Saturday, August 13, 2022

MORE ANTI-GUN PROPOSALS IN OREGON THIS NOVEMBER

By Bob Walsh


Measure 114 will appear on the November ballot in the beautiful but terrible woke state of Oregon later this year.  Depending on who you ask the measure will / may almost completely end the legal sale of firearms in Oregon.

The measure would require a "permit" to buy a firearm. It would require the reporting of application data and the reporting of mandatory safety training to the government.  It would also ban standard factory magazines that hold more than ten rounds of ammunition.  The data base to which these reports would be made would be searchable by the general public.  

Various Sheriff's throughout the state are concerned that their costs will be SIGNIFICANT and their return from the fees will come nowhere near covering the costs.  This would have a major impact on smaller, rural agencies.  The permit to purchase a firearm would require fingerprinting, a criminal background check and a safety training course including a hands-on demonstration of competence.  

The proposal mandates that the Oregon State Police develop the permitting and training programs.  There is no funding for this, and no time limit for completion.  There is no penalty for failure to do so.  There are no limits on the sort of information the State Police can demand as part of the permitting process.  

"High capacity" magazines could still be maintained if they were owned prior to the passage of the measure, BUT the way the law is worded it strongly implies the owner would have to be able to prove prior ownership of any particular magazine in question.  Since they are not serialized that would be impossible.  Also it would be illegal in most situations to possess those magazines outside of your home or a recognized firing range.  It would NOT be legal to use them while carrying a weapon in public for self defense.  

Pro-sanity and pro-2A groups are planning a vigorous opposition to Measure 114.  In addition in light of new SCOTUS ruling it is almost certainly unconstitutional and would certainly attract significant legal opposition if passed into law.

No comments: