The life of Israel is a split screen.
The first screen shows the life of a
nation and a country fending off a coordinated seven-front assault whose
goal is the Jewish state’s physical obliteration with heroism,
ingenuity and fortitude that takes your breath away.
The second screen shows the envy and hatred that the nations of the world direct at the State of Israel.
And this week, with the U.N. General
Assembly taking place in New York at the precise moment Israel has taken
the initiative vis à vis the Lebanese front, the dissonance between the
two sides is so glaring that it gives you whiplash.
Over the past week, for the first time
since it unilaterally removed its forces from Southern Lebanon in 2000,
Israel took the initiative in its war with Iran’s largest proxy force,
Hezbollah, which controls Lebanon. The threat Hezbollah poses to Israel
is orders of magnitude greater than the threat Hamas posed on Oct. 7.
Hezbollah’s arsenal, which numbers some 200,000 short- and medium-range
rockets and ballistic missiles, is nearly 35 times larger than Hamas’s
arsenal of 6,000. Hezbollah’s missiles are capable of hitting nearly
every strategic military and industrial site in Israel. They are capable
of laying waste to northern communities and devastating cities and
towns throughout the country.
And they are embedded in civilian
neighborhoods. After the 2006 war, due to its control over the Lebanese
government and military, Hezbollah oversaw the reconstruction of the
areas in Southern Lebanon that were damaged and destroyed in the war.
Hezbollah built the apartments as dual-use structures with missile
launchers and missiles in many apartments. Residents received monthly
payments for permitting their homes to be for this purpose.
Since the start of the war, Hezbollah shot
8,000 such projectiles into northern Israel. They severely damaged
several critical military installations. They destroyed hundreds of
homes. They ravaged the landscape of northern Israel, burning forests,
as well as destroying nature and wildlife reserves from the Golan
Heights to the Upper Galilee.
If the missile arsenals weren’t sufficient
to keep Israel’s north depopulated, there is also the conventional
threat of Hezbollah’s land forces. Citing U.S. and regional officials, The Wall Street Journal
reported, “Those with knowledge of Hezbollah say the group accelerated
its war preparations in recent months, expanding its network of tunnels
in Southern Lebanon, repositioning fighters and weapons and smuggling in
more arms. Iran has increased supplies of small arms and
rocket-propelled grenades, along with guided and unguided long-range
missiles.”
“The south is like a beehive right now,”
said a former Hezbollah military officer referring to the military
preparations to the newspaper. “Everything the Iranians have, we have.”
Hezbollah’ ground forces number some
40,000 men. Thousands in the so-called Radwan brigades are
battle-hardened veterans of Iran’s insurgent wars in Syria and Iraq.
They have oceans of American, British, Iraqi and Syrian blood on their
hands.
Hezbollah’s operational concept since Oct.
7 (basically since Israel removed its forces from Southern Lebanon in
May 2000) has been attrition warfare. Hezbollah’s massive and
ever-growing arsenal deters Israel from getting into a major war with
the terror army. At the same time, the terror group expands its
effective control over northern Israel by gradually expanding the
expanse of Israeli territory it can strike at will. In the past month,
emboldened by Israel’s largely defense posture since Oct. 7, Hezbollah
has massively escalated its missile assault on Israel, increasing the
number and range of the projectiles its forces shot over daily from a
few to a couple dozen to between 60 and 120.
Last week, it was the ingenious
decapitation strikes that successfully targeted Hezbollah’s operational
leadership attributed to Israel involving the detonation of hand-held
communications devices that enabled Israel to seize the operational
initiative for the first time since 2000. Its follow-on airstrikes
against the commanders of the Radwan Force in Beirut decimated
Hezbollah’s senior ranks, leaving Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and
his bosses in Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps with a largely
commander-less terror army.
Israel’s airstrikes on Monday against
missiles and missile launchers in Southern Lebanon, Beirut and the Beqaa
Valley, based on stunning intelligence superiority, reportedly
devastated Hezbollah’s strategic missile power. A diplomatic source
divulged Tuesday morning that the air force’s 1,400 hits destroyed half
of Hezbollah’s precision-guided missiles. The source claimed further
that now, Hezbollah possesses only one-quarter of the rockets with
ranges up to 40 kilometers it had at the start of the war.
Critically, the source said that
Hezbollah’s capacity to launch coordinated missile strikes involving
hundreds of projectiles simultaneously has been severely damaged.
Hezbollah’s operational concept throughout has been that in the event of
an all-out war, it would swarm Israel with hundreds of projectiles
simultaneously, overwhelming Israel’s air-defense systems. If Israel has
indeed taken out that capability, it means that Hezbollah’s threat to
Israeli territory is no longer existential.
By achieving something approaching
operational control over Gaza, blocking avenues of resupply by
controlling the Philadephi corridor controlling the 14-kilometer border
with Egypt and preventing the reinforcement of Hamas’s terror forces in
northern Gaza by controlling the Netzarim corridor, Israel has been able
to scale back its force size in Gaza. Israel’s military Division 98,
the main maneuver unit in Gaza, was moved to the north, providing the
IDF both the means to prevent or defeat a Hezbollah invasion by land,
including underground, border-crossing tunnels. Division 98 is also
capable of carrying out incursions up to and including an invasion of
Southern Lebanon if so commanded.
Jerusalem’s intelligence capabilities have
enabled it to carry out the most precise airstrikes in history. Almost
no ordnance has been wasted or misdirected. Thanks to the experience
Israel has garnered in Gaza over the past year, it has developed the
capacity to give civilians an opportunity to vacate areas, including
their apartments, housing missiles before striking, thus again, bringing
the number of civilians killed nearly to zero.
It is hard to ignore the global
implications of what is happening on the ground. It isn’t simply that
Ibrahim Aqil, Hezbollah’s operations commander who was killed at the
leadership meeting in Beirut, had a $7 million FBI award on his head for
his role in carrying out the 1983 bombings of the U.S. embassy and
Marine barracks in Beirut in 1983 that murdered some 300 Americans, as
well as 64 French paratroopers.
Hezbollah is the most powerful and
well-seeded terror force in the world. Its operational and financial
tentacles reach throughout Europe, Asia and Latin America. An Israeli
victory would mean that Hezbollah’s threat worldwide would be massively
diminished.
Then there is Iran. For the past four
years, Iran has moved steadily towards completing its nuclear weapons
program. It is widely considered a threshold nuclear state. It is
suspected of adapting its missile force to carry nuclear warheads. To
date, Hezbollah has served as Iran’s protector. By using the prospect of
an all-out combined missile strike and ground invasion of Israel from
Lebanon as a deterrent, Iran was able to deter Israel from striking its
missile and nuclear installations or its oil platforms. Now with
Hezbollah in the most vulnerable and weakest position it has suffered in
decades—and Hamas effectively defeated as an offensive force—Iran faces
the specter of an Israel free to destroy its nuclear and regional
hegemonic ambitions.
International law turned on its head
And this brings us to the second half of
the screen. As Israel fights the free world’s fight against Iran and its
terrorist forces, the nations of the world have congregated at the U.N.
General Assembly for their annual diplomatic lynch mob against the lone
Jewish state. The General Assembly opened last week by passing a
resolution demanding that Israel remove 800,000 citizens from their
homes in Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria within a year and transfer their
communities to the Palestinian Authority, which shares the goal of Iran
and its other proxies to annihilate Israel.
If Israel fails to abide by the U.N.
dictate, or even if it does, the resolution calls on the U.N. member
states to enact an arms embargo on Israel. António Guterres, the U.N.’s
Israel-hating secretary-general helpfully proclaimed that he will use
his powers of office to enforce the resolution.
It was all downhill from there. At the
United Nations, in Paris, in Washington, policymakers and lawmakers have
spared no effort to demonize Israel. President Joe Biden and Sheikh
Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, president of the United Arab Emirates, met
in Washington on Monday. Rather than congratulate (or thank) Israel for
systematically removing the gravest threats to the stability and
security of the Middle East, including to the UAE and the United States,
Biden and MBZ focused their statements on demanding that Israel move to
establish a Palestinian state in Gaza, Judea and Samaria—and Jerusalem.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and his fellow
progressives in Congress responded with rage to the simultaneous
detonation of Hezbollah’s pages and walkie-talkies that took out
thousands of terrorists in one fell swoop. They called it international
terrorism and demanded a U.S. arms embargo on Israel. Even Leon Panetta,
former secretary of defense, also called the strike that decimated the
leadership of the most powerful terror army in the world a terror
attack.
All of those clamoring to declare Israel
the enemy of all that is good, and Hezbollah and Hamas as the good guys,
predicate their condemnations on an entirely imaginary version of
international law that turns morality and the very concept of legality
on their heads to punish defenders—or one specific defender, Israel—and
reward aggressors.
The dissonance between the reality on the
ground and the diplomatic assault on Israel—now joined by nearly every
nation on earth at the United Nations—presents Israel with an epic
quandary.
Obviously, it cannot scale back the level
or nature of the assault with reason. People cannot be reasoned out of
positions they weren’t reasoned into. The international community’s
hostility towards Israel owes to a poisonous mix of political
expedience, greed, opportunism and prejudice.
And so, we come to the quandary. Can Israel afford to ignore these forces and just fight to victory or not?
Can Israel afford not to ignore them?
The Biden administration and its comrades
at the United Nations are betting that Israel will decide that it cannot
afford to ignore these voices. But in reaching this conclusion, they
ignore the one overriding factor that has informed Israel’s actions
since Oct. 7.
This is a war for Israel’s survival.
Israelis back this war because they understand that the lesson of Oct. 7
is that the can has been kicked to the end of the road. Claims that we
can stop and pick up where we left off in a year or so fall like
artillery duds. No one will accept them because no one can accept them.
It is literally now or never.
And so the United Nations and the United
States, and their diplomatic lynch mob, will be ignored. Maybe the
diplomatic chips falling today can be picked up at a later date. But
this war must be won. And after the stunning successes in Lebanon, more
and more Israelis are reinforced in their conviction that it is being
won.
No comments:
Post a Comment