The Israel Defense Forces have been in an
intense state of alert in recent weeks. Israel is anticipating a
retaliatory attack from Iran, and/or its proxy, Hezbollah in Lebanon,
allegedly in response to last month’s elimination of Hamas senior leader
Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran and Hezbollah commander Fuad Shukr in
Beirut. For Israel and Israelis, this is an unacceptable situation. The
24/7 alert has taken a particular toll on the Air Force reservist pilots
and ground crews, who must be away from their families and jobs. The
overall Israeli economy, including the agricultural sector, has also
suffered enormously. And, most critically, the war and the anxiety over
the hostages continue to seriously impact the national morale and the
psychological well-being of many in Israel.
As exhibited in previous situations,
Israel would have launched a preventive strike against Iran and
Hezbollah; however, in consideration of the Biden administration’s
demand that it avoid doing so for fear that an Israeli strike might
trigger a wider regional war, the Jewish state has refrained. The
primary reason for Washington’s efforts to restrain Israel from acting
is, first and foremost, the upcoming U.S. elections. The administration
doesn’t want American personnel in the Middle East coming back in body
bags. The United States currently has 2,500 U.S. soldiers in Iraq and
900 stationed in the northeast area of Syria. Iraqi Shi’ite militias,
under Iranian guidance, have already deployed rockets in an attack on
the Al-Asad airbase in Iraq’s Al-Anbar province, wounding several U.S.
troops. Similarly, Shi’ite militias in Syria mounted drone attacks on
American bases in the country.
Secondarily, America has been constraining
Israel from a preventive strike against Iran for purely political
purposes. Vide President Kamala Harris, as she assesses her run for the
U.S. presidency, understands that she must appease the pro-Hamas
“progressive” wing of the Democrat Party, especially in Michigan, where
the significant Arab-American community might abstain from giving the
Democrat Party their support and vote. That position also holds true in
other swing states, such as Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
As the Biden-Harris administration is
concerned, a regional war in the Middle East would work to the advantage
of Russia and China. As the administration views it, attention on the
Middle East is likely to divert attention from the war in Ukraine and
enable Russia to become more aggressive. It might also encourage China
to attack Taiwan. Moreover, arms for Ukraine would have to be
transferred to the Middle East. The question then is: Why hasn’t the
administration pursued a ceasefire between Ukraine and Russia?
While Israel is prepared and capable of
inflicting an effective preventive strike against Hezbollah in Lebanon,
that might be somewhat more complicated against Iran, due to the
distance and size of the Islamic Republic. To deal with Tehran, Israel
requires the active participation of the United States. It seems likely
that the administration’s fear of a major war during an election season
makes it equally unlikely that a Harris administration would participate
or endorse a preventive attack on Iran.
Israel, in its current face-off with
Hezbollah, is dealing with a different reality. Whereas, in 2006, it was
Israel versus Hezbollah without the interference or participation of
additional players, this time the radical Shi’ite “axis of evil” is
united and coordinated, and a full-scale engagement with Hezbollah is
certain to involve Iran, the Shi’ite militias in Iraq and Syria, with
help from both the Assad regime and the Houthis in Yemen. Israel,
nonetheless, is currently being attacked by Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Syria
and Yemen, in addition to Iranian-inspired terror groups in Judea and
Samaria, and Gaza.
In tying Israel’s hands and preventing it
from launching a preventive attack on Iran and Hezbollah, the United
States is weakening Israel’s deterrence. Some would even argue that the
Biden administration’s insistence on a ceasefire in Gaza and limited
Israeli actions against Hezbollah is meant to stop Israel from achieving
a victory.
An IDF operation inside Lebanon that
knocks out their four or five power stations will put the Land of the
Cedars in darkness. Hezbollah’s leader, Hassan Nasrallah, will then have
to deal with two fronts. The domestic front, in which he would have to
quell the massive demonstration of more than 70% of the Lebanese
population, would compel him to come to some sort of an agreement with
Israel. And, with the northern Galilee emptied of its Israeli population
for almost a full year due to Hezbollah’s rocket attacks, Israel cannot
continue with the ping-pong exchanges with Hezbollah. The people of
Israel demand a resolution that enables the evacuees to return to their
homes, and that would require decisive action against Hezbollah.
Congress approved a $14.1 billion aid
package for Israel earlier this year; however, the current
administration is using this “carrot” to force the Netanyahu government
to comply with American interests in the region. The recent approval of
$3.5 billion to be released to Israel is predicated on a hostage deal
and ending the war in Gaza. As Israelis see it, ending the war in Gaza
without the removal of Hamas from Gaza, translates into a victory for
Hamas.
A significant number of congressional
Democrats are seeking to withhold arms shipments to Israel. It is meant
to force the Jewish state to end the war in Gaza. This would leave Hamas
in place and provide terrorists the opportunity to re-emerge as a
threat to Israel’s civilian population. Israel cannot expose itself to
such dictates. It must end its dependency on the United States by
becoming self-sufficient in arms production. The U.S.-Israel alliance
must be based on mutual respect, regardless of the composition of the
Israeli government. Washington and Jerusalem are intimate allies that
share democratic and human values, yet Israel must also recognize that
U.S. President Joe Biden is, in his own words, probably one of the last
“Zionists.” The future Democrat Party doesn’t bode well for Israel;
hence, the Jewish state must become self-reliant.
No comments:
Post a Comment