In Relating of History Fairness, Objectivity Should Prevail
Newsmax - August 22, 2022
As much as some would wish to make political hay of it, how Davy Crockett fell at the Alamo matters little.
There are plenty of versions of Crockett’s heroic death — from Mexican soldiers, women survivors of the battle, the alcalde of San Antonio at the time, and others.
Today every truth or falsehood is accepted or denied based on how it either pleases or annoys the arbiters of political thought. So this alternative history, although published in Mexico in 1955 and garnering little attention until the present, has been declared the correct one by the new mindset in the U.S., whose tendencies almost always lean towards what demeans and injures the nation.
Historiography is often swayed by this kind of partisanship since every chronicle is written by the conquerors and then erased by revisionists.
Common sense, however, is more difficult for either group of censors to stamp out —requiring some sleight of hand to make the de la Peña diary more palatable.
The misdirection in this case is what relevance the manner of Davy Crockett’s demise has, when he and some 200 other Texans accepted certain death holding off an army of thousands of troops for 13 days.
Historians debate whether David Crockett was killed in the Battle of the Alamo or was executed once it was over.
To delve into the gruesome last moments of anyone’s end in those valiant circumstances is unseemly, as the average person instinctively realizes.
Great events, of course, are almost never plainly black and white, and that doubtlessly goes for last stands against overwhelming force.
And notwithstanding activists’ ceaseless and negative reinterpretations of our collective past, history need not always have a malicious, lying and conniving aspect; sometimes things just work out one way rather than another.
It wasn’t just 300 Spartans, for example, holding the pass at Thermopylae.
Seven hundred brave Thespians refused Leonidas’ order for the rest of the Greek force to retreat and perished fighting to the last man as well.
Yet whether the Spartans’ odds facing the enormous Persian army were a thousand to one or 100 to 1 1is hardly germane, except perhaps to facilitate axe grinding 2,500 years later.
And those sharpening blades seem to have one particular family of nations in their sights. If it isn’t the United States’ saga being slandered and humbled, it’s one of America’s allies having its annals negatively rewritten, its courageous episodes diminished.
The remaking of history currently underway uses partisan wrecking balls that conveniently only swing in one direction: at the foundation of the culture and traditions of the West.
So Israel too, as America’s staunch partner in the Mideast, is unquestionably a prime target. The Jewish people’s "Alamo," the fortress at Masada, has likewise also come under intense scrutiny lately.
Masada, the Jewish people’s "Alamo"
Where are the skeletons, it’s being asked, of the thousand defenders under rebel leader Eleazar Ben-Yair, and those of their families, who fought to the end and then committed mass suicide rather than surrender to the Romans?
Only a couple dozen remains have been found and there’s evidence some might be the bones of Romans.
Israel’s enemies and critics seem delighted at the dearth of mass graves, since that also deflects attention away from the Herculean proof on the ground left two thousand years ago, far too massive to ever be erased.
The outlines of Roman general Flavius Silva’s camps and walls surround Masada, as does the colossal 750 feet long, 375 feet high earthen ramp the legionnaires built up the side of the sheer cliffs to the ramparts.
Something stupendous and earth-shaking transpired here, whether the Jewish state’s detractors like it or not.
2 comments:
Approximately 200 Texian soldiers died at the Alamo. However, The 340 Texian prisoners from the Battle of Coleto Creek were executed. The uninjured were shot. The injured were bludgeoned to death or bayonetted. Mexico's Congress had ordered all Texian Soldiers to be treated as pirates and not prisoners of war.
But they had GUNS. And they shot Hispanic People who were only trying to protect their empire. People who have GUNS are EVIL, unless they are fighting against EVIL WHITE PEOPLE. Ask anybody. Joe Biden. AOC. Nancy Pelosi. Anybody. They will tell you.
Post a Comment