WASHINGTON — A top US government codebreaker who decrypted
secret Soviet communications during the Cold War concluded that Ethel
Rosenberg knew about her husband’s activities but “did not engage in the
work herself,” according to a recently declassified memo that her sons
say proves their mother was not a spy and should lead to her exoneration
in the sensational 1950s atomic espionage case.
The previously unreported assessment written days after Rosenberg’s
arrest and shown to The Associated Press adds to the questions about the
criminal case against Rosenberg, who along with her husband, Julius,
was put to death in 1953 after being convicted of conspiring to steal
secrets about the atomic bomb for the Soviet Union.
The couple maintained their innocence until the end, and their sons,
Robert and Michael Meeropol, have worked for decades to establish that
their mother was falsely implicated in spying. The brothers consider the
memo a smoking gun and are urging US President Joe Biden to issue a
formal proclamation saying she was wrongly convicted and executed.
Historians have long regarded Julius Rosenberg as a Soviet spy. But
questions about Ethel Rosenberg’s role have simmered for years, dividing
those who side with the Meeropols and say she had zero role in
espionage from some historians who contend there’s evidence she
supported her husband’s activities.
The handwritten memo from Meredith Gardner, a linguist and
codebreaker for what later became known as the National Security Agency,
cites decrypted Soviet communications in concluding that Ethel
Rosenberg knew about Julius’ espionage work “but that due to illness she
did not engage in the work herself.”
Ethel Rosenberg went on trial with her husband months after the memo
was written despite Gardner’s assessment, which the Meeropols believe
would have been available to FBI and Justice Department officials
investigating and prosecuting the case.
From left, Harry McCabe, Deputy US
Marshall; Julius Rosenberg and wife, Ethel Rosenberg, and Anthony H.
Pavone, Deputy US Marshall in New York, March 8, 1951.
“This puts it on both sides of the Atlantic — in other words, both
the KGB and the NSA ended up agreeing that Ethel was not a spy,” Robert
Meeropol said in an interview. “And so we have a situation in which a
mother of two young children was executed as a master atomic spy when
she wasn’t a spy at all.”
The Meeropols recently obtained the August 22, 1950, memo from the
NSA through a Freedom of Information Act request and provided it to the
AP.
“This piece of documentation, juxtaposing my father’s work with her
not doing the work, it seems to me nails it,” Michael Meeropol said.
Secretive findings
The document was written more than a week after Ethel Rosenberg’s
arrest — her husband was arrested a month earlier — presumably to
summarize what was known about a Soviet spy ring operating in the US at
the height of the Cold War and associated with the development of the
atomic bomb.
It refers to Julius Rosenberg, who worked as a civil engineer, by his
Soviet code names — first “Antenna” and later “Liberal” — and
characterizes him as a recruiting agent for Soviet intelligence.
In a separate paragraph titled, “Mrs. Julius Rosenberg,” Gardner
describes a decoded message as saying Ethel Rosenberg was a “party
member” and “devoted wife” who knew of her husband’s work but didn’t
engage in it.
Harvey Klehr, a now-retired Emory University historian, said this
week that the memo notwithstanding, his position is that Ethel Rosenberg
conspired to commit espionage even if she did not spy herself or access
classified information.
“Ethel may not have been a spy — that is, she might not have actually
passed on classified information — but she was an active participant in
her husband’s spy network, not just someone who happened to agree with
her husband about politics,” Klehr wrote in a 2021 piece for Mosaic
Magazine.
Another historian, Mark Kramer of Harvard University, said this week
that the interpretation of the Russian communication was debatable and
that in any event, other documents contain “damning evidence” of Ethel
Rosenberg’s involvement in spying and her participation in tasks even
“if she was not directly participating in the way Julius Rosenberg was.”
The Meeropols adamantly dispute that, insisting the evidence is clear
that the Soviets never considered their mother an asset and that she
had no role in recruiting spies or assisting her husband’s espionage.
A brother’s account
The memo is the latest information that Ethel Rosenberg’s supporters
say casts doubt on her criminal conviction and the public view of her.
For instance, previously deciphered Soviet cables showed that she,
unlike her husband, was not given a code name, and a separate memo from
Gardner stated that Ethel Rosenberg did “not work.”
In a 2001 television interview, Ethel Rosenberg’s brother, David
Greenglass, acknowledged that he lied on the stand about his sister to
assure leniency for himself and keep his wife out of prison so she could
care for their two children. A fellow communist sympathizer, he was
indicted as a co-conspirator and served 10 years in prison.
In 2015, secret grand jury testimony from Greenglass was unsealed
that contradicted damaging statements he made during the Rosenbergs’
trial that helped secure their convictions.
Greenglass claimed at trial that he had given the Rosenbergs research
data he obtained while working as an Army machinist at the Los Alamos,
New Mexico, headquarters of the Manhattan Project, where the first
atomic weapons were produced. He also said he recalled seeing his sister
using a portable typewriter at the Rosenbergs’ apartment to type up
handwritten notes to give to the Soviets.
But in his grand jury testimony, which a judge unsealed after
Greenglass’ 2014 death in response to a request from historians and
archivists, he never implicated his sister.
Greenglass told the grand jury that Julius Rosenberg was adamant he
should stick with his Army service so Greenglass could “continue giving
him information.” But when Greenglass was asked whether his sister was
similarly insistent, he replied, “I said before, and say it again,
honestly, this is a fact: I never spoke to my sister about this at all.”
Michael, left, and Robert Meeropol, the
sons of Ethel Rosenberg, pose similar to an old photograph of themselves
before they attempt to deliver a letter to then-US president Barack
Obama in an effort to obtain an exoneration for their mother, in front
of the White House, December 1, 2016, in Washington.
Sons feel relief
The Meeropols believe the newly released memo would almost certainly
have reached high levels of the FBI given that Gardner, its author,
worked closely with an FBI agent known to pass along information
uncovered by the NSA analyst. They say the information may have
influenced then-FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover’s recommendation that Ethel
Rosenberg not receive the death penalty, though she ultimately did.
Robert Meeropol, 77, said the memo’s release is a capstone of decades
of work to clear his mother’s name. As young boys, the brothers visited
the White House in 1953 in a failed bid to get then-US president Dwight
Eisenhower to prevent their parents’ executions. They were later
adopted.
In 2016, they cited the newly released grand jury testimony to try to
persuade then-US president Barack Obama to exonerate their mother.
“I’m incredibly relieved to have this out while I’m still alive
because for a lot of time, I didn’t think I was going to survive to see
it,” he said.
Michael Meeropol said he recalled his brother saying in 1973 that in a few years they were going to “blow the lid off the case.”
“Well, 1973 to 2024 is a little bit more than a few years, but it’s
just happened as far as I’m concerned. This memo being released, thank
God, blows the lid off it in terms of our mother,” Michael Meeropol
said.
No comments:
Post a Comment