Senate control will decide if change in 2021 is centrist or radical
By The Editorial Board
The Wall Street Journal
August 26, 2020
The
party conventions are focused on the race for the White House, but
there’s precious little mention of what is arguably the more important
contest: The fight for the U.S. Senate. Whoever holds that majority will
determine whether change next year is centrist or radical.
This
assumes Democrats hold the House, which is likely short of a Republican
comeback for the ages. Republicans now hold a 53-47 Senate majority,
but their hold is precarious. They’re defending as many as eight seats
that are competitive, while they look set to gain back only the Alabama
seat held by Democrat Doug Jones. A House, Senate and White House sweep
would set Democrats up for the policy transformation that Joe Biden
recently said he wants.
This
would not be your father’s Democratic Senate, or even Barack Obama’s. A
Democratic majority would elevate left-wing progressives like Elizabeth
Warren, Bernie Sanders and Sheldon Whitehouse to positions of power.
Normally they’d be constrained by the need to compromise with the
minority to get 60 votes to pass legislation. This is what has
frustrated both parties for decades, notably Republicans as recently as
two years ago on entitlement, health-care and tort reform when they also
held all of Congress and the White House.
Democrats
have all but announced that, even with a narrow majority of 51 or 52,
the 60-vote legislative filibuster is going the way of bourbon and
branchwater. “The filibuster is gone,” former Senate Majority Leader
Harry Reid told Politico last week. “It’s not a question of if, it’s a
question of when it’s going to go. . . . Next year at this time, it will
be gone.”
Harry
should know. In 2013 he killed the filibuster rule for judicial
nominees on a partisan vote. Barack Obama recently called the filibuster
a relic of Jim Crow, though he wanted to use it to stop Samuel Alito’s
Supreme Court confirmation. No less a former Senate Old Bull than Mr.
Biden has signaled he’d be happy to see it go to grease the skids for
his agenda.
The
pressure from the left will be too intense to resist. Simply watch
current Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, who for years has
advertised himself as a moderate liberal. Last week he told the press
that he’s no longer an “angry centrist.” He said he’s moved left with
the times and thus can’t take anything “off the table” in the majority.
Mr.
Schumer is anticipating a potential primary challenge in 2022 from
progressive New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who could raise all
the money she needs to take him on. That threat means Mr. Schumer
wouldn’t dare buck his backbenchers who want to kill the filibuster. It
also means that in the majority he’ll be along for the ride of whatever
Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s Democrats want.
What
would that be? Mr. Schumer said this includes addressing “income and
wealth inequality, climate [change], racial justice, [and] health care”
and “improving our democracy.” Democrats can pass a tax increase with a
mere 51 votes under current budget rules, but killing the filibuster
opens the door to all sorts of long dormant progressive priorities.
That
includes statehood, plus two Senate seats each, for Puerto Rico and the
District of Columbia. House Democrats have passed the most far-reaching
labor legislation in decades. Right-to-work laws could be banned in the
states and secret union elections replaced with “card check” that
allows open pressure on workers.
Election
mandates imposing ballot harvesting and mail-in voting on states would
be likely. Democrats could also expand the size of the federal appellate
courts and even the Supreme Court with a mere 51 votes. The only
restraint would be public opinion, but Democrats (unlike Republicans)
would have a cheerleading press corps behind them.
All
of this is more likely than many Republicans think. Senate races have
become increasingly nationalized as ticket-splitting ebbs, so President
Trump’s undertow could sweep away even moderates like Susan Collins of
Maine or Cory Gardner of Colorado. Oh, and in 2022 the GOP will have to
defend at least 20 Senate seats—many in swing states like Wisconsin and
Pennsylvania—while Democrats protect 12 mostly safe strongholds. Voters,
take note.
1 comment:
The Republicans are defending about twice as many seats as the Democrats in the senate, and as this article notes many more close seats. Assuming Trump wins the election if he loses the senate it will be hard for him to achieve his agenda.
Post a Comment