURING THAT RUSSIA AND CHINA NEVER GAIN A FOOTHOLD - ECONOMICALLY OR MILITARILY - IN GREENLAND

NATO responds as Trump hails Greenland 'deal' covering 'entire Arctic region' that involves 'small pockets of land for US bases'

 

By Katelyn Caralle, Phillip Nieto and Stephen M. Lepore 

 

Daily Mail

Jan 21, 2026

 

 

Donald Trump (right) announced he struck a deal with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte (left) in Davos today to halt tariffs in Europe amid a breakthrough in Greenland negotiations

Donald Trump (right) announced he struck a deal with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte (left) in Davos today to halt tariffs in Europe amid a breakthrough in Greenland negotiations 

 

A top NATO official said the organization is working with Donald Trump to 'implement his vision' on not just Greenland but the future of 'the whole Arctic region.' 

The president dramatically scrapped tariffs on eight European countries as he announced a breakthrough agreement with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte for the territory on Wednesday evening.

Trump wrote on Truth Social that he and Rutte 'had formed the framework of a future deal with respect to Greenland and, in fact, the entire Arctic Region.

'This solution, if consummated, will be a great one for the United States of America, and all NATO Nations.'

NATO said in a statement that 'negotiations between Denmark, Greenland and the United States will go forward aimed at ensuring that Russia and China never gain a foothold - economically or militarily - in Greenland.' 

Rutte told Fox News' Special Report with Bret Baier Wednesday that Danish sovereignty over the territory wasn't talked about in meetings with Trump.

'We basically discussed how can we implement the president's vision on protecting, yes, Greenland, but of course this – not only Greenland – this whole Arctic,' he said. 

Rutte said NATO wants 'everything needed on land, sea and air' to protect the Arctic and admitted 'there's a lot of work to be done' to get there. 

 

Trump said Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff  – the latter two of whom were at the meeting – were 'responsible for the negotiations' regarding Greenland and NATO

Trump said Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff  – the latter two of whom were at the meeting – were 'responsible for the negotiations' regarding Greenland and NATO

 

The announcement followed a meeting where top NATO military officers discussed an arrangement where Denmark would cede 'small pockets of Greenlandic' territory to the US where it could build bases, senior officials told The New York Times.

The agreement was compared by the sources to UK military bases in Cyprus which are treated as sovereign British territories.

Trump did not immediately give details of the deal but said NATO would work with the US to build his Golden Dome missile defense system and share mineral rights.

'They're going to be involved in the Golden Dome, and they're going to be involved in mineral rights, and so are we,' Trump told CNBC. 

When asked how long the agreement would last, the president said: 'Forever.' 

Trump said 'additional discussions' were ongoing regarding Greenland and that Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff were 'responsible for the negotiations.' 

Trump told reporters in Davos on Wednesday that the deal will be 'put out pretty soon.' 

'It gets us everything we needed to get,' he insisted, adding: 'It's a deal that everybody's very happy with.'

 

Trump gave a more tempered approach at the World Economic Forum in Davos today, claiming: 'I won't use force. All the United States is asking for is a place called Greenland'

Trump gave a more tempered approach at the World Economic Forum in Davos today, claiming: 'I won't use force. All the United States is asking for is a place called Greenland'

Vance visited the Pituffik Space Base in Greenland last year, as Trump made it clear early in his second term his intentions of pushing for the acquisition of the Arctic island

Vance visited the Pituffik Space Base in Greenland last year, as Trump made it clear early in his second term his intentions of pushing for the acquisition of the Arctic island

 

In his speech at the World Economic Forum, Trump pledged that he would not seize Greenland by force, walking back his bellicose rhetoric over the weekend. 

'I don't have to use force, I don't want to use force. I won't use force,' he vowed. 'All the United States is asking for is a place called Greenland.' 

The stock market bounced back immediately after crashing on Tuesday over his tariff threats, although they are still in the red for the week. 

The Dow surged by 1.2 percent, the S&P 500 gained 1.16 percent and the Nasdaq advanced 1.18 percent.

Trump on Saturday threatened Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Finland with a 10 percent tariff starting on February 1 after they sent troops to Greenland. 

Since starting his second-term, the president has suggested the US should acquire Greenland to stop Russia and China from taking over strategic positioning in the Artic region.

The Danish territory provides strategic access to the Arctic, where China and Russia have, in recent years, flexed their geopolitical might as the melting polar ice provides greater access to shipping lanes and natural resources.

Greenland, which houses NATO military bases, is also rich in oil, gold, graphite, copper, iron, and other rare earth elements.

The Trump administration believes Greenland could provide infrastructure for the proposed Golden Dome missile defense system to protect North America from ballistic threats.

Greenland's rare earth minerals and fossil fuels would be essential for America to decouple its reliance on Chinese supply chains.

TRUMP WITHDRAWS ALL THE THREATS HE'S MADE ABOUT GREENLAND ..... THATS WHY THEY CALL HIM TACO TRUMP

Every Greenlander 'could be offered $1MILLION each by Trump if they vote to join the USA'

 

By Andrew Jehring 

 

Daily Mail

Jan 21, 2026

 

 

May include: A graphic design featuring a cartoon taco with the letters "T.A.C.O." in red above it. Below the taco, the text reads "TRUMP ALWAYS CHICKENS OUT" in a mix of colors. The background is black.

 

Donald Trump is considering offering every Greenlander $1million – £750,000 – if they vote to join the United States.

Speaking after talks with NATO chief Mark Rutte, the US President said he had agreed 'the framework of a future deal' regarding the control of the Arctic island, which he claims is vital for American security. 

The US President yesterday ruled out using force to seize the Arctic island and is instead focused on enticing the people to secede from Denmark.

The Daily Mail can reveal he is mulling making the inhabitants of Greenland (population 57,000) an offer of $1million each - £750,000 or €850,000 - if they vote to join the United States. 

If he made the vast payment to all 57,000 inhabitants of the strategically vital territory, the cost could hit £42.5billion ($564million US).

While the plan sounds outlandish, the price tag is a fraction of the £595billion (nearly $800billion) the US spends on defence each year.

It would also remove Greenland's reliance on Denmark for grants and reshape the island's economy. 

The island would have to agree to hold a referendum and would likely need a decisive 60 per cent to vote in favour of joining America to receive the money.

 

Donald Trump is considering offering every Greenlander $1million – £750,000 – if they vote to join the United States

Donald Trump is considering offering every Greenlander $1million – £750,000 – if they vote to join the United States

Copenhagen has repeatedly said the mineral-rich island is not for sale and that any deal would require Danish assent

Copenhagen has repeatedly said the mineral-rich island is not for sale and that any deal would require Danish assent

 

Previously it was reported the White House was considering offering each Greenlander up to £75,000. 

But Copenhagen has repeatedly said the mineral-rich island is not for sale and that any deal would require Danish assent.

Jens-Frederik Nielsen, Greenland's PM, has also said: 'Enough is enough. No more fantasies about annexation.'

When the lower figure was floated, Greenlanders pointed out Danish grants are worth more in the long run to them.

There are also concerns that they would move to an American-style economic system with minimal welfare support. The move may also be difficult to sell to Mr Trump's voters.

Nato secretary general Mark Rutte yesterday said he is working 'behind the scenes' with US officials to find a solution on the question of Greenland and was praised by Mr Trump as 'excellent'.

Trump added that he was suspending plans to slap tariffs on Britain and other countries resisting his Greenland grab.

Markets in the US rallied on his announcement, having climbed on his earlier proclamation that he would not use force to take the 'big, beautiful piece of ice'.

 

Vice President JD Vance visited the Pituffik Space Base in Greenland last year, as Trump made it clear early in his second term his intentions of pushing for the acquisition of the Arctic island

Vice President JD Vance visited the Pituffik Space Base in Greenland last year, as Trump made it clear early in his second term his intentions of pushing for the acquisition of the Arctic island

Nato military officers were discussing an arrangement where Denmark would cede 'small pockets of Greenlandic' territory to the US, where it could build military bases

Nato military officers were discussing an arrangement where Denmark would cede 'small pockets of Greenlandic' territory to the US, where it could build military bases

 

Last night, Nato military officers were discussing an arrangement where Denmark would cede 'small pockets of Greenlandic' territory to the US, where it could build military bases. 

Senior officials compared the proposal to UK military bases in Cyprus – which are treated as sovereign British territories – according to The New York Times.

Mr Trump told reporters it was 'the ultimate long–term deal'. When asked how long, he replied: 'Infinite. There is no time limit. It's a deal that's forever.' 

He had earlier written on his Truth Social social media platform: 'Based upon a very productive meeting that I have had with the Secretary General of Nato, Mark Rutte, we have formed the framework of a future deal with respect to Greenland and, in fact, the entire Arctic Region.

'This solution, if consummated, will be a great one for the United States of America, and all Nato Nations.'

Danish foreign minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen said the US owning Greenland is a 'red line' that will not happen.

He said Copenhagen would keep ownership of Greenland, despite Mr Trump's earlier demand for negotiations on an 'acquisition'. 'It's not going to happen that the US will own Greenland. That's a red line,' Mr Rasmussen told national broadcaster DR.

Mr Trump's apparent climbdown on the imposition of tariffs over the Greenland dispute will fuel critics who coined the term TACO, short for 'Trump Always Chickens Out'.

 

Trump said he agreed 'the framework of a future deal' following talks with Nato chief Mark Rutte

Trump said he agreed 'the framework of a future deal' following talks with Nato chief Mark Rutte 

A man holds a map of Greenland covered in the American flag crossed out with an X during a protest against Trump's policy towards Greenland in front of the US consulate in Nuuk, Greenland

A man holds a map of Greenland covered in the American flag crossed out with an X during a protest against Trump's policy towards Greenland in front of the US consulate in Nuuk, Greenland

 

The row that has played out over the last fortnight has raised serious questions about the survival of Nato and yesterday plunged Britain's 'special relationship' with the US into crisis. During a rambling address at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Mr Trump sought to often belittle his allies.

In a reference to America's role in the Second World War, he told his mainly European audience: 'Without us, you'd all be speaking German, with maybe a little Japanese.'

France, Canada and even neutral Switzerland, the host of the summit, came in for some tough shots. 

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent suggested the issue could lead to Keir Starmer's trade deal with the US being unpicked, saying the UK was 'letting us down' and warned it could cause 'glitches' in economic relations. 

And Mr Trump savaged Labour's Net Zero approach, saying the Government's windfall tax on North Sea oil was driving 'catastrophically high' energy prices in the UK.

The President later said that 'bad things' would happen to Britain and Europe unless they clamped down on immigration and halted the drive for green energy. 'They have to change their ways,' he said. 

Lindsey Graham, a Republican senator, welcomed the decision to take force off the table regarding Greenland. But he added that Mr Trump had made a 'damn good argument' as to why the US should have it, and urged Nato to find a way to help Trump 'acquire title'.

TRUMP TAKES CREDIT AWAY FROM ISRAEL FOR ITS ACHIEVEMENTS ON MISSILE DEFENSE

Trump tells Netanyahu to 'stop taking credit for Golden Dome'

Speaking at Davos, president criticizes NATO and claims credit for Israeli achievements on missile defense: "It's our technology." Trump renews push for "immediate negotiations" to purchase Greenland, the "big piece of ice." On the Middle East, he warns: "Hamas agreed to give up their weapons, if they don't do it – they will be blown away."

 

by Erez Linn  

 

Israel Hayom

Jan 21, 2026

 

Trump gave a more tempered approach at the World Economic Forum in Davos today, claiming: 'I won't use force. All the United States is asking for is a place called Greenland'

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday used his platform at the World Economic Forum in Davos to challenge the established narrative regarding Israel's security infrastructure, claiming the missile defense system Israel currently enjoys is fundamentally American. "What we did for Israel was amazing," Trump told the audience, referring to the jointly developed Arrow interceptors that will serve as the basis for the ongoing Golden Dome system currently in the works in the US. He detailed a direct confrontation with the Israeli premier over the issue. "I told Bibi to stop taking credit for the Dome. It's our technology. We wiped out the Iranian nuclear program. We took out [Iranian general] Qassem Soleimani, we took out ISIS leader al-Baghdadi," he stated. "Hamas agreed to give up their weapons, they will be blown away if they don't do it," he warned.

The address also featured a renewed and detailed demand for the US acquisition of Greenland, saying the new missile technology would be used over the island to protect Canada. Trump argued that leasing the territory was strategically insufficient. "All we are asking for is to get Greenland including right, title and ownership. You can't defend it on a lease. Legally it's not totally defensible. And also psychologically, who the hell wants to protect a lease. Much of the war will take place on that piece of ice," he said. He invoked the US military's role during the 1940s as a precedent for ownership and claimed Denmark, which holds Greenland, was not "grateful" for what the US did to protect that territory after the Nazis took over the country "in five hours."

"All we are asking for is a place called Greenland, which we already had as a trustee after we defeated the Germans in WW2. We were a powerful force there and we are a more powerful force now. Our battleships are 100 times more powerful than in the war," he added.

Trump dismissed concerns that purchasing the territory would harm relations with European allies. "This would not be a threat to NATO. It would greatly enhance the alliance. The US is treated very unfairly by NATO. We give so much and get so little in return. I have done more to help NATO by far than any other person. You wouldn't have NATO if I were not involved in my first term," he claimed. However, he expressed frustration with Denmark's refusal to sell. "We gave it back. How ungrateful are they. We face much greater risk because of missiles and weapons... it's the US alone that can protect this giant piece of ice and improve it and make it good and safe for Europe. I am seeking immediate negotiations to acquire Greenland," he declared. On at least three occasions in his speech he conflated Greenland with Iceland.

The president recounted Denmark's wartime history to justify his stance. "Denmark fell to Germany in six hours. We felt an obligation to protect Greenland. They tried to get a hold of it. We set up bases there for Denmark. We fought for Denmark. It's a big piece of ice. We saved Greenland and prevented our enemies from getting a foothold in our hemisphere," Trump said, according to the report. Despite his harsh words, he insisted he respected the local population. "I have tremendous respect for people of Denmark and Greenland. No nation is in any position to secure Greenland other than the US," he said. He framed the purchase as an obvious necessity. "Ultimately these are matter of national security. More clear than what's going on in Greenland. Do you want me to say something on Greenland?" he asked.

He outlined a clear expectation of loyalty from allies, regarding Greenland, but he ruled out using force to take over the Danish territory.  "I don't want to use force. I won't use force... but you can say yes and we will be very appreciative. You can say no and we will remember. A strong America means a strong NATO," he warned.

Regarding NATO, Trump claimed credit for forcing member states to increase defense spending significantly. "Until I came along NATO was supposed to pay only 2% of the GDP on defense. But I got NATO to pay 5%, something people said was not possible," he asserted. He contrasted this with the situation in Ukraine under the current administration. "I inherited a mess with Russia and Ukraine. It is terrible what happened. Biden had given Ukraine and NATO 350 billion dollars. I came in, and just like the southern border, just like the economy, I said, this place is in trouble. Those things were out of control." he noted.

Trump also highlighted US military superiority, referencing specific hardware. "We have the best equipment F-47, the newest one. I wonder why they called it the 47. They are supposed to be undetectable like the B-2, they did their job. We want a piece of ice for protecting the world," he said. On economic issues, he criticized price disparities in global markets. "I had to use tariffs. A pill costs 10 dollars in London, costs 130 dollars in NY or LA. Friends of mine say we can buy this in London for nothing, because America was subsidizing the entire world. I watched [France's President Emmanuel] Macron with the sunglasses. 'What the Hell?'," he remarked.

The president attacked President Joe Biden's record directly. "Biden auto-penned much of the damage, the worst president ever. I don't think a sane president would have signed what he signed," he stated.  However, he remained skeptical of reciprocal support. "The problem with NATO is that we will be there for them 100 percent. I am not sure they will be for us if we gave them a call. I know them all very well. With all the blood, sweat, and tears..." he said, according to the report.

In a final comment on energy policy, Trump criticized wind turbines. "They kill the birds and ruin your landscape. Stupid people buy them," he concluded, saying that China makes all of them but they don't use them. "I didn't see a single one in China."

AN INTERNATIONAL STABILIZATION FORCE IS NOW WIDELY ACKNOWLEDGED TO BE UNWILLING TO CHALLENGE HAMAS'S AUTHORITY

Post-war, who governs Gaza matters more than who talks peace

Order requires the defeat not only of an armed force, but of the ideology and power structures that sustained it. 

 

By Stephen M. Flatow 

 

JNS

Jan 21, 2026

 

 

Hamas showed it still controls Gaza by carrying out public executions last October.
 

The opening of Phase 2 of U.S. President Donald Trump’s Gaza peace plan is being described as a case of realism. It risks reviving a dangerous illusion: that Hamas can be reasoned into relinquishing power if offered reconstruction, recognition or the promise of a “better life.”

That illusion should have died on Oct. 7.

American officials now speak of engaging and coordinating with Hamas on Gaza’s governance, as if the terror organization that planned and carried out mass murder can be separated from the political system it dominates. History suggests otherwise. Postwar peace depends less on declarations than on one decisive question: who is allowed to govern when the fighting stops.

After World War II, Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, as Supreme Allied Commander in Europe, did not imagine that Nazi officials, even supposedly “reformed” ones, could be useful partners in rebuilding Germany. The Allied military government recognized and understood that reconstruction without political exclusion was not peace but postponement. Nazis were barred from public authority because leaving the architects and enforcers of mass violence in place would have guaranteed instability and future war.

The Gaza Strip is not Germany, and Hamas is not the Third Reich. But the governing principle is the same. You do not rebuild a society by legitimizing the movement that just demonstrated, in blood, what it is. Postwar order requires the defeat not only of an armed force, but of the ideology and power structures that sustained it.

The current trajectory of the reconstruction plan, however, points in the opposite direction.

An International Stabilization Force is now widely acknowledged to be unwilling to challenge Hamas’s authority. Arab states have made it clear that they will not confront Hamas on disarmament. Instead, the United States appears to be drifting toward coordination with Hamas on “practical” governance matters, a move that confers legitimacy while demanding little in return.

This is what Israelis have come to call the “Oct. 6 mindset”: the belief that economic incentives and political inclusion can tame a jihadist movement committed, by charter and practice, to Israel’s destruction. It is the same mindset that once treated Qatari cash as a moderating influence on Hamas, only to discover that the money subsidized tunnels, rockets and terror squads.

If Hamas truly wanted only “a better economic future for their families,” as one senior U.S. official recently suggested, then it would not have launched a massacre of civilians, nor would it still be holding a hostage body in violation of a now three-month ceasefire. The problem is not poverty. It is power.

Trump has publicly recognized this reality. He has stated plainly that Gaza will see no peace as long as Hamas wields authority, and he has called for comprehensive demilitarization, including the dismantling of Hamas’s terror tunnel network. That clarity is welcome. But it must be translated into enforceable policy, not diluted through bureaucratic engagement.

Disarmament cannot mean surrendering only “heavy weapons” while leaving Hamas’s small arms, command structures, recruitment networks and intimidation apparatus intact. An organization armed with thousands of assault rifles remains able to murder dissenters, suppress rivals and guarantee its political dominance.

Nor can a “Board of Peace” succeed if it includes representatives of states that openly support Hamas, while excluding Jerusalem from meaningful enforcement authority. Governance structures that tolerate Hamas influence, even indirectly, undermine the very premise of the plan, which explicitly states that Hamas is to have no role in Gaza’s future administration.

Reconstruction, too, must be conditional. Funds released without verified disarmament, without the return of the last hostage and without the dismantling of terror infrastructure will not build schools and hospitals. They will rebuild Hamas.

The lesson of postwar history is not that reconciliation is impossible. It is that reconciliation follows defeat, not the other way around. Germany rebuilt because Nazism was barred from power, not because it was invited to help manage the transition.

If the international community is unwilling to enforce Hamas’s removal from authority, then Israel will have to do so itself. The alternative is to pretend that a terror organization responsible for the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust can be transformed into a governing partner. That is not realism. It is denial.

Peace in the Palestinian enclave will not come from trusting Hamas to change, but from ensuring that it no longer has the power to intimidate, kill or govern.

DEERFIELD BEACH TO FORM IT'S OWN POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENT

By Bob Walsh

 

Aerial view of Deerfield Beach, Florida.


 

Since forever (35 years) the teeming metropolis of Deerfield Beach has gotten public safety services from Broward County, Florida.  In an effort to save some bucks the city has decided to set up their own police and fire departments.  

They seem to believe that they will save $500 million over 20 years with this move.  The vote by the city council was 4-1.  

Deerfield Beach has a population of 87,000.  The contract with Broward County expired in September.  The county has offered a two year extension and has offered to pay for an outside consultant to analyze the city's position.  The city hired their own consultant who came up with the guesstimate of $500 million.  

The old contract requires the county to continue to cover Deerfield Beach until September of 2027.    

TWO FORMER COPS GET $830,000 FROM THEIR FORMER DEPARTMENT

By Bob Walsh

 


Former Soddy-Daisy Officers File Lawsuit Alleging Wrongful Termination

 
Two officers of the Shoddy-Daisy (Tenn) Police Department are getting a settlement of $830,000 from their former employer for wrongful termination.

Former Lt. Jake Elrod and former Captain Eric Jenkins sued the city, Burt Johnson the city manager, Police Chief Billy Petty and the former police chief Mike Sneed back in August of 2024.  They allege they were fired for speaking out about the misbehavior of another officer.  They originally asked for $1 million each.

They both testified in court about the alleged untrustworthiness of another officer.  They also assert that that officer's sexual fantasies involving children were not properly investigated.  The former chief asserted that the two men acted in concert to get the other officer fired with false testimony and to gain more power within the department.

The settlement will be covered almost entirely by insurance.  Neither side is admitting fault.  The city has agreed to supply neutral references to future potential employers.  Both men agreed to not apply for any future job with the city without permission to do so from the city.

The ball started rolling on this mess after an unnamed female officer complained that a Sergeant with that department was producing kiddie porn.  The Hamilton County S. O. determined that the complaint was not founded and not credible.  

ARROGANT, DRUNK AND STUPID

ByBob Walsh

 

At-large councilor-elect Israel Rivera 

 

Israel Rivera, 40, is a member of the Holyoke (Mass) City Council.  Back in December he was stopped by the state police after blowing thru a red light.  He seemed to be quite drunk.  At least one of the statements he made, recorded on body cam, seemed to indicate he knew he was drunk.  He then went into the usual 'Do You Know Who I Am" bullshit.

He has been removed from the Public Safety Committee of the city council.  The council is not going to take any action against him until his case is adjudicated.  The charges against him are so far only misdemeanors and a misdemeanor conviction would not automatically remove him from office.

ORANGE MAN BACKS OFF ON GREENLAND

By Bob Walsh

 

May include: A graphic design featuring a cartoon taco with the letters "T.A.C.O." in red above it. Below the taco, the text reads "TRUMP ALWAYS CHICKENS OUT" in a mix of colors. The background is black.

 

President Trump declared yesterday that he will NOT use force to acquire Greenland.  How much of this was generated by a change of heart and how much of it was caused by stock market reactions isn't clear.

He is still saying very clearly that he WANTS the U. S. to own Greenland.  I actually have no problem with that.  He has said that he wants to get it by convincing the people involved it is the right thing to do and get them to go along with the program.  

COURT WATCHERS SAY IT LOOKS LIKE THE HAWAII VAMPIRE RULE IS LIKELY DEAD AND STINKING

By Bob Walsh

 


 
Trying to figure out what SCOTUS will do based on what questions the justices ask is far from an exact science.  That being said the court watchers are asserting that it looks like Hawaii's Vampire Law is going byebye.

The name is based on popular fiction wherein it is said that a vampire can not enter a human dwelling unless first invited in.  The current law in Hawaii and four other states says that a person with a valid gun permit can not enter private property opened to the general public (such as a retail establishment during normal business hours) while carrying a gun unless there is specific signage posted permitting the carrying of firearms on the premises.  

I am fairly confident that, if the ruling goes against them, the four states in question will try very hard to come up with additional work-arounds in order to continue to deny honest, law-abiding citizens their constitutional rights.  That is just where their heads are at.  

The other states are California, New York, Maryland and New Jersey.  The law in Maryland was recently overturned by the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals.

CA STATE REPUBLICANS APPROACH SCOTUS

By Bob Walsh

 

A side by side comparison of California's congressional maps 

 

The CA Republican State Committee has approached SCOTUS to ask them to roll back the state congressional district map.  The cause for action is the allegation that the "new" map was drawn primarily to increase the political power of Hispanics, and thereby decrease the political power of other voter groups.

There is no doubt that that was the EFFECT.  Whether or not that was the intention is another question.

They also approached the Ninth Circuit to hold the current ruling in abeyance pending further legal action.  The open period for filing for elections for these seats is rapidly approaching.

My guess, for what that might be worth to you, is that there is small chance that the Ninth Circuit will oblige and a moderate chance (but less than 50%) that SCOTUS will oblige.  

ERIK SWALWELL MAY HAVE A PROBLEM

By Bob Walsh

 

 Eric Swalwell during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol Building,


Erik Swalwell is running for the Democrat-Socialist spot on the primary ballot for CA Governor.  He is actually ahead in that field, showing how thin the field actually is.  

He may have a legal issue.  His "residence address of record" in CA is his lawyer's office.  In CA you can not run for governor unless you are an actual resident of CA and have been so for 5 years.  Swalwell has no record of owning, renting or leasing a residence in CA in that period of time.  

The Republicans in CA have filed with the CA Sec of State to exclude him from the ballot on that basis.  It isn't a completely bullshit issue and may actually work. 

(The rules for this are different than the rules for his residence for his seat in Congress.)

Tuesday, January 20, 2026

ROBOCOP ..... FOR REAL

China's real-life 'robocops': City deploys AI-powered humanoid police officer that barks orders at civilians and works 'around the clock'


By Olivia Allhusen

 

Daily Mail

Jan 20, 2026

 

 

China’s real-life ‘robocops’: City deploys AI-powered humanoid police officer that barks orders at civilians and works ‘around the clock’

WAITING FOR KRISTI NOEM TO EXPLAIN ICE GOONS WERE 'FOLLOWING TRINING'

Disturbing moment US citizen with no criminal record is arrested by ICE in Minneapolis and marched out into snow in his underwear

 

By Sophie Gable 

 

Daily Mail

Jan 20, 2026

 

 

ChongLy Thao, 56, was forcibly removed from his home in St Paul by ICE agents on Sunday, pictured above

ChongLy Thao, 56, was forcibly removed from his home in St Paul by ICE agents on Sunday, pictured above 

 

A Minnesota US citizen with no criminal record was seized from his home by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents and paraded in front of his neighbors in his underwear in frigid conditions.

ChongLy Thao, 56, was snatched by the federal officers from his home in St Paul on Sunday afternoon, according to his family and videos from witnesses. 

ICE agents broke down the door of his home, pointed guns at his family, and handcuffed him while his four-year-old grandson cried in horror. 

He was marched outside in the freezing cold in his underwear and a blanket he quickly grabbed from the couch. 

Thao told Reuters and the Associated Press that he asked his daughter-in-law to find his identification for the officers, but the agents said they didn't need to see it and detained him anyway. 

Officers denied him the chance to put on clothes and he was forced outside wearing Crocs on his feet.

'I was shaking,' he told AP. 'They didn't show any warrant; they just broke down the door.'

Neighbors captured the horrifying moments on camera and screamed at ICE agents to release Thao. 

 

Thao, pictured above in an interview on Monday, is a legal US citizen and doesn't have a criminal record

Thao, pictured above in an interview on Monday, is a legal US citizen and doesn't have a criminal record 

Thao's family said he asked agents for an opportunity to put clothes on and provide identification, but was denied

Thao's family said he asked agents for an opportunity to put clothes on and provide identification, but was denied 

 

He recalled that agents drove him to 'the middle of nowhere' and photographed him outside. Thao said he feared they would assault him. 

When officers ran his fingerprints, they realized Thao was a legal citizen with no criminal record and brought him back to his home a few hours after detaining him. 

Thao said he didn't receive an apology or an explanation for the alleged inhumane treatment. 

'I was praying. I was like, God, please help me, I didn't do anything wrong. Why do they do this to me? Without my clothes on,' he told Reuters. 

Thao is a Hmong man born in Laos. His adopted mother, Choua Thao, delivered him while she served the American side in the Secret War, a series of covert CIA operations in Laos.

Choua had to flee Laos with her children when the communists took over in the 1970s because she treated US soldiers. 

'Choua raised her children with deep values of service, dignity, and responsibility, and she ensured all of them became naturalized US citizens,' Thao's family wrote in a GoFundMe description. 

'She believed strongly in doing things the right way and in protecting life and family.'

 

Thao, pictured above on Monday in front of his home, is a naturalized citizen from Laos. His mother served as a nurse and treated American soldiers and citizens during the Secret War

Thao, pictured above on Monday in front of his home, is a naturalized citizen from Laos. His mother served as a nurse and treated American soldiers and citizens during the Secret War 

Thao, pictured above in his home, feared he would be assaulted by officers and has filed complaints with the ACLU

Thao, pictured above in his home, feared he would be assaulted by officers and has filed complaints with the ACLU 

 

Thao's family said his mother treated countless civilians and American soldiers during the war. She died in December. 

'To have her son treated this way — dragged from his home, weapons pointed at him, in front of his family and a small child — while the family is still grieving her loss, is heartbreaking, unjust, and deeply traumatizing,' the family added. 

The Department of Homeland Security told Reuters and AP that they were investigating two sex offenders who lived at Thao's address. 

'He matched the description of the targets. As with any law enforcement agency, it is standard protocol to hold all individuals in a house of an operation for safety of the public and law enforcement,' a DHS spokesperson said in a statement. 

Thao's family said that one of the men wanted by DHS previously lived in the home and was a former spouse of a family member. 

Thao's son said he was stopped by ICE agents earlier in the day while driving a friend's car. 

He added that the friend shares the first name of another man on the sex offender registry, but that the two people are not the same, AP reported. 

 

ICE agents broke down the door and pointed guns at Thao's family as they detained him and removed him from their home, pictured above

ICE agents broke down the door and pointed guns at Thao's family as they detained him and removed him from their home, pictured above 

Neighbors and community members video taped the horrific moments and screamed for Thao to be released, pictured above

Neighbors and community members video taped the horrific moments and screamed for Thao to be released, pictured above 

 

St Paul Mayor Kaohly Her told the Minnesota Star Tribune that she was 'livid' over the incident, adding that Thao is a family friend whom she knows personally. 

'It’s devastating to watch. And I am not outraged because these are people personal to me. This is happening across our city, across our state,' she said. 

'The federal government, ICE is not doing what it is that they say they’re doing. They’re not going after hardened criminals. 

'They’re going after anyone and everyone in their path. It is unacceptable. That is un-American.'

Thao's family said that although he wasn't physically injured, the incident had traumatized him and left him with psychological harm. 

He also lives with severe psoriasis, which is worsened by extreme stress, according to his family. 

Thao has filed complaints with the American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota and the state's attorney general. His family is raising money for his mental health therapy and medical care.

 

Thao, pictured above hugging his sister, has suffered psychological harm from the incident. His family is raising money for his therapy

Thao, pictured above hugging his sister, has suffered psychological harm from the incident. His family is raising money for his therapy 

 

Thao's family is just one of many impacted by the increased ICE raids in Minneapolis. DHS and ICE have been under fire for carrying out violent and unjustified raids in the city. 

At the beginning of the month, a legal citizen named Renee Good, 37, was fatally shot by officers in her car. 

Protests have erupted across the state, resulting in violent clashes between citizens and law enforcement. 

Minnesota Mayor Jacob Frey and Governor Tim Walz have condemned the federal government's actions, frequently demanding that the raids subside.  

The Daily Mail has reached out to DHS and ICE for additional comment.