Tuesday, May 04, 2021

'JOHN KERRY AND JOE BIDEN HAVE PROVEN TO BE PRO-IRANIAN'

Was Kerry anti-Israel? Former envoys react to explosive tape

 

By Dmitriy Shapiro

 

JNS

May 3, 2021

 


 Mohammad Javad Zarif with John Kerry 

John Kerry (right) and JavadZarif

 

John Kerry, who serves as US special presidential envoy for climate in the Biden administration and was secretary of state during the Obama administration, continues to face a backlash over allegations that he may have provided Iranian foreign minister and nuclear negotiator Mohammad Javad Zarif inside information on Israeli military operations.

Three Republican members of the House Foreign Affairs Committee wrote a joint letter the US State Department inspector general on Wednesday to demand an investigation into whether Kerry did indeed provide information, as Zarif claimed in a recording provided to The New York Times, the details of which were published in a story on Sunday.

In what was reported to be a conversation with an Iranian economist, Zarif claimed that Kerry told him that Israel had attacked 200 Iranian targets in Syria.

"If this report is true, Secretary Kerry severely undermined the American-Israeli alliance to provide intelligence about one of our most trusted allies to the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism," Rep. Andy Barr (R-Ky.) said in a news release.

"John Kerry and Joe Biden have proven to be pro-Iranian before by championing the failed Iran nuclear deal, but this type of betrayal of a staunch ally is simply unconscionable. We need the inspector general to launch an immediate, impartial investigation to determine the validity of these claims," according to Barr.

He was joined in the letter by Reps. Ann Wagner (R-Mo.) and Lee Zeldin (R-NY), with both questioning whether Kerry should remain in his current position in the Biden administration.

"The State Department must investigate the massively alarming allegations that John Kerry, in his capacity as secretary of state, leaked information to Iran on covert Israeli military operations," Zeldin said in the release. "If it's proven that Kerry actively undermined one of America's staunchest allies, he needs to resign from the Biden administration immediately and have his security clearance revoked."

Other prominent Republicans calling an investigation – or for Kerry's resignation – include Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and former US Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley, among a growing list.

Former Israeli Ambassador to the United States and former Knesset member Michael Oren said that while he had a good working relationship with Kerry during his tenure from 2009 to 2013, Kerry seemed to have an "unhealthy obsession" with Israel during his time in office.

Oren cited Kerry's speech in 2016 after failed Israel-Palestine peace negotiations, where he spent more than an hour lecturing Israel on its settlements while war was raging out of control in neighboring Syria.

"At the same time when Syrian [President] Bashar Assad was killing a half million of his own countrymen and the US government refused to intervene, Kerry found time to give an hour-long speech condemning Israeli settlements," said Oren. "What was going on north of [Israel] was the largest massacre in post-World War II history."
The speech was especially puzzling, Oren pointed out since Kerry blamed Israel alone for the failure of the peace talks.

Oren said that he didn't know whether Zarif was telling the truth in the recording, but it was well known during the negotiations for the Iran nuclear deal Kerry and Zarif had a close relationship, something that troubled Israel.

"He made no attempts to disguise that," said Oren. "And for Israelis, this was very disturbing. This was the representative of a government that was sworn to destroy us – actively seeking to destroy us. It wasn't passive. It wasn't just rhetoric.

"That's disturbing to the Israelis and should have been disturbing for Americans because this is a regime that oppresses gay people and free speech, and imprisons people and tortures people. I mean, it should have been more disturbing for a person, I think, of a liberal outlook such as John Kerry."

'You have two leaders, and one of them is lying'

Former Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon said that he listened to the recording of Zarif and it sounded authentic, but one has to take into consideration the sophisticated propaganda of Iran.

"I think it is a very serious allegation. It involves the closest ally of Israel and the worst enemy of Israel," he said. "I really hope that it's not true. But, you know, you have two leaders and one of them is lying. It's either Zarif or Kerry."

I can tell you that this story and these allegations are unequivocally false," he tweeted. "This never happened – either when I was Secretary of State or since."Kerry denied the reports in a tweet on Monday.

Danon said Kerry was investing a lot of energy in creating the Iran nuclear deal and was trying to speak to all sides, so it was known that he kept in touch with Zarif, even after he left office.

"It's the US policy to decide with who they are speaking and about what, but once it involves our security or our interests, that's something we expect our allies to protect our interests the same way we protect US interests," explained Danon.

If the allegations against Kerry are true, which he hopes they are not, it would be a problem.

"One can argue how much it risked our lives or not, but I think it's more than that," said Danon. "It's about what you are talking with whom when it comes to our interests."

But he added that the bond between Israel and the United States is stronger than mistakes made by any particular leader.

While it remains unclear from the recording whether Kerry told Zarif the information before or after the details were already public knowledge, Oren said it wouldn't matter, as Israel's policy at the time was not to comment on its operations to prevent a situation where Assad would be obliged to respond militarily to Israel.

What really upset Oren, he said, and Israeli officials during the Iran nuclear deal negotiations was the existence of secret backchannel negotiations between the United States and Iran through Oman.

"These negotiations were conducted under the auspices of Kerry. … Israel was being assured repeatedly, every week, that no backchannel, no secret negotiation was going on with Iran when, in fact, there were," he said.

The existence of these negotiations became public in November 2013, a month after Oren was no longer ambassador. Oren said that the seriousness of what he called a "betrayal" was such that had he still been the ambassador, he would have seriously considered resigning.

"The point is that Kerry presided over negotiations that were conducted behind Israel's back on an issue vital to Israel's security, if not its survival. And deliberately misled us about them," he said.

"We took it very seriously," emphasized Oren.

After all, he said, the United States is "our No. 1 ally," and it was "negotiating behind our back with our No. 1 enemy." Israeli settlements may be an issue, he said, but Iran is "a matter of national survival for this country

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Iran doesn’t fleece the American taxpayer by demanding foreign aid and calling you an anti semite if you would rather give it to Americans verses the Jews
Israel wants Americans to go to war and die for them. Better dead goyim than the chosen.
Let the Jews go to war and die if they want to fight Iran.

BarkGrowlBite said...

OK Anon, I get it. You don't like Israel and Jews. This comment is very similar to the one you made on April 28.

You are dead wrong about Israel wanting to have young American men and women shed their blood for the Jewish state. Since its founding in 1948, Israel has fought eight major wars and never once did it ask the US to send any of its troops to help it fight the Arabs.

The deal Obama and Kerry made with Iran allowed that Islamic state to acquire nuclear weapons down the road. All that Israel wants is for the Iranians to never acquire any nuclear weapons because time after time they have vowed to obliterate the Jewish state.

Anonymous said...

I appreciate you responding to my comment. I, personally consider myself anti Israel but philo-Semitic. The us Iraq war was an example of the United States going to war when Iraq was not a threat to the United States, but Israel wanted Saddam gone. The neoconservative Zionist warmongers manipulated a naive bush into doing Israel’s bidding. Israel can do a lot of damage to Iran and could even nuke them. Unfortunately, given the size of the Iranian military, Israel cannot defeat them in a conventional war, hence the need to destroy them.

The Islamic regime in Iran is certainly fundamentalist, but not suicidal. It knows if it nuked Israel it would be suicide. Israel, as a matter of fact, is the only nuclear power in the Middle East. Given its behavior, I would want Nukes if I were Israel’s neighbor.
The bottom line is either we have a deal with Iran or we have a war with Iran. Israel wants a much tougher deal that would include Iran giving up missiles that Iran could use to hit Israel. Iran will never agree to that, nor should it. Israel is smart enough to understand that they would rather have no deal and have the us destroy Iran than risk the possibility of Iran acquiring nukes.

Lastly, if you read the Michael Scheuer book, “through our enemies eyes” and still consider Israel an ally, I will donate 10,000 to any pro Zionist organization of your choice.
Even friends of the idf. I am confident that if you actually read this great book by the former head of the cia bin laden unit you will see that we are much better driving Israel as an “ally” immediately and making peace with the Arab world.