It's not an exaggeration to compare the methods used by the new 'woke movement' to those of Mao's Red Guards
By John Gray
Daily Mail
July 18, 2020
Today we are no longer living in a free
society. Instead, we are ruled by those who try to enforce their extreme
views by shaming and ruining those who think differently.
It
is not far-fetched to compare the methods of this ‘woke movement’ to
those of Chairman Mao’s Red Guards, who terrorised the Chinese people
half a century ago.
The so-called
‘cancel culture’ – publicly shaming and trying to undermine the
professional standing of anyone who deviates from ever-more extreme
standards of political correctness – is simply the latest expression of
this intolerant, baying movement.
Such behaviour was once confined to
virtue-signalling celebrities. However, it has now insidiously taken
hold in most of our national institutions.
From
universities, the Church, big business, schools, broadcast media, the
police, local authorities, publishing houses and even in some
newspapers, woke ideology is now being actively promoted.
This is a terrifying development.
Anyone who departs from the new orthodoxy is deemed evil and beyond redemption.
By
ganging up together on social media, activists are on a mission to get
such people sacked from their jobs and silenced forever.
Historically, the far-Left tried to shut down debate. But today’s woke crusaders go much further.
Consider
what’s happening in higher education. In the early Seventies, when I
took up my first academic job at the University of Essex, it was seen as
being pretty Left-wing.
Practically
every branch of the radical Left was active on campus. From students out
of comprehensives handing out Communist Party of Great Britain
pamphlets through to ostentatiously scruffy ex-public school Trotskyites
and anarchists, the entire spectrum was represented.
I
remember carrying on teaching classes in 1973-4 in defiance of
blockades which eventually faded away after a massive police operation
in which more than 100 students were arrested.
As
a young lecturer, I was able to take a detached attitude because
neither I, nor anyone else I knew, was threatened. Back then, what we
witnessed was the small world of quarrelling radical sects. No one ever
spoke of getting anyone ‘cancelled’.
The same was true when I moved on to teach
at Oxford University and then at the London School of Economics. True,
most academics in both institutions were Left-wing but there were also
crusty old Tories, old-fashioned liberals and many who did not bother
about politics at all. There was no rigid orthodoxy in whose shadow
teachers and students cowered and quaked.
Today,
our universities are bastions of Left-wing, woke orthodoxy. Any
dissenting voices – however mild in their beliefs – have to be silenced.
And a growing number of schools are now joining universities in
propagating this ideology.
‘Critical
race theory’ – a sub-Marxist ideology in which ‘white privilege’ is
invoked to explain all kinds of injustice – is increasingly being taught
as part of ‘decolonising the curriculum’.
Indeed, no subject is immune from this re-education campaign in our schools and universities.
Academics
at Birmingham City University have proposed that Mozart be eliminated
from music teaching and replaced by the rapper Stormzy. Eton College has
announced it will change the teaching of history, geography, religion,
politics and English, along with school assemblies and societies, in
order to ensure that ‘decolonisation’ is enforced across the board.
It may be true that the school curriculum
has been narrow in the past. As an example, I believe too little has
been taught of the enormous volunteer army from India, Africa and other
then-British colonial territories that fought on behalf of this country
in the Second World War.
But the
ideology that is being used to shape a new curriculum is even narrower.
Abstract concepts of ‘whiteness’ are taught as facts, while the real
complexities of history are ignored.
Of
course, students and academic institutions have always been full of
Left-wing idealised youths but today this woke agenda goes way beyond
education and infiltrates every other institution of public life – the
very pillars of our civilisation. Nowhere is exempt.
The
head of the Church of England, Justin Welby, has, for example,
suggested it is wrong to portray Jesus as white. Different cultures
portray him in different ways, the Archbishop of Canterbury points out.
This is so but the fact is that Jesus was neither black nor white. The
historical truth is that Jesus was a Jew, who spoke the ancient Semitic
language of Aramaic – something Welby fails to mention.
Our police force, too, has also been affected by woke attitudes.
Officers face many difficulties. There
have been violent attacks by protesters on them in Hackney, Brixton,
White City and other parts of London. Also, it is true that some have
been tainted by racism.
In these
conditions, the police are bound to be cautious. But that does not
explain officers dancing along with Extinction Rebellion protesters, as
some did in April last year at a demonstration at London’s Oxford
Circus. There were also scenes of police officers ‘taking the knee’
during the recent Black Lives Matter protests.
Why
are our police officers virtue-signalling their wokery? The task of the
police is to enforce the law and maintain public peace, not show
sympathy for any political movement.
One
reason why British institutions have been captured by the forces of
illiberalism is contagion from the US, where the movement has been most
extreme.
Even the citadels of
capitalism have fallen. Giant corporations instruct their employees in
diversity training but fail to provide them with medical insurance,
childcare facilities or decent incomes.
All the while, there is a witch- hunt which has seen leading figures driven from American institutions.
Last
week, the senior curator of the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art
resigned, accused of ‘white supremacist language’ after he stated that
refusing to collect white artists would be ‘reverse discrimination’.
And
an opinion editor and writer at the New York Times resigned, citing
‘constant bullying by colleagues’ who attacked what they called her
‘forays into Wrongthink’. This reference to George Orwell’s novel 1984 –
where people are punished for ‘thought-crime’ – is very telling.
What’s
more, major American news providers and magazines are now operating a
system in which staff are encouraged to snitch on their colleagues and
denounce one another on Twitter.
This
hounding of people is strikingly reminiscent of Mao’s Cultural
Revolution, which convulsed communist China from 1966-1976 and wrecked
much of what remained of the country’s ancient civilisation.
The
only way someone accused of thought-crime could escape punishment was
through public confession, ‘re-education’ and abject apology in
so-called ‘struggle sessions’, in which they were humiliated and
tormented by their accusers.
Tragically,
the woke movement has reinvented this vile ritual, with teachers,
journalists, professors and others seeking to hang on to their jobs by
desperately begging forgiveness.
In
some ways, today’s Twitter Maoism is worse than the original Chinese
version. Mao’s Cultural Revolution was unleashed by a communist
dictator, who used the upheaval to consolidate his power.
Conversely,
in Britain and America today, our leading institutions have shamefully
surrendered their own authority to a destructive ideology.
It is vital that this ideological rampage does not rage on for a decade as Mao’s did in China.
EDITOR'S NOTE: The UK and the US are headed straight to hell.
1 comment:
I am old enough that I remember when traditional liberalism encouraged free-thinking, open discourse and discussion of different ideas. The new "progressivism" is simply fascism of the left. Deviation from orthodoxy is not only discouraged it is absolutely forbidden. This isn't politics, it's religion. If you are not going along with the program you are a heretic, a blasphemer and / or an apostate. That makes you the ENEMY. Not the opposition, the enemy. You are to be destroyed by any means necessary.
Post a Comment