Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
is a man of considerable intellect and experience, shaped by his
background as the son of a renowned historian. He is undoubtedly aware
of the complex and often brutal history of antisemitism that has plagued
the Middle East.
Despite this, Netanyahu’s recent
statements seem to reflect a dangerous optimism about the potential for
deradicalizing the Muslim enemy in our midst, specifically, the Arabs in
Gaza. While his intentions are undoubtedly rooted in a desire for peace
and coexistence, his approach appears increasingly disconnected from
the harsh realities on the ground and more focused on appeasing the
Western world.
Former President Donald Trump recently
stated that if elected, he will work towards deporting jihadi
sympathizers from the United States. Trump believes that to keep America
safe, he must deport jihadi sympathizers. Shouldn’t Israel work on
deporting terrorists, and those supporting and advocating for the
annihilation of the state as well?
The idea that radical elements within an
enemy Muslim population can be reformed or deradicalized is a dangerous
delusion. Netanyahu’s statements suggesting that peaceful coexistence
with a de-Nazified Muslim population is feasible seem to ignore a
painful historical and contemporary reality.
The Muslim Mufti of Jerusalem—Haj Amin
al-Husseini—in the 1930s and 1940s met with Adolf Hitler and partnered
with the Nazis in a bid to annihilate Jews, showcasing the deep-rooted
antisemitic currents that run through some segments of Muslim ideology.
And that has nothing to do with the establishment of modern-day Israel,
Jewish settlements, or Jews living in their ancestral and biblical lands
in Judea and Samaria.
The concept of Palestinian national
identity offers no real potential for deradicalization. As spoken about
by former Soviet Union intelligence officers, the Palestinian national
identity was invented
by the Soviets in the 1960s as a tool to undermine the Jewish people
and the destruction of the State of Israel. From a young age, Arab
children in the Gaza Strip, as well as Judea and Samaria are taught in
schools sponsored by the U.N. Relief Agency for Palestine Refugees
(UNRWA) and encouraged by their parents to aspire to martyrdom by
killing Jews.
The basis of the Palestinian national
identity systematically erases all Jewish connection to our ancestral
homeland. Jewish holy sites are reassigned as Muslim landmarks, denying
any Jewish connection. It lacks any unique historical, cultural or
archaeological significance of its own and instead focuses on denying
and negating Jewish history and heritage. The ultimate aim of this
identity is to destroy Israel and replace it. The ideology that
underpins the Palestinian national identity is fundamentally opposed to
the existence of Israel and is entirely based on the erasure and killing
of the Jews. This opposition is not merely a political stance, but a
deeply ingrained theological conviction within Islamic jihadi thought.
The existence of a Jewish state is seen as a direct challenge to the
supposed supremacy of Islam. How does one go about “reform” if this is a
cornerstone of both national and religious identity?
In contrast to the vision that Netanyahu
seems to hold, the reality is that many of our enemies are educated from
a young age to harbor deep-seated hostility towards Jews. While some
recognize the freedom, equality and opportunities available in Israel to
anyone of any faith, including Muslims, the majority remain entrenched
in a worldview that sees the Jewish state as an existential threat that
must be destroyed.
The data on growing radical Muslim
populations in Western countries further illustrates the challenge. The
woke culture and social pressure against radicalism in the West have had
no effect on lowering the hate and rhetoric. Instead, the growth of the
jihadi Muslim community in countries like the United States, United
Kingdom, France and Germany, has led to increased social tensions and
security concerns.
Lebanese-Christian American commentator
Brigitte Gabriel has eloquently described the futility of dismissing
radical elements within the Muslim community. She argues that even a
minority of extremists, numbering in the hundreds of millions globally,
poses a significant threat to the whole freedom-loving world. Her view
underscores the challenge of addressing radical ideologies that are not
confined to a small, isolated group but are widespread and deeply
ingrained.
While Netanyahu’s intentions to present a
hopeful narrative of deradicalization are surely well-intentioned, they
are based on an unrealistic assessment of the situation. The ideological
battle against radical jihadi Islam is not merely about changing minds
but about confronting a worldview that sees the destruction of the
Jewish state and developing a global caliphate under Sharia law to
control all infidels as a religious imperative. This cannot be easily
overcome by goodwill and diplomatic efforts alone.
Facing this reality requires respect for
the impact of religious Islam on geopolitics, not ignoring it. A more
practical approach is recognizing that the road to security and peace
involves confronting radical ideologies head-on rather than relying on
improbable dreams of reform.
No comments:
Post a Comment